nach oben

Erschienen in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Explicit Alignment of Requirements and Architecture in Agile Development

verfasst von : Sabine Molenaar, Tjerk Spijkman, Fabiano Dalpiaz, Sjaak Brinkkemper

Erschienen in: Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

[Context & Motivation] Requirements and architectural components are designed concurrently, with the former guiding the latter, and the latter restricting the former. [Question/problem] Effective communication between requirements engineers and software architects is often experienced as problematic. [Principal ideas/results] We present the Requirements Engineering for Software Architecture (RE4SA) model with the intention to support the communication within the development team. In RE4SA, requirements are expressed as epic stories and user stories, which are linked to modules and features, respectively, as their architectural counterparts. Additionally, we provide metrics to measure the alignment between these concepts, and we also discuss how to use the model and the usefulness of the metrics by applying both to case studies. [Contribution] The RE4SA model employs widely adopted notations and allows for explicitly relating a system’s requirements and architectural components, while the metrics make it possible to measure the alignment between requirements and architecture.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Designing a Virtual Client for Requirements Elicitation Interviews

Nächstes Kapitel Applying Distributed Cognition Theory to Agile Requirements Engineering

Ali, N., Baker, S., O’Crowley, R., Herold, S., Buckley, J.: Architecture consistency: state of the practice, challenges and requirements. Empirical Softw. Eng. 23(1), 224–258 (2018)

Apel, S., Kästner, C.: An overview of feature-oriented software development. J. Object Technol. 8(5), 49–84 (2009)CrossRef

Berry, D.M.: Evaluation of tools for hairy requirements and software engineering tasks. In: Proceedings of the RE Workshops, pp. 284–291 (2017)

Borg, M., Runeson, P., Ardö, A.: Recovering from a decade: a systematic mapping of information retrieval approaches to software traceability. Empirical Softw. Eng. 19(6), 1565–1616 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-013-9255-yCrossRef

Bosch, J.: Software architecture: the next step. In: Oquendo, F., Warboys, B.C., Morrison, R. (eds.) EWSA 2004. LNCS, vol. 3047, pp. 194–199. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24769-2_14CrossRef

Bourque, P., Fairley, R.E., et al.: Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK (R)): Version 3.0. IEEE Computer Society Press (2014)

Brinkkemper, S., Pachidi, S.: Functional architecture modeling for the software product industry. In: Babar, M.A., Gorton, I. (eds.) ECSA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6285, pp. 198–213. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15114-9_16CrossRef

Cao, L., Ramesh, B.: Agile requirements engineering practices: an empirical study. IEEE Softw. 25(1), 60–67 (2008)CrossRef

Cleland-Huang, J., Gotel, O.C., Huffman Hayes, J., Mäder, P., Zisman, A.: Software traceability: trends and future directions. In: Proceedings of the FOSE, pp. 55–69 (2014)

10.

Cleland-Huang, J., Hanmer, R.S., Supakkul, S., Mirakhorli, M.: The twin peaks of requirements and architecture. IEEE Softw. 30(2), 24–29 (2013)CrossRef

11.

Cohn, M.: User Stories Applied. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2004)

12.

Coplien, J.O., Bjørnvig, G.: Lean Architecture. Wiley, Hoboken (2011)

13.

Curtis, B., Krasner, H., Iscoe, N.: A field study of the software design process for large systems. Commun. ACM 31(11), 1268–1287 (1988)CrossRef

14.

Egyed, A., Grünbacher, P.: Automating requirements traceability: beyond the record & replay paradigm. In: Proceedings of the ASE, pp. 163–171 (2002)

15.

Fernández, D.M., et al.: Naming the pain in requirements engineering. Empirical Softw. Eng. 22(5), 2298–2338 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-016-9451-7CrossRef

16.

Gayer, S., Herrmann, A., Keuler, T., Riebisch, M., Antonino, P.O.: Lightweight traceability for the agile architect. Computer 49(5), 64–71 (2016)CrossRef

17.

Gotel, O., et al.: The quest for ubiquity: a roadmap for software and systems traceability research. In: Proceedings of RE, pp. 71–80 (2012)

18.

Gotel, O., et al.: Traceability fundamentals. In: Cleland-Huang, J., Gotel, O., Zisman, A. (eds.) Software and Systems Traceability, pp. 3–22. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2239-5_1CrossRef

19.

Hubaux, A., Tun, T.T., Heymans, P.: Separation of concerns in feature diagram languages: a systematic survey. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 45(4), 1–23 (2013)

20.

Inayat, I., Salim, S.S., Marczak, S., Daneva, M., Shamshirband, S.: A systematic literature review on agile requirements engineering practices and challenges. Comput. Hum. Behav. 51, 915–929 (2015)CrossRef

21.

Lindvall, M., Muthig, D.: Bridging the software architecture gap. Computer 41(6), 98–101 (2008)CrossRef

22.

Lucassen, G., Dalpiaz, F., Van Der Werf, J.M., Brinkkemper, S.: Bridging the twin peaks: the case of the software industry. In: Proceedings of the TwinPeaks, pp. 24–28 (2015)

23.

Lucassen, G., Dalpiaz, F., van der Werf, J.M.E., Brinkkemper, S.: Improving agile requirements: the quality user story framework and tool. Requirements Eng. 21(3), 383–403 (2016)CrossRef

24.

Lucassen, G., van de Keuken, M., Dalpiaz, F., Brinkkemper, S., Sloof, G.W., Schlingmann, J.: Jobs-to-be-done oriented requirements engineering: a method for defining job stories. In: Kamsties, E., Horkoff, J., Dalpiaz, F. (eds.) REFSQ 2018. LNCS, vol. 10753, pp. 227–243. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77243-1_14CrossRef

25.

McChesney, I.R., Gallagher, S.: Communication and co-ordination practices in software engineering projects. Inf. Softw. Technol. 46(7), 473–489 (2004)CrossRef

26.

Molenaar, S., Brinkkemper, S., Menkveld, A., Smudde, T., Blessinga, R., Dalpiaz, F.: On the nature of links between requirements and architectures: case studies on user story utilization in agile development. Technical report UU-CS-2019-008, Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University (2019). http://www.cs.uu.nl/research/techreps/repo/CS-2019/2019-008.pdf

27.

Murugesan, A., Rayadurgam, S., Heimdahl, M.: Requirements reference models revisited: accommodating hierarchy in system design. In: 2019 IEEE 27th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 177–186. IEEE (2019)

28.

Nuseibeh, B.: Weaving together requirements and architectures. Computer 34(3), 115–119 (2001)CrossRef

29.

Pfleeger, S.L., Bohner, S.A.: A framework for software maintenance metrics. In: Proceedings of Conference on Software Maintenance, pp. 320–327 (1990)

30.

Rath, M., Rendall, J., Guo, J.L.C., Cleland-Huang, J., Mäder, P.: Traceability in the wild: automatically augmenting incomplete trace links. In: Proceedings of the ICSE, pp. 834–845 (2018)

31.

Rempel, P., Mäder, P.: Estimating the implementation risk of requirements in agile software development projects with traceability metrics. In: Fricker, S.A., Schneider, K. (eds.) REFSQ 2015. LNCS, vol. 9013, pp. 81–97. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16101-3_6CrossRef

32.

Spijkman, T., Brinkkemper, S., Dalpiaz, F., Hemmer, A.F., van de Bospoort, R.: Specification of requirements and software architecture for the customisation of enterprise software. In: Proceedings of the RE Workshops, pp. 64–73 (2019)

33.

Tang, A., Liang, P., Clerc, V., Van Vliet, H.: Traceability in the co-evolution of architectural requirements and design. In: Avgeriou, P., Grundy, J., Hall, J., Lago, P., Mistrík, I. (eds.) Relating Software Requirements and Architectures, pp. 35–60. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21001-3_4CrossRef

34.

Venters, C.C., Capilla, R., Betz, S., Penzenstadler, B., Crick, T., Crouch, S., Nakagawa, E.Y., Becker, C., Carrillo, C.: Software sustainability: research and practice from a software architecture viewpoint. J. Syst. Softw. 138, 174–188 (2018)CrossRef

35.

Wautelet, Y., Heng, S., Kolp, M., Mirbel, I., Poelmans, S.: Building a rationale diagram for evaluating user story sets. In: Proceedings of the RCIS, pp. 1–12 (2016)

36.

Whitehead, J.: Collaboration in software engineering: a roadmap. In: Proceedings of FOSE, pp. 214–225 (2007)

37.

Yu, E.S.: Towards modelling and reasoning support for early-phase requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of ISRE, pp. 226–235 (1997)

38.

Zhang, Y., Witte, R., Rilling, J., Haarslev, V.: An ontology-based approach for traceability recovery. In: Proceedings of the ATEM, pp. 36–43 (2006)

39.

Zowghi, D., Nurmuliani, N.: A study of the impact of requirements volatility on software project performance. In: Proceeding of the APSEC, pp. 3–11 (2002)

Titel: Explicit Alignment of Requirements and Architecture in Agile Development
verfasst von: Sabine Molenaar
Tjerk Spijkman
Fabiano Dalpiaz
Sjaak Brinkkemper
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44428-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-44429-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44429-7_13

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"