Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
We discuss typical issues in getting access to and using high-quality administrative tax data for research purposes. We discuss research involving both quasi- and field experiments implemented together with the tax authority. We reflect on practical solutions that promote co-creation of knowledge and reduce information asymmetries between researchers and practitioners, based on our experiences of working with the tax authorities in Finland and the UK. We provide examples of how to improve the overall research environment focusing on two successful case studies: the HMRC Datalab in the UK and the remote access to data from Statistics Finland. We propose two key arguments to persuade policymakers elsewhere to follow similar practices: improved data security and equality of access across researchers.
Almunia, M., Lockwood, B., & Scharf, K. (2017). More giving or more givers? The effects of tax incentives on charitable donations in the UK. Working paper, University of Warwick.
Best, M. C., & Kleven, H. J. (2018). Housing market responses to transaction taxes: Evidence from notches and stimulus in the UK. Review of Economic Studies, 85(1), 157–193. CrossRef
Bott, K. M., Cappelen, A. W., Sorensen, E., & Tungodden, B. (2017). You’ve got mail: A randomised field experiment on tax evasion. NHH Department of Economics Discussion Paper No. 10.
Card, D., Chetty, R., Feldstein, M., & Saez, E. (2010). Expanding access to administrative data for research in the United States. Retrieved September, 2017 from https://eml.berkeley.edu/~saez/card-chetty-feldstein-saezNSF10dataaccess.pdf.
Cornes, R., & Sandler, T. (1984). Easy riders, joint production, and public goods. Economic Journal, 94(375), 580–598. CrossRef
Devereux, M., Liu, L., & Loretz, S. (2014). The elasticity of corporate taxable income: New evidence from UK tax records. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(2), 19–53.
Gillitzer, C., & Skov, P. E. (2018). The use of third-party information reporting for tax deductions: Evidence and implications from charitable deductions in Denmark. Oxford Economic Papers, 70, 1–25. CrossRef
Guceri, I., & Liu, L. (2016). How effective are fiscal incentives in R&D- intensive sectors? Working paper, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
Harju, J., Kosonen, T., & Skans, O. N. (2018). Firm types, price-setting strategies, and consumption-tax incidence? Journal of Public Economics, 165, 48–72. CrossRef
Harju, J., & Matikka, T. (2016). The elasticity of taxable income and income-shifting: What is “Real” and what is not? International Tax and Public Finance, 23(4), 640–669. CrossRef
Harju, J., Matikka, T., & Rauhanen, T. (2017). The effects of size- based regulation on small firms: Evidence from VAT threshold. Working paper, VATT Institute for Economic Research.
Johnson, M. (2017). Tutkimusaineistojen käyttö Fiona- etäkäyttöjärjestelmässä (Use of research data in fiona remote access system). Seminar presentation 29.5.2017, Statistics Finland.
Kleven, H., Knudsen, M., Kreiner, C., Pedersen, S., & Saez, E. (2011). Unwilling or unable to cheat? Evidence from a tax audit experiment in denmark. Econometrica, 79, 651–692. CrossRef
Kosonen, T. (2015). More and cheaper haircuts after VAT cut? On the efficiency and incidence of service sector consumption taxes. Journal of Public Economics, 131, 87–100. CrossRef
Kosonen, T., & Ropponen, O. (2015). The role of information in tax compliance: Evidence from a natural field experiment. Economics Letters, 129(C), 18–21. CrossRef
Kotakorpi, K., & Laamanen, J.-P. (2016). Prefilled income tax returns and tax compliance: Evidence from a natural experiment. University of Tampere, Economics Working Papers, No. 104.
Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2011). Was there really a hawthorne effect at the hawthorne plant? An analysis of the original illumination experiments. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3, 224–238.
List, J. A. (2011). Why economists should conduct field experiments and 14 tips for pulling one off. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(3), 3–16. CrossRef
Liu, L., Lockwood, B., & Almunia, M. (2017). VAT notches, voluntary registration, and bunching: Theory and UK evidence. Working paper, University of Warwick.
Matikka, T. (2018). The elasticity of taxable income: Evidence from changes in municipal income tax rates in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 120, 943–973. CrossRef
Ministry of Finance. (2012). Tilastolain uudistamistyöryhmän ehdotus (Proposal of the working group on the Revision of the Statistics Act). Ministry of Finance Publications, July 2012.
Slemrod, J. (2016). Caveats to the research use of tax-return administrative data. National Tax Journal, 69(4), 1003–1020. CrossRef
- Expanding access to administrative data: the case of tax authorities in Finland and the UK
- Springer US
International Tax and Public Finance
Print ISSN: 0927-5940
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6970
microm, Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, Avaloq/© Avaloq Evolution AG, Avaloq/© Avaloq