nach oben

Erschienen in:

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

15. Expert Judgement for Geological Hazards in New Zealand

verfasst von : Annemarie Christophersen, Matthew C. Gerstenberger

Erschienen in: Expert Judgement in Risk and Decision Analysis

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Expert judgement is important for the short- and long-term assessments of natural hazards in New Zealand, contributing to their risk analyses and informing decision-making. The problems are complex and usually require input from experts from different sub-disciplines. Expert judgement, like all human cognitive processes, is prone to biases. Therefore, we aim to use methods that are robust, transparent, reproducible and help reduce biases. The Classical Model treats expert opinion as scientific data and its performance-based weighting of experts allows us to measure the uncertainty of a quantifiable problem. We have developed a protocol for risk assessment, including structured expert judgement, which is centred around workshop-style interactions between experts to share knowledge. The protocol borrows heavily from the framework for the risk management process of the International Organization for Standardization. We outline seven recent applications of structured judgement, mostly in seismology and volcanology. Most of them use the Classical Model to aggregate the expert judgement. We discuss challenges and insights, concluding that developing an optimal protocol for expert judgement is a continuing journey.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Developing a Training Course in Structured Expert Judgement

Nächstes Kapitel Using the Classical Model for Source Attribution of Pathogen-Caused Illnesses

Allen, T. I., Griffin, J., Leonard. M., Clark, D., & Ghasemi, H. (2018) The 2018 National Seismic Hazard Assessment for Australia: model overview. Geoscience Australia, Canberra, Australia. https://doi.org/10.11636/Record.2018.027.

Aspinall, W. (2008) Expert judgment elicitation using the classical model and EXCALIBUR. Retrieved 8 June 2018, from http://dutiosc.twi.tudelft.nl/~risk/extrafiles/EJcourse/Sheets/Aspinall%20Briefing%20Notes.pdf.

Bang, D., & Frith, C. D. (2017). Making better decisions in groups Royal Society Open Science 4 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170193.

Bebbington, M. S., Stirling, M. W., Cronin, S., Wang, T., & Jolly, G. (2018). National-level long-term eruption forecasts by expert elicitation. Bulletin of Volcanology, 80, 56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-018-1230-4.CrossRef

Bradley, B. A. (2010). NZ-specific pseudo-spectral acceleration ground motion prediction equations based on foreign models. University of Canterbury.

Bradley, B. A. (2013). A New Zealand-specific Pseudospectral acceleration Ground-Motion prediction equation for active shallow crustal earthquakes based on foreign models. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 103, 1801–1822. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120120021.CrossRef

Burgman, M. A., et al. (2011). Expert Status and Performance PLOS ONE, 6, e22998. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022998.CrossRef

Christophersen, A., Deligne, N. I., Hanea, A. M., Chardot, L., Fournier, N., & Aspinall, W. P. (2018). Bayesian Network modeling and expert elicitation for probabilistic eruption forecasting: pilot study for Whakaari/White Island. New Zealand Frontiers in Earth Science, 6, 23.CrossRef

Christophersen, A., Gerstenberger, M., & Nicol, A. (2011) The feasibility of using seed questions for weighting expert opinion in CCS risk assessment. CO2CRC.

Christophersen, A., Rhoades, D. A., Gerstenberger, M. C., Bannister, S., Becker, J., Potter, S. H., & McBride, S. (2017). Progress and challenges in operational earthquake forecasting in New Zealand. Paper presented at the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Technical Conference, Michael Fowler Centre, Wellington, 27–29 April 2017.

CO2CRC. (2011). CRC for Greenhouse Gas Technology. http://www.co2crc.com.au/ (2018).

Colson, A. R. (2016). Excalibur tutorial. Retrieved 8 June 2018, from https://www.expertsinuncertainty.net/Portals/60/ESR%20Warsaw/Excalibur%20tutorial.pdf?ver=2017-11-27-124915-117.

Cooke, R. M. (1991). Experts in uncertainty: Opinion and subjective probability in science. USA: Oxford University Press.

Cooke, R. M., ElSaadany, S., & Huang, X. (2008). On the performance of social network and likelihood-based expert weighting schemes. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 93, 745–756.CrossRef

Cooke, R. M., & Goossens, L. H. J. (1999). Procedures guide for structured expert judgment. Luxemburg.

Cooke, R. M., & Goossens, L. L. H. J. (2008). TU Delft Expert Judgment Data Base Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 93, 657–674.CrossRef

Cooke, R. M., & Solomantine, D. (1992). EXCALIBUR—integrated system for processing expert judgements. Delft, The Netherlands.

Deligne, N. I., Jolly, G. E., & Taig, T. (2018). Evaluating life-safety risk for field work on active volcanoes: VoLiST, a volcano observatory’s decision-support tool Journal of Applied Volcanology in review.

Gerstenberger, M., Christophersen, A., Buxton, R., Allinson, G., Hou, W., Leamon, G., et al. (2012). Integrated risk assessment for CCS Energy Procedia, 37, 2775–2782.

Gerstenberger, M. C., & Christophersen, A. (2016). A Bayesian network and structured expert elicitation for Otway Stage 2C: Detection of injected CO2 in a saline aquifer International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 51, 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.05.011.

Gerstenberger, M. C., Christophersen, A., Buxton, R., & Nicol, A. (2015). Bi-directional risk assessment in carbon capture and storage with Bayesian Networks. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 35, 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.01.010.CrossRef

Gerstenberger, M. C., Kaneko, Y., Fry, B., Wallace, L., Rhoades, D., Christophersen, A., & Williams, C. (2017). Probabilities of earthquakes in central New Zealand. Lower Hutt (NZ). https://doi.org/10.21420/g2fp7p.

Gerstenberger, M. C., McVerry, G. H., Rhoades, D. A., & Stirling, M. (2014). Seismic hazard modelling for the recovery of Christchurch. New Zealand Earthquake Spectra, 30, 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1193/021913EQS037M.CrossRef

Gerstenberger, M. C., Rhoades, D. A., & McVerry, G. H. (2016). A Hybrid time-dependent probabilistic seismic-hazard model for canterbury. New Zealand Seismological Research Letters, 87, 1311–1318. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220160084.CrossRef

Griffin, J., et al. (2018). Expert elicitation of model parameters for the 2018 National Seismic Hazard Assessment. Canberra, Australia: Geoscience Australia.

Hanea, A. M., McBride, M. F., Burgman, M. A., & Wintle, B. C. (2018). The value of performance weights and discussion in aggregated expert judgments. Risk Analysis, 38, 1781–1794. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12992.CrossRef

Hemming, V., Burgman, M. A., Hanea, A. M., McBride, M. F., & Wintle, B. C. (2017). A practical guide to structured expert elicitation using the IDEA protocol Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12857.CrossRef

Hemming, V., Walshe, T. V., Hanea, A. M., Fidler, F., & Burgman, M. A. (2018). Eliciting improved quantitative judgements using the IDEA protocol: A case study in natural resource management PLoS ONE, 13 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198468.

Hincks, T. K., Komorowski, J. C., Sparks, S. R., & Aspinall, W. P. (2014) Retrospective analysis of uncertain eruption precursors at La Soufrière volcano, Guadeloupe, 1975–77: volcanic hazard assessment using a Bayesian Belief Network approach. Journal of Applied Volcanology, 3, 1–26.

ISO. (2009). ISO 31000:2009 Risk management—Principles and guidelines. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.

Jenkins, C. R. et al. (2012). Safe storage and effective monitoring of CO2 in depleted gas fields Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, E35-E41 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1107255108.

Jolly, G. E., Keys, H. J. R., Procter, J. N., & Deligne, N. I. (2014). Overview of the co-ordinated risk-based approach to science and management response and recovery for the 2012 eruptions of Tongariro volcano. New Zealand Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 286, 184–207 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2014.08.028.

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Straus and Giroux, New York: Farrar.

Kaneko, Y., Wallace Laura, M., Hamling Ian, J., & Gerstenberger Matthew, C. (2018). Simple physical model for the probability of a subduction-zone earthquake following slow slip events and earthquakes: application to the Hikurangi Megathrust. New Zealand Geophysical Research Letters, 45, 3932–3941. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077641.CrossRef

Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2011). Group-based forecasting?: A social psychological analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 27, 14–40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.02.001.

Kunda, Z. (1990). The Case for Motivated Reason Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480.CrossRef

Lighttwist Software. (2008). Excalibur. Retrieved 8 June 2018, from http://www.lighttwist.net/wp/excalibur.

Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371–378.CrossRef

Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. Taylor & Francis.

Montibeller, G., & von Winterfeldt, D. (2015). Cognitive and motivational biases in decision and risk analysis risk. Analysis, 35, 1230–1251. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12360.CrossRef

Montibeller, G., & von Winterfeldt, D. (2018). Individual and group biases in value and uncertainty judgments. In L. M. A. Dias, J. Quigley (Eds.) Elicitation, vol 261. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65052-4_15.

Moore, D. A., & Healy, P. J. (2008). The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review, 115, 502–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.502.CrossRef

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Volcanic Eruptions and Their Repose, Unrest, Precursors, and Timing. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/24650.

New Zealand Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management. (2015). The Guide to the National Civil Defence Emergency Management Plan 2015.

Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175.CrossRef

Pevzner, R., Caspari, E., Gurevich, B., Dance, T., & Cinar, Y. (2015). Feasibility of CO2 plume detection using 4D seismic: CO2CRC Otway Project case study—Part 2: Detectability analysis GEOPHYSICS 80, B105-B114 https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2014-0460.1.

Pevzner, R. et al. (2017). Stage 2C of the CO2CRC Otway Project: Seismic Monitoring Operations and Preliminary Results Energy Procedia, 114, 3997–4007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1540.

Potter, S. H., Jolly, G. E., Neall, V. E., Johnston, D. M., & Scott, B. J. (2014). Communicating the status of volcanic activity: Revising New Zealand’s volcanic alert level system. Journal of Applied Volcanology, 3.

Quigley, J., Colson, A., Aspinall, W., Cooke, R. M. (2018) Elicitation in the classical model. In L. C. Dias, A. Morton, J. Quigley (Eds.) Elicitation: The science and art of structuring judgement. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65052-4_2.

Robinson, R., Van Dissen, R., & Litchfield, N. (2011). Using synthetic seismicity to evaluate seismic hazard in the Wellington region. New Zealand Geophysical Journal International, 187, 510–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05161.x.CrossRef

Sparks, R. S. J., Biggs, J., & Neuberg, J. W. (2012). Monitoring Volcanoes Science, 335, 1310–1311. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1219485.CrossRef

Stirling, M., et al. (2017). Conceptual development of a national volcanic hazard model for New Zealand frontiers in Earth. Science, 5, 51.CrossRef

Stirling, M., McVerry, G., Gerstenberger, M., Litchfield, N., Van Dissen, R., Berryman, K., Barnes, P., Wallace, L., Villamor, P., Langridge, R., Lamarche, G., Nodder, S., Reyners, M., Bradley, B., Rhoades, D., Smith, W., Nicol, A., Pettinga, J., Clark, K., & Jacobs, K. (2012). National seismic hazard model for New Zealand: 2010 update. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 102, 1514–1542. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120110170.

Trouche, E., Sander, E., & Mercier, H. (2014). Arguments, more than confidence, explain the good performance of reasoning groups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1958–1971. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037099.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.CrossRef

Wallace, L. M. et al. (2017). Large-scale dynamic triggering of shallow slow slip enhanced by overlying sedimentary wedge. Nature Geoscience, 10, 765 https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo3021.

Westen, D., Blagov, P. S., Harenski, K., Kilts, C., & Hamann, S. (2006). Neural bases of motivated reasoning: An FMRI study of emotional constraints on partisan political judgment in the 2004 U.S. Presidential election Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 18, 1947–1958. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.11.1947.CrossRef

Titel: Expert Judgement for Geological Hazards in New Zealand
verfasst von: Annemarie Christophersen
Matthew C. Gerstenberger
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Expert Judgement in Risk and Decision Analysis
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-46473-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-46474-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46474-5_15