nach oben

International Journal of Technology and Design Education

Erschienen in:

16.05.2015

Exploring the learning problems and resource usage of undergraduate industrial design students in design studio courses

verfasst von: Wenzhi Chen

Erschienen in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education | Ausgabe 3/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Design is a powerful weapon for modern companies so it is important to have excellent designers in the industry. The purpose of this study is to explore the learning problems and the resources that students use to overcome problems in undergraduate industrial design studio courses. A survey with open-type questions was conducted to collect data. Participants in this study were 189 undergraduate industrial design students from three universities, and two coding schema were formulated for analysing the data. The results demonstrated that the most difficult design tasks included concept generation, design presentation, and design research. The learning resources used to solve the learning problems included four categories: people, object, method, and environment. This information will increase the understanding of the learning process of students and provide a reference for teaching and the setting of learning resources in industrial design education.

Vorheriger Artikel Designing interaction: How do interaction design students address interaction?

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Akalin, A., & Sezal, I. (2009). The importance of conceptual and concrete modelling in architectural design education. International Journal of Art & Design Education,. doi:10.1111/j.1476-8070.2009.01589.x.

Arsham, H. (2002). Impact of the internet on learning and teaching. USDLA Journal, 16(3). http://www.usdla.org/html/journal/MAR02_Issue/article01.html. Accessed 7 June 2006.

Attoe, W., & Mugerauer, R. (1991). Excellent studio teaching in architecture. Studies in Higher Education, 16(1), 41–50.CrossRef

Bakar, M. A., Jilani, J., Jailani, N., Razali, R., Shukur, Z., & Aziz, M. J. A. (2013). Student centered learning environment for project monitoring. Procedia Technology, 11, 940–949. doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.279.CrossRef

Brandt, C. B., Cennamo, K., Douglas, S., Vernon, M., McGrath, M., & Reimer, Y. (2013). A theoretical framework for the studio as a learning environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 329–348. doi:10.1007/s10798-011-9181-5.CrossRef

Brown, M. I., Doughty, G. F., Draper, S. W., Henderson, F. P., & McAteer, E. (1996). Measuring learning resource use. Computers & Education, 27(2), 103–113. doi:10.1016/0360-1315(96)00017-6.CrossRef

Bucciarelli, L. L. (2001). Design knowledge & learning: A socially mediated activity. In C. M. Eastman, W. M. McCracken, & W. C. Newsletter (Eds.), Design knowing and learning: cognition in design education (pp. 297–314). New York: Elsevier.

Budd, J., Vanka, S., & Runton, A. (1999). The ID-online asynchronous learning network: a ‘Virtual Studio’ for interdisciplinary design collaboration. Digital Creativity, 10(4), 205–214.CrossRef

Cameron, M., Forsyth, A., Green, W. A., Lu, H., McGirr, P., Owens, P. E., et al. (2001). Learning through service. College Teaching, 49(3), 105–114.CrossRef

Cartier, P. (2011). Most valuable aspects of educational expectations of the students in design education. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2187–2191. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.077.CrossRef

Casakin, H., & Kreitler, S. (2008). Correspondences and divergences between teachers and students in the evaluation of design creativity in the design studio. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 35(4), 666–678. doi:10.1068/b3405.CrossRef

Chang, P.-F., Hsiau, S.-S., Yeh, T.-L., & Wu, J.-C. (2000). The development and implementation of the technological creativity course: an interdisciplinary approach. In International conference of engineering education (ICEE), Taipei, Taiwan.

Chang, T.-W., & Huang, J. H. (2002). A pilot study of role-interplay in a web-based learning environment. Education Media International, 39(1), 75–85.CrossRef

Chen, W., & You, M. (2010). Student response to an Internet-mediated industrial design studio course. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(2), 151–174. doi:10.1007/s10798-008-9068-2.CrossRef

Chiu, S.-H. (2010). Students’ knowledge sources and knowledge sharing in the design studio—an exploratory study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(1), 27–42. doi:10.1007/s10798-008-9061-9.CrossRef

Crowther, P. (2013). Understanding the signature pedagogy of the design studio and the opportunities for its technological enhancement. Journal of Learning Design, 6(3), 18–28.CrossRef

Demirbas, O. O., & Demirkan, H. (2003). Focus on architectural design process through learning styles. Design Studies, 24(5), 437–456.CrossRef

Demirbas, O. O., & Demirkan, H. (2007). Learning styles of design students and the relationship of academic performance and gender in design education. Learning and Instruction, 17(3), 345–359. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.007.CrossRef

Esjeholm, B.-T., & Bungum, B. (2013). Design knowledge and teacher–student interactions in an inventive construction task. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3), 675–689. doi:10.1007/s10798-012-9209-5.CrossRef

Gencosmanoglu, A. B. (2010). Learning, teaching and administration in design education: DESIGNtrain project: Training tools for developing design education. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 522–530. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.191.CrossRef

Green, L. N., & Bonollo, E. (2003). Studio-based teaching: History and advantages in the teaching of design. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 2(2), 269–272.

Groenendijk, T., Janssen, T., Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H. (2013). Learning to be creative. The effects of observational learning on students’ design products and processes. Learning and Instruction, 28, 35–47. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.05.001.CrossRef

Jacobs Reimer, Y., & Douglas, S. A. (2003). Teaching HCI design with the studio approach. Computer Science Education, 13(3), 191–205.CrossRef

Lewis, W. P., & Bonollo, E. (2002). An analysis of professional skills in design: implications for education and research. Design Studies, 23(4), 385–406. doi:10.1016/s0142-694x(02)00003-0.CrossRef

Mawson, B. (2007). Designers as teachers and learners: transferring workplace design practice into educational settings. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 17(2), 163–177. doi:10.1007/s10798-006-0002-1.CrossRef

Ministry of Education. (2011). Summary of higher education (numbers of student, graduate, teacher, and class). http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/b0013/100_sdata.xls. Accessed 1 May 2012.

Ministry of Education. Summary of higher education (Number of students, graduates, teachers, and classes) (in Chinese) (2014). https://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/detail/102/102_sdata.xls. Accessed 1 May 2014.

Nikander, J. B., Liikkanen, L. A., & Laakso, M. (2014). The preference effect in design concept evaluation. Design Studies, 35(5), 473–499. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2014.02.006.CrossRef

Pirrie, A., Hamilton, S., & Wilson, V. (1999). Multidisciplinary education: Some issues and concerns. Educational Research, 41(3), 301–314.CrossRef

Reimer, Y. J., & Douglas, S. A. (2003). Teaching HCI design with studio approach. Computer Science Education, 13(3), 191–205.CrossRef

Rittel, H., & Webber, M. M. (1984). Planning problems are wicked problems. In N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in design methodology (pp. 135–144). New York: Wiley.

Román, S., Cuestas, P., & Fenollar, P. (2008). An examination of the interrelationships between self-esteem, others’ expectations, family support, learning approaches and academic achievement. Studies in Higher Education, 33(2), 127–138. doi:10.1080/03075070801915882.CrossRef

Sagun, A., & Demirkan, H. (2009). On-line critiques in collaborative design studio. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(1), 79–99.

Schön, D. A. (1987). Education the reflective practitioner. London: Jossey-Bass.

Smith, D., Hedley, P., & Molloy, M. (2009). Design learning: A reflective model. Design Studies, 30(1), 13–37. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2008.06.002.CrossRef

Tempelman, E., & Pilot, A. (2011). Strengthening the link between theory and practice in teaching design engineering: An empirical study on a new approach. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(3), 261–275. doi:10.1007/s10798-010-9118-4.CrossRef

Tsenn, J., Atilola, O., McAdams, D. A., & Linsey, J. S. (2014). The effects of time and incubation on design concept generation. Design Studies, 35(5), 500–526. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2014.02.003.CrossRef

Uluoǧlu, B. (2000). Design knowledge communicated in studio critiques. Design Studies, 21(1), 33–58. doi:10.1016/s0142-694x(99)00002-2.CrossRef

van Niekerk, E., Ankiewicz, P., & de Swardt, E. (2010). A process-based assessment framework for technology education: A case study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(2), 191–215. doi:10.1007/s10798-008-9070-8.CrossRef

Wilson, S., & Watson, K. (2009). STP case studies of effective practice (Vol. 4, curriculum development in studio teaching). New South Wales, Australia: Studio Teaching Project.

Yang, M.-Y., You, M., & Chen, F.-C. (2005a). Competencies and qualifications for industrial design jobs: Implications for design practice, education, and student career guidance. Design Studies, 26(2), 155–189. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2004.09.003.CrossRef

Yang, M.-Y., You, M., & Chen, F.-C. (2005b). A study on the difficulties and career guidance needs of industrial design students: Implications for design education. Journal of Design (TW), 10(2), 57–76.

Yang, M.-Y., You, M., & Lin, S.-H. (2003). Preliminary study of learning situations and career issues for university ID students. Journal of Design (TW), 8(3), 75–90.

You, M., Yang, M.-Y., & Liao, P. (2007). Survey of industrial design students’ learning attitudes. Journal of Design (TW), 12(2), 15–36.

Zehner, R., Forsyth, G., De La Harpe, B., Peterson, F., Musgrave, E., Neale, D., et al. (2010). Optimising studio outcomes: Guidelines for curriculum development from the Australian studio teaching project. In 2nd International conference on design education, Sydney, 2010: Connected.

Zehner, R., Forsyth, G., Musgrave, E., Neale, D., Harpe, B. D. L., Peterson, F., et al. (2009). STP final report (Vol. 1, curriculum development in studio teaching). New South Wales, Australia: Studio Teaching Project.

Zimring, C., & Latch Craig, D. (2001). Defining design between domains: An argument for design research á la caret. In C. M. Eastman, W. M. McCracken, & W. C. Newsletter (Eds.), Design knowing and learning: Cognition in design education (pp. 125–146). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.CrossRef

Titel: Exploring the learning problems and resource usage of undergraduate industrial design students in design studio courses
verfasst von: Wenzhi Chen
Publikationsdatum: 16.05.2015
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education / Ausgabe 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0957-7572
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1804
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9315-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2016

Analysing the correlation between social network analysis measures and performance of students in social network-based engineering education

Designing interaction: How do interaction design students address interaction?

Innovation learning in comprehensive education?

How are students’ attitudes related to learning outcomes?

Two elementary schools’ developing potential for sustainability of engineering education

Response strategies for curriculum change in engineering

Premium Partner