Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
There has been a recent upsurge of interest in self-reported measures of wellbeing by official statisticians and by researchers in the social sciences. This paper considers data from a wellbeing supplement to the American Time Use Survey (ATUS), which parsed the previous day into episodes. Respondents provided ratings of five experiential wellbeing adjectives (happiness, stress, tiredness, sadness, and pain) for each of three randomly selected episodes. Because the ATUS wellbeing module has not received very much attention, in this paper we provide the reader with details about the features of these data and our approach to analyzing the data (e.g., weighting considerations), and then illustrate the applicability of these data to current issues. Specifically, we examine the association of age and income with all of the experiential wellbeing adjective in the ATUS. Results from the ATUS wellbeing module were broadly consistent with earlier findings on age, but did not confirm all earlier findings between income and wellbeing. We conclude that the ATUS, with its measurement of time use, specific activities, and hedonic experience in a nationally representative survey, offers a unique opportunity to incorporate time use into the burgeoning field of wellbeing research.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Baltes, P. B. (2003). Extending longevity: Dignity gain-or dignity drain? MaxPlanck Research, 3, 14–19.
Baum, A., Garofalo, J., & Yali, A. (1999). Socioeconomic status and chronic stress: Does stress account for SES effects on health? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 896(1), 131–144. CrossRef
Bühler, C. (1935). The curve of life as studied in biographies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 19(4), 405–409. CrossRef
Carstensen, L. L., Fung, H. H., & Charles, S. T. (2003). Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 103–123. CrossRef
Carstensen, L. L., Pasupathi, M., Mayr, U., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2000). Emotional experience in everyday life across the adult life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 644–655. CrossRef
Carstensen, L. L., Turan, B., Scheibe, S., Ram, N., Ersner-Hershfield, H., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., et al. (2011). Emotional experience improves with age: Evidence based on over 10 years of experience sampling. Psychology and Aging, 26(1), 21–33. CrossRef
Christodoulou, C., Schneider, S., & Stone, A. (2014). Validation of a brief yesterday measure of hedonic well-being and daily activities: Comparison with the day reconstruction method. Social Indicators Research, 115, 907–917. CrossRef
Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46, 95–144. CrossRef
Clark, A. E., Kristensen, N., & Westergard-Nielsen, N. (2009). Economic satisfaction and income rank in small neighbourhoods. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7, 519–527. CrossRef
Cohen, S., Tyrrell, D. A. J., & Smith, A. P. (1992). Psychological stress and the common cold. New England Journal of Medicine, 326, 645–646.
Deaton, A. (2008). Income, health, and well-being around the world: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22, 53–72. CrossRef
DeVries, M. (1987). Investigating mental disorders in their natural settings: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Nervious and Mental Disease, 175, 509–513. CrossRef
Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research, 57, 119–169. CrossRef
Dockray, S., Grant, N., Stone, A. A., Kahneman, D., Wardle, J., & Steptoe, A. (2010). A comparison of affect ratings obtained with ecological momentary assessment and the day reconstruction method. Social Indicators Research, 99, 269–283. CrossRef
Dolan, P., & Kudrna, L. (2015). More years, less yawns: Fresh evidence on tiredness by age and other factors. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 70(4), 576–580. CrossRef
Dolan, P., Kudrna, L., & Stone, A. (2016). The measure matters: An investigation of evaluative and experience-based measures of wellbeing in time use data. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1429-8.
English, T., & Carstensen, L. L. (2014). Emotional experience in the mornings and the evenings: Consideration of age differences in specific emotions by time of day. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 185. CrossRef
Flood, S. M., & Genadek, K. R. (2016). Time for each other: Work and family constraints among couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(1), 142–164. CrossRef
Forgeard, M. J., Jayawickreme, E., Kern, M. L., & Seligman, M. E. (2011). Doing the right thing: Measuring wellbeing for public policy. International Journal of Wellbeing, 1, 79–106.
Frenkel-Brunswik, E. (1968). Adjustments and reorientation in the course of the life span. In B. L. Neugarten (Ed.), Middle age and aging (pp. 77–84). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gana, K., Bailly, N., Saada, Y., Joulain, M., & Alaphilippe, D. (2013). Does life satisfaction change in old age: Results from an 8-year longitudinal study. Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68, 540–552. CrossRef
Harter, J. K., & Gurley, V. F. (2008). Measuring health in the United States. APS Observer, 21, 23–26.
Junghaenel, D. U., Christodoulou, C., Lai, J.-S., & Stone, A. A. (2011). Demographic correlates of fatigue in the US general population: Results from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) initiative. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 71(3), 117–123. CrossRef
Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 16489–16493. CrossRef
Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306, 1776–1780. CrossRef
Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2006). Would you be happier if you were richer? A focusing illusion. Science, 312(5782), 1908–1910. CrossRef
Krueger, A., Kahneman, D., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. (2009). Measuring the subjective well- being of nations: National accounts of time use and well- being: National time accounting: the currency of life (NBER Working Paper No. c5053). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Krueger, A. B., & Mueller, A. I. (2012a). The lot of the unemployed: A time use perspective. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10, 765–794. CrossRef
Krueger, A. B., & Mueller, A. I. (2012b). Time use, emotional well-being, and unemployment: Evidence from longitudinal data. American Economic Review, 102, 594–599. CrossRef
Krueger, A. B., & Stone, A. A. (2008). Assessment of pain: A community-based diary survey in the USA. The Lancet, 371(9623), 1519–1525. CrossRef
Kushlev, K., Dunn, E. W., & Lucas, R. E. (2015). Higher income is associated with less daily sadness but not more daily happiness. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(5), 483–489. CrossRef
Lee, Y., Hofferth, S. L., Flood, S. M., & Fisher, K. (2016). Reliability, validity, and variability of the subjective well-being questions in the 2010 American time use survey. Social Indicators Research, 126(3), 1355–1373. CrossRef
Luhmann, M., Schimmack, U., & Eid, M. (2011). Stability and variability in the relationship between subjective well-being and income. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(2), 186–197. CrossRef
Luttmer, E. F. P. (2005). Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 963–1002.
McFarland, C., Ross, M., & DeCourville, N. (1989). Women’s theories of menstruation and biases in recall of menstrual symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 522–531. CrossRef
O’Donnell, G., Deaton, A., Durand, M., Halpern, D., & Layard, R. (2014). Wellbeing and policy. London: Legatum Limited.
OECD. (2013). OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Pampel, F. C., Krueger, P. M., & Denney, J. T. (2010). Socioeconomic disparities in health behaviors. Annual review of sociology, 36, 349–370. CrossRef
Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727. CrossRef
Sacks, D. W., Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2012). The new stylized facts about income and subjective well-being. Emotion, 12, 1181–1187. CrossRef
Santiago, C. D., Wadsworth, M. E., & Stump, J. (2011). Socioeconomic status, neighborhood disadvantage, and poverty-related stress: Prospective effects on psychological syndromes among diverse low-income families. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(2), 218–230. CrossRef
Scheibe, S., & Carstensen, L. L. (2010). Emotional aging: Recent findings and future trends. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65B(2), 135–144. CrossRef
Schimmack, U. (2008). The structure of subjective well-being. In M. Eid & R. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 97–123). New York: Guilford Press.
Schneider, S., & Stone, A. A. (2014). Distinguishing between frequency and intensity of health-related symptoms from diary assessments. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 77(3), 205–212. CrossRef
Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports. How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54, 93–105. CrossRef
Schwarz, N. (2012). Why researchers should think “real-time”: A cognitive rationale. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 22–42). New York: Guilford.
Shelley, K. J. (2005). Developing the American time use survey activity classification system. Monthly Labor Review, 128, 3–15.
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008). Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 1–32. CrossRef
Steptoe, A., Deaton, A., & Stone, A. A. (2015). Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing. Lancet, 385, 640–648. CrossRef
Steptoe, A., & Kivimaki, M. (2012). Stress and cardiovascular disease. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 9(6), 360–370. CrossRef
Steptoe, A., Wardle, J., & Marmot, M. (2005). Positive affect and health-related neuroendocrine, cardiovascular, and inflammatory processes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 6508–6512. CrossRef
Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2013). Subjective well-being and income: Is there any evidence of satiation? The American Economic Review, 103(3), 598–604. CrossRef
Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress (CMEPSP). http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/en/documents.htm
Stone, A. A., & Mackie, C. (2014). Subjective well-being: Measuring happiness, suffering, and other dimensions of experience. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Stone, A. A., Schwartz, J. E., Broderick, J. E., & Deaton, A. (2010). A snapshot of the age distribution of psychological well-being in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 107, 9985–9990. CrossRef
Stone, A. A., & Shiffman, S. (1994). Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) in behavioral medicine. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 16, 199–202.
- Experiential Wellbeing Data from the American Time Use Survey: Comparisons with Other Methods and Analytic Illustrations with Age and Income
Arthur A. Stone
Joseph E. Schwartz
- Springer Netherlands
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, digitale Transformation/© Maksym Yemelyanov | Fotolia