Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Review of Managerial Science
Erschienen in: Review of Managerial Science 1/2019

23.05.2017 | Original Paper

Exploratory and exploitative innovation in family businesses: the moderating role of the family firm image and family involvement in top management

verfasst von: Unai Arzubiaga, Amaia Maseda, Txomin Iturralde

Erschienen in: Review of Managerial Science | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Drawing on innovation and family business literature, this study examines the largely overlooked family effect in exploratory and exploitative innovation–performance processes via the moderating impact of the family firm image and family involvement in the top management team (TMT). Based on a sample of 91 Spanish small and medium family firms (family SMEs), our results show some interesting findings. First, we find that while family firm image is beneficial to the exploitative innovation–firm performance relationship, it has a negative impact on the exploratory innovation–performance link. Second, we find that different forms of family involvement in the TMT have different effects on the results of exploratory and exploitative innovation processes. A higher proportion of family members in the TMT negatively impacts the positive effect that both exploratory and exploitative innovation have on firm performance. We also find that a higher number of generations involved in the TMT has a positive effect on exploratory innovation–firm performance, but a detrimental effect on exploitative innovation–firm performance. Thus, our study deepens the current understanding of exploratory and exploitative innovation in family SMEs, highlighting previously overlooked effects of family firm image and two forms of family involvement in the TMT on exploration– and exploitation–firm performance relationships. Furthermore, our findings have meaningful managerial implications for the development of an attractive family firm image and an effective TMT composition in order to improve the outcomes of exploratory and exploitative innovation processes.
Nächster Artikel Assessing ethical efficacy, workplace incivility, and turnover intention: a moderated-mediation model

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Alexiev AS, Jansen JJ, Van den Bosch FA, Volberda HW (2010) Top management team advice seeking and exploratory innovation: the moderating role of TMT heterogeneity. J Manage Stud 47(7):1343–1364
Allison TH, McKenny AF, Short JC (2013) Integrating time into family business research: using random coefficient modeling to examine temporal influences on family firm ambidexterity. Fam Bus Rev 27(1):20–34
Andersén J (2015) The absorptive capacity of family firms: how familiness affects potential and realized absorptive capacity. J Fam Bus Manag 5(1):73–89
Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J Marketing Res 14:396–402
Arosa B, Iturralde T, Maseda A (2010) Ownership structure and firm performance in non-listed firms: evidence from Spain. J Fam Bus Strategy 1(2):88–96
Arregle JL, Hitt MA, Sirmon DG, Very P (2007) The development of organizational social capital: attributes of family firms. J Manage Stud 44(1):73–95
Astrachan JH, Klein SB, Smyrnios KX (2002) The F-PEC scale of family influence: a proposal for solving the family business definition problem. Fam Bus Rev 15(1):45–58
Azim MI (2012) Corporate governance mechanisms and their impact on company performance: a structural equation model analysis. Aust J Manage 37(3):481–505
Barkema HG, Shvyrkov O (2007) Does top management team diversity promote or hamper foreign expansion? Strategic Manage J 28(7):663–680
Basco R (2013) The family’s effect on family firm performance: a model testing the demographic and essence approaches. J Fam Bus Strategy 4(1):42–66
Basco R (2014) Exploring the influence of the family upon firms performance: does strategic behaviour matter? Int Small Bus J 32:967–995
Benner MJ, Tushman ML (2003) Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited. Acad Manage Rev 28(2):238–256
Block JH, Jaskiewicz P, Miller D (2011) Ownership versus management effects on performance in family and founder companies: a Bayesian reconciliation. J Fam Bus Strategy 2(4):232–245
Boisvert J, Burton S (2011) Towards a better understanding of factors affecting transfer of brand associations. J Consum Mark 28(1):57–66
Brannon DL, Wiklund J, Haynie JM (2013) The varying effects of family relationship in entrepreneurial teams. Entrep Theory Pract 37(1):107–132
Brettel M, Rottenberger JD (2013) Examining the link between entrepreneurial orientation and learning processes in small and medium-sized enterprises. J Small Bus Manage 51(4):471–490
Burgelman RA, Hitt MA (2007) Entrepreneurial actions, innovation, and appropriability. Strateg Entrep J 1(3–4):349–352
Buyl T, Boone C, Hendriks W, Matthyssens P (2011) Top management team functional diversity and firm performance: the moderating role of CEO characteristics. J Manage Stud 48(1):151–177
Campbell DT, Fiske DW (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 56(2):81–91
Capital FS (2009) Family capital, family business and free enterprise. Fam Bus Rev 22(3):193–195
Carmines EG, Zeller RA (1979) Reliability and validity assessment, vol 17. Sage, California
Carnes CM, Ireland RD (2013) Familiness and innovation: resource bundling as the missing link. Entrep Theory Pract 37(6):1399–1419
Casillas JC, Moreno AM, Barbero JL (2011) Entrepreneurial orientation of family firms: family and environmental dimensions. J Fam Bus Strategy 2(2):90–100
Chesbrough H (2003) The logic of open innovation: managing intellectual property. Calif Manage Rev 45(3):33–58
Chin WW (1998) The partial least squares approach to structural equation. Mod Methods Bus Res 295(2):295–336
Chirico F, Sirmon DG, Sciascia S, Mazzola P (2011) Resource orchestration in family firms: investigating how entrepreneurial orientation, generational involvement, and participative strategy affect performance. Strateg Entrep J 5(4):307–326
Chrisman JJ, Chua JH, Sharma P (2005) Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrep Theory Pract 29(5):555–576
Chrisman JJ, Chua JH, De Massis A, Frattini F, Wright M (2015) The ability and willingness paradox in family firm innovation. J Prod Innovat Manag 32(3):310–318
Chua JH, Chrisman JJ, Sharma P (1999) Defining the family business by behavior. Entrep Theory Pract 23(4):19–39
Classen N, Van Gils A, Bammens Y, Carree M (2012) Accessing resources from innovation partners: the search breadth of family SMEs. J Small Bus Manage 50(2):191–215
Classen N, Carree M, Van Gils A, Peters B (2014) Innovation in family and non-family SMEs: an exploratory analysis. Small Bus Econ 42(3):595–609
Cohen WM (2010) Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance. In: Hall BN, Rosenberg N (eds) Handbook of the economics of innovation, 1st edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 129–213
Colombo MG, Franzoni C, Rossi-Lamastra C (2015) Internal social capital and the attraction of early contributions in crowdfunding. Entrep Theory Pract 39(1):75–100
Cooper MJ, Upton N, Seaman S (2005) Customer relationship management: a comparative analysis of family and nonfamily business practices. J Small Bus Manage 43(3):242–256
Craig JB, Dibrell C, Davis PS (2008) Leveraging family-based brand identity to enhance firm competitiveness and performance in family businesses. J Small Bus Manage 46(3):351–371
Cruz C, Nordqvist M (2012) Entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: a generational perspective. Small Bus Econ 38(1):33–49
Danneels E (2003) Tight–loose coupling with customers: the enactment of customer orientation. Strategic Manage J 24(6):559–576
Dawes J (2008) Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? Int J Market Res 50(1):61–104
Dawson A, Mussolino D (2014) Exploring what makes family firms different: discrete or overlapping constructs in the literature? J Fam Bus Strategy 5(2):169–183
De Clercq D, Belausteguigoitia I (2015) Intergenerational strategy involvement and family firms’ innovation pursuits: the critical roles of conflict management and social capital. J Fam Bus Strategy 6(3):178–189
De Clercq D, Dimov D, Thongpapanl NT (2010) The moderating impact of internal social exchange processes on the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship. J Bus Ventur 25(1):87–103
De Massis A, Frattini F, Lichtenthaler U (2013) Research on technological innovation in family firms: present debates and future directions. Fam Bus Rev 26(1):10–31
De Massis A, Kotlar J, Chua JH, Chrisman JJ (2014) Ability and willingness as sufficiency conditions for family-oriented particularistic behavior: implications for theory and empirical studies. J Small Bus Manage 52(2):344–364
De Massis A, Di Minin A, Frattini F (2015a) Family-driven innovation. Calif Manage Rev 58(1):5–19
De Massis A, Frattini F, Pizzurno E, Cassia L (2015b) Product innovation in family versus nonfamily firms: an exploratory analysis. J Small Bus Manage 53(1):1–36
De Massis A, Kotlar J, Frattini F, Chrisman JJ, Nordqvist M (2016) Family governance at work organizing for new product development in family SMEs. Fam Bus Rev 29(2):189–213
Deephouse DL, Jaskiewicz P (2013) Do family firms have better reputations than non-family firms? An integration of socioemotional walth and social identity theories. J Manag Stud 50(3):337–360
Dess GG, Robinson RB (1984) Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: the case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strateg Manage J 5(3):265–273
Diéguez-Soto J, López-Delgado P, Rojo-Ramírez A (2015) Identifying and classifying family businesses. Rev Manag Sci 9(3):603–634
Discua-Cruz A, Howorth C, Hamilton E (2013) Intrafamily entrepreneurship: the formation and membership of family entrepreneurial teams. Entrep Theory Prac 37(1):17–46
Dyer WG (2003) The family: the missing variable in organizational research. Entrep Theory Pract 27:401–416
Dyer WG, Whetten DA (2006) Family firms and social responsibility: preliminary evidence from the S&P 500. Entrep Theory Pract 30(6):785–802
Ensley MD, Pearson AW (2005) An exploratory comparison of the behavioral dynamics of top management teams in family and nonfamily new ventures: cohesion, conflict, potency, and consensus. Entrepr Theory Pract 29(3):267–284
Falk RF, Miller NB (1992) A primer for soft modelling. University of Akron Press, Akron
Fombrun C, Shanley M (1990) What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Acad Manage J 33(2):233–258
Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18:39–50
Fukuyama F (1996) Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press, London
García-Álvarez E, López-Sintas J, Gonzalvo PS (2002) Socialization patterns of successors in first-to second-generation family businesses. Fam Bus Rev 15(3):189–203
Gefen D, Straub D, Boudreau MC (2000) Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 4(7):1–77
Geisser S (1975) The predictive sample reuse method with applications. J Am Stat Assoc 70(350):320–328
George G (2005) Slack resources and the performance of privately held firms. Acad Manage J 48(4):661–676
Gibson CB, Birkinshaw J (2004) The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad Manage J 47(2):209–226
Godfrey PC (2005) The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: a risk management perspective. Acad Manage Rev 30(4):777–798
Goel S, Jones RJ (2016) Entrepreneurial exploration and exploitation in family business: a systematic review and future directions. Fam Bus Rev 29(1):94–120
Grewal R, Chakravarty A, Saini A (2010) Governance mechanisms in business-to-business electronic markets. J Marketing 74(4):45–62
Gupta AK, Smith KG, Shalley CE (2006) The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad Manag J 49:693–706
Güttel WH, Konlechner SW, Trede JK (2015) Standardized individuality versus individualized standardization: the role of the context in structurally ambidextrous organizations. Rev Manag Sci 9(2):261–284
Habbershon TG, Williams M, MacMillan IC (2003) A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. J Bus Ventur 18(4):451–465
Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Mena JA (2012) An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. J Acad Market Sci 40:414–433
Hambrick DC (2007) Upper echelons theory: an update. Acad Manage Rev 32(2):334–343
Harman HH (1967) Modem factor analysis. University of Chicago, Chicago
He Z, Wong P (2004) Exploration versus exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organ Sci 15(4):481–494
Heavey C, Simsek Z (2013) Top management compositional effects on corporate entrepreneurship: the moderating role of perceived technological uncertainty. J Prod Innovat Manage 30(5):837–855
Henseler J, Ringle C, Sinkovics R (2009) The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Adv Int Mar 20:277–319
Hiebl MRW (2013) Risk aversion in family firms: what do we really know? J Risk Finance 14(1):49–70
Hiebl MRW (2015) Family involvement and organizational ambidexterity in later-generation family businesses: a framework for further investigation. Manage Decis 53(5):1061–1082
Hofstede GH, Hofstede G (2001) Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage, California
Hulland J (1999) Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strateg Manage J 20(2):195–204
Huybrechts J, Voordeckers W, Lybaert N, Vandemaele S (2011) The distinctiveness of family-firm intangibles: a review and suggestions for future research. J Manag Organ 17(2):268–287
Inkpen A, Tsang EW (2005) Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Acad Manage Rev 30(1):146–165
Jensen MB, Johnson B, Lorenz E, Lundvall BA (2007) Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Res Policy 36(5):680–693
Kammerlander N, Burger D, Fust A, Fueglistaller U (2015) Exploration and exploitation in established small and medium-sized enterprises: the effect of CEOs’ regulatory focus. J Bus Ventur 30(4):582–602
Kashmiri S, Mahajan V (2010) What’s in a name? An analysis of the strategic behavior of family firms. Int J Res Mark 27(3):271–280
Kellermanns FW, Eddleston KA (2006) Corporate entrepreneurship in family firms: a family perspective. Entrep Theory Pract 30(6):809–830
Kleijnen M, Lee N, Wetzels M (2009) An exploration of consumer resistance to innovation and its antecedents. J Econ Psychol 30:344–357
Klein SB, Astrachan JH, Smyrnios KX (2005) The F-PEC scale of family influence: construction, validation, and further implication for theory. Entrep Theory Pract 29(3):321–339
Kollmann T, Stöckmann C (2014) Filling the entrepreneurial orientation–performance gap: the mediating effects of exploratory and exploitative innovations. Entrep Theory Pract 38(5):1001–1026
König A, Kammerlander N, Enders A (2013) The family innovator’s dilemma: how family influence affects the adoption of discontinuous technologies by incumbent firms. Acad Manage Rev 38(3):418–441
Kortmann S (2014) The mediating role of strategic orientations on the relationship between ambidexterity-oriented decisions and innovative ambidexterity. J Prod Innovat Manage 32(5):666–684
Kotlar J, De Massis A (2013) Goal setting in family firms: goal diversity, social interactions, and collective commitment to family-centered goals. Entrep Theory Pract 37(6):1263–1288
Kotlar J, Fang H, De Massis A, Frattini F (2014a) Profitability goals, control goals, and the R&D investment decisions of family and nonfamily firms. J Prod Innovat Manage 31(6):1128–1145
Kotlar J, De Massis A, Fang H, Frattini F (2014b) Strategic reference points in family firms. Small Bus Econ 43(3):597–619
Kraiczy ND, Hack A, Kellermanns FW (2014) New product portfolio performance in family firms. J Bus Res 67(6):1065–1073
Kraus S, Pohjola M, Koponen A (2012) Innovation in family firms: an empirical analysis linking organizational and managerial innovation to corporate success. Rev Manag Sci 6(3):265–286
Le Breton-Miller I, Miller D (2006) Why do some family businesses out-compete? Governance, long-term orientations, and sustainable capability. Entrep Theory Pract 30(6):731–746
Liang H, Saraf N, Hu Q, Xue Y (2007) Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. Manag Informat Syst 31(1):59–87
Ling Y, Kellermanns FW (2010) The effects of family firm specific sources of TMT diversity: the moderating role of information exchange frequency. J Manage Stud 47(2):322–344
Litz RA, Kleysen RF (2001) Your old men shall dream dreams, your young men shall see visions: toward a theory of family firm innovation with help from the Brubeck family. Fam Bus Rev 14(4):335–352
Liu J, Chen J, Tao Y (2015) Innovation performance in new product development teams in china’s technology ventures: the role of behavioral integration dimensions and collective efficacy. J Prod Innovat Manage 32(1):29–44
Lubatkin MH, Simsek Z, Ling Y, Veiga JF (2006) Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: the pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. J Manage 32(5):646–672
Lumpkin GT, Dess GG (2001) Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: the moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. J Bus Ventur 16(5):429–451
Lumpkin GT, Steier L, Wright M (2011) Strategic entrepreneurship in family business. Strateg Entrep J 5(4):285–306
Machold S, Huse M, Minichilli A, Nordqvist M (2011) Board leadership and strategy involvement in small firms: a team production approach. Corp Gov 19(4):368–383
Mahto RV, Davis PS, Pearce II, John A, Robinson RB Jr (2010) Satisfaction with firm performance in family businesses. Entrep Theory Pract 34(5):985–1001
March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2(1):71–87
Marchisio G, Mazzola P, Sciascia S, Miles M, Astrachan J (2010) Corporate venturing in family business: the effects on the family and its members. Entrep Reg Dev 22(3–4):349–377
Martinez-Romero MJ, Rojo-Ramirez AA (2015) Socioemotional wealth’s implications in the calculus of the minimum rate of return required by family businesses’ owners. Rev Manag Sci. doi:10.​1007/​s11846-015-0181-9
Matzler K, Veider V, Hautz J, Stadler C (2015) The impact of family ownership, management, and governance on innovation. J Prod Innovat Manage 32(3):319–333
McGrath RG (2001) Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Acad Manage J 44(1):118–131
Memili E, Eddleston KA, Kellermanns FW, Zellweger TM, Barnett T (2010) The critical path to family firm success through entrepreneurial risk taking and image. J Fam Bus Strategy 1(4):200–209
Miller D, Le Breton-Miller I (2006) Family governance and firm performance: agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Fam Bus Rev 19(1):73–87
Miller D, Le Breton-Miller I, Scholnick B (2008) Stewardship versus stagnation: an empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. J Manage Stud 45(1):51–78
Miller D, Le Breton-Miller I, Lester RH (2013) Family firm governance, strategic conformity and performance: institutional versus strategic perspectives. Organ Sci 24:189–209
Minichilli A, Corbetta G, MacMillan IC (2010) Top management teams in family-controlled companies: ‘Familiness’, ‘faultlines’, and their impact on financial performance. J Manage Stud 47(2):205–222
Moss TW, Payne GT, Moore CB (2014) Strategic consistency of exploration and exploitation in family businesses. Fam Bus Rev 27(1):51–71
Naldi L, Nordqvist M, Sjöberg K, Wiklund J (2007) Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and performance in family firms. Fam Bus Rev 20(1):33–47
Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York
Orth UR, Green MT (2009) Consumer loyalty to family versus non-family business: the roles of store image, trust and satisfaction. J Retail Consum Serv 16(4):248–259
Patel PC, Chrisman JJ (2014) Risk abatement as a strategy for R&D investments in family firms. Strateg Manage J 35(4):617–627
Patel PC, Fiet JO (2011) Knowledge combination and the potential advantages of family firms in searching for opportunities. Entrep Theory Pract 35(6):1179–1197
Patel PC, Kohtamäki M, Parida V, Wincent J (2015) Entrepreneurial orientation-as-experimentation and firm performance: the enabling role of absorptive capacity. Strateg Manage J 36(11):1739–1749
Peng DX, Lai F (2012) Using partial least squares in operations management research: a practical guideline and summary of past research. J Oper Manag 30(6):467–480
Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manage 12(4):531–544
Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879–891
Raisch S, Birkinshaw J (2008) Organizational ambidexterity: antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. J Manage 34(3):375–409
Raisch S, Birkinshaw J, Probst G, Tushman ML (2009) Organizational ambidexterity: balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organ Sci 20(4):685–695
Rego A, Oliveira P, Rosado P, Habib N (2014) Product innovation in resource-poor environments: three research streams. J Prod Innovat Manage 31(2):202–210
Reisinger S, Lehner JM (2015) Navigating a family business through a changing environment: findings from a longitudinal study. Rev Manag Sci 9(2):411–429
Rindova VP, Williamson IO, Petkova AP, Sever JM (2005) Being good or being known: an empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Acad Manage J 48(6):1033–1049
Ringle CM, Wende S, Will A (2005) SmartPLS 2.0 (beta). University of Hamburg, Germany
Robeson D, O’Connor GC (2013) Boards of directors, innovation, and performance: an exploration at multiple levels. J Prod Innovat Manag 30(4):608–625
Sageder M, Mitter C, Feldbauer-Durstmüller B (2016) Image and reputation of family firms: a systematic literature review of the state of research. DOI, Rev Manag Sci. doi:10.​1007/​s11846-016-0216-x
Salvato C, Melin L (2008) Creating value across generations in family-controlled businesses: the role of family social capital. Fam Bus Rev 21(3):259–276
Sanchez-Famoso V, Maseda A, Iturralde T (2014) The role of internal social capital in organisational innovation. An empirical study of family firms. Eur Manag J 32(6):950–962
Schuster T, Holtbrügge D (2014) Resource dependency, innovative strategies, and firm performance in BOP markets. J Prod Innovat Manage 31(S1):43–59
Sciascia S, Mazzola P, Chirico F (2013) Generational involvement in the top management team of family firms: exploring nonlinear effects on entrepreneurial orientation. Entrep Theory Pract 37(1):69–85
Sciascia S, Mazzola P, Kellermanns FW (2014) Family management and profitability in private family-owned firms: introducing generational stage and the socioemotional wealth perspective. J Fam Bus Strategy 5(2):131–137
Sciascia S, Nordqvist M, Mazzola P, De Massis A (2015) Family ownership and R&D intensity in small-and medium-sized firms. J Prod Innovat Manage 32(3):349–360
Sharma P (2004) An overview of the field of family business studies: current status and directions for the future. Fam Bus Rev 17(1):1–36
Sharma P, Irving PG (2005) Four bases of family business successor commitment: antecedents and consequences. Entrep Theory Prac 29(1):13–33
Sharma P, Salvato C (2011) Commentary: exploiting and exploring new opportunities over life cycle stages of family firms. Entrep Theory Prac 35(6):1199–1205
Shu C, Page AL, Gao S, Jiang X (2012) Managerial ties and firm innovation: is knowledge creation a missing link? J Prod Innovat Manage 29(1):125–143
Sieger P, Bernhard F, Frey U (2011) Affective commitment and job satisfaction among non-family employees: investigating the roles of justice perceptions and psychological ownership. J Fam Bus Strategy 2(2):78–89
Simon M, Shrader RC (2012) Entrepreneurial actions and optimistic overconfidence: the role of motivated reasoning in new product introductions. J Bus Ventur 27(3):291–309
Sirmon DG, Hitt MA (2003) Managing resources: linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrep Theory Pract 27(4):339–358
Sorenson RL, Goodpaster KE, Hedberg PR, Yu A (2009) The family point of view, family social capital, and firm performance an exploratory test. Fam Bus Rev 22(3):239–253
Stadler C, Rajwani T, Karaba F (2014) Solutions to the exploration/exploitation dilemma: networks as a new level of analysis. Int J Manag Rev 16(2):172–193
Steiger T, Duller C, Hiebl MRW (2015) No consensus in sight: an analysis of ten years of family business definitions in empirical research studies. J Enterp Cult 23(01):25–62
Stone M (1974) Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. J R Stat Soc 36(2):111–133
Stubner S, Blarr WH, Brands C, Wulf T (2012) Organizational ambidexterity and family firm performance. J Small Bus Entrep 25(2):217–229
Sundaramurthy C, Kreiner GE (2008) Governing by managing identity boundaries: the case of family businesses. Entrep Theory Pract 32(3):415–436
Talke K, Salomo S, Rost K (2010) How top management team diversity affects innovativeness and performance via the strategic choice to focus on innovation fields. Res Policy 39(7):907–918
Tenenhaus M, Vinzi VE, Chatelin YM, Lauro C (2005) PLS path modeling. Comput Stat Data Anal 48(1):159–205
Vallejo-Martos MC (2011) The organizational culture of family firms as a key factor of competitiveness. J Bus Econ Manage 12(3):451–481
Veider V, Matzler K (2015) The abiltiy and willingness of family-controlled firms to arrive at organizational ambidexterity. J Fam Bus Strategy 7(2):106–116
Venkatraman NU, Ramanujam V (1987) Measurement of business economic performance: an examination of method convergence. J Manage 13(1):109–122
Villalonga B, Amit R (2009) How are US family firms controlled? Rev Financ Stud 22(8):3047–3091
Voordeckers W, Van Gils A, Van den Heuvel J (2007) Board composition in small and medium-sized family firms. J Small Bus Manage 45(1):137–156
Yang H, Phelps C, Steensma HK (2010) Learning from what others have learned from you: the effects of knowledge spillovers on originating firms. Acad Manage J 53(2):371–389
Zahra SA, Filatotchev I (2004) Governance of the entrepreneurial threshold firm: a knowledge-based perspective. J Manage Stud 41(5):885–897
Zahra SA, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad Manage Rev 27(2):185–203
Zahra SA, Neubaum DO, Larrañeta B (2007) Knowledge sharing and technological capabilities: the moderating role of family involvement. J Bus Res 60(10):1070–1079
Zellweger TM, Astrachan JH (2008) On the emotional value of owning a firm. Fam Bus Rev 21(4):347–363
Zellweger TM, Eddleston KA, Kellermanns FW (2010) Exploring the concept of familiness: introducing family firm identity. J Fam Bus Strategy 1(1):54–63
Zellweger TM, Nason RS, Nordqvist M, Brush CG (2013) Why do family firms strive for nonfinancial goals? An organizational identity perspective. Entrep Theory Pract 37(2):229–248
Metadaten
Titel
Exploratory and exploitative innovation in family businesses: the moderating role of the family firm image and family involvement in top management
verfasst von
Unai Arzubiaga
Amaia Maseda
Txomin Iturralde
Publikationsdatum
23.05.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Review of Managerial Science / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1863-6683
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-6691
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0239-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Review of Managerial Science 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Review Paper

Price discovery of German index derivatives during financial turmoil

Original Paper

Strong shareholder rights, internal capital allocation efficiency, and the moderating role of market competition and external financing needs

Original Paper

Organizational wisdom practices and firm product innovation

Original Paper

Assessing ethical efficacy, workplace incivility, and turnover intention: a moderated-mediation model

Original Paper

Did UEFA’s financial fair play harm competition in European football leagues?

Review Paper

Entrepreneurship research: mapping intellectual structures and research trends