Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The present literature review builds on the results of 50 research articles published from 2000 until 2016. All these studies have successfully accomplished various learning tasks in the domain of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education using three-dimensional (3-D) multi-user virtual worlds for Primary, Secondary and Higher education, in order to: (a) present an overview about the potential contribution of this technology in practice-based perspectives on knowledge and learning; (b) identify the theoretical underpinnings based on contemporary learning theories and pedagogical approaches that leverage content design characteristics, with the respect to the constructs of their instructional design methods; (c) suggest a synthesis of the relevant literature about how the utilization of 3-D multi-user virtual worlds have affected positively learning outcomes based on students’ achievements; (d) concretize the educational potential and instructional affordances covering the pedagogical (socio-) cognitive, technological-operational and financial perspectives; and lastly (e) propose an instructional design workflow to contextualize pedagogical content design principles for the implementation of different learning scenarios in STEM courses. The overviewed articles ascertained that 3-D multi-user virtual worlds have many instructional and technological affordances as candidate learning platforms for different educational levels, influencing to a large extent students’ attendance, knowledge transfer, skill acquisition, hands-on digital experience and positive attitudes in laboratory experimental exercises. This technology gives to users the opportunity to manage learning materials more effectively and efficiently during the teaching process. The vast majority of educational benefits and potential enhanced the degree of their engagement and participation, contributing positively to their achievements.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
August, S. E., Hammers, M. L., Murphy, D. B., Neyer, A., Gueye, P., & Thames, R. (2016). Virtual engineering sciences learning lab: giving STEM education a second life. IEEE Transactions on. Learning Technology, 9(1), 18–30.
Barab, S., Michael, T., Tyler, D., Robert, C., & Hakan, T. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1), 86–107. CrossRef
Barab, S., Pettyjohn, P., Gresalfi, M., Volk, C., & Solomou, M. (2012). Game-based curriculum and transformational play: Designing to meaningfully positioning person, content, and context. Computers & Education, 58(1), 518–533. CrossRef
Bell, M. W. (2008). Toward a definition of “virtual worlds. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 1(1).
Beltrán Sierra, L. M., Gutiérrez, R. S., & Garzón-Castro, C. L. (2012). Second Life as a support element for learning electronic related subjects: A real case. Computers & Education, 58(2), 291–302. CrossRef
Bouta, H., Retalis, S., & Paraskeva, F. (2012). Utilizing a collaborative macro-script to enhance student engagement: A mixed method study in a 3-D virtual environment. Computers & Education, 58(1), 501–517. CrossRef
Bronack, S., Riedl, R., & Tashner, J. (2006). Learning in the Zone: A social constructivist framework for distance education in a 3-dimensional virtual world. Interactive Learning Environments, 14(3), 219–232. CrossRef
Burgess, M., Slate, J., Rojas-LeBouef, A., & LaPrairie, K. (2010). Teaching and learning in Second Life: Using the community of inquiry (CoI) model to support online instruction with graduate students in instructional technology. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(2), 84–88. CrossRef
Capraro, R. & Slough, S. (2013). Why PBL? Why STEM? Why Now? An Introduction to STEM Project-Based Learning: An Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Approach. In R., Capraro, M. Capraro & Morgan, J. STEM Project-Based Learning: An Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) approach (pp. 1–5). USA: Sense publishers.
Chen, X. & Thomas, W. (2009). Students who study science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in post-secondary education. NCES 2009–161. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Choi, B., & Baek, Y. (2011). Exploring factors of media characteristic influencing flow in learning through virtual worlds. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2382–2394. CrossRef
Coban, M., Karakus, T., Karaman, A., Gunay, F., & Goktas, Y. (2015). Technical Problems Experienced in the Transformation of Virtual Worlds into an Education Environment and Coping Strategies. Educational Technology & Society, 18(1), 37–49.
Corbit, M. (2002). Building virtual worlds for informal science learning (SciCentr and SciFair) in the active worlds educational universe (AWEDU). Teleoperators and Virtual. Environments, 11(1), 55–67.
Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10–32. CrossRef
Dass, S., Dabbagh, N., & Clark, K. (2011). Using virtual worlds: What the research says. The Quarterly review of Distance Education, 12(2), 95–111.
Davis, T. (2012). Affordances of virtual worlds to support STEM project-based learning. In R., Capraro, M. Capraro & Morgan, J. STEM Project-Based Learning: An Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) approach (pp. 77–84). USA: Sense publishers.
de Freitas, S., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Liarokapis, F., Magoulas, G., & Poulovassilis, A. (2010). Learning as immersive experiences: Using the four-dimensional framework for designing and evaluating immersive learning experiences in a virtual world. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 69–85. CrossRef
De Lucia, A., Francese, R., Passero, I., & Tortora, G. (2009). Development and evaluation of a virtual campus on Second Life: The case of second DMI. Computers & Education, 52(1), 220–233. CrossRef
de Noyelles, A., & Seo, K. (2012). Inspiring equal contribution and opportunity in a 3-D multi-user virtual environment: Bringing together men gamers and women non-gamers in Second Life. Computers & Education, 58(1), 21–29. CrossRef
Dickey, M. (2003). Teaching in 3-D: pedagogical affordances and constraints of 3-D virtual worlds for synchronous distance learning. Distance Education, 24(1), 105–121. CrossRef
Dickey, M. (2005). Three-dimensional virtual worlds and distance learning: two case studies of active worlds as a medium for distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 439–461. CrossRef
Duncan, I., Miller, A., & Jiang, S. (2012). A taxonomy of virtual world’s usage in education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 949–964. CrossRef
Erlandson, B., Nelson, B., & Savenye, W. (2010). Collaboration modality, cognitive load, and science inquiry learning in virtual inquiry environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(6), 693–710. CrossRef
Esteves, M., Fonseca, B., Morgado, L., & Martins, P. (2011). Improving teaching and learning of computer programming through the use of the Second Life virtual world. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 624–637. CrossRef
Fiedler, M., & Haruvy, E. (2009). The lab versus the virtual lab and virtual field—An experimental investigation of trust games with communication. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72(2), 716–724. CrossRef
Girvan, C., &, Savage, T. (2010). Identifying an appropriate pedagogy for virtual worlds: A Communal Constructivism case study, Computers & Education, 55(1), 342–349
Girvan, C., Tangney, B. &, Savage, T. (2013). SLurtles: Supporting constructionist learning in Second Life. Computers & Education, 61(1), 115–132.
Glancy, A. W. & Moore, T. J., (2013). Theoretical Foundations for Effective STEM Learning Environments. Engineering Education. Working Papers. Paper 1
Gregory, S., Scutter, S., Jacka, L., McDonald, M., Farley, H., & Newman, C. (2015). Barriers and Enablers to the Use of Virtual Worlds in Higher Education: An Exploration of Educator Perceptions, Attitudes and Experiences. Educational Technology & Society, 18(1), 3–12.
Griol, D., Molina, J., de Miguel, A. S., & Callejas, Z. (2012). A proposal to create learning environments in virtual worlds integrating advanced educative resources. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 18(18), 2516–2541.
Han, S. Y., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). How science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) project based learning (PBL) affects high, middle, and low achievers differently: The impact of student factors on achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. doi: 10.1007/s10763–014–9526-0.
Hernandez, P. R., Bodin, R., Elliott, J. W., Ibrahim, B., Rambo-Hernandez, K. E., Chen, T. W., et al. (2014). Connecting the STEM dots: measuring the effect of an integrated engineering design intervention. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(1), 107–120. CrossRef
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2010). Use of three-dimensional (3-D) immersive virtual worlds in K-12 and higher education settings: a review of the research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 33–55. CrossRef
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12(1), 45–58. CrossRef
Hickey, D. T., Ingram-Goble, A. A., & Jameson, E. M. (2009). Designing assessments and assessing designs in virtual educational environments. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(2), 187–208. CrossRef
Ibáñez, M., Rueda, J., Morillo, D., & Kloos, C. (2012). Creating test questions for 3-D collaborative virtual worlds: The World of Questions authoring environment. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 18(18), 2556–2575.
Inman, C., Wright, V., & Hartman, J. (2010). Use of Second Life in K-12 and higher education: A review of research. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(1), 44–63.
Jamaludin, A., Chee, Y. S., & Ho, C. M. L. (2009). Fostering argumentative knowledge construction through enactive role play in second life. Computers & Education, 53(2), 317–329. CrossRef
Jarmon, L., Traphagan, T., Mayrath, M., & Trivedi, A. (2009). Virtual world teaching, experiential learning, and assessment: An interdisciplinary communication course in Second Life. Computers & Education, 53(2), 169–182. CrossRef
Keskitalo, T., Pyykkö, E., & Ruokamo, H. (2011). Exploring the meaningful learning of students in Second Life. Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 16–26.
Ketelhut, D. J. (2007). The impact of student self-efficacy on scientific inquiry skills: an exploratory investigation in river city, a multi-user virtual environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 99–111. CrossRef
Khalil, M., & Ebner, M. (2015). A STEM MOOC for School Children – What Does Learning Analytics tell us? Proceedings of 2015 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL). IEEE: Florence, Italy Retrieved from http://www.weef2015.eu/Proceedings_WEEF2015/proceedings/papers/Contribution1431.pdf.
Kim, H., & Ke, F. (2016). Effects of game-based learning in an OpenSim-supported virtual environment on mathematical performance. Interactive Learning Environments. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2016.1167744.
Konstantinidis, A., Tsiatsos, T., Terzidou, T., & Pomportsis, A. (2009). Collaborative virtual learning environments: design and evaluation. Multimedia Tools & Applications, 44(2), 279–304. CrossRef
Konstantinidis, A., Tsiatsos, T., Terzidou, T., & Pomportsis, A. (2010). Fostering collaborative learning in Second Life: Metaphors and affordances. Computers & Education, 55(3), 603–615.
Koutsabasis, P., & Vosinakis, S. (2012). Rethinking HCI education for design: problem-based learning and virtual worlds at an HCI design studio. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 28(8), 485–499. CrossRef
Koutsabasis, P., Vosinakis, S., Malisova, K., & Paparounas, N. (2012). On the value of virtual worlds for collaborative design. Design Studies, 33(4), 357–390. CrossRef
Laboy-Rush, D. (2012). Integrated STEM Education through Project-Based Learning. USA.
Lee, M. (2009). How can 3-D virtual worlds be used to support collaborative learning? An analysis of cases from the literature. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge society, 5(1), 149–158.
Lim, C., Nonis, D., & Hedberg, J. (2006). Gaming in a 3-D multi-user virtual environment: engaging students in Science lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 211–231. CrossRef
Livingstone, D., Kemp, J., & Edgar, E. (2008). From multi-user virtual environment to 3-D virtual learning environment. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology, 16(3), 139–150. CrossRef
Lorenzo, C. M., Sicilia, M. A., & Sánchez, S. (2012). Studying the effectiveness of multi-user immersive environments for collaborative evaluation tasks. Computers & Education, 59(2), 1361–1376. CrossRef
Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., Cifuentes, L., Kwok, O., & Davis, T. J. (2013). Exploring 3-D virtual reality technology for spatial ability and chemistry achievement. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 579–590. CrossRef
Meyrick, M. K. (2011). How STEM education impress student learning. Meridian K-12 School Computer Technologies. Journal, 14(1), 1–6.
Mikropoulos, A., & Natsis, A. (2011). Educational virtual environments: A ten-year review of empirical research (1999–2009). Computers & Education, 56(2), 769–780. CrossRef
Mueller, D., & Strohmeier, S. (2011). Design characteristics of virtual learning environments: state of research. Computers & Education, 57(2), 2505–2516. CrossRef
National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER). (2010). The STEM cohesion programme: final report. Retrieved from 12 October 2014 https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/182142/DFE-RR147.pdf
National Research Council (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research (Committee on Integrated STEM education). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Navruz, B., Erdogan, N., Bicer, A., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Would a STEM school ‘by any other name smell as sweet’? International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 1(2), 67–75.
Nelson, B. C., & Ketelhut, D. J. (2007). Scientific inquiry in educational multi-user virtual environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 265–283. CrossRef
Okutsu, M., DeLaurentis, D., Brophy, S., & Lambert, J. (2013). Teaching an aerospace engineering design course via virtual worlds: A comparative assessment of learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 60(2), 288–298. CrossRef
Omale, N., Hung, W.-C., Luetkehans, L., & Cooke-Plagwitz, J. (2009). Learning in 3-D multi-user environments: Exploring the use of unique 3-D attributes for online problem-based learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(3), 480–495. CrossRef
Pearson, A., White, H., Bath-Hextall, F., Apostolo, J., Salmond, S., & Kirkpatrick, P. (2014). Methodology for JBI mixed methods systematic reviews. Australia: The Joanna Briggs Institute.
Pellas, N. (2014). Bolstering the quality and integrity of online collaborative courses at university-level with the conjunction of Sloodle and open simulator. Education and Information Technologies, 21(5), 1007–1032. CrossRef
Pellas, N. (2016). An exploration of interrelationships among presence indicators of a community of inquiry in a 3D game-like environment for high school programming courses. Interactive Learning Environments. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2015.1127819.
Pellas, N., & Kazanidis, I. (2014). The impact of computer self-efficacy, situational interest and academic self-concept in virtual communities of inquiry during the distance learning procedures through Second Life. World Wide Web Journal, 17(4), 695–722. CrossRef
Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrović, V. M., & Jovanović, K. (2016). Virtual Laboratories for Education in Science, Technology, and Engineering: A Review. Computers & Education. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002.
Prendinger, H., Brandherm, B., & Ullrich, S. (2012). A simulation framework for sensor-based systems in Second Life. Presence Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 18(6), 468–477. CrossRef
President’s Council of Advisors on Science & Technology (PCST) (2012) Engage to excel: producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/micro sites/ostp/pcast-executive-report-final_2-13-12.pdf
Rico, M., Martνnez-Muρ oz, G., Alaman, X., Camacho, D., & Pulido, E. (2011). Improving the programming experience of high school students by means of virtual worlds. International Journal of Engineering Education, 27(1), 52–60.
Russell, C. K., & Gregory, D. M. (2003). Evaluation of qualitative research studies. Evidence-Based Nursing, 6, 36–40. CrossRef
Ryoo, J., Techatassanasoontorn, A., Lee, D., & Lothian, J. (2011). Game-based Infosec education using Open Sim. In Proceedings of the 15th Colloquium for Information systems security Education. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. Ohio.
Sahin, A., Top, A. & Vanegas, S. (2014). Harmony STEM S.O.S. TM Model Increases Students’ College Readiness and Develops twenty-first Century Skills. Research & Policy, 1(1)
Sancho, P., Torrente, J., & Fernández-Manjón, M. (2012). MareMonstrum: a contribution to empirical research about how the use of MUVEs may improve students’ motivation. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 18(18), 2576–2598.
Sancho-Thomas, P., Fuentes-Fernández, R., & Fernández-Manjón, B. (2009). Learning teamwork skills in university programming courses. Computers & Education, 53(3), 517–531. CrossRef
Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–26.
Slough, S. & Milam, J. (2013). Theoretical framework for the design of STEM project-based learning. In R., Capraro, M. Capraro & Morgan, J. STEM Project-Based Learning: An Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) approach (pp. 15–27). USA: Sense publishers.
Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2000). Instructional design. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
Smith, A., Douglas, C., & Cox, F. (2009). Supportive teaching and learning strategies in STEM education. New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 1(17), 19–32. CrossRef
Subbian, V. (2013). Role of MOOCs in integrated STEM education: A learning perspective.” In Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC) (pp. 1–4) IEEE: Princeton, NJ.
Tüzün, H. (2007). Blending video games with learning: issues and challenges with classroom implementations in the Turkish context. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 465–477. CrossRef
Twining (2009). Exploring the educational potential of virtual worlds-Some reflections from the. SPP British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(3), 496–514. CrossRef
Uttal D. H. & Cohen C. A. (2012). Spatial Thinking and STEM Education: When, Why, and How? Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 57 CrossRef
Vahey, P., Brecht, J., Patton, C., Rafanan, K., & Cheng, B. H. (2011). Investigating collaborative innovation in a virtual world task. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 17(12), 1638–1658.
Vosinakis, S., & Koutsabasis, P. (2012). Problem-based learning for design & engineering activities in virtual worlds. PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 21(3), 338–358. CrossRef
Vrellis, I., Avouris, N., & Mikropoulos, A. (2016). Learning outcome, presence and satisfaction from a science activity in Second Life. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(1), 59–77. CrossRef
Wang, X. (2013). Why students choose STEM majors motivation, high school learning, and post-secondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1081–1121. CrossRef
Wang, F., & Burton, J. (2013). Second Life in education: A review of publications from its launch to 2011. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 357–371. CrossRef
Wilkerson, S. B., & Haden, C. M. (2014). Effective practices for evaluating STEM out-of-school time programs. Afterschool Matters, 19(1), 10–19.
Xu, Y., Park, H., & Baek, Y. (2011). A new approach toward digital storytelling: An activity focused on writing self-efficacy in a virtual learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 14(4), 181–191.
Yong, T., & Ping, L. (2008). Engaging academically at risk primary school students in an ICT mediated after school program. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(5), 521–539.
Young, W., Franklin, T., Cooper, T., Carroll, S., & Liu, C. (2012). Game-based learning aids in Second Life. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 23(1), 57–80.
- Exploring the educational potential of three-dimensional multi-user virtual worlds for STEM education: A mixed-method systematic literature review
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© ITandMEDIA, Best Practices für die Mitarbeiter-Partizipation in der Produktentwicklung/© astrosystem | stock.adobe.com