Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The purpose of this study was to examine student awareness of the pedagogical benefits of Web 2.0 to supplement in-class learning and to better understand factors that influence student decisions to adopt these tools, using the Decomposed Theory of Planned Behavior (DTPB). Findings indicated that while many students feel that some Web 2.0 applications can be effective at increasing satisfaction with a course, improving their learning and their writing ability, and increasing student interaction with other students and faculty; few choose to use them in educational contexts. Additional results indicated that student attitudes and their subjective norms are strong indicators of their intentions to use Web 2.0.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 71–80. CrossRef
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. CrossRef
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147. CrossRef
Baylor, A., & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classroom? Computer and Education, 39(1), 395–414. CrossRef
Boulos, N. K., & Wheelert, S. (2007). The emerging Web 2.0 social software: An enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 24(1), 2–23. CrossRef
Brown, A. L., & Ferrara, R. A. (1985). Diagnosing zones of proximal development. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 273–305). NY: Cambridge University Press.
Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189–211. CrossRef
Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–339. CrossRef
Dearstyne, B. W. (2007). Blogs, mashups, and wikis: Oh my!. Information Management Journal, 41(4), 24–33.
Dixon, S., & Black, L. (1996). Vocal point: A collaborative, student run online newspaper. In E. J. Valauskas & M. Ertel (Eds.), The internet for teachers and school library media specialists: Today’s applications tomorrow’s prospects (pp. 147–158). New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc.
Ferdig, R. (2007). Examining social software in teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(1), 5–10.
Franklin, T., & Van Harmelen, M. (2007). Web 2.0 for content for learning and teaching in higher education. London: Joint Information Systems Committee.
Johnson, R. T., & Johnson, D. W. (1986). Action research: Cooperative learning in the science classroom. Science and Children, 24, 31–32.
Klamma, R., Chatti, M. A., Duval, E., Fiedler, S., Hummel, H., Hvannberg, E. T. et al. (2006). Social software for professional learning: Examples and research issues. Proceedings of the ICALT-2006 Conference, The Netherlands, pp 912–914.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007). Social networking websites and teens: An overview (pp. 1–10). Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
Linn, M. C. (1991). The computer as learning partner: Can computer tools teach science? In K. Sheingold, L. G. Roberts, & S. M. Malcolm (Eds.), Technology for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Madden, M., and Fox, S. (2006). Riding the waves of “Web 2.0”: More than a buzzword, but still not easily defined. Pew Internet Project, 1–6, (Unpublished).
Maloney, E. (2007). What Web 2.0 can teach us about learning? Chronicle of Higher Education, 25(18), B26.
Nunnaly, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pence, H. E. (2007). Preparing for the real web generation. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35(3), 347–356. CrossRef
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. CrossRef
Riley, R. W., & Roberts, L. G. (2000). Putting a world-class education at the fingertips of all children: The national educational technology plan. eLearning. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
Rollett, H., Lux, M., Strohmaier, M., Gisela, D., & Tochtermann, K. (2007). The Web 2.0 way of learning with technologies. International Journal of Learning Technology, 3(1), 87–107. CrossRef
Routman, R. (1991). Invitations: Changing as teachers and learners K-12. Toronto, Canada: Irwin Publishing.
Schofield, J. W., & Davidson, A. L. (2002). Bringing the Internet to school: Lessons from an urban district. San Francisco, CA: Jolley-Bass.
Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 325–343. CrossRef
Simões, L., e Gouveia, L. (2008). Web 2.0 and higher education: Pedagogical implications. Higher Education: New Challenges and Emerging Roles for Human and Social Development. 4th International Barcelona Conference on Higher Education Technical University of Catalonia (UPC).
Sturm, M., Kennel, T., McBride, M., & Kelly, M. (2008). The pedagogical implications of Web 2.0. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of research on Web 2.0 and second language learning (pp. 367–384). Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176. CrossRef
Tornatzky, L. G., & Klein, K. J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29(1), 28–45.
Triandis, H. C. (1979). Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. In M. M. Page (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 27, pp. 195–259). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wright, S. (1921). Correlation and causation. Journal of Agriculture Research, 20, 557–585.
- Examining student decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: theory and empirical tests
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© ITandMEDIA, Best Practices für die Mitarbeiter-Partizipation in der Produktentwicklung/© astrosystem | stock.adobe.com