1 Introduction
2 Constitutive equations of shape memory alloy fibers
Modulus | Transformation temperatures | Transformation constants | Material properties | Maximum residual strain |
---|---|---|---|---|
\(E_{\mathrm{A}} =67\) GPa | \(M_{\mathrm{f}} =9\)\(^{\circ }\)C | \(C_{\mathrm{M}} =8\) MPa/\(^{\circ }\)C | \(\alpha _{\mathrm{s}} =10.26\times 10^{-6}\) 1/\({^{\circ }}\)C | \(\varepsilon _L =0.067\) |
\(E_{\mathrm{M}} =26.3\) GPa | \(M_{\mathrm{s}} =18.4\)\(^{\circ }\)C | \(C_{\mathrm{A}} =13.8\) MPa/\(^{\circ }\)C | \(\upsilon _{\mathrm{s}} =0.33\) | |
\(\Theta =0.55\) MPa/\(^{\circ }\)C | \(A_{\mathrm{s}} =34.5\,^{\circ }\)C | \(\sigma _{\mathrm{s}}^{\mathrm{cr}} =100\) MPa | \(\rho _{\mathrm{s}} =6450\) kg/m\(^{3}\) | |
\(A_{\mathrm{f}} =49\)\(^{\circ }\)C | \(\sigma _{\mathrm{f}}^{\mathrm{cr}} =170\) MPa |
3 Micromechanical modeling of the hybrid laminated composite
4 Governing equations of motion
5 Pre-buckling analysis
6 Dynamic stability equations
7 Solution procedure
8 Numerical results and discussion
8.1 Comparative studies
\(\left[ {0,90} \right] _{N/2} , \quad \omega _c =\sqrt{{\rho h}/{A_{11} }}R_2 \omega , \alpha =30^{\circ }, \quad L/{R_2 }=0.5, \quad n=0, \quad {E_x }/{E_\theta }=15, {G_{x\theta } }/{E_\theta }=0.5, \upsilon _{x\theta } =0.25\) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\(h/{R_2 }\) | \(N=\infty \) | \(N=2\) | ||||
Shu [33] | Tong [36] | Present study | Wu [37] | Tong [36] | Present study | |
0.01 | 0.1976 | 0.1978 | 0.1978 | 0.1769 | 0.1769 | 0.1770 |
0.02 | 0.2351 | 0.2355 | 0.2355 | 0.2118 | 0.2119 | 0.2119 |
0.03 | 0.2667 | 0.2671 | 0.2671 | 0.2358 | 0.2360 | 0.2359 |
0.04 | 0.2987 | 0.2992 | 0.2992 | 0.2575 | 0.2578 | 0.2577 |
0.05 | 0.3303 | 0.3308 | 0.3308 | 0.2790 | 0.2794 | 0.2793 |
0.06 | 0.3602 | 0.3606 | 0.3606 | 0.3005 | 0.3010 | 0.3008 |
0.07 | 0.3873 | 0.3877 | 0.3877 | 0.3216 | 0.3222 | 0.3220 |
0.08 | 0.4113 | 0.4117 | 0.4117 | 0.3419 | 0.3426 | 0.3424 |
0.09 | 0.4322 | 0.4325 | 0.4326 | 0.3612 | 0.3620 | 0.3618 |
0.10 | 0.4502 | 0.4504 | 0.4504 | 0.3793 | 0.3801 | 0.3800 |
\(\lambda _{\mathrm{cr}} =\Delta T_{\mathrm{cr}} \alpha _{11} {R_1 }/h, {R_1 }/h=100, L/{R_1 }=1, \alpha _{11} =6.3\times 10^{-6}1/{^{\circ }}{\mathrm{C}}, \alpha _{22} =3\alpha _{11} , E_{11} =172.25\, \mathrm{GPa}, E_{22} =6.89\, \mathrm{GPa}, G_{12} =G_{13} =3.445\, \mathrm{GPa}, G_{23} =1.378\, \mathrm{GPa}, \upsilon _{12} =0.25\) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B.C. | \(\alpha \) | \(\left[ {0,90} \right] , \quad n=8\) | \(\left[ {0,90} \right] _4 , \quad n=7\) | ||||
Singh and Babu [39] | Patel et al. [38] | Present study | Singh and Babu [39] | Patel et al. [38] | Present study | ||
CC | \(0^\circ \) | 0.1049 | 0.10135 | 0.10147 | 0.1640 | 0.16379 | 0.16523 |
\(15^\circ \) | 0.0823 | 0.08904 | 0.08900 | 0.1463 | 0.14528 | 0.14687 | |
\(30^\circ \) | 0.0770 | 0.07496 | 0.07496 | 0.1265 | 0.12552 | 0.12752 | |
\(45^\circ \) | 0.0635 | 0.05951 | 0.05968 | 0.1036 | 0.10408 | 0.10429 | |
\(60^\circ \) | 0.0468 | 0.04471 | 0.04524 | 0.0807 | 0.08241 | 0.08130 | |
SS | \(0^\circ \) | – | 0.09774 | 0.09894 | – | 0.14334 | 0.14545 |
\(15^\circ \) | – | 0.08320 | 0.08412 | – | 0.12176 | 0.12389 | |
\(30^\circ \) | – | 0.06729 | 0.06860 | – | 0.10057 | 0.10297 | |
\(45^\circ \) | – | 0.05068 | 0.05240 | – | 0.07869 | 0.081481 | |
\(60^\circ \) | – | 0.03503 | 0.03737 | – | 0.05804 | 0.061528 |
\(T=80\,^{\circ }\mathrm{C}, \quad \varepsilon _0 =1\% , \quad V_{\mathrm{s}} =10\% , \quad {R_1 }/h=500, \quad L/{R_1 }=1, \quad n=11, \left[ {0_{\mathrm{SMA}} ,90,0,90} \right] _S \) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\(\alpha \) | B.C. | Fundamental frequency (Hz) | ||||
\(K=15\) | \(K=17\) | \(K=19\) | \(K=21\) | \(K=25\) | ||
\(30^\circ \) | SS | 154.485 | 154.475 | 154.472 | 154.471 | 154.471 |
CS | 157.282 | 157.312 | 157.319 | 157.319 | 157.319 | |
SC | 158.201 | 158.220 | 158.218 | 158.217 | 158.217 | |
CC | 161.250 | 161.303 | 161.317 | 161.320 | 161.320 | |
\(45^\circ \) | SS | 131.821 | 131.815 | 131.814 | 131.814 | 131.814 |
CS | 134.472 | 134.490 | 134.493 | 134.492 | 134.492 | |
SC | 135.936 | 135.940 | 135.938 | 135.938 | 135.938 | |
CC | 138.890 | 138.917 | 138.923 | 138.924 | 138.924 |
Properties | Value, \(\Delta T=T-T_{\mathrm{ref}} \) |
---|---|
\(E_{1m} \) | \(155\left( {1-3.53\times 10^{-4}\Delta T} \right) \) GPa |
\(E_{2m} \) | \(8.07\left( {1-4.27\times 10^{-4}\Delta T} \right) \) GPa |
\(G_{12m} \) | \(4.55\left( {1-6.06\times 10^{-4}\Delta T} \right) \) GPa |
\(\alpha _{1m} \) | \(-0.07\times 10^{-6}\left( {1-1.25\times 10^{-3}\Delta T} \right) 1/{^{\circ }}\)C |
\(\alpha _{2m} \) | \(30.1\times 10^{-6}\left( {1+0.41\times 10^{-4}\Delta T} \right) 1/{^{\circ }}\)C |
\(\upsilon _{12m} \) | 0.22 |
\(\rho _m \) | 1586 kg/m\(^{3}\) |
\(\alpha \) | Layup | Pre-strain | Fundamental frequency (Hz) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Without SMA | \(V_{\mathrm{s}} =5\% \) | \(V_{\mathrm{s}} =10\% \) | \(V_{\mathrm{s}} =15\% \) | |||
\(30^\circ \) | \(\left[ {0_{\mathrm{SMA}} ,90} \right] \) | \(\varepsilon _0 =1\% \) | 129.645 (12) | 139.843 (12) | 148.266 (12) | 155.406 (12) |
RI | 7.9% | 14.4% | 19.9% | |||
\(\varepsilon _0 =2\% \) | 129.645 (12) | 140.995 (12) | 150.243 (12) | 158.003 (12) | ||
RI | 8.7% | 15.9% | 21.9% | |||
\(\left[ {0_{\mathrm{SMA}} ,90,0,90} \right] \) | \(\varepsilon _0 =1\% \) | 149.936 (11) | 153.947 (11) | 157.735 (11) | 161.307 (11) | |
RI | 2.7% | 5.2% | 7.6% | |||
\(\varepsilon _0 =2\% \) | 149.936 (11) | 154.474 (11) | 158.706 (11) | 162.655 (11) | ||
RI | 3% | 5.8% | 8.5% | |||
\(45^\circ \) | \(\left[ {0_{\mathrm{SMA}} ,90} \right] \) | \(\varepsilon _0 =1\% \) | 104.750 (12) | 118.358 (12) | 129.018 (12) | 137.762 (12) |
RI | 13% | 23.2% | 31.5% | |||
\(\varepsilon _0 =2\% \) | 104.750 (12) | 119.737 (12) | 131.323 (12) | 140.746 (12) | ||
RI | 14.3% | 25.4% | 34.4% | |||
\(\left[ {0_{\mathrm{SMA}} ,90,0,90} \right] \) | \(\varepsilon _0 =1\% \) | 122.479 (11) | 128.095 (11) | 133.221 (11) | 137.924 (11) | |
RI | 4.6% | 8.8% | 12.6% | |||
\(\varepsilon _0 =2\% \) | 122.479 (11) | 128.740 (11) | 134.396 (11) | 139.543 (11) | ||
RI | 5.1% | 9.7% | 13.9% | |||
\(60^\circ \) | \(\left[ {0_{\mathrm{SMA}} ,90} \right] \) | \(\varepsilon _0 =1\% \) | 73.238 (11) | 93.245 (11) | 107.351 (11) | 118.351 (11) |
RI | 27.3% | 46.6% | 61.6% | |||
\(\varepsilon _0 =2\% \) | 73.238 (11) | 95.010 (11) | 110.149 (11) | 121.874 (11) | ||
RI | 29.7% | 50.4% | 66.4% | |||
\(\left[ {0_{\mathrm{SMA}} ,90,0,90} \right] \) | \(\varepsilon _0 =1\% \) | 87.983 (10) | 96.620 (10) | 104.074 (10) | 110.635 (10) | |
RI | 9.8% | 18.3% | 25.7% | |||
\(\varepsilon _0 =2\% \) | 87.983 (10) | 97.487 (10) | 105.605 (10) | 112.697 (10) | ||
RI | 10.8% | 20% | 28.1% |
8.2 Convergence study
\(\left[ {0_{\mathrm{SMA}} ,90,0,90} \right] _S \) | Fundamental frequency (Hz) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\(\alpha \) | B.C. | Without SMA | \(\varepsilon _0 =0.2\% \) | \(\varepsilon _0 =1\% \) | \(\varepsilon _0 =2\% \) | \(\varepsilon _0 =3\% \) |
\(30^\circ \) | SS | 134.871 | 138.175 | 154.471 | 156.302 | 157.008 |
RI | 2.4% | 14.5% | 15.9% | 16.4% | ||
CS | 137.628 | 140.848 | 157.3190 | 159.158 | 159.863 | |
RI | 2.3% | 14.3% | 15.6% | 16.2% | ||
SC | 138.336 | 141.568 | 158.217 | 160.071 | 160.782 | |
RI | 2.3% | 14.3% | 15.7% | 16.2% | ||
CC | 141.443 | 144.533 | 161.320 | 163.177 | 163.885 | |
RI | 2.2% | 14.1% | 15.4% | 15.9% | ||
\(45^\circ \) | SS | 106.769 | 112.457 | 131.814 | 133.965 | 134.808 |
RI | 5.3% | 23.5% | 25.5% | 26.3% | ||
CS | 109.187 | 114.884 | 134.492 | 136.656 | 137.501 | |
RI | 5.2% | 23.2% | 25.2% | 25.9% | ||
SC | 110.327 | 116.066 | 135.938 | 138.122 | 138.974 | |
RI | 5.2% | 23.2% | 25.2% | 26.0% | ||
CC | 113.222 | 118.872 | 138.924 | 141.113 | 141.963 | |
RI | 5.0% | 22.7% | 24.6% | 25.4% |
\(\left[ {0_{\mathrm{SMA}} ,90,0,90} \right] _S \) | Fundamental frequency (Hz) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
\(\alpha \) | B.C. | Without SMA | \(V_{\mathrm{s}} =5\% \) | \(V_{\mathrm{s}} =10\% \) | \(V_{\mathrm{s}} =15\% \) |
\(30^\circ \) | SS | 134.871 | 145.300 | 154.471 | 162.642 |
CS | 137.628 | 148.129 | 157.3190 | 165.479 | |
SC | 138.336 | 148.956 | 158.217 | 166.418 | |
CC | 141.443 | 152.080 | 161.320 | 169.479 | |
\(45^\circ \) | SS | 106.769 | 120.362 | 131.814 | 141.720 |
CS | 109.187 | 122.970 | 134.492 | 144.413 | |
SC | 110.327 | 124.315 | 135.938 | 145.907 | |
CC | 113.222 | 127.295 | 138.924 | 148.863 |
8.3 Parametric studies
9 Conclusions
- Embedding pre-strained SMA fibers in a laminated composite at temperature activation above the austenite start temperature severely increases the fundamental frequency of the conical shell. This is due to the generation of a tensile recovery force during phase transformation that increases the stiffness of the SMA hybrid conical shell.
- Adding pre-strained SMA fibers in a laminated composite at temperature activation below the austenite start temperature reduces the fundamental frequency of the conical shell. This is due to the lack of a tensile recovery force and increase of weight of the SMA hybrid conical shell.
- Inserting pre-strained SMA fibers in a laminated composite shell severely increases the critical buckling temperature. In addition, an increase in volume fraction or pre-strain of SMA fibers is more efficient for increasing the critical buckling temperature of SMA hybrid composite conical shells. This is due to generation of a tensile recovery force during phase transformation.
- At the constant activation temperature along the phase transformation region, an increase in volume fraction of pre-strained SMA fibers is more efficient than an increase in pre-strain parameter for increasing the fundamental frequency of SMA hybrid composite conical shells.
- At constant activation temperature above the phase transformation region, an increase in the pre-strain parameter of SMA fibers is more efficient than an increase in the volume fraction parameter for increasing the fundamental frequency of SMA hybrid composite conical shells.
- Adding pre-strained SMA fibers in a higher semi-vertex angle is more efficient in increasing the fundamental frequency.
- Embedding pre-strained SMA fibers to the first and eighth layer in a composite conical shell with SS boundary conditions is more efficient than for CC boundary conditions in increasing the fundamental frequency, whereas for the case of one reinforced layer it is the opposite.
- Placing pre-strained SMA fibers in the layers near the inner surface of the conical shell is more effective on increasing the fundamental frequency.