Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Responding to criticism by Gordon Sollars and Frank Englander, this paper highlights a significant tension in recent debates over the ethics of global supply chains. This tension concerns the appropriate focus and normative frame(s) for these debates. My first goal is to make sense of what at first reading seems to be a very odd set of claims: that valuing free, autonomous, and respectful markets entails a “fetish for philosophical purity” that is inconsistent with a moral theory that finds no wrong in harming workers, including the least advantaged among them. Sollars and Englander reach these conclusions, I believe, because their criticism assumes and relies upon the presumption of a global prioritarian frame, one which focuses individual welfare, and which they then apply at the level of individual political and economic actors. Much of Benjamin Powell and Matt Zwolinski’s work, I continue, including their criticism of political and economic activism and Powell’s indictment of organized labor, relies on a similar frame—while expanding the harms to include the freedom and autonomy of would-be sweatshop workers. This prioritarian frame, I argue, is particularly poorly suited to discussion of the ethical responsibilities of individual economic and political actors. We ought to reject it. To make progress on debates over global sweatshops, and the ethics of global supply chains in general, we need a better frame, and better standards of freedom and autonomy, than those invoked by many prominent defenders of sweatshops.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Arrow, K. J. (1972). Gifts and exchanges. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(4), 343–362.
Blackston, W. (1978). Commentaries on the laws of England. New York: Garland Press.
Bohman, J. (2013). Kant, Madison, and the problem of transnational order: Popular sovereignty in multilevel systems. In A. Niederberger & P. Schink (Eds.), Republican democracy: Law, liberty, and politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Cobble, D. S. (2004). The other women’s movement: Workplace justice and social rights in modern America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Dann, O. (2009). Kant’s republicanism and its consequences. In J. Heideking & J. A. Henretta (Eds.), Republicanism in America and the German states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dasgupta, P. (2004). World poverty: Causes and pathways. In F. Bourguignon & B. Plescovik (Eds.), Accelerating development. Oxford: World Bank and Oxford University Press.
Dasgupta, P. (2009). Matter of trust: Social capital and economic development. Plenary lecture at annual bank conference on development economics. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTABCDESK2009/Resources/Partha-Dasgupta.pdf. Accessed May 17, 2017.
Elazar, Y. (2015). Liberty as caricature: Bentham’s antidote to republicanism. Journal of the History of Ideas, 76(3), 417–439. CrossRef
Freeland, C. (2012). The plutocrats: The rise of the new global super-rich and the fall of everyone else. New York: Penguin Press.
Gourevitch, A. (2015). From slavery to the cooperative commonwealth: Labor and republican liberty in the nineteenth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hacker, J., & Pierson, P. (2010). Winner-take-all politics: How Washington made the rich richer—and turned their back on the middle class. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Henderson, J. (2006). The economics of sweatshops. The everyday economist. May 18. http://everydayecon.wordpress.com/2006/05/18/the-economics-of-sweatshops/. Accessed May 17, 2017.
Houston, A. C. (1991). Algernon Sidney and the republican heritage in England and America. Princeton University Press.
Kant, I. (1996). Practical philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kates, M. (2015). The ethics of sweatshops and the limits of choice. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(2), 191–212. CrossRef
Lichtenstein, N. (2003). State of the union: A century of American labor. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lind, J. (1776). An answer to the declaration of the American congress. London. https://archive.org/details/cihm_20519. Accessed May 17, 2017.
Locke, J. (2003). Two treatises of government and a letter concerning toleration. In I. Shapiro (Ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Long, D. G. (1977). Bentham on liberty: Jeremy Bentham’s idea of liberty in relation to his utilitarianism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Lovett, F. (2010). A general theory of domination and justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Milanovic, B. (2014). Comments on “the past, present, and future of economic growth. In F. Allen et al. (Eds.), Toward a better global economy: Policy implications for citizens worldwide in the 21st century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Milanovic, B. (2016). Global inequality: A new approach for the age of globalization. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. CrossRef
Mill, J. S. (1994). Principles of political economy. Oxford: Oxford World Classics.
Mill, J. S. (1998). On liberty and other essays. Oxford: Oxford World Classics.
Naidu, S., & Yuchtman, N. (2013). Coercive law enforcement: Law and the labor market in nineteenth century industrial Britain. American Economic Review, 103(1), 107–144. CrossRef
Niederberger, A. (2013). Republicanism and transnational democracy. In A. Niederberger & P. Schink (Eds.), Republican democracy: Law, liberty, and politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. CrossRef
Pettit, P. (2001). A theory of freedom: From the psychology to the politics of agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pettit, P. (2012). On the people’s terms: A republican theory and model of democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Pettit, P. (2014). Just freedom: A moral compass for a complex world. New York: Norton.
Powell, B. (2014). Out of poverty: Sweatshops in the global economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Powell, B., & Zwolinski, M. (2012). The ethical and economic case against sweatshop labor. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 449–472. CrossRef
Preiss, J. (2014). Global labor justice and the limits of economic analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(1), 55–83. CrossRef
Price, R. (1991). Political writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rahe, P. A. (1992). Republics ancient and modern: Classical republicanism and the American revolution. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Rosenfeld, J. (2014). What unions no longer do. Harvard: Harvard University Press. CrossRef
Rothkopf, D. (2009). Superclass: The global power elite and the world they are making. New York: Farrar, Strauss, and Giroix.
Schofield, P. (2006). Utility and democracy: The political thought of Jeremy Bentham. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Sellers, M. N. S. (1994). American republicanism: Roman ideology and the United States Constitution. New York: New York University Press. CrossRef
Shapiro, I. (2016). Politics against domination. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. CrossRef
Sidney, A. (1687/1990). Discourses concerning Government. In T. G. West (Ed.). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Skinner, Q. (1998). Liberty before liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sollars, G. G., & Englander, F. (2016). Sweatshops: Economic analysis and exploitation as unfairness. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3091-0.
Taylor, R. S. (2017). Exit left: Markets and mobility in republican thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Tully, J. (1980). A discourse on property: John Locke and his adversaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Western, B., & Rosenfeld, J. (2011). Unions, norms, and the rise in wage inequality. American Sociological Review, 76(4), 513–537. CrossRef
Zwolinski, M. (2007). Sweatshops, choice, and exploitation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(4), 689–727. CrossRef
- Freedom, Autonomy, and Harm in Global Supply Chains
- Springer Netherlands
Journal of Business Ethics
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta