Skip to main content
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Further Semiotic Perspectives on the Outcome-Based vs Performance-Based Semantic Dispute

verfasst von : Lauri Korkeamäki

Erschienen in: The Palgrave Handbook of Servitization

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Das Kapitel vertieft sich in die nuancierte Debatte zwischen ergebnis- und leistungsbezogenen Verträgen und konzentriert sich auf die semantischen, pragmatischen und syntaktischen Dimensionen. Sie überprüft systematisch über 80 hochrangige Zeitschriftenartikel und zeigt, dass der Begriff "Ergebnis" in innovations- und marketingorientierten Bereichen zunehmend bevorzugt wird. Die Analyse zeigt eine Verschiebung der Terminologie im Laufe der Zeit, wobei das "Ergebnis" mehr Verwendung findet, insbesondere im letzten Jahrzehnt des 21. Jahrhunderts. Das Kapitel unterstreicht auch den polysemischen Charakter von "Leistung" und die Wichtigkeit, sie im rechtlichen und operativen Kontext von "Ergebnis" zu unterscheiden. Durch die Regressionsanalyse wird ein direkter Zusammenhang zwischen der Verwendung von "Geschäftsmodell" und "Innovation" und der Häufigkeit von "Ergebnis" aufgezeigt. Diese gründliche Untersuchung trägt zum konzeptionellen Strom der Literatur über ergebnisbasierte Verträge bei und bietet sowohl akademischen Forschern als auch Praktikern aus der Industrie wertvolle Erkenntnisse.
KI-Generiert

Diese Zusammenfassung des Fachinhalts wurde mit Hilfe von KI generiert.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Towards Servitization: A Taxonomy of Industrial Product-Service Systems for Small- and Medium-Sized Manufacturers
Nächstes Kapitel The Features of Performance Measurement Systems in Value-Based Selling
Fußnoten
1
The distinction between “word” and “term” is that while a word is only component of language, a term is a word that has meaning(s) attached to it.
 
Literatur
Baines, T., & Lightfoot, H. W. (2014). Servitization of the manufacturing firm: Exploring the operations practices and technologies that deliver advanced services. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(1), 2–35.CrossRef
Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsh, R. E. (1980). Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity (1st ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRef
Blei, D., & Lafferty, J. (2006). Dynamic topic models. In ICML 2006—Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning, (June, 25–29), 113–120.
Böhm, E., Backhaus, C., Eggert, A., & Cummins, T. (2016). Understanding outcome-based contracts. Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation, 2(1–2), 128–149.CrossRef
Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1979). A simple test for Heteroskedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica, 50, 987–1007.
Brown, R. E., & Burke, J. J. (2000). Managing the risk of performance based rates. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 15(2), 893–898.CrossRef
Carnie, A. (2006). Syntax: A generative introduction (2nd ed.). New York and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Cook, R. D. (1977). Detection of influential observation in linear regression. Technometrics, 19(1), 15–18.
Cook, R. D. (1979). Influential observations in linear regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(365), 169–174.CrossRef
Cruse, D. A. (2000). Meaning in language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics (1st ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Datta, P. P., & Roy, R. (2011). Operations strategy for the effective delivery of integrated industrial product-service offerings. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(5), 579–603.CrossRef
Essig, M., Glas, A. H., Selviaridis, K., & Roehrich, J. K. (2016). Performance-based contracting in business markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 59, 5–11.CrossRef
Fehrenbacher, D. D., Kaplan, S. E., & Pedell, B. (2017). The relation between individual characteristics and compensation contract selection. Management Accounting Research, 34, 1–18.CrossRef
Grubic, T., & Jennions, I. (2018). Do outcome-based contracts exist? The investigation of power-by-the-hour and similar result-oriented cases. International Journal of Production Economics, 206, 209–219.CrossRef
Guajardo, J. A., Cohen, M. A., Kim, S. H., & Netessine, S. (2012). Impact of performance-based contracting on product reliability: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 58(5), 961–979.CrossRef
Hou, J., & Neely, A. (2018). Investigating risks of outcome-based service contracts from a provider’s perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 56(6), 2103–2115.CrossRef
Huang, F., Chen, J., Sun, L., Zhang, Y., & Yao, S. (2020). Value-based contract for smart operation and maintenance service based on equitable entropy. International Journal of Production Research, 58(4), 1271–1284.CrossRef
Hypko, P., Tilebein, M., & Gleich, R. (2010a). Benefits and uncertainties of performance-based contracting in manufacturing industries: An agency theory perspective. Journal of Service Management, 21(4), 460–489.CrossRef
Hypko, P., Tilebein, M., & Gleich, R. (2010b). Clarifying the concept of performance-based contracting in manufacturing industries: A research synthesis. Journal of Service Management, 21(5), 625–655.CrossRef
Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic structures (1st ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jain, N., Hasija, S., & Popescu, D. (2013). Optimal contracts for outsourcing of repair and restoration services. Operations Research, 61(6), 1295–1311.CrossRef
Kim, S. H., Cohen, M. A., Netessine, S., & Veeraraghavan, S. (2010). Contracting for infrequent restoration and recovery of mission-critical systems. Management Science, 56(9), 1551–1567.CrossRef
Kleemann, F. C., & Essig, M. (2013). A providers’ perspective on supplier relationships in performance-based contracting. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(3), 185–198.CrossRef
Kohtamäki, M., Rabetino, R., & Möller, K. (2018). Alliance capabilities: A systematic review and future research directions. Industrial Marketing Management, 68(October 2017), 188–201.
Korkeamäki, L., & Kohtamäki, M. (2020). To Outcomes and Beyond: Discursively Managing Legitimacy Struggles in Outcome Business Models. Industrial Marketing Management, 91(February), 196–208.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. In Cambridge textbooks in linguistics (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Li, Y., Qiu, Y., & Wang, Y. D. (2014). Explaining the contract terms of energy performance contracting in China: The importance of effective financing. Energy Economics, 45, 401–411.CrossRef
Ng, I. C. L., Ding, D. X., & Yip, N. (2013). Outcome-based contracts as new business model: The role of partnership and value-driven relational assets. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(5), 730–743.CrossRef
Ng, I. C. L., & Nudurupati, S. S. (2010). Outcome based service contracts in the defence industry—Mitigating the challenges. Journal of Service Management, 21(5), 656–674.CrossRef
Nowicki, D., Kumar, U. D., Steudel, H. J., & Verma, D. (2008). Spares provisioning under performance-based logistics contract: Profit-centric approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(3), 342–352.CrossRef
Öner, K. B., Kiesmüller, G. P., & Van Houtum, G. J. (2015). On the upgrading policy after the redesign of a component for reliability improvement. European Journal of Operational Research, 244(3), 867–880.CrossRef
Patra, P., Kumar, U. D., Nowicki, D. R., & Randall, W. S. (2019). Effective management of performance-based contracts for sustainment dominant systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 208, 369–382.CrossRef
Rice, C. A., Beekhuizen, B., Dubrovsky, V., Stevenson, S., & Armstrong, B. C. (2019). A comparison of homonym meaning frequency estimates derived from movie and television subtitles, free association, and explicit ratings. Behavior Research Methods, 51(3), 1399–1425.CrossRef
Rodd, J. M., Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2004). Modelling the effects of semantic ambiguity in word recognition. Cognitive Science, 28(1), 89–104.CrossRef
Samra-Fredericks, D. (2005). Strategic practice, “discourse” and the everyday interactional constitution of “power effects”. Organization, 12(6), 803–841.CrossRef
Schaefers, T., Ruffer, S., & Böhm, E. (2021). Outcome-based contracting from the customers’ perspective: A means-end chain analytical exploration. Industrial Marketing Management, 93(February), 466–481.
Selviaridis, K., & Van der Valk, W. (2019). Framing contractual performance incentives: effects on supplier behaviour. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 39(2), 190–213.CrossRef
Selviaridis, K., & Wynstra, F. (2015). Performance-based contracting: A literature review and future research directions. International Journal of Production Research, 53(12), 3505–3540.CrossRef
Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3–4), 591–611.CrossRef
Sjödin, D., Parida, V., Jovanovic, M., & Visnjic, I. (2020). Value creation and value capture alignment in business model innovation: A process view on outcome-based business models. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(2), 158–183.CrossRef
Töytäri, P., & Rajala, R. (2015). Value-based selling: An organizational capability perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 45(February), 101–122.CrossRef
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222.CrossRef
Van Ostaeyen, J., Van Horenbeek, A., Pintelon, L., & Duflou, J. R. (2013). A refined typology of product-service systems based on functional hierarchy modeling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 51, 261–276.CrossRef
Visnjic, I., Jovanovic, M., Neely, A., & Engwall, M. (2017). What brings the value to outcome-based contract providers? Value drivers in outcome business models. International Journal of Production Economics, 192(October), 169–181.CrossRef
Visnjic, I., Neely, A., & Jovanovic, M. (2018). The path to outcome delivery: Interplay of service market strategy and open business models. Technovation, 72–73(April), 46–59.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Further Semiotic Perspectives on the Outcome-Based vs Performance-Based Semantic Dispute
verfasst von
Lauri Korkeamäki
Copyright-Jahr
2021
Buch
The Palgrave Handbook of Servitization

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-75770-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-75771-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75771-7_9

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise