Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Fuzzy-Based Optimal Integration of Multiple Distributed Generations Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Evaluation and Assessment of Smart Grid Reliability Using Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-Making

verfasst von : Ibrahim Mashal

Erschienen in: Applications of Fuzzy Logic in Planning and Operation of Smart Grids

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Smart grid is a new paradigm that integrates traditional electricity grid and communication networks. Reliability is a critical challenge associated with smart grid and needs to be addressed. Based on comprehensive literature review and experts’ judgments, we develop a model to identify the most important criteria that have an impact on smart grid reliability from the perspective of users. The model takes into account three main criteria: “Big Data Management,” “Communication System,” and “System Functionality.” The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process is applied to analyze and prioritize these criteria based on the triangular fuzzy numbers and triangular membership function.
The results show that the “Big Data Management” main criterion has a significant impact on smart grid reliability, followed by “Communication System.” Furthermore, “Data Analytics” and “Data Visualization” were ranked as the most influential sub-criteria that influence smart grid reliability. Four various sensitivity analysis strategies have been applied to investigate the stability and robustness of results. This chapter provides meaningful implications and future research directions that are useful for many practitioners, engineers, academicians, and electricity policy makers to focus their efforts on smart grid reliability.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Fuzzy Logic-Based Planning and Operation of a Resilient Microgrid
Nächstes Kapitel Fuzzy Realizations of Adaptive Autonomy in Smart Grid
Literatur
1.
L. Atzori, A. Iera, G. Morabito, The Internet of Things: A survey. Comput. Netw. 54, 2787–2805. 2010/10/28/ (2010)MATHCrossRef
2.
I. Mashal, O. Alsaryrah, T.-Y. Chung, C.-Z. Yang, W.-H. Kuo, D.P. Agrawal, Choices for interaction with things on Internet and underlying issues. Ad Hoc Netw. 28(5), 68–90 (2015)CrossRef
3.
Z.M. Fadlullah, M.M. Fouda, N. Kato, A. Takeuchi, N. Iwasaki, Y. Nozaki, Toward intelligent machine-to-machine communications in smart grid. IEEE Commun. Mag. 49, 60–65 (2011)CrossRef
4.
D. Niyato, L. Xiao, P. Wang, Machine-to-machine communications for home energy management system in smart grid. IEEE Commun. Mag. 49, 53–59 (2011)CrossRef
5.
A. Ghasempour, Internet of things in smart grid: Architecture, applications, services, key technologies, and challenges. Inventions 4, 22 (2019)CrossRef
6.
K. Moslehi, R. Kumar, Smart grid – A reliability perspective, in 2010 Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT) (2010), pp. 1–8
7.
M. Ourahou, W. Ayrir, B. El Hassouni, A. Haddi, Review on smart grid control and reliability in presence of renewable energies: Challenges and prospects. Math. Comput. Simul. 167, 19–31. 2020/01/01/ (2020)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
8.
S.R. Shady, A.-R. Haitham, Smart grid condition assessment: Concepts, benefits, and developments. Power Electron. Drive 1, 147–163. 2016/01/12 (2016)
9.
X. Fang, S. Misra, G. Xue, D. Yang, Smart grid – The new and improved power grid: A survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 14, 944–980 (2012)CrossRef
10.
M.R. Hossain, A.M.T. Oo, A.B.M.S. Ali, Smart grid, in Smart Grids: Opportunities, Developments, and Trends, ed. by A. B. M. S. Ali, (Springer, London, 2013), pp. 23–44CrossRef
11.
P. Ponce, K. Polasko, A. Molina, End user perceptions toward smart grid technology: Acceptance, adoption, risks, and trust. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 60, 587–598. 2016/07/01/ (2016)CrossRef
12.
M. Hashmi, S. Hänninen, K. Mäki, Survey of smart grid concepts, architectures, and technological demonstrations worldwide, in 2011 IEEE PES Conference on Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Latin America (ISGT LA) (2011), pp. 1–7
13.
J.-S. Chou, I. Gusti Ayu Novi Yutami, Smart meter adoption and deployment strategy for residential buildings in Indonesia. Appl. Energy 128, 336–349. 2014/09/01/ (2014)CrossRef
14.
M. Broman Toft, G. Schuitema, J. Thøgersen, The importance of framing for consumer acceptance of the smart grid: A comparative study of Denmark, Norway and Switzerland. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 3, 113–123. 2014/09/01/ (2014)CrossRef
15.
I. Mashal, O. Alsaryrah, T.-Y. Chung, F.-C. Yuan, A multi-criteria analysis for an internet of things application recommendation system. Technol. Soc. 60, 101216. 2020/02/01/ (2020)CrossRef
16.
S. Kahrobaee, S. Asgarpoor, Reliability assessment for smart grid and future power distribution systems, in 2015 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability (SusTech) (2015), pp. 160–164
17.
I. Mashal, O. Alsaryrah, Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process model for multi-criteria analysis of internet of things. Kybernetes 49, 2509–2520 (2019)CrossRef
18.
A. Shuhaiber, I. Mashal, Understanding users’ acceptance of smart homes. Technol. Soc. 58, 101110. 2019/08/01/ (2019)CrossRef
19.
I. Mashal, A. Shuhaiber, M. Daoud, Factors influencing the acceptance of smart homes in Jordan. Int. J. Electron. Market. Retail. 11, 113–142 (2020)CrossRef
20.
A. Shuhaiber, I. Mashal, O. Alsaryrah, The role of smart homes’ attributes on users’ acceptance, in 2019 International Conference on Electrical and Computing Technologies and Applications (ICECTA) (2019), pp. 1–4
21.
A. Shuhaiber, I. Mashal, O. Alsaryrah, Smart homes as an IoT application: Predicting attitudes and behaviours, in 2019 IEEE/ACS 16th International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA) (2019), pp. 1–7
22.
I. Mashal, A. Shuhaiber, What makes Jordanian residents buy smart home devices? A factorial investigation using PLS-SEM. Kybernetes 48, 1681–1698 (2019)CrossRef
23.
G. Dileep, A survey on smart grid technologies and applications. Renew. Energy 146, 2589–2625. 2020/02/01/ (2020)CrossRef
24.
U. Department of Energy, 2010 Smart Grid System Report (US Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 2009)
25.
Y. Bamberger, J. Baptista, R. Belmans, B.M. Buchholz, M. Chebbo, J.L.D.V. Doblado, et al., Vision and Strategy for Europe’s Electricity Networks of the Future: European Technology PlatformSmartGrids (2006)
26.
N. Good, K.A. Ellis, P. Mancarella, Review and classification of barriers and enablers of demand response in the smart grid. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 72, 57–72. 2017/05/01/ (2017)CrossRef
27.
M. Rahmani-andebili, Modeling nonlinear incentive-based and price-based demand response programs and implementing on real power markets. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 132, 115–124. 2016/03/01/ (2016)CrossRef
28.
29.
M. Rahmani-Andebili, Robust operation of a reconfigurable electrical distribution system by optimal charging management of plug-in electric vehicles considering the technical, social, and geographical aspects, in Planning and Operation of Plug-In Electric Vehicles: Technical, Geographical, and Social Aspects, ed. by M. Rahmani-Andebili, (Springer, Cham, 2019), pp. 75–104CrossRef
30.
M. Rahmani-Andebili, M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, An adaptive approach for PEVs charging management and reconfiguration of electrical distribution system penetrated by renewables. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 14, 2001–2010 (2018)CrossRef
31.
M. Rahmani-Andebili, Studying the effects of plug-in electric vehicles on the real power markets demand considering the technical and social aspects, in Planning and Operation of Plug-In Electric Vehicles: Technical, Geographical, and Social Aspects, ed. by M. Rahmani-Andebili, (Springer, Cham, 2019), pp. 1–21CrossRef
32.
M.H. Rehmani, M. Reisslein, A. Rachedi, M. Erol-Kantarci, M. Radenkovic, Integrating renewable energy resources into the smart grid: Recent developments in information and communication technologies. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 14, 2814–2825 (2018)CrossRef
33.
R. Bayindir, I. Colak, G. Fulli, K. Demirtas, Smart grid technologies and applications. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 66, 499–516. 2016/12/01/ (2016)CrossRef
34.
B. Heile, Smart grids for green communications [Industry Perspectives]. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 17, 4–6 (2010)CrossRef
35.
M. Kuzlu, M. Pipattanasomporn, Assessment of communication technologies and network requirements for different smart grid applications, in 2013 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT) (2013), pp. 1–6
36.
B. Haddad, A. Liazid, P. Ferreira, A multi-criteria approach to rank renewables for the Algerian electricity system. Renew. Energy 107, 462–472. 2017/07/01/ (2017)CrossRef
37.
S. Vashishtha, M. Ramachandran, Multicriteria evaluation of demand side management (DSM) implementation strategies in the Indian power sector. Energy 31, 2210–2225. 2006/09/01/ (2006)CrossRef
38.
S.-K. Yi, H.-Y. Sin, E. Heo, Selecting sustainable renewable energy source for energy assistance to North Korea. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 15, 554–563. 2011/01/01/ (2011)CrossRef
39.
J. Li, T. Li, L. Han, Research on the evaluation model of a smart grid development level based on differentiation of development demand. Sustainability 10, 4047 (2018)CrossRef
40.
X. Chuansheng, D. Dapeng, H. Shengping, X. Xin, C. Yingjie, Safety evaluation of smart grid based on AHP-entropy method. Syst. Eng. Proc. 4, 203–209. 2012/01/01/ (2012)CrossRef
41.
J. Zhang, Z. Sang, Y. Cai, Y. Wang, Y. Shen, Y. Chen, Research on smart grid evaluation index system based on the analytic hierarchy process, in 2018 IEEE 2nd International Electrical and Energy Conference (CIEEC) (2018), pp. 463–468
42.
T.A. Alaqeel, S. Suryanarayanan, A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process algorithm to prioritize smart grid technologies for the Saudi electricity infrastructure. Sustain. Energy Grids Netw. 13, 122–133. 2018/03/01/ (2018)CrossRef
43.
A. Janjić, M. Stanković, L. Velimirović, Smart grid strategy assessment using the fuzzy AHP, in U: 6th ICT Conference, Niš (2014), pp. 13–18
44.
A. Janjic, S. Savic, L. Velimirovic, V. Nikolic, Renewable energy integration in smart grids-multicriteria assessment using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Turk. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 23, 1896–1912 (2015)CrossRef
45.
G. van de Kaa, J. Rezaei, L. Kamp, A. de Winter, Photovoltaic technology selection: A fuzzy MCDM approach. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 32, 662–670. 2014/04/01/ (2014)CrossRef
46.
H. Yong-Gui, L. Yan, Evaluation of power demand-side management factors in the new electric power system reform based on FAHP, in 2016 5th International Conference on Energy and Environmental Protection (ICEEP 2016) (2016), pp. 229–233
47.
M.M. Montazeri, M. Najjartabar-Bisheh, Optimizing technology selection for power smart grid systems: A case study of Iran Power Distribution Industry (IPDI). Technol. Econ. Smart Grids Sustain. Energy 2, 6. 2017/03/30 (2017)CrossRef
48.
O.A. Sianaki, M.A.S. Masoum, A fuzzy TOPSIS approach for home energy management in smart grid with considering householders’ preferences, in 2013 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT) (2013), pp. 1–6
49.
J.R. San Cristóbal, Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: The Vikor method. Renew. Energy 36, 498–502. 2011/02/01/ (2011)CrossRef
50.
M. Kumar, C. Samuel, Selection of best renewable energy source by using VIKOR method. Technol. Econ. Smart Grids Sustain. Energy 2, 8. 2017/04/19 (2017)CrossRef
51.
M. R. Mokhtar, M. P. Abdullah, M. Y. Hassan, F. Hussin, Combination of AHP-PROMETHEE and TOPSIS for selecting the best Demand Side Management (DSM) options, in 2015 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD) (2015), pp. 367–372
52.
O. Taylan, R. Alamoudi, M. Kabli, A. AlJifri, F. Ramzi, E. Herrera-Viedma, Assessment of energy systems using extended fuzzy AHP, fuzzy VIKOR, and TOPSIS approaches to manage non-cooperative opinions. Sustainability 12, 2745 (2020)CrossRef
53.
S. Wibowo, S. Grandhi, A multicriteria group decision making approach for evaluating sustainable smart grid systems, in 2018 13th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA) (2018), pp. 1455–1460
54.
D. Streimikiene, T. Balezentis, I. Krisciukaitienė, A. Balezentis, Prioritizing sustainable electricity production technologies: MCDM approach. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 16, 3302–3311. 2012/06/01/ (2012)CrossRef
55.
B. Lazzerini, F. Pistolesi, A linear programming-driven MCDM approach for multi-objective economic dispatch in smart grids, in 2015 SAI Intelligent Systems Conference (IntelliSys) (2015), pp. 475–484
56.
B. Lazzerini, F. Pistolesi, Efficient energy dispatching in smart microgrids using an integration of fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS assisted by linear programming, in 8th conference of the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology (2013), pp. 310–317
57.
H. Zhao, N. Li, Performance evaluation for sustainability of strong smart grid by using stochastic AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Sustainability 8, 129 (2016)CrossRef
58.
H. Zhao, S. Guo, H. Zhao, Comprehensive assessment for battery energy storage systems based on fuzzy-MCDM considering risk preferences. Energy 168, 450–461. 2019/02/01/ (2019)CrossRef
59.
H. Zhao, H. Zhao, S. Guo, Comprehensive performance evaluation of electricity grid corporations employing a novel MCDM model. Sustainability 10, 2130 (2018)CrossRef
60.
H. Zhao, S. Guo, External benefit evaluation of renewable energy power in China for sustainability. Sustainability 7, 4783–4805 (2015)CrossRef
61.
J. Dong, R. Li, H. Huang, Performance evaluation of residential demand response based on a modified fuzzy VIKOR and scalable computing method. Energies 11, 1097 (2018)CrossRef
62.
J. Dong, H. Huo, S. Guo, Demand side management performance evaluation for commercial enterprises. Sustainability 8, 1041 (2016)CrossRef
63.
J. Dong, H. Huo, D. Liu, R. Li, Evaluating the comprehensive performance of demand response for commercial customers by applying combination weighting techniques and fuzzy VIKOR approach. Sustainability 9, 1332 (2017)CrossRef
64.
A. Mardani, A. Jusoh, E.K. Zavadskas, F. Cavallaro, Z. Khalifah, Sustainable and renewable energy: An overview of the application of multiple criteria decision making techniques and approaches. Sustainability 7, 13947–13984 (2015)CrossRef
65.
A. Kumar, B. Sah, A.R. Singh, Y. Deng, X. He, P. Kumar, et al., A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 69, 596–609. 2017/03/01/ (2017)CrossRef
66.
A. Mardani, E.K. Zavadskas, Z. Khalifah, N. Zakuan, A. Jusoh, K.M. Nor, et al., A review of multi-criteria decision-making applications to solve energy management problems: Two decades from 1995 to 2015. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 71, 216–256. 2017/05/01/ (2017)CrossRef
67.
E. Ilbahar, S. Cebi, C. Kahraman, A state-of-the-art review on multi-attribute renewable energy decision making. Energy Strat. Rev. 25, 18–33. 2019/08/01/ (2019)CrossRef
68.
A. Kandakoglu, A. Frini, S. Ben Amor, Multicriteria decision making for sustainable development: A systematic review. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 26, 202–251. 2019/09/01 (2019)CrossRef
69.
M. Baumann, M. Weil, J.F. Peters, N. Chibeles-Martins, A.B. Moniz, A review of multi-criteria decision making approaches for evaluating energy storage systems for grid applications. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 107, 516–534. 2019/06/01/ (2019)CrossRef
70.
İ. Kaya, M. Çolak, F. Terzi, A comprehensive review of fuzzy multi criteria decision making methodologies for energy policy making. Energy Strat. Rev. 24, 207–228. 2019/04/01/ (2019)CrossRef
71.
R. Abu-Taha, Multi-criteria applications in renewable energy analysis: A literature review, in 2011 Proceedings of PICMET'11: Technology Management in the Energy Smart World (PICMET) (2011), pp. 1–8
72.
J.-J. Wang, Y.-Y. Jing, C.-F. Zhang, J.-H. Zhao, Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 13, 2263–2278. 2009/12/01/ (2009)CrossRef
73.
I. Siksnelyte-Butkiene, E.K. Zavadskas, D. Streimikiene, Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) for the assessment of renewable energy technologies in a household: A review. Energies 13, 1164 (2020)CrossRef
74.
S. Alam, M.F. Sohail, S.A. Ghauri, I.M. Qureshi, N. Aqdas, Cognitive radio based smart grid communication network. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 72, 535–548. 2017/05/01/ (2017)CrossRef
75.
M. Kuzlu, M. Pipattanasomporn, S. Rahman, Communication network requirements for major smart grid applications in HAN, NAN and WAN. Comput. Netw. 67, 74–88. 2014/07/04/ (2014)CrossRef
76.
N.A. Qarabsh, S.S. Sabry, H.A. Qarabash, Smart grid in the context of industry 4.0: An overview of communications technologies and challenges. Indonesian J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 18, 656–665 (2020)CrossRef
77.
H. Daki, A. El Hannani, A. Aqqal, A. Haidine, A. Dahbi, Big Data management in smart grid: Concepts, requirements and implementation. J. Big Data 4, 1–19 (2017)CrossRef
78.
R. Kappagantu, S.A. Daniel, Challenges and issues of smart grid implementation: A case of Indian scenario. J. Electr. Syst. Inf. Technol. 5, 453–467. 2018/12/01/ (2018)CrossRef
79.
L. Tightiz, H. Yang, M.J. Piran, A survey on enhanced smart micro-grid management system with modern wireless technology contribution. Energies 13, 2258 (2020)CrossRef
80.
E. Ancillotti, R. Bruno, M. Conti, The role of communication systems in smart grids: Architectures, technical solutions and research challenges. Comput. Commun. 36, 1665–1697. 2013/11/01/ (2013)CrossRef
81.
L. Tightiz, H. Yang, A comprehensive review on IoT protocols’ features in smart grid communication. Energies 13, 2762 (2020)CrossRef
82.
J. Gao, Y. Xiao, J. Liu, W. Liang, C.L.P. Chen, A survey of communication/networking in smart grids. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 28, 391–404. 2012/02/01/ (2012)CrossRef
83.
Y. Yan, Y. Qian, H. Sharif, D. Tipper, A survey on smart grid communication infrastructures: Motivations, requirements and challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 15, 5–20 (2013)CrossRef
84.
C. Hawk, A. Kaushiva, Cybersecurity and the smarter grid. Electr. J. 27, 84–95. 2014/10/01/ (2014)CrossRef
85.
P. Jain, M. Gyanchandani, N. Khare, Big data privacy: A technological perspective and review. J. Big Data 3, 25., 2016/11/26 (2016)CrossRef
86.
A. Bari, J. Jiang, W. Saad, A. Jaekel, Challenges in the smart grid applications: An overview. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 10, 974682 (2014)CrossRef
87.
Y. Zhang, T. Huang, E.F. Bompard, Big data analytics in smart grids: A review. Energy Inf. 1, 8. 2018/08/13 (2018)CrossRef
88.
L. Wang, Heterogeneous data and big data analytics. Autom. Control Inf. Sci. 3, 8–15 (2017)
89.
M.-A. Sanchez-Hidalgo, M.-D. Cano, A survey on visual data representation for smart grids control and monitoring. Sustain. Energy Grids Netw. 16, 351–369. 2018/12/01/ (2018)CrossRef
90.
A. Sanchez, W. Rivera, Big data analysis and visualization for the smart grid, in 2017 IEEE International Congress on Big Data (BigData Congress) (2017), pp. 414–418
91.
M. Stefan, J.G. Lopez, M.H. Andreasen, R. L. Olsen, Visualization techniques for electrical grid smart metering data: A survey, in 2017 IEEE Third International Conference on Big Data Computing Service and Applications (BigDataService) (2017), pp. 165–171
92.
D.V. Nga, O.H. See, C.Y. Xuen, L.L. Chee, Visualization techniques in smart grid. Smart Grid Renew. Energy 3, 175 (2012)CrossRef
93.
M. Strohbach, J. Daubert, H. Ravkin, M. Lischka, Big data storage, in New Horizons for a Data-Driven Economy: A Roadmap for Usage and Exploitation of Big Data in Europe, ed. by J. M. Cavanillas, E. Curry, W. Wahlster, (Springer, Cham, 2016), pp. 119–141CrossRef
94.
M. Lněnička, AHP model for the big data analytics platform selection. Acta Inf. Pragensia 4, 108–121 (2015)CrossRef
95.
A. Siddiqa, A. Karim, A. Gani, Big data storage technologies: A survey. Front. Inf. Technol. Electron. Eng. 18, 1040–1070. 2017/08/01 (2017)CrossRef
96.
Y. Shen, Y. Chen, J. Zhang, Z. Sang, Q. Zhou, Self-healing evaluation of smart distribution network based on uncertainty theory. IEEE Access 7, 140022–140029 (2019)CrossRef
97.
H. Al Garni, A. Kassem, A. Awasthi, D. Komljenovic, K. Al-Haddad, A multicriteria decision making approach for evaluating renewable power generation sources in Saudi Arabia. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 16, 137–150. 2016/08/01/ (2016)
98.
I. Diahovchenko, M. Kolcun, Z. Čonka, V. Savkiv, R. Mykhailyshyn, Progress and challenges in smart grids: Distributed generation, smart metering, energy storage and smart loads. Iranian J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Electr. Eng. 44, 1319–1333. 2020/12/01 (2020)CrossRef
99.
T.L. Saaty, Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Serv. Sci. 1, 83–98 (2008)
100.
M. Brunelli, Introduction to the Analytic Hierarchy Process (Springer, New York, 2014)MATH
101.
T.L. Saaty, L.G. Vargas, Decision Making in Economic, Political, Social, and Technological Environments with the Analytic Hierarchy Process, vol 7 (RWS Publications, Pittsburg, 1994)
102.
S. Seyhan, T. Mehpare, The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: an overview of applications. Manag. Decis. 48, 775–808. 2010/06/01 (2010)CrossRef
103.
104.
S. Kubler, J. Robert, W. Derigent, A. Voisin, Y. Le Traon, A state-of the-art survey & testbed of fuzzy AHP (FAHP) applications. Expert Syst. Appl. 65, 398–422. 2016/12/15/ (2016)CrossRef
105.
H. Singh, M.M. Gupta, T. Meitzler, Z.-G. Hou, K.K. Garg, A.M.G. Solo, et al., Real-life applications of fuzzy logic. Adv. Fuzzy Syst. 2013, 581879. 2013/06/26 (2013)
106.
C.-C. Yeh, Y.-F. Chen, Critical success factors for adoption of 3D printing. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 132, 209–216. 2018/07/01/ (2018)CrossRef
107.
P.J.M. van Laarhoven, W. Pedrycz, A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 11, 229–241. 1983/01/01/ (1983)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
108.
109.
S.-W. Chou, Y.-C. Chang, The implementation factors that influence the ERP (enterprise resource planning) benefits. Decis. Support. Syst. 46, 149–157. 2008/12/01/ (2008)CrossRef
110.
S. Kim, S. Kim, A multi-criteria approach toward discovering killer IoT application in Korea. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 102(1), 143–155 (2016)CrossRef
111.
E. Forman, K. Peniwati, Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 108, 165–169. 1998/07/01/ (1998)MATHCrossRef
112.
M. Yazdani, E.K. Zavadskas, J. Ignatius, M.D. Abad, Sensitivity analysis in MADM methods: Application of material selection. Eng. Econ. 27, 382–391 (2016)CrossRef
113.
E. Triantaphyllou, A. Sánchez, A sensitivity analysis approach for some deterministic multi-criteria decision-making methods*. Decis. Sci. 28, 151–194. 1997/01/01 (1997)CrossRef
114.
A. Memariani, A. Amini, A. Alinezhad, Sensitivity analysis of simple additive weighting method (SAW): The results of change in the weight of one attribute on the final ranking of alternatives. J. Optim. Ind. Eng. (J. Ind. Eng.) 4, 13–18 (2009)
115.
K. Govindan, M. Kaliyan, D. Kannan, A.N. Haq, Barriers analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 147, 555–568. 2014/01/01/ (2014)CrossRef
116.
117.
M. Kim, A survey on guaranteeing availability in smart grid communications, in 2012 14th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT) (2012), pp. 314–317
Metadaten
Titel
Evaluation and Assessment of Smart Grid Reliability Using Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-Making
verfasst von
Ibrahim Mashal
Copyright-Jahr
2021
Buch
Applications of Fuzzy Logic in Planning and Operation of Smart Grids

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64626-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-64627-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64627-1_3