nach oben

Erschienen in:

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Farmer Cooperatives as Systems of Attributes: An Analysis of Ownership and Investment Complementarities

verfasst von : Jasper Grashuis, Michael L. Cook

Erschienen in: Management and Governance of Networks

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The long-term economic viability of the farmer cooperative mode of organization is often assumed to be jeopardized by an equity constraint. To inform possible solutions, the farmer cooperative is conceptualized as an independent firm comprising a system of attributes, thus facilitating a better understanding of the dual function of organized farm producers as both patrons and capitalists. We place emphasis on the hybrid assignment and configuration of claim rights to find possible complementarities between ownership and investment so as to loosen the equity constraint. Based on survey data on US farmer cooperatives, we analyze multiple configurations of membership access, ownership transferability, equity redeemability, preferred stock provision and ownership, and upfront capital contribution in relation to the desire to patronize and the obligation to capitalize the cooperative. Thus, we inform constitutional responses to rapid developments in the agri-food industry, which force farmer cooperatives to find additional equity for necessary growth in scale and scope.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Profiling the Natural Food Cooperative Members: Strategic Implications in Terms of Market Positioning and Governance

Nächstes Kapitel Toward an Updated Typology of US Farmer Cooperatives: Survey Evidence of Recent Hybrid Ownership Restructuring

Cooperative law mandates the formation of a board of directors.

Confusingly, Nilsson (1999) applied the term member-investor cooperative to the new generation cooperative and the public limited company. In the present chapter, member investor is defined as in Chaddad and Cook (2004).

Subsidiary formation is not exclusive to the comaker structure. However, the defining characteristic of the comaker cooperative is combined member and investor ownership, not full member ownership as is applicable to other structures with vertical investment (Cook and Chaddad 2004).

In reference to Südzucker, the German sugar producer, Filippi et al. (2012) used the term cooperative investor-owned firm to describe its ownership structure. Südzucker is traded on the public market, but majority ownership is held by Süddeutsche Zuckerrübenverwertungs-Genossenschaft (SZVG), the sugar producer cooperative.

For example, see the Wyoming Processing Cooperative Statute, the Minnesota Cooperative Associations Act, the Iowa Cooperative Associations Act, and the Tennessee Processing Cooperative Law.

For a full description of the survey data, see Grashuis and Cook (2017).

Closed membership is arguably the key characteristic of the new generation cooperative, as discussed by Cook and Iliopoulos (1999) and Nilsson (1999). Because of its closed membership, the new generation cooperative is hypothesized to offer greater incentive to invest member equity.

Baarda JR (2006) Current issues in cooperative finance and governance. Cooperative Programs, Rural Development, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC

Baker GP, Gibbons R, Murphy KJ (2008) Strategic alliances: bridges between “islands of conscious power”. J Jpn Int Econ 22(2):146–163CrossRef

Benos T, Kalogeras N, Verhees FJ, Sergaki P, Pennings JM (2016) Cooperatives’ organizational restructuring, strategic attributes, and performance: the case of agribusiness cooperatives in Greece. Agribusiness 32(1):127–150CrossRef

Briggeman BC, Jacobs KL, Kenkel P, Mckee G (2016) Current trends in cooperative finance. Agric Financ Rev 76(3):402–410CrossRef

Brynjolfsson E, Milgrom P (2013) Complementarity between organizations. In: The handbook of organizational economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 11–55

Chaddad F (2012) Advancing the theory of the cooperative organization: the cooperative as a true hybrid. Ann Public Coop Econ 83(4):445–461CrossRef

Chaddad FR, Cook ML (2004) Understanding new cooperative models: an ownership–control rights typology. Appl Econ Perspect Policy 26(3):348–360

Chaddad FR, Cook ML, Heckelei T (2005) Testing for the presence of financial constraints in US agricultural cooperatives: an investment behaviour approach. J Agric Econ 56(3):385–397CrossRef

Cook ML (1995) The future of US agricultural cooperatives: a neo-institutional approach. Am J Agric Econ 77(5):1153–1159CrossRef

Cook ML, Chaddad FR (2004) Redesigning cooperative boundaries: the emergence of new models. Am J Agric Econ 86(5):1249–1253CrossRef

Cook ML, Iliopoulos C (1999) Beginning to inform the theory of the cooperative firm: emergence of the new generation cooperative. Finn J Bus Econ 4(99):525–535

Cook ML, Iliopoulos C (2000) Ill-defined property rights in collective action: the case of US agricultural cooperatives. In: Menard C (ed) Institutions, contracts, and organizations: perspectives from new institutional economics. Edward Elgar, London, pp 335–348

Cook ML, Iliopoulos C (2016) Generic solutions to coordination and organizational costs: informing cooperative longevity. J Chain Netw Sci 16(1):19–27CrossRef

Demsetz H (1983) Structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. J Law Econ 26(2):375–390CrossRef

Deng W, Hendrikse G (2013) Uncertainties and governance structure in incentives provision for product quality. In: Network governance. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 179–203CrossRef

Ebers M, Oerlemans L (2016) The variety of governance structures beyond market and hierarchy. J Manag 42(6):1491–1529

Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J Law Econ 26(2):301–325CrossRef

Feng L, Hendrikse G (2008) On the nature of a cooperative: a system of attributes perspective. In: Strategy and governance of networks. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 13–26CrossRef

Filippi M, Kühl R, Smit AB (2012) Support for farmers’ cooperatives: internationalisation of sugar cooperatives: Cosun, Südzucker/Agrana, Tereos. Wageningen UR, Wagening

Fulton ME, Hueth B (2009) Cooperative conversions, failures and restructurings: an overview. J Coop 23:1–11

Goldberg RA, Preble M (2011) CHS Inc.: cooperative leadership in a global economy. In: Harvard business school teaching note 911–418. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

Grashuis J, Cook ML (2016) Tinkering and reinventing: economic adaptation by farmer cooperatives. Selected paper presented at the World Interdisciplinary Network for institutional research conference – WINIR, Boston, Massachusetts, September 4, 2016

Grashuis J, Cook ML (2017) Toward an updated typology of U.S. farmer cooperatives: survey evidence of recent hybrid ownership restructuring. In: Hendrikse G, Cliquet G, Ehrmann T, Windsperger J (eds) Management and governance of networks: franchising, cooperatives and strategic alliances. Springer, Heidelberg

Harris A, Stefanson B, Fulton M (1996) New generation cooperatives and cooperative theory. J Agric Coop 11:15–28

Harte LN (1997) Creeping privatisation of Irish co-operatives: a transaction cost explanation. In: Strategies and structures in the agro-food industries. Van Gorcum, Assen, pp 31–53

Hendrikse G, Veerman C (1997) Marketing cooperatives as a system of attributes. In: Strategies and structures in the agro-food industries. Van Gorcum, Assen, pp 111–130

Hovelaque V, Duvaleix-Tréguer S, Cordier J (2009) Effects of constrained supply and price contracts on agricultural cooperatives. Eur J Oper Res 199(3):769–780CrossRef

James HS, Klein PG, Sykuta ME (2007) Markets, contracts, or integration? The adoption, diffusion, and evolution of organizational form. Contracting and Organizations Research Institute, University of Missouri

Katchova AL (2013) Agricultural contracting and agrifood competition. In: The ethics and economics of agrifood competition. Springer, Netherlands, pp 177–191CrossRef

Liang Q, Hendrikse G (2013) Cooperative CEO identity and efficient governance: member or outside CEO? Agribusiness 29(1):23–38CrossRef

Liang Q, Hendrikse G (2016) Pooling and the yardstick effect of cooperatives. Agric Syst 143:97–105CrossRef

Lund M (2013) Cooperative equity and ownership: an introduction. University of Wisconsin Center for Cooperatives, Madison, WI

Makadok R, Coff R (2009) Both market and hierarchy: an incentive-system theory of hybrid governance forms. Acad Manag Rev 34(2):297–319CrossRef

Ménard C (2004) The economics of hybrid organizations. J Inst Theor Econ 160(3):345–376CrossRef

Menard C (2007) Cooperatives: hierarchies or hybrids? In: Vertical markets and cooperative hierarchies. Springer, Netherlands, pp 1–18CrossRef

Menard C (2013) Hybrid modes of organization. In: The handbook of organizational economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 1066–1105

Mérel PR, Saitone TL, Sexton RJ (2009) Cooperatives and quality-differentiated markets: strengths, weaknesses, and modeling approaches. J Rural Coop 37(2):201

Mérel PR, Saitone TL, Sexton RJ (2015) Cooperative stability under stochastic quality and farmer heterogeneity. Eur Rev Agric Econ 42(5):765–795CrossRef

Milgrom P, Roberts J (1990) Rationalizability, learning, and equilibrium in games with strategic complementarities. Econometrica 58(6):1255–1277CrossRef

Milgrom P, Roberts J (1994) Complementarities and systems: understanding Japanese economic organization. Estud Econ 9(1):3–42

Nilsson J (1999) Co-operative organisational models as reflections of the business environments. Finn J Bus Econ 4(99):449–470

Nilsson J (2001) Organisational principles for co-operative firms. Scand J Manag 17(3):329–356CrossRef

Parmigiani A, Rivera-Santos M (2011) Clearing a path through the forest: a meta-review of interorganizational relationships. J Manag 37(4):1108–1136

Porter PK, Scully GW (1987) Economic efficiency in cooperatives. J Law Econ 30(2):489–512CrossRef

Puusa A, Hokkila K, Varis A (2016) Individuality vs. communality—a new dual role of co-operatives? J Coop Organ Manag 4(1):22–30

Rey P, Tirole J (2007) Financing and access in cooperatives. Int J Ind Organ 25(5):1061–1088CrossRef

Richards TJ, Manfredo MR (2003) Cooperative mergers and acquisitions: the role of capital constraints. J Agric Resour Econ 28(1):152–168

Sexton RJ (2013) Market power, misconceptions, and modern agricultural markets. Am J Agric Econ 95(2):209–219CrossRef

Staatz JM (1987) The structural characteristics of farmer cooperatives and their behavioral consequences. Coop Theory New Approach 18:33–60

Su Y, Cook ML (2015) Price stability and economic sustainability–achievable goals? A case study of organic valley. Am J Agric Econ 97:635–651CrossRef

Sykuta ME, Cook ML (2001) A new institutional economics approach to contracts and cooperatives. Am J Agric Econ 83(5):1273–1279CrossRef

United States Department of Agriculture (2014) Cooperative statistics, 2013. Service report 75. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC

Van Bekkum O, Bijman J (2006) Innovations in cooperative ownership: converted and hybrid listed cooperatives. In 7th international conference on management in agrifood chains and networks, vol. 31, Ede, The Netherlands

Van der Krogt D, Nilsson J, Høst V (2007) The impact of cooperatives’ risk aversion and equity capital constraints on their inter-firm consolidation and collaboration strategies—with an empirical study of the European dairy industry. Agribusiness 23(4):453–472CrossRef

Williamson OE (1991) Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Adm Sci Q 36(2):269–296CrossRef

Titel: Farmer Cooperatives as Systems of Attributes: An Analysis of Ownership and Investment Complementarities
verfasst von: Jasper Grashuis
Michael L. Cook
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Management and Governance of Networks
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57275-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-57276-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57276-5_8