Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
Erschienen in: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 5/2019

01.09.2019

Examining Community Dynamics of Civic Crowdfunding Participation

verfasst von: Martin Mayer

Erschienen in: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) | Ausgabe 5/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Over the past decade, crowdfunding has emerged as a legitimate, albeit niche, resource for public service delivery. Predicated on utilizing the resources of the crowd to address public issues, civic crowdfunding has the potential to offer citizens a greater role in service delivery and community development. This study investigates community dynamics and their potential impact on project success in jurisdictions proposing civic crowdfunding proposals. The results highlight the dynamics and characteristics of communities where project proposals are likely to find funding success. The results further highlight several potential opportunities for future research to better understand how and why these projects truly work.
Vorheriger Artikel Rating Working Conditions on Digital Labor Platforms
Nächster Artikel Capitalizing Relationships: Modes of Participation in Crowdsourcing

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
Ajay Agrawal, Christian Catalini, and Avi Goldfarb (2013). Crowdfunding: Social frictions in the Flat World? NEBR working paper 16820.
Baeck, Peter and Liam Collins (2013). Working the Crowd: A Short Guide to Crowdfunding and How it Can Work for You. London, UK: Nesta.
Belleflamme, Paul, Thomas Lambert, and Armin Schwienbacher (2013). Crowdfunding: Tapping the Right Crowd. Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 585-609.CrossRef
Bingham, Lisa Blomgren, Tina Nabatchi, and Rosemary O'Leary (2005). The New Governance: Practices and Processes for Stakeholder and Citizen Participation in the Work of Government. Public Administration Review, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 547-558.CrossRef
Bovaird, Tony (2007). Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services. Public Administration Review, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 846-860.CrossRef
Brabham, Darren C. (2009). Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects. Planning Theory, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 242-262.CrossRef
Brabham, Darren C. (2010). Moving the Crowd at Threadless: Motivations for Participation in a Crowdsourcing Application. Information, Communication & Society, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1122-1145.CrossRef
Brandsen, Taco and Victor Pestoff (2006). Co-Production, the Third Sector and the Delivery of Public Services: An Introduction. Public Management Review, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 493-501.CrossRef
Brito, Jerry. (2008). Improving Government Transparency Online. Public Manager, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 22-26.
Brudney, Jeffrey L. and Robert E. England (1983). Toward a Definition of the Coproduction Concept. Public Administration Review, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 59-65.CrossRef
Bryson, John M., Barbara C. Crosby, and Laura Bloomberg (2014). Public Value Governance: Moving Beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management. Public Administration Review, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 445-456.CrossRef
Clark, Benjamin Y., Nicholas Zingale, Joseph Logan, and Jeffrey Brudney (2016). A Framework for Using Crowdsourcing in Government. International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 57-75.CrossRef
Davies, Rodrigo (2014). Civic Crowdfunding: Participatory Communities, Entrepreneurs and the Political Economy of Place. Graduate thesis. MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Demediuk, Peter, Rolf Solli, and Petra Adolfsson. (2012). People Plan Their Park: Voice and Choice Through Participatory Budgeting. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 185-198.CrossRef
Denhardt, Robert and Janet Denhardt (2000). The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering. Public Administration Review, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 549-559.CrossRef
DeSisto, Tony (2016). Personal Communication, 22 January 2016.
Dixon, J., and Dogan, R. (2002). Hierarchies, networks and markets: responses to societal governance failure. Administrative Theory & Praxis, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 175-196.
Estellés-Arolas, Enrique and Fernando González-Ladrón-de-Guevara (2012). Towards an Integrated Crowdsourcing Definition. Journal of Information Science, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 189-200.CrossRef
Gerber, Elizabeth M., Julie S. Hui, and Pei-Yi Kuo. (2012). Crowdfunding: Why People are Motivated to Post and Fund Projects on Crowdfunding Platforms. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Design, Influence, and Social Technologies: Techniques, Impacts and Ethics. Pp. 1-10.
Griffin, Zachary. (2012). Crowdfunding: Fleecing the American Masses. Case Western Reserve Journal of Law, Technology & the Internet, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 375-421.
Hemer, Joachim. (2011). A Snapshot on Crowdfunding. Working papers firms and region, vol. R2/2011, pp. 1-44.
Howe, Jeff. (2006). The Rise of Crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1-4.
Howe, Jeff. (2008). Crowdsourcing: How the Power of the Crowd is Driving the Future of Business. New York, NY, Random House Publishing.
Irvin, Renee A. and John Stansbury (2004). Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is it Worth the Effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55-65.CrossRef
Jordan, Meagan, Juita-Elena Yusuf, Martin Mayer, and Kaitrin Mahar. (2016). What Citizens Want to Know About Their Government's Finances: Closing the Information Gap. The Social Science Journal, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 301-308.CrossRef
Kettl, D. F. (2002). The transformation of governance: Public administration for twenty-first century America. Baltimore, MD: JHU Press.
Lambert, Thomas and Armin Schwienbacher (2010). An Empirical Analysis of Crowdfunding. Social Science Research Network, vol. 1578175, pp. 1-23.
Mayer, Martin (2016). Civic Crowdfunding and Local Government: An Examination into Projects, Scope, and Implications for Local Government. Ph.D. Dissertation. Old Dominion University. Norfolk, Virginia.
Mayer, Martin (2018). “Crowdfunding and Social Policy” in Farazmand (Ed.), The Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration. New York, New York: Springer Reference.
Mayer, Martin and Robert Kenter (2015). “The Prevailing Elements of Public-Sector Collaboration” in Morris and Miller-Stevens (eds), Advancing Collaboration Theory: Models, Typologies, and Evidence. New York, New York: Routledge Press.
Mayer, Martin and Robert Kenter (2018). “Public Sector Collaboration and Social Policy” in Farazmand (Ed.), The Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Springer Reference.
Mergel, Ines (2015a). Open Collaboration in the Public Sector: The Case of Social Coding on GitHub. Government Information Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 464-472.CrossRef
Mergel, Ines (2015b). Opening Government: Designing Open Innovation Processes to Collaborate with External Stakeholders. Social Science Computer Review, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 599-612.CrossRef
Mergel, Ines and Kevin Desouza, (2013). Implementing Open Innovation in the Public Sector: The Case of Challenge.gov. Public Administration Review, vol, 73, no. 6, pp. 882-890.
Miglietta, Angelo, Emanuele Parisi, Matteo Pessione, and Flavio Servato (2014). CrowdFunding and Local Governments: A Financial Opportunity for a New Liaison with Citizens. In Conference Proceedings, 16th Toulon-Verona Conference “Excellence in Services”. University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, pp. 485-495.
Milward, H. B., and Provan, K. G. (2000). Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 10, no 2, pp. 359-380.
Mollick, Ethan. (2014). The Dynamics of Crowdfunding: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1-16.CrossRef
Noveck, Beth S. (2009). Wiki Government: How Technology Can Make Government Better, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Robbins, Mark D., and Bill Simonsen. (2002). A Dynamic Method of Citizen Preference Revelation. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting, and Financial Management, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 445-462.CrossRef
Seltzer, Ethan, and Dillon Mahmoudi. (2012). Citizen Participation, Open Innovation, and Crowdsourcing: Challenges and Opportunities for Planning. Journal of Planning Literature, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 3-18.CrossRef
Stoker, Gerry. (2006). Public Value Management a New Narrative for Networked Governance? The American Review of Public Administration, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 41-57.CrossRef
Zuckerman, Ethan. (2014). New Media, New Civics? Policy & Internet, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 151-168.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Examining Community Dynamics of Civic Crowdfunding Participation
verfasst von
Martin Mayer
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2019
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) / Ausgabe 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0925-9724
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7551
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-018-9307-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2019

Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 5/2019 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

The Evolution of Power and Standard Wikidata Editors: Comparing Editing Behavior over Time to Predict Lifespan and Volume of Edits

OriginalPaper

Citizen Representation in City Government-Driven Crowdsourcing

OriginalPaper

Capitalizing Relationships: Modes of Participation in Crowdsourcing

OriginalPaper

Investigating the Amazon Mechanical Turk Market Through Tool Design

OriginalPaper

Rating Working Conditions on Digital Labor Platforms

EditorialNotes

Crowd Dynamics: Conflicts, Contradictions, and Community in Crowdsourcing