nach oben

Erschienen in:

2024 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Factors of Intention to Use a Photo Tool: Comparison Between Privacy-Enhancing and Non-privacy-enhancing Tools

verfasst von : Vanessa Bracamonte, Sebastian Pape, Sascha Löbner

Erschienen in: ICT Systems Security and Privacy Protection

Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Tools that detect and transform privacy sensitive information in user content have been proposed to enhance privacy in contexts such as social media. However, previous research has found that privacy-related concerns can be higher in these types of tools compared to similar non-privacy tools. In this paper, we focus on adoption of these tools and investigate how the knowledge that a data-processing tool has a privacy purpose affects privacy-related factors of intention to use such a tool, when compared with a similar tool with a non-privacy-related purpose. We conducted a user study where we described a privacy-enhancing and a non-privacy-enhancing photo manipulation app to two groups of participants. The results show that general and context-specific privacy-related perception has different effects for the two types of apps. In particular, although participants perceived the same level of privacy risk towards both types of apps, this risk only had a significant negative effect on intention to use in the case of the privacy-enhancing app. Furthermore, disposition to value privacy increased both perceived risk and intention to use the privacy-enhancing app. We discuss these findings in the context of the diffusion of privacy-enhancing tools for user content.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Machine Learning Metrics for Network Datasets Evaluation

Nächstes Kapitel Real-Time Platform Identification of VPN Video Streaming Based on Side-Channel Attack

Bracamonte, V., Pape, S., Loebner, S.: “All apps do this”: comparing privacy concerns towards privacy tools and non-privacy tools for social media content. Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol. 2022(3) (2022)

Bracamonte, V., Tesfay, W.B., Kiyomoto, S.: Towards exploring user perception of a privacy sensitive information detection tool. In: 7th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy (2021)

Corner, M., Dogan, H., Mylonas, A., Djabri, F.: A usability evaluation of privacy add-ons for web browsers. In: Marcus, A., Wang, W. (eds.) HCII 2019. LNCS, vol. 11586, pp. 442–458. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23535-2_33CrossRef

Dijkstra, T.K., Henseler, J.: Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Q. 39(2), 297–316 (2015)CrossRef

Dinev, T., McConnell, A.R., Smith, H.J.: Research commentary—informing privacy research through information systems, psychology, and behavioral economics: thinking outside the “APCO’’ box. Inf. Syst. Res. 26(4), 639–655 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0600CrossRef

Dinev, T., Xu, H., Smith, J.H., Hart, P.: Information privacy and correlates: an empirical attempt to bridge and distinguish privacy-related concepts. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 22(3), 295–316 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.23CrossRef

Hair, J., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N., Ray, S.: Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook (2021)

Hair, J.F., Risher, J.J., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M.: When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. (2019)

Harborth, D., Pape, S.: How privacy concerns and trust and risk beliefs influence users’ intentions to use privacy-enhancing technologies – the case of tor. In: 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) 2019, pp. 4851–4860 (2019). https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/59923

10.

Harborth, D., Pape, S.: How privacy concerns, trust and risk beliefs and privacy literacy influence users’ intentions to use privacy-enhancing technologies - the case of tor. ACM SIGMIS Database: DATABASE Adv. Inf. Syst. 51(1), 51–69 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3380799.3380805. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3380799.3380805

11.

Harborth, D., Pape, S., Rannenberg, K.: Explaining the technology use behavior of privacy-enhancing technologies: the case of tor and Jondonym. Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol. (PoPETs) 2020(2), 111–128 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2478/popets-2020-0020. https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/popets/2020/2/article-p111.xml

12.

Hasan, R., Crandall, D., Fritz, M., Kapadia, A.: Automatically detecting bystanders in photos to reduce privacy risks. In: 2020 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 318–335 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/SP40000.2020.00097

13.

Henseler, J.: PLS-MGA: a non-parametric approach to partial least squares-based multi-group analysis. In: Gaul, W., Geyer-Schulz, A., Schmidt-Thieme, L., Kunze, J. (eds.) Challenges at the Interface of Data Analysis, Computer Science, and Optimization. STUDIES CLASS, pp. 495–501. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24466-7_50CrossRef

14.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. Int. Mark. Rev. (2016)

15.

Jarvenpaa, S.L., Tractinsky, N., Saarinen, L.: Consumer trust in an internet store: a cross-cultural validation. J. Comput.-Mediated Commun. 5(2), JCMC526 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00337.x

16.

Kang, R., Brown, S., Dabbish, L., Kiesler, S.: Privacy attitudes of mechanical Turk workers and the U.S. public. In: 10th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2014), pp. 37–49 (2014)

17.

Klesel, M., Schuberth, F., Henseler, J., Niehaves, B.: A test for multigroup comparison using partial least squares path modeling. Internet Res. 29(3), 464–477 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-11-2017-0418CrossRef

18.

Kock, N., Hadaya, P.: Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: the inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Inf. Syst. J. 28(1), 227–261 (2018)CrossRef

19.

Kokolakis, S.: Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: a review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon. Comput. Secur. 64, 122–134 (2017)CrossRef

20.

Korayem, M., Templeman, R., Chen, D., Crandall, D., Kapadia, A.: Enhancing lifelogging privacy by detecting screens. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2016, pp. 4309–4314. Association for Computing Machinery (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858417

21.

Li, Y., Vishwamitra, N., Knijnenburg, B.P., Hu, H., Caine, K.: Effectiveness and users’ experience of obfuscation as a privacy-enhancing technology for sharing photos. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1(CSCW), 67:1–67:24 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3134702

22.

Lin, T.Y., et al.: Microsoft COCO: common objects in context. In: Fleet, D., Pajdla, T., Schiele, B., Tuytelaars, T. (eds.) ECCV 2014. LNCS, pp. 740–755. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48CrossRef

23.

Malhotra, N.K., Kim, S.S., Agarwal, J.: Internet users’ information privacy concerns (IUIPC): the construct, the scale, and a causal model. Inf. Syst. Res. 15(4), 336–355 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0032CrossRef

24.

Pavlou, P.A.: Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 7(3), 101–134 (2003)CrossRef

25.

Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., Becker, J.M.: SmartPLS 3 (2015)

26.

Sarstedt, M., Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., Thiele, K.O., Gudergan, S.P.: Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: where the bias lies! J. Bus. Res. 69(10), 3998–4010 (2016)CrossRef

27.

Schaub, F., et al.: Watching them watching me: browser extensions impact on user privacy awareness and concern. In: Proceedings 2016 Workshop on Usable Security. Internet Society (2016). https://doi.org/10.14722/usec.2016.23017

28.

Sleeper, M., et al.: “I read my Twitter the next morning and was astonished”: a conversational perspective on Twitter regrets. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2013, pp. 3277–3286. Association for Computing Machinery (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466448

29.

Smith, H.J., Milberg, S.J., Burke, S.J.: Information privacy: measuring individuals’ concerns about organizational practices. MIS Q. 20(2), 167–196 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2307/249477CrossRef

30.

Spiel, K., Haimson, O.L., Lottridge, D.: How to do better with gender on surveys: a guide for HCI researchers. Interactions 26(4), 62–65 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3338283CrossRef

31.

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y., Xu, X.: Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 157–178 (2012)

32.

Wang, Y., Norcie, G., Komanduri, S., Acquisti, A., Leon, P.G., Cranor, L.F.: “I regretted the minute I pressed share”: a qualitative study of regrets on Facebook. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, SOUPS 2011, pp. 1–16. Association for Computing Machinery (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/2078827.2078841

33.

Xu, H., Dinev, T., Smith, J., Hart, P.: Information privacy concerns: linking individual perceptions with institutional privacy assurances. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 12(12) (2011). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00281

Titel: Factors of Intention to Use a Photo Tool: Comparison Between Privacy-Enhancing and Non-privacy-enhancing Tools
verfasst von: Vanessa Bracamonte
Sebastian Pape
Sascha Löbner
Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland
Buch: ICT Systems Security and Privacy Protection
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-56325-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-56326-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56326-3_23

Premium Partner

Bildnachweise

Rittal/© Rittal, NTT Data/© NTT Data, Wildix/© Wildix, Ceyoniq Technology GmbH/© Ceyoniq Technology GmbH, arvato Systems GmbH/© arvato Systems GmbH, Ninox Software GmbH/© Ninox Software GmbH, Everyday Software S.L./© Everyday Software S.L., Redgate/© Redgate, CELONIS Labs GmbH, DC-Datacenter-Group GmbH/© DC-Datacenter-Group GmbH, all for one/© all for one, G Data CyberDefense/© G Data CyberDefense, FAST LTA/© FAST LTA, Vendosoft/© Vendosoft, Kumavision/© Kumavision, Noriis Network AG/© Noriis Network AG, WSW Software GmbH/© WSW Software GmbH

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"