Skip to main content
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben

2024 | Buch

Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

Free Speech in the Puzzle of Content Regulation

Insights from the West and the Global South

verfasst von: Soorya Balendra

Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland

Buchreihe : Law, Governance and Technology Series

Enthalten in: Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" , Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Inhaltsverzeichnis
insite
SUCHEN

Über dieses Buch

Dieses Buch untersucht die Schnittmenge von Recht und Technologie und konzentriert sich dabei auf die Regulierung der Online-Rede und ihr komplexes Zusammenspiel mit der freien Meinungsäußerung im digitalen Zeitalter. Es identifiziert drei primäre Regulierungsmodelle - Selbstregulierung, externe Regulierung und Koregulierung - und untersucht, wie jedes Modell wiederkehrende Herausforderungen sowohl bei der inhaltlichen Mäßigung als auch beim Schutz der Redefreiheit darstellt. Die Studie untersucht die Regulierung schädlicher Äußerungen, einschließlich Verleumdung, Gewalt, Fehlinformationen und Propaganda, und hebt die Spannungen zwischen der Regulierung verbotener Inhalte und der Wahrung der Meinungsfreiheit im Internet hervor. Darüber hinaus befasst sich das Buch mit dem digitalen Autoritarismus und seiner Manifestation in Regulierungsansätzen, insbesondere dem chinesischen Modell der Inhaltsregulierung. Sie untersucht auch die plattformgestützte Regulierung und bewertet die Herausforderungen, die von der Mäßigung menschlicher und KI-getriebener Inhalte ausgehen. Durch eine vergleichende Analyse der rechtlichen Rahmenbedingungen in wichtigen Rechtsordnungen - darunter den Vereinigten Staaten (Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act), Deutschland (Network Enforcement Act), Indien (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021) und Sri Lanka (Online Safety Act, 2024) - untersucht das Buch, wie diese Rahmenbedingungen das Gleichgewicht zwischen Redefreiheit und Plattformverantwortung in diesen Rechtsordnungen mit dem unterschiedlichen Kontext, der Machtasymmetrie der Behörden mit den Plattformen, der politischen und kulturellen Landschaft und dem Markt der sozialen Medien steuern. Außerdem wird untersucht, wie diese sich entwickelnden Modelle signifikante Unterschiede in der Rolle von Regierungen, Plattformen, Regulierungsbehörden, Normen und Compliance-Mechanismen widerspiegeln. Indem dieses Buch eine wissenschaftliche Diskussion zu diesen Themen aus rechtlicher und regulatorischer Perspektive führt, versucht es, ein Gleichgewicht zwischen Online-Redefreiheit und legitimen Einschränkungen zu finden. Sie bietet einen vergleichenden Blick auf die westliche Rechtsprechung und die Mehrheitswelt und verknüpft gemeinsame Themen in verschiedenen Rechtsordnungen, um Licht auf die komplizierten Herausforderungen der Regulierung der Online-Rede zu werfen. Damit schließt das Buch eine Lücke in der bestehenden Literatur und bietet eine dringend benötigte Grundlage für die Entwicklung und Aktualisierung sowohl interner als auch externer Regulierungsrahmen.
Mit KI übersetzt

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Frontmatter
Chapter 1. Introduction
Abstract
Free speech, one of the oldest and most widely recognized constitutional rights in many countries across the world, is traditionally perceived as the liberty to express oneself and is indispensable as it guarantees the opportunity for citizens to participate in the government (Kentridge, 1996; Meiklejohn, 1961; Stevens, 1993). Also, it has been recognized as a fundamental human right in many of the international and regional instruments. However, when free speech adopts an increasingly dark and deeply malicious tone, it plays a conflicting role with other rights, such as the right to privacy, and the right to freedom of thought and religion (Bychawska-Siniarska, 2017; Smet, 2010; Sullivan, 2010). Navigating these conflicts requires a delicate balance between upholding free speech and addressing its potential adverse consequences on other rights and societal values. Different jurisdictions adapt various approaches and preferences in balancing conflicts among these fundamental human rights. For instance, in the United States, a strong preference is placed on protecting free speech, as guaranteed under the First Amendment to the Constitution. For example, in the case of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, where the New York Times published an ad by civil rights activists criticizing the Montgomery, Alabama, police’s treatment of protestors, containing some inaccuracies. Police Commissioner L.B. Sullivan, claiming the ad defamed him, won a libel case against the Times in Alabama courts. The New York Times appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, arguing the ad’s content was protected under the First Amendment and not intended to harm Sullivan’s reputation. The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of the New York Times, establishing that the First Amendment protects the publication of statements, even if inaccuracies exist. The Court introduced the standard that a public official claiming libel must prove the statement was made with actual malice, meaning with knowledge of its falsehood or reckless disregard for the truth. This decision emphasized that vigorous debate about government and public affairs is protected under the First Amendment, even if such debate includes vehement criticism and mistakes. The ruling extended First Amendment protections to the press, significantly impacting how libel and defamation are approached legally, particularly in cases involving public figures and officials. In a 2015 Time magazine survey involving over 50 law professors, this decision was named the best Supreme Court decision since 1960 by both Owen Fiss of Yale and Steven Shiffrin of Cornell.
Soorya Balendra
Chapter 2. The Evolution of Free Speech in the Era of Social Media
Abstract
Undoubtedly, social media has significantly contributed to the proliferation of free speech online. This chapter begins with an overview of the evolution of social media platforms over time. It then delves into contemporary case studies to analyze how social media has contributed to the evolution and amplification of free speech within democratic spaces. While recognizing the intriguing challenges posed by widespread social media use, the chapter assesses the pros and cons of unlimited free speech online, stressing them through the lens of the need for regulatory measures.
Soorya Balendra
Chapter 3. International Standards on Free Speech and Intermediaries
Abstract
This chapter focuses on two interconnected variables critical to the study: free speech and Internet intermediaries. It delves into the international framework to illustrate the global recognition of free speech amidst debates on competing rights and values. Additionally, the chapter explores the concept of intermediaries, highlighting the pivotal role of intermediaries in content moderation practices worldwide. Given the Internet’s universal and international character, and the global nature of content moderation, this discussion aims to provide a thorough analysis from the perspective of international recognition. This foundational analysis sets the stage for the deeper discussions that will occur later in the book.
Soorya Balendra
Chapter 4. Regulating Social Media Platforms
Abstract
The chapter explores the regulatory need of the social media platforms, focusing on the various approaches employed by different regulatory models to manage online content and their effects on human rights, particularly free speech. It highlights the necessity for a regulatory model in social media, identifying three main models discussed within the context of social media governance by scholars and policymakers: internal, external, and co-regulation. Through meticulous examination and case studies, the chapter outlines the challenges and chances associated with each model. It aims to identify the most effective model for navigating these challenges while ensuring the protection or promotion of free speech online. Additionally, the chapter extends the discussion to intermediary liability models, which are crucial for developing co-regulation frameworks that accommodate both authorities and private platforms.
Soorya Balendra
Chapter 5. Content Regulations by Platforms: Enduring Challenges
Abstract
This study investigates the moderation practices by platforms, primarily executed by AI, as part of the “internal regulation” model outlined in the previous chapter. It aims to identify the factors that influence these moderation practices and uncover the complexities involved. Through scholarly discussions and policy case studies, this chapter highlights the serious repercussions of discriminatory platform moderation on free speech and other fundamental values of a democratic society. It concludes with recommendations to address and mitigate these challenges.
Soorya Balendra
Chapter 6. Digital Authoritarianism: The Chinese Model and Beyond
Abstract
The contemporary expansion of authoritarian regimes into digital platforms poses significant challenges to democratic values and human rights, including free speech. This chapter examines four methods through which governments carry out digital authoritarianism: mass surveillance, cyber-operations, censorship, and information operations, along with their potential implications for democratic society. By analyzing these through case studies, the study aims to identify the challenges in externally regulating Social Media Platforms—which empower government authorities—often resulting in authoritarian control in the jurisdictions like China, and Russia.
Soorya Balendra
Chapter 7. Section 230: Ongoing Debates on the “Safe Harbor” Provision
Abstract
This chapter explores the regulation of social media from the perspective of the United States, focusing on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. It examines the significant role social media plays in free speech and democratic discourse, particularly during widespread movements and elections. The study delves into the legal challenges of regulating social media content, emphasizing Section 230 while analyzing issues related to protecting free speech and achieving consistent content moderation both in the United States and globally. It proposes an “interpretational shift” in judicial approaches to Section 230 cases and addresses the risks of amending the section. Additionally, the chapter suggests that any amendments to the “safe harbor” provision should include clear standards to safeguard free speech online.
Soorya Balendra
Chapter 8. Unveiling NetzDG: The Digital Berlin Wall
Abstract
The EU has been proactive in creating comprehensive legislative frameworks to address contemporary challenges faced by its member states, with platform moderation and regulation being key areas of focus. The Digital Services Act (DSA) serves as a prime example of this effort. Despite its general stance of minimal interference with Internet freedom, Germany enacted the controversial Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG) in 2017, which took effect in 2018, to tackle hate speech and fake news. This chapter discusses the impact of NetzDG on free speech online—with the paradigm of DSA, particularly on the regulations of social media platforms (SMPs)—through an analysis of judicial, research, scholarly, and policy debates. While acknowledging and supporting the shift of platform governance to private platforms, the chapter identifies critical challenges posed by the current regulatory framework. It proposes strategies for addressing these challenges in the governance of social media content, aiming to protect the inherent rights to free speech recognized both locally and globally.
Soorya Balendra
Chapter 9. Regulation from the South: IT Rules of India
Abstract
While the Information Technology (IT) Act of India (2000) stands as a pioneering effort in technology regulation, India introduced the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules in 2021. This move aimed to tackle emerging issues in digital spaces by regulating digital platforms, including social media platforms (SMPs), digital news portals, and OTT platforms. Despite introducing significant contemporary standards, such as the revocation of platform immunities and imposing additional obligations on Internet intermediaries, the framework faces practical challenges. This chapter analyzes the role of social media within the Indian context, examining its contributions to free speech and social movements. It also reviews the regulatory landscape prior to the 2021 IT Rules, with a particular focus on Section 66A of the IT Act. However, the core of this paper is to discuss the background, key features, and critical analysis of the newly implemented IT Rules of India, with a special emphasis on the potential challenges they pose to online speech across various SMPs. Acknowledging these challenges, the chapter concludes with suggestions for overcoming these obstacles by amending certain aspects of the IT Rules—especially those related to procedural standards and the distribution of authority mandated by the Rules.
Soorya Balendra
Chapter 10. Continuing Repression: The Online Safety Act of Sri Lanka
Abstract
Sri Lanka, as a postconflict country from the Global South, has experienced the proliferation of hate content over the Internet, particularly after incidents such as the mob violence (2018) and the Easter Sunday attacks (2019). In response to these challenges, Sri Lanka implemented Internet shutdowns as existing legal frameworks proved ineffective and were criticized as heavy-handed measures against free speech online. Specifically, the study examines the Online Safety Act (OSA) of Sri Lanka, passed in January 2024, with the objective of regulating content over the Internet, particularly on social media platforms (SMPs). This study attempts to discern the pros and cons of the OSA and its impacts on free speech in the digital era, from a fragile democratic jurisprudence. Identifying the key challenges associated with the Act, the chapter concludes with suggestions on how to rectify these issues by adopting international standards and holding platforms accountable.
Soorya Balendra
Chapter 11. Conclusion and a Way Forward
Abstract
This book set out to answer the question: How do different social media content regulatory models, from Western to Majority world contexts, impact online free speech?
Soorya Balendra
12. Correction to: Free Speech in the Puzzle of Content Regulation: Insights from the West and the Global South
Soorya Balendra
Backmatter
Metadaten
Titel
Free Speech in the Puzzle of Content Regulation
verfasst von
Soorya Balendra
Copyright-Jahr
2024
Electronic ISBN
978-3-031-75813-3
Print ISBN
978-3-031-75812-6
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-75813-3