Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Evaluation and comparison of the factor structure of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS) using both confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with two samples of people living with HIV/AIDS in China.
Secondary analyses were conducted with data from two comparable samples of 320 people living with HIV/AIDS from the same hospital using the same inclusion criteria. The first sample of 120 was collected in 2006, and the second sample of 200 was collected in 2012. For each sample, CFA was first performed on the original four-factor structure to check model fit, followed by EFA to explore other factor structures and a subsequent CFA for model fit statistics to be compared to the original four-factor CFA.
In both samples, CFA on the originally hypothesized four-factor structure yielded an acceptable model fit. The EFA yielded a two-factor solution in both samples, with different items included in each factor for the two samples. Comparison of CFA on the a priori four-factor structure and the new two-factor structure in both samples indicated that both factor structures were of acceptable model fit, with the four-factor model performing slightly better than the two-factor model.
Factor structure of the MOS-SSS is method-dependent, with CFA supporting a four-factor structure, while EFA yielded a two-factor structure in two separate samples. We need to be careful in selecting the analytic method when applying the MOS-SSS to various samples and choose the factor structure that best fits the theoretical model.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Arriola, K. J., Spaulding, A. C., Booker, C. A., Williams, C., Avery, A., Porter, N. J. et al. (2013). Understanding the relationship between social support and physical and mental well-being among jail detainees living with HIV. Journal of Health Psychology, 1–10. doi: 10.1177/1359105313496447
House, J. S., Robbins, C., & Metzner, H. L. (1982). The association of social relationships and activities with mortality: Prospective evidence from the Tecumseh Community Health Study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 116(1), 123–140. PubMed
Reich, W. A., Lounsbury, D. W., Zaid-Muhammad, S., & Rapkin, B. D. (2010). Forms of social support and their relationships to mental health in HIV-positive persons. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 15(2), 135–145. CrossRef
Dimkovic, N., & Oreopoulos, D. G. (2000). Chronic peritoneal dialysis in the elderly: A review. Peritoneal Dialysis International, 20(3), 276–283. PubMed
Bekele, T., Rourke, S. B., Tucker, R., Greene, S., Sobota, M., Koornstra, J., et al. (2013). Direct and indirect effects of perceived social support on health-related quality of life in persons living with HIV/AIDS. AIDS Care, 25(3), 337–346. PubMed
Costa-Requena, G., Salamero, M., & Gil, F. (2007). Validity of the questionnaire MOS-SSS of social support in neoplastic patients. Medicina Clínica (Barcelona), 128(18), 687–691. CrossRef
Anderson, D., Bilodeau, B., Deshaies, G., Gilbert, M., & Jobin, J. (2005). French-Canadian validation of the MOS Social Support Survey. Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 21(10), 867–873. PubMed
Robitaille, A., Orpana, H., & McIntosh, C. N. (2011). Psychometric properties, factorial structure, and measurement invariance of the English and French versions of the Medical Outcomes Study social support scale. Health Reports, 22(2), 33–40. PubMed
Yu, D. S., Lee, D. T., & Woo, J. (2004). Psychometric testing of the Chinese version of the medical outcomes study social support survey (MOS-SSS-C). Research in Nursing & Health, 27(2), 135–143. CrossRef
Li., H. (2012). Psychometric measurement of the simplified Chinese medical outcomes study social support survey (MOS- SSS- C) and its application in HIV/AIDS patients. Unpublished PhD thesis. Central South University, China.
Gjesfjeld, C. D., Green, C. G., & Kim, K. H. (2008). A confirmatory factor analysis of an abbreviated social support instrument: The MOS-SSS. Research on Social Work Practice, 18(3), 231–237. CrossRef
Chen, W. T., Shiu, C. S., Yang, J. P., Simoni, J. M., Fredriksen-Goldsen, K. I., Lee, T. S., et al. (2013). Antiretroviral therapy (ART) side effect impacted on quality of life, and depressive symptomatology: A mixed-method study. Journal of AIDS & Clinical Research, 4, 218.
Nunnally, J. C. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: Mc Graw-Hill Inc.
Mueller, R. O. (1996). Basic principles of structural equation modeling: An introduction to LISREL and EQS. New York: Springer. CrossRef
Munro, B. H., Duffy, M. E., Brancato, V., Newton, S., & Talbot, L. (2005). Statistical methods for health care research (5th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Co.
Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1996(1), 130–149. CrossRef
Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Testing structural equation models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. CrossRef
Hurley, A. E., Scandura, T. A., Schriesheim, C. A., Brannick, M. T., Seers, A., Vandenberg, R. J., et al. (1997). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Guidelines, issues, and alternatives. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(6), 667–683. CrossRef
Tamaka, J. S. (1987). How big is big enough? Sample size and goodness of fit in structural equation models with latent variables. Child Development, 58(1), 134–146. CrossRef
- Factor analyses of a social support scale using two methods
Joyce P. Yang
Jane M. Simoni
- Springer International Publishing
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta