nach oben

Journal of Happiness Studies

Erschienen in:

22.06.2016 | Research Paper

Free to Be Happy: Economic Freedom and Happiness in US States

verfasst von: Jeremy Jackson

Erschienen in: Journal of Happiness Studies | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

While the measurement of subjective well-being and its usefulness as a policy objective is a matter of contention, a burgeoning field of happiness economics is emerging. This paper examines the relationship between the institutions of economic freedom and happiness as reported by respondents to the Generalized Social Survey (GSS) in the United States. GSS responses are matched via geocode to state of residence. This allows individual responses in the GSS to be matched to institutional characteristics of the state of residence. A novel contribution of this study is that analysis of the effect of economic freedom on reported happiness is conducted both at the individual level and using state averages. It is found that the level of economic freedom in US states has a positive effect on both individual reported happiness and state average happiness. Dynamic panel analysis is also conducted both as a robustness check and in an effort to control for endogeneity. This confirms the relationship as positive and is suggestive of a causal positive impact of economic freedom on average state happiness.

Vorheriger Artikel Subjective Well-Being and Self-Reported Health in Osteoarthritis Patients Before and After Arthroplasty

Nächster Artikel The Emotional Timeline of Unemployment: Anticipation, Reaction, and Adaptation

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

The Fraser Institute is headquartered in the Canadian city of Vancouver. It is a public policy think tank that is widely known for its affiliation with a libertarian viewpoint.

While only results for economic freedom measured accounting for government at the Federal, state, and local level are reported, results limiting measured economic freedom to the state and local level generated similar results and are therefore omitted for brevity. Tables of these results are available by request.

Kahneman and Deaton (2010) use an indicator type taking a value of zero for no children or one indicating the presence of children. Our measure is the number of children for which values are correlated with lower happiness.

These statistics are testing for properties that are necessary for the validity of the instruments.

A shortcoming of is that no Hansen, AR(1), or AR(2) test statistics are provided which allow the reader to assess the validity of the model and its assumptions.

Spruk and Kešeljevic (2015) uncover a positive relationship between economic freedom and happiness in standard specifications but the sign is reversed in their dynamic panel regressions.

Spruk and Kešeljević (2015) implemented the Arrellano-Bond procedure, often referred to as difference GMM, while this study uses the system GMM procedure of Arellano and Bover (1995) and Blundell and Bond (1998). System GMM is well known to have better statistical properties than difference GMM. Spruk and Kešeljević (2015) also do not include the necessary test statistics to confirm that the many assumptions required for dynamic panel estimation are indeed met. These include the Arrellano-Bond test for autoregressive error in AR(1) and AR(2) in addition to Sargen/Hansen test statistics for over identifying restrictions.

The economic freedom measure used by Spruk and Kešeljevic (2015) is not the Economic Freedom of the World index of the Fraser Institute. Rather they use the Index of Economic Freedom generated by the Heritage Foundation. This index produced by the Heritage makes some use subjective valuation in creation of the index while the indices created by the Fraser Institute are objectively data driven.

This switch in sign is possibly indicative of a spurious result being driven by a methodological short coming.

Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88(9), 2009–2042.CrossRef

Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.CrossRef

Belasen, A. R., & Hafer, R. W. (2012). Well-being and economic freedom: Evidence from the states. Intelligence, 40(3), 306–316.CrossRef

Belasen, A. R., & Hafer, R. W. (2013). Do changes in economic freedom affect well-being. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 43(1), 56–64.

Berggren, N., & Jordahl, H. (2006). Free to trust: Economic freedom and social capital. Kyklos, 59(2), 141–169.CrossRef

Bernanke, B. (2010). The economics of happiness [Speech]. Retrieved from http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bernanke20100508a.htm.

Bjørnskov, C. (2008). Social capital and happiness in the United States. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 3(1), 43–62.CrossRef

Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.CrossRef

Bueno, A., Ashby, N. J., & Fred McMahon with Deborah Martine. (2012). Economic freedom of North America 2012. Vancouver: Fraser Institute.

Carter, J. R. (2007). An empirical note on economic freedom and income inequality. Public Choice, 130(1–2), 163–177.CrossRef

Compton, R. A., Giedeman, D. C., & Hoover, G. A. (2011). Panel evidence on economic freedom and growth in the United States. European Journal of Political Economy, 27(3), 423–435.CrossRef

Compton, R. A., Giedeman, D. C., & Hoover, G. A. (2014). A distributional analysis of the benefits of economic freedom. European Journal of Political Economy, 33, 121–133.CrossRef

Easton, S. T., & Walker, M. A. (1997). Income, growth, and economic freedom. The American Economic Review, 87(2), 328–332.

Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. The Economic Journal, 110(466), 918–938.CrossRef

Gehring, K. (2013). Who benefits from economic freedom? Unraveling the effect of economic freedom on subjective well-being. World Development, 50, 74–90.CrossRef

Graafland, J., & Compen, B. (2015). Economic freedom and life satisfaction: Mediation by income per capita and generalized trust. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(3), 789–810.CrossRef

Gropper, D. M., Lawson, R. A., & Thorne, J. T. (2011). Economic freedom and happiness. Cato Journal, 31(2), 237–255.

Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., & Block, W. (1996). Economic freedom of the world. Annual Report, Fraser Institute.

Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., & Hall, J. (2015). Economic freedom of the world. Annual Report, Fraser Institute.

Helliwell, J. F. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modelling, 20(2), 331–360.CrossRef

Howell, R. T., Chenot, D., Hill, G., & Howell, C. J. (2011). Momentary happiness: The role of psychological need satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(1), 1–15.CrossRef

Inglehart, R., Foa, R., Peterson, C., & Welzel, C. (2008). Development, freedom, and rising happiness: A global perspective (1981–2007). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(4), 264–285.CrossRef

Jackson, J., Carden, A., & Compton, R. A. (2015). Economic freedom and social capital. Applied Economics, 47(65), 5853–5867.

Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(38), 16489–16493.CrossRef

Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. (2004). Toward national well-being accounts. American Economic Review, 94(2), 429–434.

Lelkes, O. (2006). Tasting freedom: Happiness, religion and economic transition. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 59(2), 173–194.CrossRef

Luhmann, M., Hofmann, W., Eid, M., & Lucas, R. E. (2012). Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 592.CrossRef

Nikolaev, B. (2014). Economic freedom and quality of life: Evidence from the OECD’s Your Better Life Index. Journal of Private Enterprise, 29(Fall 2014), 61–96.

Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., & Diener, E. (2011). Income inequality and happiness. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1095–1100.CrossRef

Pesta, B. J., McDaniel, M. A., & Bertsch, S. (2010). Toward an index of well-being for the fifty US states. Intelligence, 38(1), 160–168.CrossRef

Roodman, D. (2009). A note on the theme of too many instruments*. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 135–158.CrossRef

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166.CrossRef

Spruk, R., & Kešeljević, A. (2015). Institutional origins of subjective well-being: Estimating the effects of economic freedom on national happiness. Journal of happiness studies, 1–54.

Veenhoven, R. (2000). Freedom and happiness: A comparative study in forty-four nations in the early 1990s. In E. Diener & E. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 257–288). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Verme, P. (2009). Happiness, freedom and control. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 71(2), 146–161.CrossRef

Welsch, H. (2003). Freedom and rationality as predictors of cross-national happiness patterns: The role of income as a mediating variable. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4(3), 295–321.CrossRef

Titel: Free to Be Happy: Economic Freedom and Happiness in US States
verfasst von: Jeremy Jackson
Publikationsdatum: 22.06.2016
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Happiness Studies / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1389-4978
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7780
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9770-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Income and Wellbeing in a Society on the Verge to Market Integration: The Case of the Tsimane’ in the Bolivian Amazon

Social Comparisons on Subjective Well-Being: The Role of Social and Cultural Capital

An Experimental Investigation of the Impact of Absolute and Relative Inequalities on Individual Satisfaction

Subjective Well-Being and Self-Reported Health in Osteoarthritis Patients Before and After Arthroplasty

My Friends Are My Estate: Friendship Experiences Mediate the Relationship Between Perceived Responses to Capitalization Attempts and Happiness

The Emotional Timeline of Unemployment: Anticipation, Reaction, and Adaptation