nach oben

Erschienen in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

21. Facilitating Communication in Adaptive Planning Processes for Inclusive Innovation: Discussing an Integrative Approach

verfasst von : Bernardo Alayza, Domingo Gonzalez

Erschienen in: New Leadership in Strategy and Communication

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In this chapter, it is argued that linear approaches have influenced innovation strategies for local development, having limitations for addressing long-standing socio-economic problems in unequal and exclusionary societies such as Peru. However, the facilitation of a broader communication perspective could contribute to configure more inclusive innovation processes for a number of reasons: it can contribute to understand the nature of inclusive innovation processes; it can serve to recognise entry points for inclusive innovation as well as to reorient innovation processes towards inclusivity. This discussion allows a rethinking of the current innovation strategies for local development and proposes a set of recommendations to enable communication with adaptive planning processes for a broad-based inclusive development strategy in the Peruvian context.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Group Work: Application and Performance Effectiveness in Musical Ensembles

Nächstes Kapitel Corporate Values and People Attributes. Practical Leadership Applications in the Asset Management Industry

Excluded groups are defined as groups or subgroups that lives under an unequal distribution of a valued good or basic service such as health, food, water and/or energy. For example, people who live in isolated rural villages in Peru or people who live in peri-urban zones of Peru that are lacking a basic service, live with less than 3.5 American dollars and have an informal job could be considered as excluded.

Local development is defined as the interactive process of expansion of capabilities and collective liberties in a territory for the reduction of disparities and the participative role of the excluded populations in their development (Sen 2000).

Cusco is a region in the southeastern Sierra of Peru located at 3300–4500 m above sea level. It has a population of roughly 1.2 million inhabitants. Cusco has a millenary tradition, having an impressive cultural heritage that came from the Inca culture. However, it is one of the poorest regions in Peru with more than 60% of people living in poverty. Also, more than 80% of the local population is involved in informal activities with very low economic productivity, with a monthly average income of approximately US$85 per capita (INEI 2015).

Ackoff, R. (1974). Redesigning the future: A system approach to societal problems. New York: Willey-Interscience.

Akrich, M., Callon, M., Latour, B., & Monaghan, A. (2002). The key to success in innovation Part I: The art of interessement. International Journal of Innovation Management, 06(02), 187–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s1363919602000550.

Alayza, B. (2017). Communication for inclusive innovation: Rethinking science, technology and innovation policies for development in Peru (M.Phil thesis). School of Communication and Arts, The University of Queensland. https://doi.org/10.14264/uql.2017.893.

Alayza, B., & Ismodes, E. (2011). Estrategias de comunicación para aumentar el éxito en proyectos de fomento a la innovación tecnológica a nivel descentralizado: experiencia del proyecto RAMP-PERÚ [Strategies of communication to improve the success of innovation projects at national level: Experience of RAMP-PERU project]. Anales del XIV Congreso Latino Iberoamericano de Gestión Tecnológica “Innovación para el crecimiento sostenible en el marco del Bicentenario”. ALTEC, Lima.

Alfaro, R. (2006). Otra Brújula: Innovaciones en comunicación y desarrollo [Innovation in communication and development] (1st ed.). Lima, Perú: Asociación de Comunicadores Sociales CALANDRIA.

Almeida, M. F. L. D., & De Melo, M. A. C. D. (2017). Sociotechnical regimes, technological innovation and corporate sustainability: From principles to action. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29(4), 395–413.CrossRef

Andersen, A. D., & Andersen, P. D. (2014). Innovation system foresight. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 88, 276–286.CrossRef

Andersen, A. D., & Andersen, P. D. (2017). Foresighting for inclusive development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, 227–236.CrossRef

Arocena, R., & Sutz, J. (2014). Innovation and democratisation of knowledge as a contribution to inclusive development. In G. Dutrénit & J. Sutz (Eds.), National innovation systems, social inclusion and development: The Latin American experience (pp. 15–33). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

Babüroglu, O. N., & Ravn, I. (1992). Normative action research. Organization Studies, 13(1), 019–34.CrossRef

Bazán, M., Sagasti, F., & Cárdenas, R. (2014). National system of innovation for inclusive development: Achievements and challenges in Peru. In National innovation systems, social inclusion and development: The Latin American experience. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.library.uq.edu.au/10.4337/9781782548683.00011.

Beltran, R. (2005). La comunicación para el desarrollo en Latinoamérica: un recuento de medio siglo [Communication for development in Latin America: A recount of half a century]. III Congreso panamericano de la comunicación Panel 3: Problemática De La Comunicación Para El Desarrollo, 54.

Berlo, D. K. (1960) The process of communication: An introduction to theory and practice. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

BID. (2010). La necesidad de Innovar. El camino hacia el progreso de América Latina y el Caribe. Paper prepared for the EU-LAC Summit of Heads of State and Government. Madrid: Inter-American and Development Bank (IDB). Retrieved from: http://idbdocs.iadb.org/wsdocs/getdocument.aspx?docnum=35168065.

Bijker, W., Hughes, T., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (1987). The social construction of technological systems. New directions in sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Borrás, S. (2011). Policy learning and organizational capacities in innovation policies. Science and Public Policy, 38(9), 725–734. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234211x1307002163332.

Burns, T. (1980). Network agents and community governance (Tesis de Doctorado). University of Pennsylvania, Filadelfia.

Burns, T., Cohen, B., De Melo, M. A. C., Hawk, D., Keidel, R., Pava, C.Y., et al. (1983). Where planning fails: A perspective of adaptive incremental learning in complex organizational settings. Filadélfia, Mimeo: University of Pennsylvania.

Castells, M. (2010). The information age (1st ed.). Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.

Castells, M. (2011). A network theory of power. International Journal of Communication, 5, 773–787. http://dx.doi.org/1932–8036/20110773.

Chataway, J., Hanlin, R., & Kaplinsky, R. (2014). Inclusive innovation: An architecture for policy development. Innovation and Development, 4(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930x.2013.876800.CrossRef

CONCYTEC. (2016). Política nacional para el desarrollo de la ciencia, tecnología e innovación tecnológica - CTI [National policy for the development of science, technology and technological innovation—ST&I] (p. 124). Lima, Peru: CONSEJO NACIONAL DE CIENCIA, TECNOLOGÍA E INNOVACIÓN TECNOLÓGICA.

Coutts, J., & Roberts, K. (2011). Theories and approaches of extension: Review of extension in capacity building. In J. Jennings, R. Packham, & D. Woodside (Eds.), Shaping change: Natural resource management, agriculture and the role of extension (pp. 22–31). Australia: Australasia-Pacific Extension Network (APEN).

Cozzens, S., & Sutz, J. (2014). Innovation in informal settings: Reflections and proposals for a research agenda. Innovation and Development, 4(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930x.2013.876803.CrossRef

De Melo, M. A. C. (2014). Sustainable innovation and the dimensions of complexity. READINGS BOOK, 122.

De Melo, M. A. C. (1985). Action research and planning process: A learning perspective. In Proceedings of the V International Congress of Industrial Engineering, Florianopolis, Brazil.

De Melo, M. A. C. (2003). Innovatory planning: Methods and instruments. In Readings Book of X Annual Conference of GBATA—Global Business and Technology Association, Budapest.

Dervin, B. (1983). Information as a user construct: the relevance of perceived information needs to synthesis and interpretation. In S.A. Ward & L.J. Reed (Eds.), Knowledge, structure and use: Implications for synthesis and interpretation, pp. 153–83. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Dutrénit, G., & Sutz, J. (2014). National innovation systems, social inclusion and development: The Latin American experience. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.CrossRef

Dutta, M. J. (2012). Communicating social change structure, culture, and agency. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.

Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. L. (1973). Towards a social ecology, contextual appreciation of the future in the present. London: Plenum Press.

Escobal, J., Ponce, C., Pajuelo, R., & Espinoza, M. (2012). Estudio comparativo de intervenciones para el desarrollo rural en la sierra sur del Perú [A comparative study of rural development interventions in the south highlands of Peru]. Lima: GRADE, c2012.

European Commission. (2014). Study on strengthening regional innovation systems in Peru: Policy lessons. (p. 86). Cusco-Tacna: Germán Granda (Director), María Angélica Ropert (Consultant), Lenia Planas (Consultant).

Foster, C., & Heeks, R. (2013). Conceptualising inclusive innovation: Modifying systems of innovation frameworks to understand diffusion of new technology to low-income consumers. The European Journal of Development Research, 25(3), 333–355. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2013.7.CrossRef

Freeman, C. (1995). The national system of innovation in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5–24.

Fressoli, M., Arond, E., Abrol, D., Smith, A., Ely, A., & Dias, R. (2014). When grassroots innovation movements encounter mainstream institutions: Implications for models of inclusive innovation. Innovation and Development, 4(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930x.2014.921354.CrossRef

Fressoli, M., Garrido, S., Picabea, F., Lalouf, A., & Fenog, V. (2013). Cuando las “transferencias” tecnológicas “fracasan”. Aprendizajes y limitaciones en la construcción de Tecnologías para la Inclusión Socia [When technological “transfers” fail. Learning and limitations in the construction of technologies for social inclusion] l. Universitas Humanística, (76), 73–96.

Fressoli, M., Smith, A., & Thomas, H. (2012). Grassroots innovation movements: Enduring dilemmas as sources of knowledge production. Retrieved August 20, 2015, from https://grfscp.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/grf-2012-rio-smith-et-al.pdf.

Geels, F. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33, 897–920.CrossRef

Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274.CrossRef

González, M., & De Melo (2004). Planificación interoganizacional y desarrollo emprendedor: un estudio de caso. In Anais da III Conferencia Internacional de Pesquisa em Emprendedorismo na América Latina (CIPEAL), Río de Janeiro (pp. 11–13).

González, M. D. (1997). Planejamento dos Pólos Tecnológicos: un enfoque adaptativo (Tese de Doutorado em Engenharia de Produção). Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.

Hajer, M. A., & Laws, D. (2006). Ordering through discourse. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (p. 249266). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harman, U. (2018). Inclusive innovation in rural communities: Three case studies of rural electrification in Peru (Ph.D. thesis). School of Agriculture & Food Sciences, The University of Queensland. https://doi.org/10.14264/uql.2018.149.

Heeks, R., Foster, C., & Nugroho, Y. (2014). New models of inclusive innovation for development. Innovation and Development, 4(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930x.2014.928982.CrossRef

Herrera, A. (2011). La recuperación de tecnologías indígenas. Arqueología, tecnología y desarrollo en los Andes. [The recovery of Indigenous technologies. Archaeology, Technology and Development in the Andes]. Lima: IEP.

Hülsmann, M., & Pfeffermann, N. (Eds.). (2011). Strategies and communications for innovations: An integrative management view for companies and networks. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.

IDRC. (2011). Innovation for inclusive development, program prospectus for 2011–2016. Accessed: December 1, 2015. http://www.slideshare.net/uniid-sea/october-2011-innovation-for-inclusivedevelopment-program-prospectus-for-20112016.

INEI. (2015). Evolución de la Pobreza Monetaria 2009 – 2014. Informe Técnico [Evolution of monetary poverty 2009–2014. Technical report]. Lima: Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática.

Ismodes, E. (2006). Países sin futuro: qué puede hacer la Universidad? [Countries without future. What can the university do?] (1st ed.). Lima: Fondo Editorial de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.

Ismodes, E., & Manrique, K. (2016). Estudio de Caracterización del Sistema de Innovación del Perú [Characterization study of the Peruvian innovation system] (p. 192). Lima.

Johnson, B., & Andersen, A. D. (2012). Learning, innovation and inclusive development. New perspectives on economic development strategy and development aid. Globelics. Thematic Report 2011/12. Aalborg University Press.

Joseph, K. J. (2014). Exploring exclusion in innovation systems. Innovation and Development, 4(1), 73–90.CrossRef

Kuramoto, J. R. (2014). Inclusive innovation against all odds: The case of Peru. In G. Dutrénit & G. Crespi (Eds.), Science, technology and innovation policies for development: The Latin American experience (pp. 109–131). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04108-7.

Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Leeuwis, C. (2004a). Communication for rural innovation: Rethinking agricultural extension (with contributions by A. van den Ban). Oxford: Blackwell Science.

Leeuwis, C. (2004b). Changing views of innovation and the role of science. The ‘socio-technical root-system’ as a tool for identifying relevant cross-disciplinary research questions. In Pre Proceedings of the Sixth European IFSA Symposium (Vol. 2, pp. 773–782).

Leeuwis, C., & Aarts, N. (2011). Rethinking communication in innovation processes: Creating space for change in complex systems. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 17(1), 21–36.CrossRef

Leeuwis, C., & Aarts, N. (2016). Communication as intermediation for socio-technical innovation. Journal of Science Communication, 15(6), 1–12.CrossRef

Lundvall, B. Å. (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.

Lundvall, B. Å., Joseph, K., & Chaminade, C. (2009). Handbook on innovation systems and developing countries: Building domestic capabilities in a global context. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRef

Mattelart, A., & Mattelart, M. (2003). Theories of communication: A short introduction. Thousand Oaks, Calif; London: Sage Publications.

Nelson, R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

OECD. (2011). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) reviews of innovation policy: Peru 2011. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Papaioannou, T. (2014). How inclusive can innovation and development be in the twenty-first century? Innovation and Development, 4(2), 187–202.CrossRef

Pfeffermann, N., & Gould, J. (2017). Strategy and communication for innovation: Integrative perspectives on innovation in the digital economy (3rd ed., 2017 ed.). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Pfeffermann, N., Minshall, T., & Mortara, L. (Eds.). (2013). Strategy and communication for innovation. Berlin: Springer.

Powel W. W., & Grodal, S. (2009). Networks of innovators. The Oxford handbook of innovation (p. 78).

Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.

Rogers, E. M. (2002). The nature of technology transfer. Science Communication, 23(3), 323–341.CrossRef

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.

Schillo, R. S., & Robinson, R. M. (2017). Inclusive innovation in developed countries: The who, what, why, and how. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(7).

Sen, A. (2000). Social exclusion: Concept, application, and scrutiny. Social Development Papers No. 1. Manila: Asian Development Bank.

Smith, A., Fressoli, M., & Thomas, H. (2014). Grassroots innovation movements: Challenges and contributions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.025.CrossRef

Smits, R. (2002). Innovation studies in the 21st century: Questions from a user’s perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69(9), 861–883.CrossRef

Smits, R., & Kuhlmann, S. (2004). The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1(1/2), 4. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijfip.2004.004621.CrossRef

Te Molder, H., & Potter, J. (2005). Conversation and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Thomas, H. (2009). Tecnologías para la inclusión social y políticas públicas en América Latina, 32. [Technologies for social inclusion and public policies in Latin America]. Grupo de Estudios Sociales de la Tecnología y la Innovación IESCT/UNQ CONICE. Retrieved from http://www.redtisa.org/Hernan-Thomas-Tecnologias-para-la-inclusion-social-y-politicas-publicas-en-America-Latina.pdf.

Thomas, H. (2012), Tecnologías para la inclusión social en América Latina. De las tecnologías apropiadas a los sistemas tecnológicos sociales. Problemas conceptuales y soluciones estratégicas [From technologies appropriate to social technological systems. Conceptual problems and strategic solutions]. In H. Thomas, M. Fressoli, & G. Santos (Eds.), Tecnología, desarrollo y democracia. Nueve estudios sobre dinámicas socio-técnicas de exclusión/inclusión social (pp. 25–78). Buenos Aires: Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva.

Thomas, H., Fressoli, M., & Becerra, L. (2012). Science and technology policy and social ex/inclusion: Analyzing opportunities and constraints in Brazil and Argentina. Science and Public Policy, 39(5), 579–591. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs065.CrossRef

Trist, E. (1976a). A concept of organizational ecology. Pennsylvania: Management and Behavioral Science Center, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Mimeo.

Trist, E. (1976b). Action research and adaptive planning. In Experimenting with organization life: The action research approach, Clark, A. (org.). London: Plenum Press.CrossRef

Trist, E. (1976c). Some concepts of planning. Pennsylvania: Management and Behavioral Science Center, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Mimeo.

Vanclay, F., & Leach, G. (2011). Enabling change in rural and regional Australia. In J. Jennings, R. Packham, & D. Woodside (Eds.), Shaping change: Natural resource management, agriculture and the role of extension (pp. 62–71). Australia: Australasia-Pacific Extension Network (APEN).

Villaran, F. (2010). Emergencia de la Ciencia, la Tecnología y la Innovación (CTI) en el Perú. Organización de Estados Iberoamericanos [Emergency in science, technology and innovation in Peru. Organization of Iberoamerican states]. Lima. Retrieved from: http://www.oei.es/salactsi/EmergenciaDeCtiEnPeru.pdf.

Wieczorek, A., Hekkert, M., & Smits, R. (2012). Contemporary innovation policy and instruments: Challenges and implications. Innovation Studies Utrecht (ISU) Working Paper Series, 45. Retrieved from http://www.geo.uu.nl/isu/pdf/isu0912.pdf.

World Bank. (2010). Innovation policy. A guide for developing countries. Washington, DC. Retrieved from: http://www.innovation.lv/ino2/publications/Innovation_policy_World_Bank.pdf

Zerfass, A., & Huck, S. (2007). Innovation, communication, and leadership: New developments in strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(2), 107–122.CrossRef

Titel: Facilitating Communication in Adaptive Planning Processes for Inclusive Innovation: Discussing an Integrative Approach
verfasst von: Bernardo Alayza
Domingo Gonzalez
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: New Leadership in Strategy and Communication
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19680-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-19681-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19681-3_21