Skip to main content

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

18. Expert Elicitation to Inform Health Technology Assessment

verfasst von : Marta O. Soares, Laura Bojke

Erschienen in: Elicitation

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In the face of constrained budgets, unavoidable decisions about the use of health care interventions have to be made. Decision makers seeking to maximise health for their given budget should use the best available information on effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and for this purpose they may use a process of gathering and combining existing evidence in this context called Health Technology Assessment (HTA). In informing decisions, utilising HTA, expert elicitation can provide valuable information, particularly where evidence is missing, where it may not be as well developed (e.g. diagnostics, medical devices, early access to medicines scheme or public health) or limited (insufficient, not very relevant, contradictory and/or flawed). Here, formal methods to elicit expert judgements are preferred to improve the accountability and transparency of the decision making process, in addition to the important role in reducing bias and the use of heuristics. There have been a limited number of applications of expert elicitation in health care decision making, and in part this may be due to a number of methodological uncertainties regarding the applicability and transferability of techniques from other disciples, such as Bayesian statistics and engineering, to health care. This chapter discusses the distinguishing features of health care decision making and the use of expert elicitation to inform this, drawing on applied examples in the area illustrating some of the complexities and uncertainties.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Babuscia A, Cheung KM (2014) An approach to perform expert elicitation for engineering design risk analysis: methodology and experimental results. J R Stat Soc 177(2):475–497CrossRef Babuscia A, Cheung KM (2014) An approach to perform expert elicitation for engineering design risk analysis: methodology and experimental results. J R Stat Soc 177(2):475–497CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Briggs AH (1999) A Bayesian approach to stochastic cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Econ 8(3):257–261CrossRef Briggs AH (1999) A Bayesian approach to stochastic cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Econ 8(3):257–261CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bryan S, Williams I, McIver S (2007) Seeing the NICE side of cost-effectiveness analysis: a qualitative investigation of the use of CEA in NICE technology appraisals. Health Econ 16(2):179–193CrossRef Bryan S, Williams I, McIver S (2007) Seeing the NICE side of cost-effectiveness analysis: a qualitative investigation of the use of CEA in NICE technology appraisals. Health Econ 16(2):179–193CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Claxton K (1999) The irrelevance of inference: a decision-making approach to the stochastic evaluation of health care technologies. J Health Econ 18(3):341–364CrossRef Claxton K (1999) The irrelevance of inference: a decision-making approach to the stochastic evaluation of health care technologies. J Health Econ 18(3):341–364CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cooke RM (1991) Experts in Uncertainty. Oxford University Press, Oxford Cooke RM (1991) Experts in Uncertainty. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Zurück zum Zitat Culyer AJ, Wagstaff A (1993) Equity and equality in health and health care. J Health Econ 12:431–458CrossRef Culyer AJ, Wagstaff A (1993) Equity and equality in health and health care. J Health Econ 12:431–458CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Drummond M, Sculpher MJ, Torrance JW, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL (2005) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford Drummond M, Sculpher MJ, Torrance JW, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL (2005) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Zurück zum Zitat Folland S, Goodman AC, Stano M (2013) The economics of health and healthcare, 7th edn. Routledge, New York Folland S, Goodman AC, Stano M (2013) The economics of health and healthcare, 7th edn. Routledge, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Gigerenzer G, Hoffrage U (1995) How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: frequency formats. Psychol Rev 102(4):684CrossRef Gigerenzer G, Hoffrage U (1995) How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: frequency formats. Psychol Rev 102(4):684CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gosling JP (2018) SHELF: the Sheffield elicitation framework. In: Dias LC, Morton A, Quigley J (eds) Elicitation: the science and art of structuring judgment. Springer, New York. (Chapter 4 in this book) Gosling JP (2018) SHELF: the Sheffield elicitation framework. In: Dias LC, Morton A, Quigley J (eds) Elicitation: the science and art of structuring judgment. Springer, New York. (Chapter 4 in this book)
Zurück zum Zitat Griffin S, Claxton K, Palmer SJ, Sculpher MJ (2011) Dangerous omissions: the consequences of ignoring decision uncertainty. Health Econ 20(2):212–224CrossRef Griffin S, Claxton K, Palmer SJ, Sculpher MJ (2011) Dangerous omissions: the consequences of ignoring decision uncertainty. Health Econ 20(2):212–224CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grigore B, Peters J, Hyde C, Stein K (2016) A comparison of two methods for expert elicitation in health technology assessments. BMC Med Res Methodol 16:85CrossRef Grigore B, Peters J, Hyde C, Stein K (2016) A comparison of two methods for expert elicitation in health technology assessments. BMC Med Res Methodol 16:85CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grigore B, Peters J, Hyde C, Stein K (2013) Methods to elicit probability distributions from experts: a systematic review of reported practice in health technology assessment. PharmacoEconomics 31(11):991–1003CrossRef Grigore B, Peters J, Hyde C, Stein K (2013) Methods to elicit probability distributions from experts: a systematic review of reported practice in health technology assessment. PharmacoEconomics 31(11):991–1003CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Haakma W, Steuten LM, Bojke L, IJzerman MJ (2014) Belief elicitation to populate health economic models of medical diagnostic devices in development. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 12(3):327–334CrossRef Haakma W, Steuten LM, Bojke L, IJzerman MJ (2014) Belief elicitation to populate health economic models of medical diagnostic devices in development. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 12(3):327–334CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Iglesias CPTA, Rogowski WH, Payne K (2016) Reporting guidelines for the use of expert judgement in model-based economic evaluations. PharmacoEconomics 34(11):1161–1172CrossRef Iglesias CPTA, Rogowski WH, Payne K (2016) Reporting guidelines for the use of expert judgement in model-based economic evaluations. PharmacoEconomics 34(11):1161–1172CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Morris DE, Oakley JE, Crowe JA (2014) A web-based tool for eliciting probability distributions from experts. Environ Model Softw 52:1–4CrossRef Morris DE, Oakley JE, Crowe JA (2014) A web-based tool for eliciting probability distributions from experts. Environ Model Softw 52:1–4CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat O’Hagan A, Buck CE, Daneshkhah A, Eiser JR, Garthwaite PH, David J, Jenkinson DJ, Oakley JE, Rakow T (2006) Uncertain judgements: eliciting experts’ probabilities. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRef O’Hagan A, Buck CE, Daneshkhah A, Eiser JR, Garthwaite PH, David J, Jenkinson DJ, Oakley JE, Rakow T (2006) Uncertain judgements: eliciting experts’ probabilities. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Romanow RJQ (2002) Building on values: the future of health care in Canada, Final Report Romanow RJQ (2002) Building on values: the future of health care in Canada, Final Report
Zurück zum Zitat Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, Drummond M, Mccabe C (2006) Whither trial-based economic evaluation for health care decision making? Health Econ 15(7):677–687CrossRef Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, Drummond M, Mccabe C (2006) Whither trial-based economic evaluation for health care decision making? Health Econ 15(7):677–687CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Soares MO, Bojke L, Dumville J, Iglesias C, Cullum N, Claxton K (2011) Methods to elicit experts’ beliefs over uncertain quantities: application to a cost effectiveness transition model of negative pressure wound therapy for severe pressure ulceration. Stat Med 30(19):2363–2380CrossRef Soares MO, Bojke L, Dumville J, Iglesias C, Cullum N, Claxton K (2011) Methods to elicit experts’ beliefs over uncertain quantities: application to a cost effectiveness transition model of negative pressure wound therapy for severe pressure ulceration. Stat Med 30(19):2363–2380CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Soares MODJ, Ashby R, Iglesias C, Bojke L, Adderley U (2013) Methods to assess cost effectiveness and value of further research when data are sparse: negative pressure wound therapy for severe pressure ulcers. Med Decis Mak 33(3):415–436CrossRef Soares MODJ, Ashby R, Iglesias C, Bojke L, Adderley U (2013) Methods to assess cost effectiveness and value of further research when data are sparse: negative pressure wound therapy for severe pressure ulcers. Med Decis Mak 33(3):415–436CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Soares MO, Dumville JC, Ades AE, Welton NJ (2014) Treatment comparisons for decision making: facing the problems of sparse and few data. J R Stat Soc 177(1):259–279CrossRef Soares MO, Dumville JC, Ades AE, Welton NJ (2014) Treatment comparisons for decision making: facing the problems of sparse and few data. J R Stat Soc 177(1):259–279CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sullivan W, Payne K (2011) The appropriate elicitation of expert opinion in economic models. PharmacoEconomics 29(6):455–459CrossRef Sullivan W, Payne K (2011) The appropriate elicitation of expert opinion in economic models. PharmacoEconomics 29(6):455–459CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Expert Elicitation to Inform Health Technology Assessment
verfasst von
Marta O. Soares
Laura Bojke
Copyright-Jahr
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65052-4_18