Introduction
Materials and methods
Study area
Camera-trap survey
Estimating population and density
Factors associated with tiger and leopard distribution
Temporal activity patterns
Diet of tigers and leopards
Results
Density and abundance of tigers and leopards
Parameters | Tiger | Leopard |
---|---|---|
Number of camera stations with capture | 143 | 110 |
Number of independent detections | 329 | 207 |
Capture rate (number of detections per 100 trap days) | 5.4 | 3.4 |
Number of individuals captured | 78 (50 F, 18 M, 10 U) | 71 (32 F, 27 M, 11 U) |
Both flanks | 61 | 58 |
Right flank only | 10 | 7 |
Left flank only | 7a | 6a |
Parameters | Tiger | Leopard | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Estimate ± SD | 95% CI | Gweke diagnostics|z score| | Estimate ± SD | 95% CI | Gweke diagnostics|z score| | |
Sigma (σ) | 5089.2 ± 191.0 | 4746–5475 | 1.2956 | 7002.52 ± 604.67 | 5841–8176 | − 0.0716 |
Lamda (λ0) | 0.029 ± 0.004 | 0.021–0.038 | − 1.2801 | 0.003 ± 0.001 | 0.003–0.004 | − 0.1049 |
Beta (β) | 1.33 ± 0.19 | 0.97–1.71 | 0.5596 | 3.28 ± 0.23 | 2.84–3.74 | − 0.1471 |
Psi (ѱ) | 0.32 ± 0.04 | 0.25–0.39 | − 0.4057 | 0.31 ± 0.04 | 0.23–0.39 | 0.989 |
N-super | 152 ± 14 | 123–179 | − 0.2921 | 128 ± 15 | 99–157 | 0.807 |
Density (D) | 3.94 ± 0.37 | 3.19–4.64 | 3.31 ± 0.39 | 2.57–4.07 | ||
p1 | 0.028 ± 0.004 | 0.02–0.037 | 0.003 ± 0.001 | 0.003–0.004 | ||
p2 | 0.103 ± 0.014 | 0.076–0.131 | 0.072 ± 0.011 | 0.051–0.095 | ||
Effective sampling area (km2) | 2142.2 | 2571.1 | ||||
Ñ | 86 ± 8 | 70–102 | 85 ± 10 | 66–105 |
Factors related to tiger and leopard occurrence
Parameters | Estimate | Unconditional SE | Z value | Relative importance | Pr(> |z|) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(A) Tiger | |||||
(Intercept) | − 2.087 | 0.592 | 3.516 | – | < 0.001*** |
Chital | 0.064 | 0.027 | 2.326 | 1.00 | 0.020* |
Grassland | 0.006 | 0.003 | 1.992 | 1.00 | 0.046* |
Livestock | − 0.130 | 0.066 | 1.981 | 0.97 | 0.048* |
Management_CNP | 0.843 | 0.405 | 2.074 | 0.93 | 0.038* |
Muntjac | 0.082 | 0.047 | 1.732 | 0.92 | 0.083 |
Riverine_forest | 0.942 | 0.353 | 2.658 | 0.75 | 0.008** |
Sal_forest | 0.180 | 0.111 | 1.611 | 0.70 | 0.107 |
Sambar | 0.057 | 0.032 | 1.769 | 0.64 | 0.077 |
Physio_Lowland | 0.452 | 0.299 | 1.508 | 0.44 | 0.132 |
Ruggedness | − 0.003 | 0.003 | 1.010 | 0.24 | 0.313 |
Waterbodies | 0.609 | 0.664 | 0.914 | 0.19 | 0.361 |
Local_people | − 0.043 | 0.037 | 1.150 | 0.16 | 0.250 |
Leopard_density | − 0.167 | 0.154 | 1.080 | 0.10 | 0.280 |
(B) Leopard | |||||
(Intercept) | − 1.613 | 0.378 | 4.258 | – | < 0.001*** |
Chital | 0.051 | 0.025 | 2.031 | 1.00 | 0.042* |
Livestock | 0.118 | 0.044 | 2.701 | 1.00 | 0.007** |
Sal_forest | 0.203 | 0.104 | 1.938 | 1.00 | 0.053* |
Sambar | 0.035 | 0.027 | 1.294 | 0.31 | 0.196 |
Waterbodies | 0.773 | 0.639 | 1.206 | 0.29 | 0.228 |
Ruggedness | 0.003 | 0.002 | 1.062 | 0.23 | 0.288 |
Tiger_density | − 0.052 | 0.049 | 1.062 | 0.21 | 0.288 |
Grassland | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.934 | 0.10 | 0.350 |
Distance_forest_edge | − 0.027 | 0.046 | 0.59 | 0.05 | 0.555 |
Management_CNP | 0.179 | 0.310 | 0.574 | 0.05 | 0.566 |
Physio_Lowland | − 0.136 | 0.254 | 0.535 | 0.05 | 0.593 |