Skip to main content

2022 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

14. From Global to National: Manufacturing Strategies in the US, China, Germany and Japan in Comparative Perspective

verfasst von : Wei Zhao

Erschienen in: Rethinking Asian Capitalism

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Since the 2008 global crisis, the focus of industrial policy has shifted to manufacturing strategy in the main economies in the world. In this paper, we examine the national manufacturing strategies of the US, Germany, Japan and China from the analytical perspective of varieties of capitalism and the developmental state in order to have a better understanding of the strategy plans and implementation as a mode of regulation and their impacts on each country’s mode of production and accumulation.
We find that the manufacturing strategies of the four countries overlap considerably in terms of industry targeting and that China’s Made in China 2025 master plan is the most comprehensive strategy for developing the entire advanced sectors. While the US and Germany have primarily put in place a bottom-up process of strategy implementation led by enterprises, China has adopted a top-down approach, similar to its earlier national policy initiatives in high-technology industries. Compared to other nations, Japan is weak in implementation for domestic macroeconomic and structural reasons. For all four countries, while there is a superficial convergence in terms of the structure of their manufacturing strategy plans, the mechanisms for monitoring implementation still differ because each national manufacturing strategy is deeply embedded in the existing institutions and economic structures.
Apparently, through the implementation of national manufacturing strategies, the world of capitalism is increasingly dominated by two extreme varieties: a revised model of the liberal market economy, represented by the US, and a reinforced of developmental state model, exemplified by China. This bipolarization of varieties of capitalism suggests there will be a new round of competition between manufacturing powers.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Amable, B. (2016). Institutional complementarities in the dynamic comparative analysis of capitalism. Journal of Institutional Economics, 12(1), 79–103.CrossRef Amable, B. (2016). Institutional complementarities in the dynamic comparative analysis of capitalism. Journal of Institutional Economics, 12(1), 79–103.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Amsden, A. (1989). Asia's next Giant: South Korea and late industrialization. Oxford University Press. Amsden, A. (1989). Asia's next Giant: South Korea and late industrialization. Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Amsden, A. (2001). The rise of the rest: Challenges to the west from late-industrializing economies (p. 405p). Oxford University Press.CrossRef Amsden, A. (2001). The rise of the rest: Challenges to the west from late-industrializing economies (p. 405p). Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Amsden, A. (2007). Escape from empire: The developing World's journey through heaven and hell (p. 197). MIT Press.CrossRef Amsden, A. (2007). Escape from empire: The developing World's journey through heaven and hell (p. 197). MIT Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Berger, S. (2013). Making in America: From innovation to market. MIT Press. Berger, S. (2013). Making in America: From innovation to market. MIT Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyer, R. (1988). Technical change and the theory of ‘regulation’. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory. Pinter Publishers. Boyer, R. (1988). Technical change and the theory of ‘regulation’. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory. Pinter Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyer, R. (2005). How and why capitalisms differ. Economy and Society, 34(4), 509–557.CrossRef Boyer, R. (2005). How and why capitalisms differ. Economy and Society, 34(4), 509–557.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chang, H.-J. (2002). Kicking away the ladder: Development strategy in historical perspective. Anthem. Chang, H.-J. (2002). Kicking away the ladder: Development strategy in historical perspective. Anthem.
Zurück zum Zitat Desai, R. (2010). The absent geopolitics of pure capitalism. World Review of Political Economy, 1(3, Fall), 463–484. Desai, R. (2010). The absent geopolitics of pure capitalism. World Review of Political Economy, 1(3, Fall), 463–484.
Zurück zum Zitat Eder, J., & Schneider, E. (2018). Progressive industrial policy – A remedy for Europe. Journal für Entwicklungspolitik, XXXIV(3/4), S. 108–142. Eder, J., & Schneider, E. (2018). Progressive industrial policy – A remedy for Europe. Journal für Entwicklungspolitik, XXXIV(3/4), S. 108–142.
Zurück zum Zitat European Union Chamber of Commerce in China. (2017). China Manufacturing 2025 Putting Industrial Policy Ahead of Market Force (p. 68). Research Report. European Union Chamber of Commerce in China. (2017). China Manufacturing 2025 Putting Industrial Policy Ahead of Market Force (p. 68). Research Report.
Zurück zum Zitat Evans, P. (1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton University Press.CrossRef Evans, P. (1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Haggard, S. (1986). The newly industrializing countries in the international system. World Politics, 38, 343–370.CrossRef Haggard, S. (1986). The newly industrializing countries in the international system. World Politics, 38, 343–370.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hall, P. (2003). Varieties of capitalism: And then there was one? Comparative Politics, 36(1), 103–124.CrossRef Hall, P. (2003). Varieties of capitalism: And then there was one? Comparative Politics, 36(1), 103–124.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hall, P., & Soskice, D. W. (2001). Varieties of capitalism, the institutional foundations of competitive Advantage. Oxford University Press.CrossRef Hall, P., & Soskice, D. W. (2001). Varieties of capitalism, the institutional foundations of competitive Advantage. Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson, C. (1982). MITI and the Japanese miracle: The growth of industrial policy, 1925–75. Stanford University Press.CrossRef Johnson, C. (1982). MITI and the Japanese miracle: The growth of industrial policy, 1925–75. Stanford University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson, C. (1984). Introduction: The idea of industrial policy. In C. Johnson (Ed.), The industrial policy debate (pp. 3–26). Institute of Contemporary Studies Press. Johnson, C. (1984). Introduction: The idea of industrial policy. In C. Johnson (Ed.), The industrial policy debate (pp. 3–26). Institute of Contemporary Studies Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalinowski, T. (2013). Regulating international finance and the diversity of capitalism. Socio-Economic Review, 11, 471–496.CrossRef Kalinowski, T. (2013). Regulating international finance and the diversity of capitalism. Socio-Economic Review, 11, 471–496.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Krugman, P. (1983). Targeted industrial policies: Theory and evidence. In Proceedings of economic policy symposium (pp. 123–176). Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Krugman, P. (1983). Targeted industrial policies: Theory and evidence. In Proceedings of economic policy symposium (pp. 123–176). Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
Zurück zum Zitat McKinsey Global Institute. (2017). Digital China: Powering the economy to global competitiveness (p. 163). MGI Report. McKinsey Global Institute. (2017). Digital China: Powering the economy to global competitiveness (p. 163). MGI Report.
Zurück zum Zitat Mercator Institute for China Studies. (2016, December). Made in China 2025: The making of a high-tech superpower and consequences for industrial countries (p. 73). MERICS Papers on China, No. 2. Mercator Institute for China Studies. (2016, December). Made in China 2025: The making of a high-tech superpower and consequences for industrial countries (p. 73). MERICS Papers on China, No. 2.
Zurück zum Zitat Muro, M., Rothwell, J., Andes, S., Fikri, K., & Kulkarni, S. (2015). America’s advanced industries (p. 84). The Brookings Institution report. Muro, M., Rothwell, J., Andes, S., Fikri, K., & Kulkarni, S. (2015). America’s advanced industries (p. 84). The Brookings Institution report.
Zurück zum Zitat National Economic Council, & Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2015). A Strategy for American Innovation (p. 120p). The White House. National Economic Council, & Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2015). A Strategy for American Innovation (p. 120p). The White House.
Zurück zum Zitat Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2012). A National Strategic Plan for Advanced Manufacturing (p. 38). Report of Interagency working group on Advanced Manufacturing. Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2012). A National Strategic Plan for Advanced Manufacturing (p. 38). Report of Interagency working group on Advanced Manufacturing.
Zurück zum Zitat Reinert, E. (2007). How rich countries got rich... And why poor countries stay poor. Constable. Reinert, E. (2007). How rich countries got rich... And why poor countries stay poor. Constable.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodrik, D. (2018). Populism and the economics of globalization. Journal of International Business Policy, 1–2, 12–33.CrossRef Rodrik, D. (2018). Populism and the economics of globalization. Journal of International Business Policy, 1–2, 12–33.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wade, R. (1990). Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of the government in east Asian industrialization. Princeton University Press.CrossRef Wade, R. (1990). Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of the government in east Asian industrialization. Princeton University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weiss, L. (1998). The myth of the powerless state: Governing the economy in a global era. Polity Press.CrossRef Weiss, L. (1998). The myth of the powerless state: Governing the economy in a global era. Polity Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Woo-Cumings, M. (Ed.). (1999). The developmental state. Cornell University Press. Woo-Cumings, M. (Ed.). (1999). The developmental state. Cornell University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamamura, K., & Streeck, W. (Eds.). (2001). The origins of nonliberal capitalism: Germany and Japan in comparison. Cornell University Press. Yamamura, K., & Streeck, W. (Eds.). (2001). The origins of nonliberal capitalism: Germany and Japan in comparison. Cornell University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu, H. (2017). Pivot to internet plus: Molding China’s digital economy for economic restructuring? International Journal of Communication, 11(2017), 1486–1506. Yu, H. (2017). Pivot to internet plus: Molding China’s digital economy for economic restructuring? International Journal of Communication, 11(2017), 1486–1506.
Metadaten
Titel
From Global to National: Manufacturing Strategies in the US, China, Germany and Japan in Comparative Perspective
verfasst von
Wei Zhao
Copyright-Jahr
2022
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98104-4_14