Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The author declares that she has no competing interests.
Organizational learning has been playing an important role for competitive advantages for the organization. Managing learning and change in the unique context of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) can obtain benefits from network alliance. The paper seeks to draw attention to learning approaches from adaptive learning to generative learning in a SME in the context of asymmetric learning relationship. A qualitative research is conducted on a towing company of Taiwan with 14 in-depth interviews on persons of strategic alliances. This study discusses an asymmetric learning relationship where a large enterprise dominates the central place of the network, decides the learning policies and practices and guides learning involving adaptive and generative learning. This case of the SME assumes adaptive learning to ensure the development of network capability and adopts generative learning through communication channels and resources provided by the central firm. The outcomes of generative learning are the enhancement of absorptive capacity, the transfer of knowledge, shared identities, and shared contextual understanding in the towing industry. Though acquiring generative learning development, the case of the SME gets a competitive advantage but chooses to stay small and to be a business owner. This situation meets the psychological needs of the Chinese people.
Alvarez, S. A., & Busenitz, L. W. (2001). The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of Management, 27(6), 755–775. CrossRef
Antonacopoulou, E., & Chiva, R. (2007). The social complexity of organisational learning: the dynamics of learning and organizing. Management Learning, 38, 277–295. CrossRef
Anussornnitisarn, P., Sanpanich, S., Phusavat, K., Kess, P., & Muhos, M. (2010). Sustaining organizational innovation and learning through external knowledge. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 7(1), 85–99. CrossRef
Argyris, C. (1976). Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(3), 363–375. CrossRef
Argyris, C. (1994). Good communication that blocks learning. Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 77–85.
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning. A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Birdthistle, N. (2006). Training and learning strategies of family businesses: an Irish case. Journal of European Industrial Training, 30(7), 550–568. CrossRef
Business Weekly. (2013). Towing Industry Leader-Telephone lines pull in Three Billion NT Dollars (Vol. 1329, pp. 98–113). Taiwan (in Chinese): Business Weekly Group.
Chell, E., & Baines, S. (2000). Networking, entrepreneurship and micro business behavior. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12, 195–215. CrossRef
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. CrossRef
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21. CrossRef
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Greve, H., Rowley, T., & Shipilov, A. (2014). Network Advantage. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gubrium, J., Holsten, J., Marvasti, A., & McKinney, K. (2012). The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft. London: Sage. CrossRef
Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 293–317. CrossRef
Higgins, D., Mirza, M., & Drozynska, A. (2013). Power, politics & learning: a social enactment of the SME owner/manager. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20(3), 470–483. CrossRef
Hill, R., & Stewart, J. (2000). Human resource development in small organizations. Journal of European Industrial Training, 24, 105–117. CrossRef
Jasra, J. M., Khan, M. A., Hunjra, A. I., Rehman, R. A. U., & Azam, R.-I. (2011). Determinants of business success of small and medium enterprises. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(20), 274–280.
Jerez-Gomez, P., Cespedes-Lorente, J., & Valle-Cabrera, J. (2005). Organizational learning capability: a proposal for measurement. Journal of Business Research, 56(6), 715–725. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.11.002. CrossRef
Kitching, J. (2007). Regulating employment relations through workplace learning: a study of small employers. Human Resource Management Journal, 17, 42–57. CrossRef
Lin, C. Y.-Y., & Chen, Y.-C. (2007). Does innovation lead to performance? An empirical study of SMEs in Taiwan?”. Management Research News, 30(2), 115–132. CrossRef
Lin, C., & Zhang, J. (2005). Changing structures of SME networks: lessons from the publishing industry in Taiwan. Long Range Planning, 38(2), 145–162. CrossRef
Muscio, A. (2007). The impact of absorptive capacity on SMEs’ collaboration. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(8), 653–668. CrossRef
Mustafa Kamal, E. (2013). Absorptive capacity in construction SMEs: a literature synthesis. World Applied Sciences Journal, 21(8), 1122–1127.
Ndiege, J. R., Herselman, M. E., & Flowerday, S. V. (2012). Absorptive capacity: relevancy for large and small enterprise. SA Journal of Information Management, 14(1), 1–9. CrossRef
Nolan, C., & Garavan, T. (2012). Lost in translation? Critiquing the HRD discourse in the small firm, working paper. Limerick: University of Limerick.
Poell, R. F., Chivers, G. E., Van der Krogt, F. J., & Wildermeersch, D. A. (2000). Learning network theory – Organizing the dynamic relationships between learning and work. Management Learning, 31, 25–49. CrossRef
Saunders, M. N. K., Gray, D. E., & Goregaokar, H. (2014). SME innovation and learning: the role of networks and crisis events. European Journal of Training and Development, 38(1/2), 136–149.
Senge, P. (1990). Fifth Discipline. NewYork: Doubleday.
Skerlavaj, M., & Dimovski, V. (2007). Towards network perspective of intra-organizational learning: bridging the gap between acquisition and participation perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 2, 43–58.
Sören Kock, M. B. (2000). Coopetition in business networks-to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 29, 411–426. CrossRef
Tsai, W. (2007). Learning in small and medium enterprises (SMEs)-taking Taiwanese SMEs as examples, Proceedings of OLKC (pp. 966–979).
Vickerstaff, S., & Parker, K. T. (1995). Helping small firms: the contribution of TECs and LECs. International Small Business Journal, 16, 56–72. CrossRef
Walsh, J. P., & Ungson, G. R. (1991). Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 57–91. CrossRef
White Paper Book: Small and Medium Enterprises in Taiwan (2014). Taipei: Taiwan Medium and Small Business Administration, Ministry of Economic Affairs, Taiwan (in Chinese).
Wolfe, D. A., & Gertler, M. (2002). Innovation and social learning: an introduction’. In M. Gertler & D. A. Wolfe (Eds.), Innovation and Social Learning: Institutional Adaptation in an Era of Technological Change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wolff, J. A., Pett, T. L., & Ring, J. K. (2014). Small firm growth as a function of both learning orientation and entrepreneurial orientation: an empirical analysis. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 21(5), 709–730. CrossRef
Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. J. (2001). Social capital, knowledge acquisition and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 587–614. CrossRef
- From adaptive to generative learning in small and medium enterprises-a network perspective
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta