nach oben

Journal of Computers in Education

Erschienen in:

01.12.2016

Extending the TAM to examine the effects of quality features on mobile learning acceptance

verfasst von: Mohammed Amin Almaiah, Masita Abdul Jalil, Mustafa Man

Erschienen in: Journal of Computers in Education | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of quality features on students’ beliefs towards acceptance of mobile learning based on extending technology acceptance model (TAM) and the updated DeLone and McLean information system success model (DL&ML). This study gathered sample data from five public universities in Jordan. A total of 400 questionnaires were randomly distributed, and 392 usable questionnaires were analyzed, with a usable response rate of 81.6 %. The research results revealed that learning content quality, content design quality, interactivity, functionality, user-interface design, accessibility, personalization, and responsiveness, as the primary antecedents of mobile learning acceptance which had positive effects on students’ perception with regard to their beliefs (i.e., perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use) and this situation can lead to enhance students’ behavioral intention to use of mobile learning application.

Vorheriger Artikel Analytic hierarchy process as integrated criteria for evaluating students of the bridging program

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Abachi, H. R., & Muhammad, G. (2014). The impact of m-learning technology on students and educators. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 491–496.CrossRef

Abu-Al-Aish, A., & Love, S. (2013). Factors influencing students’ acceptance of m-learning: An investigation in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(5)

Ahn, T., Ryu, S., & Han, I. (2007). The impact of web quality and playfulness on user acceptance of online retailing. Information & Management, 44(3), 263–275.CrossRef

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Al-Debei, M. M. (2014). The quality and acceptance of websites: an empirical investigation in the context of higher education. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 15(2), 170–188.CrossRef

Al-Emran, M., Elsherif, H. M., & Shaalan, K. (2016). Investigating attitudes towards the use of mobile learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 93–102.CrossRef

Ali, A., Alrasheedi, M., Ouda, A., & Capretz, L. F. (2015). A study of the interface usability issues of mobile learning applications for smart phones from the users perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:1501.01875.

Almaiah, M. A., & Man, M. (2016). Empirical investigation to explore factors that achieve high quality of mobile learning system based on students’ perspectives. Engineering Science and Technology: An International Journal.

Almarashdeh, I. A., Sahari, N., Zin, N. A. M., & Alsmadi, M. (2010). The success of learning management system among distance learners in Malaysian universities. Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology, 21(2)

Almasri, A. K. M. (2014). The influence on mobile learning based on technology acceptance model (TAM), mobile readiness (MR) and perceived interaction (PI) for higher education students.

Al-Mushasha, N. F., & Nassuora, A. B. (2012). Factors determining e-learning service quality in Jordanian higher education environment. Journal of Applied Sciences, 12(14), 1474.CrossRef

Al-Shboul, M., Rababah, O., Al-Sayyed, R., Sweis, G., & Aldreabi, H. (2013). Roadmap to advance e-Learning management system at The University of Jordan. Journal of American Science, 9(1), 531–545.

Althunibat, A. (2015). Determining the factors influencing students’ intention to use m-learning in Jordan higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 65–71.CrossRef

Ariffin, S. A. (2011). Mobile learning in the institution of higher learning for Malaysia students: Culture perspectives. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 1(3), 283–288.CrossRef

Bidin, S., & Ziden, A. A. (2013). Adoption and application of mobile learning in the education industry. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 720–729.CrossRef

Bontis, N. (1998). Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision, 36(2), 63–76.CrossRef

Campbell, D., & Fiske, D. (1998). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethods matrix. Personality, 56, 162.

Chang, C. C., Yan, C. F., & Tseng, J. S. (2012). Perceived convenience in an extended technology acceptance model: Mobile technology and English learning for college students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(5), 809–826.CrossRef

Chen, H. R., & Tseng, H. F. (2012). Factors that influence acceptance of web-based e-learning systems for the in-service education of junior high school teachers in Taiwan. Evaluation and Program Planning, 35(3), 398–406.CrossRef

Cheng, Y. M. (2012). Effects of quality antecedents on e-learning acceptance. Internet Research, 22(3), 361–390.CrossRef

Cho, V., Cheng, T. E., & Lai, W. J. (2009). The role of perceived user-interface design in continued usage intention of self-paced e-learning tools. Computers & Education, 53(2), 216–227.CrossRef

Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19, 189–211.CrossRef

Dahlstrom, E., Walker, J. D., & Dziuban, C. (2013). ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology. 2013.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340.CrossRef

Delone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.

Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Franklin, T. (2011). Mobile learning: At the tipping point. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(4), 261.

Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(1), 7.

Gikas, J., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 18–26.CrossRef

Glackin, B. C., Rodenhiser, R. W., & Herzog, B. (2014). A library and the disciplines: A collaborative project assessing the impact of eBooks and mobile devices on student learning. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(3), 299–306.CrossRef

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Hassan, M. H., Alhosban, F., & Hourani, M. A. (2016). Using mobile technologies for enhancing student academic experience: University of Jordan case study. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 10(1), 13–18.CrossRef

Hassanzadeh, A., Kanaani, F., & Elahi, S. (2012). A model for measuring e-learning systems success in universities. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(12), 10959–10966.CrossRef

Holsapple, C. W., & Lee-Post, A. (2010). Behavior-based analysis of knowledge dissemination channels in operations management. Omega, 38(3), 167–178.CrossRef

Hunt, S. D., Sparkman Jr, R. D., & Wilcox, J. B. (1982). The pretest in survey research: Issues and preliminary findings. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(2), 269–273.CrossRef

Jaradat, M. I. R. M. (2014). Understanding individuals’ perceptions, determinants and the moderating effects of age and gender on the adoption of mobile learning: Developing country perspective. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 8(3–4), 253–275.CrossRef

Kanthawongs, P., & Kanthawongs, P. (2013). Individual and social factors affecting student’s usage intention in using Learning Management System. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 88, 89–95.CrossRef

Kellerer, W., Wagner, M., & Balke, W. T. (2003). Preference-based session management for personalized services. In Proceedings of the MOMUC

Khan, A. I., Al-Shihi, H., Al-Khanjari, Z. A., & Sarrab, M. (2015). Mobile learning (M-Learning) adoption in the Middle East: Lessons learned from the educationally advanced countries. Telematics and Informatics, 32(4), 909–920.CrossRef

Lan, Y. F., & Sie, Y. S. (2010). Using RSS to support mobile learning based on media richness theory. Computers & Education, 55(2), 723–732.CrossRef

Lee, K. C., & Chung, N. (2009). Understanding factors affecting trust in and satisfaction with mobile banking in Korea: A modified DeLone and McLean’s model perspective. Interacting with Computers, 21(5–6), 385–392.CrossRef

Lee, Y., & Kozar, K. A. (2006). Investigating the effect of website quality on e-business success: An analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1383–1401.CrossRef

Lee, B. C., Yoon, J. O., & Lee, I. (2009). Learners’ acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1320–1329.CrossRef

Liang, T. P. (1987). User interface design for decision support systems: A self-adaptive approach. Information & Management, 12(4), 181–193.CrossRef

Lin, J. C. C., & Lu, H. (2000). Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a web site. International Journal of Information Management, 20(3), 197–208.CrossRef

Liu, Y., Li, H., & Carlsson, C. (2010). Factors driving the adoption of m-learning: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1211–1219.CrossRef

Lwoga, E. T. (2014). Critical success factors for adoption of web-based learning management systems in Tanzania. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 10(1), 4.

Mohammadi, H. (2015). Social and individual antecedents of m-learning adoption in Iran. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 191–207.CrossRef

Molenet.org. (2009). The Mobile Learning Network (MoLeNET). Retrieved Apr 28, 2016 from http://www.molenet.org.uk/

O’bannon, B. W., & Thomas, K. (2014). Teacher perceptions of using mobile phones in the classroom: Age matters! Computers & Education, 74, 15–25.CrossRef

Ozdamli, F., & Cavus, N. (2011). Basic elements and characteristics of mobile learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 937–942.CrossRef

Özer, A., Argan, M. T., & Argan, M. (2013). The effect of mobile service quality dimensions on customer satisfaction. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, 428–438.CrossRef

Paechter, M., Maier, B., & Macher, D. (2010). Students’ expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction. Computers & Education, 54(1), 222–229.CrossRef

Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use e-Learning. Educational technology & society, 12(3), 150–162.

Park, S. Y., Nam, M. W., & Cha, S. B. (2012). University students’ behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 592–605.CrossRef

Pituch, K. A., & Lee, Y. K. (2006). The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers & Education, 47(2), 222–244.CrossRef

Pollara, P., & Kee Broussard, K. (2011, March). Student perceptions of mobile learning: A review of current research. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1643–1650).

Prieto, J. C. S., Migueláñez, S. O., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2014, October). Mobile learning adoption from informal into formal: An extended TAM model to measure mobile acceptance among teachers. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 595–602). ACM.

Rahman, S., Haque, A., & Ahmad, M. I. S. (2010). Exploring influencing factors for the selection of mobile phone service providers: A structural equational modeling (SEM) approach on Malaysian consumers. African Journal of Business Management, 4(13), 2885.

Rieh, S. Y. (2002). Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 145–161.CrossRef

Roca, J. C., Chiu, C. M., & Martínez, F. J. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(8), 683–696.CrossRef

Rogers, R. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. Social Psychophysiology, 153–176.

Rovai, A. P. (2004). A constructivist approach to online college learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 79–93.CrossRef

Sarrab, M., Alzahrani, A., Alwan, N. A., & Alfarraj, O. (2014). From traditional learning into mobile learning in education at the university level: Undergraduate students perspective. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 8(3–4), 167–186.CrossRef

Sarrab, M., Elbasir, M., & Alnaeli, S. (2016). Towards a quality model of technical aspects for mobile learning services: An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 100–112.CrossRef

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, M. (2009). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. Chichester: Wiley.

Su, C. H., & Cheng, C. H. (2015). A mobile gamification learning system for improving the learning motivation and achievements. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 31(3), 268–286.CrossRef

Prieto, J. C. S., Migueláñez, S. O., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. Intención de Uso de Tecnologías Mobiles Entre los Profesores en Formación.

The Jordan Times. (2014). 95 % of Jordanians own mobiles; 47% use the Internet. Retrieved 21 April, 2016 from http://jordantimes.com/95-of-jordanians-own-mobiles-47-use-the-internet.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.CrossRef

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–478.

Viberg, O., & Grönlund, Å. (2013). Cross-cultural analysis of users’ attitudes toward the use of mobile devices in second and foreign language learning in higher education: A case from Sweden and China. Computers & Education, 69, 169–180.CrossRef

Voss, C. (2000). Developing an eService strategy. Business Strategy Review, 11(1), 21–34.CrossRef

Wang, W. T., & Wang, C. C. (2009). An empirical study of instructor adoption of web-based learning systems. Computers & Education, 53(3), 761–774.CrossRef

Wang, Y. S., Wang, Y. M., Lin, H. H., & Tang, T. I. (2003). Determinants of user acceptance of Internet banking: An empirical study. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(5), 501–519.CrossRef

Wingkvist, A. (2009). Understanding scalability and sustainability in mobile learning: A systems development framework.

Yamakawa, P., Delgado, C., Díaz, E., Garayar, E., & Laguna, H. (2013). Factors influencing the use of mobile technologies in a university environment: A case from Latin America. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 9(2), 24–38.CrossRef

Yong Wee, S., Siong Hoe, L., Kung Keat, T., Check Yee, L., & Parumo, S. (2011). Prediction of user acceptance and adoption of smart phone for learning with technology acceptance model. Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(20), 2395–2402.

Zarmpou, T., Saprikis, V., & Vlachopoulou, M. (2012). Examining behavioral intention toward mobile services: An empirical investigation in Greece. In Mobile opportunities and applications for E-service innovations (Vol. 37).

Titel: Extending the TAM to examine the effects of quality features on mobile learning acceptance
verfasst von: Mohammed Amin Almaiah
Masita Abdul Jalil
Mustafa Man
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2016
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Journal of Computers in Education / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 2197-9987
Elektronische ISSN: 2197-9995
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-016-0074-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Analytic hierarchy process as integrated criteria for evaluating students of the bridging program

Exploring individual contributions during online collaborative discussions

A framework of curriculum design for computational thinking development in K-12 education

An effective learning and teaching model for programming languages