nach oben

Journal of Business Ethics

04.01.2015

Expert Evaluation of Diagnostic Instrument for Personal and Organizational Value Congruence

verfasst von: Jolita Vveinhardt, Evelina Gulbovaitė

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 3/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The article aims to evaluate the quality of a newly constructed diagnostic instrument for personal and organizational value congruence. To attain this, an expert evaluation was invoked. The selected experts evaluated the questionnaire scales and their constituent subscales as well as the eligibility of the contained statements for diagnosing of personal and organizational value congruence. It should be emphasized that the experts were provided a possibility of commenting on each of the statements, making observations and providing suggestions in regard to the statements, scales and subscales of the questionnaire. This article presents the analysis of the evaluation commentaries by the experts, basing on which the main drawbacks of the new instrument were identified and highlighted. Furthermore, a new diagnostic instrument, constructed in accordance with the results of the expert evaluation as applicable for personal and organizational value congruence is introduced as the main result of the research.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Aminzadeh, F., Plotnikoff, R., & Edwards, N. (1999). Development and evaluation of the cane use cognitive mediator instrument. Nursing Research, 48(5), 269–275.CrossRef

Bardauskiene, D. (2007). The expert’s estimates application in the preparation of city general plan. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 13(3), 223–236.

Beležentis, A., & Žalimaitė, M. (2011). Ekspertinių vertinimų taikymas inovacijų plėtros veiksnių analizėje: Lietuvos inovatyvių įmonių vertinimas. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 3(27), 23–31.

Burinskiene, M., & Rudzkiene, V. (2009). Future insights, scenarios and expert method application in sustainable territorial planning. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 15(1), 10–25.CrossRef

Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 875–884.CrossRef

Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1996). Person-organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3), 294–311.

Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1991). Reliability and validity assessment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Chaiyawat, W., & Brown, J. (2000). Psychometric Properties of the Thai versions of State-Trait anxiety inventory for children and child medical fear scale. Research in Nursing & Health, 23(5), 406–414.CrossRef

Duobienė, J. (2014). Organizacinės verslininkystės vertinimo instrumentas. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 36(1), 45–55.CrossRef

Guillemin, F., Bonbardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(12), 1417–1432.CrossRef

Gulbovaitė, E. (2012). Asmeninių ir organizacinių vertybių kongruencija: bendros asmeniui ir organizacijai vertybės. Lietuvos aukštųjų mokyklų vadybos ir ekonomikos jaunųjų mokslininkų Konferencijų darbai, 15, 45–52.

Hannes, K., Lockwood, C., & Pearson, A. (2010). A comparative analysis of three online appraisal instruments’ ability to assess validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 20(12), 1736–1743.CrossRef

Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247.CrossRef

Hecimovich, M. D., Peiffer, J. J., & Harbough, A. G. (2014). Development and psychometric evaluation of a post exercise exhaustion scale utilising the Rasch measurement model. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(6), 569–579.CrossRef

Hughes, L. (1998). Development of an instrument to measure caring peer group interactions. Journal of Nursing Education, 37(5), 202–207.

Hyrkas, K., Appelqvist-Schmidlechner, K., & Oksa, L. (2003). Validating an instrument for clinical supervision using an expert panel. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 40(6), 619–625.CrossRef

Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1–49.CrossRef

Lauver, K., & Kristof-Brown, A. (2001). Distinguishing between employees’ perceptions of person-job and person-organization fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3), 454–470.

Lester, F. K. (2005). On the theoretical, conceptual, and philosophical foundations for research in mathematics education. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 37, 457–467.CrossRef

Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385.CrossRef

MacCarthy, B. L., & Atthirawong, W. (2003). Factors Affecting Location Decisions in International Operations—a Delphi Study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(7), 794–818.CrossRef

Maskeliūnaitė, L., Sivilevičius, H., & Podvezko, V. (2009). Research on the quality of passenger transportation by railway. Transport, 24(2), 100–212.CrossRef

McDonald, P., & Gandz, J. (1991). Identification of values relevant to business research. Human Resource Management, 30(2), 217–236.CrossRef

O’Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J. A., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing persona-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487–516.CrossRef

Olson, K. (2010). An examination of questionnaire evaluation by expert reviewers. Field Methods, 22(4), 295–318.CrossRef

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Bustamante, R. M., & Nelson, J. A. (2010). Mixed research as a tool for developing quantitative instruments. Journal of Mixed Methods Research January, 4(1), 56–78.CrossRef

Podvezko, V. (2008). Comprehensive evaluation of complex quantities. Business Theory and Practice, 9(3), 160–168.

Posner, B. Z., & Westwood, R. I. (1995). A cross-cultural investigation of the shared values relationship. International Journal of Value-Based Management, 8(3), 197–206.CrossRef

Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.

Rudzkienė, V., & Burinskienė, M. (2007). Plėtros krypčių vertinimo ir valdymo informaciniai modeliai. Monografija. Vilnius: Technika.CrossRef

Schilling, L. S., Dixon, J. K., Knafl, K. A., Grey, M., Ives, B., & Lynn, M. R. (2007). Determining content validity of a self-report instrument for adolescents using a heterogeneous expert panel. Nursing Research, 56(5), 361–366.CrossRef

Siegall, M., & McDonald, T. (2004). Person-organization value congruence, burnout and diversion of resources. Personnel Review, 33(3), 291–301.CrossRef

Tidikis, R. (2003). Socialinių mokslų tyrimų metodologija. Vilnius: Lietuvos teisės universitetas.

Tilden, V., Nelson, C., & May, B. (1990). Use of qualitative methods to enhance content validity. Nursing Research, 39(3), 172–175.CrossRef

Vveinhardt, J., & Gulbovaitė, E. (2012a). Asmeninių ir organizacijos vertybių kongruencija: dialogo paieškos. Jaunųjų mokslininkų darbai, 1(34), 167–173.

Vveinhardt, J., & Gulbovaitė, E. (2012b). Asmeninių ir organizacinių vertybių kongruencijos modelis. Vadybos mokslas ir studijos – kaimo verslų ir jų infrastruktūros plėtrai, 4(33), 113–124.

Vveinhardt, J., & Gulbovaitė, E. (2013). Comparative analysis of the researches on personal and organizational value congruence. Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, 67, 127–142.

Vveinhardt, J., & Gulbovaitė, E. (2014). Diagnostic Instruments for Value Congruence. Journal of Business Theory and Practice, 2(2), 126–151.

Wynd, C. A., Schmidt, B., & Schaefer, M. A. (2003). Two quantitative approaches for estimating instrument content validity. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(5), 508–518.CrossRef

Titel: Expert Evaluation of Diagnostic Instrument for Personal and Organizational Value Congruence
verfasst von: Jolita Vveinhardt
Evelina Gulbovaitė
Publikationsdatum: 04.01.2015
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2527-7