nach oben

Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment

Erschienen in:

01.01.2024 | Original Paper

Evaluation of the seismic site characterization of Kovancilar (Elazig), Turkey

verfasst von: Yetis Bulent Sonmezer, Murat Celiker, Hilal Simsek

Erschienen in: Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment | Ausgabe 1/2024

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Der Artikel geht auf die seismische Standortcharakterisierung von Kovancilar in der Türkei ein und betont die erhebliche seismische Gefahr in der Region aufgrund ihrer Nähe zur ostanatolischen Verwerfungszone. Die Studie umfasst probabilistische seismische Gefahrenanalysen, Bodenverhaltensanalysen mit der SHAKE2000-Software und die Bestimmung von Designspektren. Die Ergebnisse zeigen die Bedeutung lokaler Bodenbedingungen für die Verstärkung seismischer Wellen und die Notwendigkeit standortspezifischer Designspektren für erdbebensichere Strukturen. Der Artikel enthält auch Karten, die die räumliche Verteilung der maximalen Bodenbeschleunigung, Bodenverstärkung und spektralen Beschleunigungen zeigen und wertvolle Erkenntnisse für die Stadtplanung und Risikobewertung liefern.

KI-Generiert

Diese Zusammenfassung des Fachinhalts wurde mit Hilfe von KI generiert.

Vorheriger Artikel The influence of alteration and fractures on gas permeability and mechanical properties of the sedimentary and volcanic rocks of the Acoculco Caldera Complex (México)

Nächster Artikel Experimental study on shrinkage characteristics of compacted bentonite–sand mixtures

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Abrahamson AN, Shedlock KM (1997) Overview. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):9–23. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.68.1.9CrossRef

Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ, Kamai R (2013) Update of the AS08 ground-motion prediction equations based on the nga-west2 data set. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California PEER Report No: 2013/04

Adampira M, Alielahi H, Panji M, Koohsari H (2015) Comparison of linear and nonlinear methods in seismic analysis of liquefiable site response due to near-fault incident waves: a case study equivalent. Arab J Geosci 8(5):3103–3118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1399-6CrossRef

AFAD (2023) Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency Earthquake Department. Ankara, Turkey

Aki K, Richards PG (1980) Quantitative seismology, W.H, vol 1. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, California, p 137 ISBN 0-7167-1058-7.

Akın MK, Topal T, Kramer SL (2013) A newly developed seismic microzonation model of Erbaa (Tokat, Turkey) located on seismically active eastern segment of the North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ). Nat Hazards 65(3):1411–1442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0420-1CrossRef

Akkar S, Bommer JJ (2007) Empirical prediction equations for peak ground velocity derived from strong-motion records from Europe and the Middle East. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97(2):511–530. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060141CrossRef

Akkar S, Gülkan P, (2002) Tasarım Spektrumlarının Performansa Dayalı Deprem Mühendisliği (PDDM) ve Yakın Mesafe Depremler Yönünden İncelenmesi. ECAS, (2002) Uluslararası Yapı ve Deprem Mühendisliği Sempozyumu. ODTU, Ankara, Turkey

Akkaya I, Özvan A (2019) Site characterization in the Van settlement (Eastern Turkey) using surface waves and HVSR microtremor methods. J Appl Geophys 160:157–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.11.009CrossRef

Akkoca DB, Karatas O (2019) The geochemical composition of The Palu Formation from The Palu-Uluova Basin, Elaziğ, Eastern Anatolia (Turkey): implication of source area, weathering, and tectonic setting. J Afr Earth Sci 151:472–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2019.01.007CrossRef

Aksoy E, İnceöz M, Koçyiğit A (2007) Lake Hazar Basin: a negative flower structure on The East Anatolian Fault System (EAFS), SE Turkey. Turk J Earth Sci 16:319–338. https://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/earth/vol16/iss3/3

Aktuğ B, Özener H, Doğru A, Sabuncu A, Turgut B, Halıcıoğlu K, Yılmaz O (2016) Slip rates and seismic potential on the East Anatolian Fault System using an improved GPS velocity field. J Geodyn 94-95:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2016.01.001CrossRef

Allen CR (1969) Active faulting in northern turkey. Contribution No: 1577, Division of Geological Sciences, California Instutite Technology, 32

Ambraseys NN, Bommer JJ (1991) The attenuation of ground accelerations in Europe. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 20(12):1179–1202. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290201207CrossRef

Anbazhagan P, Sheikh MN, Parihar A (2013) Influence of rock depth on seismic site classification for shallow bedrock regions. Nat Hazard Rev 14(2):108–121. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000088CrossRef

Anderson JG, Bodin P, Brune JN, Prince J, Singh SK, Quaas R, Onate M (1986) Strong ground motion from the michoacan, Mexico, earthquake. Science 233:1043–1049. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.233.4768.1043CrossRef

Ansal A, Biro Y, Erken A, Gulerce U (2004) Seismic microzonation: a case study. In: Ansal A (ed) Recent advances in earth quake geotechnical engineering and microzonation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2528-9_9CrossRef

Ansal A, Özaydın K, Erdik M, Yıldırım H, Kılıç H, Adatepe Ş, Özener PT, Tonaroğlu M, Şeşetyan K, Demircioğlu M (2005) Seismic Microzonation for urban planning and vulnerability assessment, Proceedings of the Int. Symposium of Earthquake Engineering (ISEE2005), Awaji Island, Kobe, Japonya

Ansal A, Tönük G, Kurtuluş A (2011) Zemin Büyütme Analizleri Ve Sahaya Özel Tasarım Depremi Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi. 1. Türkiye Deprem Mühendisliği ve Sismoloji Konferansı, ODTU, Ankara, Turkey

Arpat E (1977) The Karakaya dam will be tested by very big earthquakes. Yeryuvarı ve İnsan 2(1):59–62

Arpat E, Şaroğlu F (1972) Doğu Anadolu Fayı ile İlgili Bazı Gözlemler ve Düşünceler. MTA Enst. Dergisi 78: 44-50 Ankara

Bayrak E, Yılmaz S, Softa M, Turker T, Bayrak Y (2015) Earthquake hazard analysis for East Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey. Nat Hazards 76:1063–1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1541-5CrossRef

BDTIM (2015) Regional Earthquake-Tsunami Monitoring Center. Boğaziçi University Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute

Bolisetti C, Whittaker AS, Mason HB, Almufti I, Willford M (2014) Equivalent linear and nonlinear site response analysis for design and risk assessment of safety-related nuclear structures. Nucl Eng Des 275:107–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.04.033CrossRef

Boore DM, Stewart JP, Seyhan E, Atkinson GM (2013) NGA-West2 equations for predicting response spectral accelerations for shallow crustal earthquakes. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California PEER Report No: 2013/05

Borcherdt RD (1994) Estimates of site-dependent response spectra for design (methodologyand justification). Earthq Spectra 10(4):617–653. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585791CrossRef

Bozkurt E (2001) Neotectonics of Turkey–a synthesis. Geodinamica Acta 14:3–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09853111.2001.11432432CrossRef

Cabalar AF, Karabas B, Mahmutluoglu B, Yıldız Ö (2021) An IDW-based GIS application for assesment of geptechnical characterization in Erzincan Turkey. Arab J Geosci 14:2129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08481-6CrossRef

Campbell KW (1989) The dependence of peak horizontal acceleration on magnitude, distance, and site effects for small-magnitude earthquakes in California and eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 79(5):1311–1346. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279462659

Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2013) NGA-West2 campbell-bozorgnia ground motion model for the horizontal components of pga, pgv, and 5%-damped elastic pseudo-acceleration response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 sec. pacific earthquake. Engineering Research Center, University of California PEER Report No: 2013/06

Cavallaro A, Capilleri P, Grasso S (2018b) Site characterization by in situ and laboratory tests for liquefaction potential evaluation during Emilia Romagna earthquake. Geosciences 8(7):1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8070242CrossRef

Cavallaro A, Castelli F, Ferraro A, Grasso S, Lentini V (2018a) Site response analysis for the seismic improvement of a historical and monumental building: the case study of Augusta Hangar. Bull Eng Geol Environ 77(3):1217–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1170-9CrossRef

Cavallaro A, Grasso S, Sammito MSV (2022) A seismic Microzonation study for some areas around the Mt. Etna Volcano on the East Coast of Sicily, Italy. In book: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Performance Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Beijing, China, 15-17 July. 10.1007/978-3-031-11898-2_61

Celik H (2008) Doğu Anadolu Fay Sistemi’nde Sivrice Fay Zonunun Palu-Hazar Gölü (Elazığ) arasındaki bölümünde Atımla İlgili Yeni Arazi Bulgusu. Fırat Üniv Fen ve Müh Bil Dergisi 20(2):305–314

Cetin H, Güneyli H, Mayer L (2003) Paleoseismology of the Palu–Lake Hazar segment of the East Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey. Tectonophysics 374:163–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2003.08.003CrossRef

Chen S, Zhuang H, Quan D, Yuan J, Zhao K, Ruan B (2019) Shaking table test on the seismic response of large-scale subway station in a loess site: a case study. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 123:173–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.04.023CrossRef

Chen WF, Scawthorn C (2002) Earthquake Engineering Handbook. CRC Press

Christenson GE (1994) Ground shaking in Utah (Public Information Series/Utah Geological Survey). Utah Geol Surv 29:1–4

Ci̇velekler E, Okur VD, Afacan KB (2021) A study of the local site effects on the ground response for the city of Eskişehir, Turkey. Bull Eng Geol Env 80:5589–5607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02285-4CrossRef

Colak S, Aksoy E, Koçyiğit A, İnceöz M (2012) The Palu-Uluova Strike-Slip Basin in the East Anatolian Fault System, Turkey: its transition from the Palaeotectonic to Neotectonic stage. Turk J Earth Sci 21:547–570. https://doi.org/10.3906/yer-1002-14CrossRef

Darendeli M (2001) Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves. Ph.D. Dissertation,. University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA

Das S, Gupta ID, Gupta VK (2006) A probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of Northeast India. Earthq Spectra 22(1):1–27. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2163914CrossRef

Deniz A (2006) Estimation of earthquake insurance premium rates for Turkey. M.Sc. Thesis,. Dept. of Civil Engineering, METU

Dikmen Ü (2009) Statistical correlations of shear wave velocity and penetration resistance for soil. J Geophys Eng 6:61–72. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/6/1/007CrossRef

Douglas J, Aochi H (2008) A survey of techniques for predicting earthquake ground motions for engineering purposes. Surv Geophys 29(3):187–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-008-9046-yCrossRef

EC-8 (2004) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels, Belgium

Edinçliler A, Tuncay GS (2018) Nonlinear and equivalent linear site response analysis for the Bodrum region. Eurasian J Civ Eng Archit 2(2):59–68 https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ejcar/issue/39134/432262

Eskişar T, Kuruoğlu M, Altun S, Özyalın Ş, Recep Yılmaz HR (2014) Site response of deep alluvial deposits in the northern coast of İzmir Bay. Engineering Jeoloji 172:95–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.01.006CrossRef

Finn WDL, Ventura CE (1995) Challenging issues in local microzonation. In: In: 5th International Conference on Seismic Zonation, Nice, France

Gautam D, Forte G, Rodrigues H (2016) Site efects and associated structural damage analysis in Kathmandu Valley. Nepal Earthq Struct 10(5):1013–1032. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.5.1013CrossRef

Grasso S, Maugeri M (2009) The Seismic Microzonation of the City of Catania (Italy) for the Maximum Expected Scenario Earthquake of January 11, 1693. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29(6):953–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.11.006CrossRef

Grasso S, Sammito MSV (2022) Uncertainties in performance based design methodologies for seismic Microzonation of ground motion and site effects: state of development and applications for Italy. In book: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Performance Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Beijing, China, 15-17 July. 10.1007/978-3-031-11898-2_23

Gülkan P, Kocyigit A, Yucemen S, Doyuran V, Basoz N (1993) Earthquake zoning map of Turkey based on most recent data. Research Report, METU Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Ankara, Turkey

Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1942) Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy and acceleration. Bull Seismol Soc Am 323:163–191. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0320030163CrossRef

Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1944) Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 34:185–188. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0340040185CrossRef

Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1956) Magnitude and energy of earthquakes. Ann.Geofis. 9:1–15 https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20140130-105324849

Hanumantharao C, Ramana GV (2008) Dynamic soil properties for microzonation of Delhi. India J Earth Syst Sci 117(2):719–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-008-0066-2CrossRef

Hashash YMA, Musgrove MI, Harmon JA, Ilhan O, Xing G, Numanoglu O, Groholski DR, Phillips CA, Park D (2020) DEEPSOIL 7.0, User Manual. IL, Board of Trustees of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana

Hempton MR (1982) The North Anatolian fault and complexities of continental escape. J Struct Geol 4:502–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8141(82)90041-4CrossRef

Joyner WB, Boore DM (1981) Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strongmotion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71(6):2011–2038. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0710062011CrossRef

Kagan YY (2002) Aftershock zone scaling. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92(2):641–655. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120010172CrossRef

Kalkan E, Gülkan P, Yilmaz N, Çelebi M (2009) Reassessment of probabilistic seismic hazard in the Marmara Region. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99(4):2127–2146. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120080285CrossRef

Kallberg KT (1969) Seismic risk of Southern California. M.I.T. Department of Civil Engineering, Research Report, pp R69–R31

Kijko A, Graham G (1998) Parametric-historic procedure for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis part I: estimation of maximum regional magnitude Mmax. Pure Appl Geophys 152(3):413–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s000240050161CrossRef

Kim B, Hashash YM (2013) Site response analysis using downhole array recordings during the March 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake and the effect of long-duration ground motions. Earthq Spectra 29:37–54. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000114CrossRef

Kolat C, Ulusay R, Suzen ML (2012) Development of geotechnical microzonation model for Yenisehir (Bursa Turkey) located at a seismically active region. Eng Geol 127:36–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.12.014CrossRef

Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. PrenticeHall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, p 653

Kramer SL (2009a) CEE 526 Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering lecture notes. University of Washington, Seattle, WA-USA

Kramer SL (2009b) Oral communication. University of Washington, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering

Kumar A, Baro O, Harinarayan NH (2016) Obtaining the surface PGA from site response analyses based on globally recorded ground motions and matching with the codal values. Nat Hazards 81(1):543–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2095-xCrossRef

Martínez-Pagán P, Navarro M, Pérez-Cuevas J, Alcalá FJ, García-Jerez A, Rancisco Vidal F (2018) Shearwave velocity structure from MASW and SPAC methods: The case of Adra town. SE Spain near Surf Geophys 16(3):356–371. https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2018012CrossRef

Midorikawa S (1987) Prediction of isoseismal map in the Kanto plain due to hypothetical earthquake. J Struct Eng 33:43–48

NEHRP 2003, National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program, https://www.nehrp.gov/index.htm

Okamoto S (1973) Introduction to earthquake engineering. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, Japan

Ordonez G (2012) Shake2000 : a computer program for the 1-D analysis of geotechnical earthquake engineering problems. GeoMotions, LLC, Washington

Park C (2013) MASW for geotechnical site investigation. Lead Edge 32(6):656–662. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle32060656.1CrossRef

PEER (2023), Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Strong Motion Database. https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu

Perinçek D (1979) The geology of Hazro-Korudağ-Çüngüş-Maden-Ergani-Hazar-Elazığ Malatya area. Geological Society of Turkey, Ankara

Power M, Chiou B, Abrahamson N, Bozorgnia Y, Shantz T, Roblee C (2008) An overview of the NGA project. Earthq Spectra 24(1):3–21. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2894833CrossRef

Puri N, Jain A, Mohanty P, Bhattacharya S (2017) Earthquake response analysis of sites of Haryana using DEEPSOIL software. 6th International Conference on Smart computing and Comminications ICSCC2017, 7-8 December, Kurukshetra, India

Rayhani MHT, El Naggar MH, Tabatabaei SH (2008) Nonlinear analysis of local site effects on seismic ground response in the Bam earthquake. Geotech Geol Eng 26(1):91–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-007-9149-0CrossRef

Richter CF (1958) Elementary Seismology. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v11i2.9289CrossRef

Sana H, Nath SK, Gujral KS (2019) Site response analysis of the Kashmir valley during the 8 October 2005 Kashmir earthquake (Mw 7.6) using a geotechnical dataset. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78(4):2551–2563. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10064-018-1254-1

Saroglu F, Emre Ö (1992) Kuscu İ (1992) The East Anatolian fault zone of Turkey. Annales Tectonicae 6:99–125

Savage MK, Rupp SH (2000) Foreshock probabilities in New Zealand. N Z J Geol Geophys 43:461–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288306.2000.9514902CrossRef

Schnabel P, Seed HB, Lysmer J (1972) Modification of seismograph records for effects of local soil conditions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 62(6):1649–1664. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/ssa/bssa/articleabstract/62/6/1649/117185/modification-of seismogCrossRef

Seed H, Idriss I (1981) Evaluation of liquefaction potential sand deposits based on observation of performance in previous earthquakes. ASCE National Convention (MO), pp 481–544

Seed H, Wong R, Idriss I, Tokimatsu K (1986) Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analyses of cohesionless soils. J Geotech Eng 112(11):1016–1032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1986)112:11(1016)CrossRef

Seed HB, Idriss IM (1970) Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses. Report No. EERC 70/10,. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, California

Selcuk L, Ciftci Y (2007) Microzonation of the Plio-Quaternary soils: a study of the liquefaction risk potential in the Lake Van Basin. Turkey Bull Eng Geol Environ 66(2):161–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-006-0052-3CrossRef

Sengör AMC, Canitez N (1982) The North Anatolian fault. In: Berckhemer H, Hsul K (eds) Alpine and Mediterranean Geodynamics, vol 7. American Geophysical Union, Geodynamics Series, pp 205–216CrossRef

Sengör AMC, Görür N, Şaroğlu F (1985) Strike slip faulting and related basin formations in zones of tectonic escape: Turkey as a case study. In: Biddle KT, Christie-Blick N (eds) Strike-Slip Faulting and Basin Formation. Society of Economic

Silahtar A (2022) Evaluation of local soil conditions with 1D nonlinear site response analysis of Arifiye (Sakarya District). Turkey Nat Haz 116(3):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05695-zCrossRef

Silahtar A, Kanbur Z (2021) 1D nonlinear site response analysis of the Isparta Basin (Southwestern Turkey) with surface wave (ReMi) and borehole data. Environ Earth Sci 80:268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09551-4CrossRef

Sonmezer YB, Akbas SO, Isik NS (2015) Assessment of the peak acceleratıon, amplıfıcatıon ratıo and fundamental perıod propertıes for the Kırıkkale provınce settlement area. J Fac Eng Archit Gazi Univ 30(4):711–721

Sonmezer YB, Bas S, Isik NS, Akbaş SO (2018) Linear and nonlinear site response analyses to determine dynamic soil properties of Kırıkkale. Geomechanics anad. Engineering 16(4):435–448. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2018.16.4.435CrossRef

Sonmezer YB, Celiker M (2020) Determination of seismic hazard and soil response of a critical region in Turkey considering far-field and near-field earthquake effect. Geomech Eng 20(2):131–146. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2020.20.2.131CrossRef

Sonmezer YB, Celiker M, Bas S (2019) An investigation on the evaluation of dynamic soil characteristics of the Elazig City through the 1-D equivalent linear site-response analysis. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78(7):4689–4712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-01450-6CrossRef

Sun J, Golesorkhi R, Seed H (1988) Book Chapter: Dynamic moduli and damping ratios for cohesive soils. Research Report; Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA, USA

Sungurlu O, Perinçek D, Kurt G, Tuna E, Dülger S, Çelikdemir E, Naz H (1985) Geology of the Elazığ-Hazar-Palu area. Türk Cumhur. Pet İşleri Genel Müdür Derg 29:83–191

TBSR (2018) Turkish Building Seismic Regulation 2018. Disaster and Emergency Management Directorate, Ankara, Turkey

Tunç B, Güven T, Ulutaş E, Irmak TS, Sertçelik F, Çetinol T, Çaka D, Özer MF, Kenar Ö (2003) Doğu Marmara Bölgesi için Deneysel En Büyük Yatay İvme Uzaklık Azalım İlişkisi ve Kocaeli’nin Probalistik Deprem Tehlikesi. Kocaeli, Deprem Sempozyomu

Ulusay R, Tuncay E, Sonmez H, Gokceoglu C (2004) An attenuation relationship based on Turkish strong ground motion data and iso-acceleration map of Turkey. Eng Geol 74:265–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.04.002CrossRef

Unutmaz B, Siyahi B, Fahjan Y, Akbaş B (2011) Derin Alüvyon Dolgunun Doğrusal Olmayan Davranışının Eşdeğer Lineer Ve Doğrusal Olmayan Yöntemlerle Karşılaştırılması. In: 1. Türkiye Deprem Mühendisliği ve Sismoloji Konferansı 11-14 Ekim ODTÜ, Ankara

Utsu T, Ogata Y, Matsu’ura RS (1995) The centenary of the Omori formula for a decay law of aftershock activity. J Phys Earth 43:1–33. https://doi.org/10.4294/jpe1952.43.1CrossRef

Van Dyck JFM (1985) Statistical analysis of earthquake catalogs. Ph.D. Thesis,. Civil Engineering Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

Vucetic M, Dobry R (1988) Degradation of marine clays under cyclic loading. J Geotech Eng 114(2):133–149. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1988)114:2(133)CrossRef

Vucetic M, Dobry R (1991) Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. J Geotech Eng 117(1):89–107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:1(89)CrossRef

Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:974–1002. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0840040974CrossRef

Xiaohui W, Xiaojun L, Aiwen L et al (2020) Seismic analysis of soil-structure system of nuclear power plant on non-rock site via shaking table test. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 136:106209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106209CrossRef

Yalçınkaya E (2010) Why is soil so important. Society of Geophysics Engineering Publication

Yang J, Yan XR (2009) Factors affecting site response to multi-directional earthquake loading. Eng Geol 107:77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.04.002CrossRef

Yıldız Ö (2022) Seismic site characterization of Battalgazi in Malatya. Turkey Arab J Geosci 15:867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10170-xCrossRef

Yücemen MS (2011) Olasılıksal Sismik Tehlike Analizi: Genel Bakış ve Yeni Nesil Deprem Tehlike Haritaları. 7. Ulusal Deprem Mühendisliği Konferansı, İstanbul

Zerva A, Stephenson WR (2011) Stochastic characteristics of seismic excitations at a non-uniform (rock and soil) site. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31:1261–1284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.05.006CrossRef

Zhou YG, Chen J, Chen YM, Kutter BL (2017) Centrifuge modeling and numerical analysis on seismic site response of deep offshore clay deposits. Eng Geol 227:54–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.01.008CrossRef

Titel: Evaluation of the seismic site characterization of Kovancilar (Elazig), Turkey
verfasst von: Yetis Bulent Sonmezer
Murat Celiker
Hilal Simsek
Publikationsdatum: 01.01.2024
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment / Ausgabe 1/2024
Print ISSN: 1435-9529
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-9537
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-023-03509-5

A quantitative study on the characteristics of desiccation cracks and their effect on the shear failure characteristics of granite red soil

Original Paper

Stress ratio sensitivity—a novel parameter for evaluating the shearing-based structural characteristic of loess

Original Paper

Analysis of the interfacial landslide mechanism based on asperity theory: a case study of Baotou Aviation Industrial Park, Inner Mongolia

Original Paper

Hybrid soft computing models for predicting unconfined compressive strength of lime stabilized soil using strength property of virgin cohesive soil

Original Paper

Bearing capacity mechanism of soilbagged graphite tailings

Original Paper

Mechanical interpretation of retrogressive failure in mild dip rock slopes induced by slope cutting and rainfall: a case study in Yunnan, China

Original Paper