Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Kongresse
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Veranstaltungskalender Awards MyNewsletter Firmensuche
Kunden Login
Über Einzelzugang informieren
Über Unternehmenszugang informieren
Referenzkunden
Heavy-Duty Engines 2025 | 18. + 19. November 2025

Nutzfahrzeuge | Land- und Baumaschinen | Marine

Nehmen Sie als Referent an der 20. Internationalen MTZ-Fachtagung für Erfahrungsaustausch zu Industrie- und Nfz-Motoren teil. Reichen Sie online einen Themenvorschlag ein!
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2022 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

10. Future Challenges to Trade Policy in Support of International Business

verfasst von : Louise Curran

Erschienen in: Global Trade and Trade Governance During De-Globalization

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter will explore the key emerging innovations in EU trade policy, as it seeks to respond to the multiple conflicting pressures within the post-COVID-19 world. This will involve balancing the needs of their economies and businesses with the necessity to protect their populations, workers and the planet. Trade policy will need to respond, not just to the economic crisis and restructuring which COVID-19 has engendered, but also to the longstanding criticisms of globalisation which were widespread in the years leading up to it.
The chapter will highlight the key debates on trade policy, especially as policymakers seek to ensure that sustainability concerns are better integrated into EU policy at the unilateral level. The different proposals which are being enacted (or are under discussion) will be discussed and their potential impacts on international business highlighted. These impacts will vary depending on the sector, the extent to which companies have integrated sustainability concerns into their strategic orientation and their individual value chains. This complicates somewhat the development of a clear business and policy stance.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Sustainable Development in EU Trade Agreements: Different Trade Partners, Different Rules?
Nächstes Kapitel Two Lenses to Megatrends in Trade Policy: Towards a Future-Oriented Contextual Approach
Fußnoten
7
The administration initiated, in particular, two Section 232 investigations into Steel and Aluminium imports, thereby resuscitating an instrument which, although widely used in the 70s and 80s, had fallen into disuse, with the last investigation dating from 2001.
 
8
As noted in Morrison (2019), under previous administrations, this process would have led to a WTO complaint, not unilateral tariffs.
 
9
For example, in the EU, the threat of import surges in steel products which were deflected from the US market by the 232 tariffs, was the basis for Safeguard measures against steel imports. This action was strongly opposed by up-stream steel users like the car industry.
 
13
At the end of 2020, China faced 4 antidumping duties on aluminium products and 17 on various iron and steel products. Russia faced duties on 7 iron and steel products (CEC, 2021a, 2021b, 2021c).
 
Literatur
Amfori. (2019). Amfori calls on the European Commission to intensify its efforts to persuade Cambodia to implement the improvements needed for it to retain its trade preferences. January 2019.
Bacchus, J. (2021). Legal issues with the European carbon border adjustment mechanism. Cato Briefing Paper 125. Cato Institute.
Bauer, M. (2016). Manufacturing discontent: The rise to power of anti-TTIP groups, ECIPE occasional paper 2/2016. European Centre for International Political Economy.
BHRRC. (2020). Towards EU mandatory due diligence legislation perspectives from business, public sector, academia and civil society. Business and Human Rights Resource Centre.
CEC. (2019). Communication from the commission of 11 December 2019 on the European green deal (COM(2019) 640 final). Commission of the European Communities.
CEC. (2021a). Proposal for a regulation on the making available on the Union market as well as export from the Union of certain commodities and products associated with deforestation and forest degradation and repealing regulation (EU) No. 995/2010. Commission of the European Communities.
CEC. (2021b). Proposal for a regulation on applying a generalised scheme of tariff preferences and repealing regulation (EU) No. 978/2012 of the European Parliament and of the council. Commission of the European Communities.
CEC. (2021c). Proposal for a regulation establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism. Commission of the European Communities.
Copa–Cogeca. (2021). Statement on the proposal for a regulation on deforestation free products. Copa–Cogeca.
Curran, L. (2010). The potential impacts of Border Tax adjustments on imports of energy intensive goods in the EU and US markets. International Journal of Sustainable Society, 2(3), 265–290.CrossRef
Curran, L., & Eckhardt, J. (forthcoming). The response of EU trade dependent firms to the globalization backlash. European Journal of International Management.
Curran, L., & Eckhardt, J. (2018). Influencing trade policy in a multi-level system—understanding corporate political activity in the context of global value chains and regime complexity. Business and Politics, 20(1), 132–164.CrossRef
Curran, L., & Eckhardt, J. (2021). Why COVID-19 will not lead to major restructuring of global value chains. Management and Organization Review, 17(2), 407–411.CrossRef
Curran, L., Eckhardt, J., & Lee, J. (2020). The trade policy response to COVID-19 and its implications for international business. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 17(2), 252–320.CrossRef
Curran, L., & Nadvi, K. (2015). Shifting trade preferences and value chain impacts in the Bangladesh textiles and garment industry. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(3), 459–474.CrossRef
Development Solutions. (2018). Mid-term evaluation of the EU’s generalised scheme of preferences (GSP). Final report for DG Trade.
ECCJ. (2019). Seizing the opportunity to uphold human rights in the context of business operations. Open letter to the EU commissioner for justice. European Coalition for Corporate Justice.
Eckhardt, J., & Curran, L. (2019). Corporate strategy in times of anti-trade sentiment: Current challenges and future scenarios. In M. Elsig, G. Spilker, M. Hahn (Eds.), The Shifting Landscape of Global Trade. Cambridge University Press.
Eckhardt, J., & de Bièvre, D. (2015). Boomerangs over Lac Leman: Transnational lobbying and foreign venue shopping in WTO dispute settlement. World Trade Review, 14(3), 507–530.CrossRef
EP. (2017). Cambodia: The banning of the opposition. European Parliament resolution of 14 December 2017 on Cambodia: Notably the dissolution of CNRP Party (2017/3002(RSP) European Parliament.
EP. (2021). Corporate due diligence and corporate accountability. 2020/2129(INL) European Parliament.
EPRS. (2018). The generalised scheme of preferences regulation (No 978/2012). European implementation assessment. European Parliament Research Service.
FERN. (2015). WTO compatibility with EU action on deforestation. FERN.
Howse, R., & Levy, P. (2013). The TBT panels: US–cloves, US–tuna, US–cool. World Trade Review, 12(2), 327–375.CrossRef
Hufbauer, G., Kim, J., & Schott, J. (2021). Can EU carbon border adjustment measures propel WTO climate talks? Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Jaremba, U. (2020). Non-economic values and objectives in EU trade policy: Different models of externalization and enforcement. In W. Weiss, & C. Furculita (Eds.), Global Politics and EU Trade Policy. Springer, Cham (CH).
Jean, S., Martin, P., & Sapir, A. (2018). International trade under attack: What strategy for Europe? Policy Contribution (Vol. 12). Bruegel.
Kim, S., & Woo, H. (2021). Global fashion retailers’ responses to external and internal crises during the COVID-19 pandemic Fashion and Textiles. Fashion and Textiles, 8, 32.
Lamp, N. (2018). How should we think about the winners and losers from globalization? Three narratives and their implications for the redesign of international economic agreements. European Journal of International Law, 30(4), 1359–1397.CrossRef
Lee, J. (2018). Commercializing national security? National security exceptions’ outer parameter under GATT article XXI. Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy, 13(2), 277–310.
Madeira, M. A. (2016). New trade, new politics: Intra-industry trade and domestic political coalitions. Review of International Political Economy, 23(4), 677–711.CrossRef
Mehling, M., van Asselt, H., Das, K., Droege, S., & Verkuijl, C. (2019). Designing carbon adjustments for enhanced climate action. The American Journal of International Law, 113(3), 433–481.CrossRef
National Board of Trade. (2020). Border carbon adjustments. An analysis of trade related aspects and the way forward. National Board of Trade.
Nordhaus, W. (2015). Climate clubs: Overcoming free-riding in international climate policy. American Economic Review, 105(4), 1339–1370.CrossRef
Parry, I., Black, S., & Roaf, J. (2021). Proposal for an International Carbon Price Floor among Large Emitters. IMF Staff Climate Note 2021/001. International Monetary Fund.
Quick, R., & Lau, C. (2003). Environmentally motivated tax distinctions and WTO law: The European commission’s green paper on integrated product policy in light of the ‘Like Product-’ and ‘PPM-’ debates. Journal of International Economic Law, 6(2), 419–458.CrossRef
Rashish, P. S. (2017). US trade policy in the age of Trump: What role for Europe in the “New Nationalism”? European Policy Center.
Shaffer, G., & Apea, Y. (2005). Institutional choice in the generalized system of preferences case. Journal of World Trade, 39(6), 977–1008.
Velluti, S. (2016). The promotion and integration of human rights in EU external trade relations. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law, 32(83), 41–68.CrossRef
Zeitlin, J., & Overdevest, C. (2021). Experimentalist interactions: Joining up the transnational timber legality regime. Regulation and Governance, 15(3), 686–708.CrossRef
Zhou, W., & Cuyvers, L. (2011). Linking international trade and labour standards: The effectiveness of sanctions under the European Union’s GSP. Journal of World Trade, 45(1), 63–85.
Metadaten
Titel
Future Challenges to Trade Policy in Support of International Business
verfasst von
Louise Curran
Copyright-Jahr
2022
Buch
Global Trade and Trade Governance During De-Globalization

Print ISBN: 978-3-031-13756-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-13757-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2022

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13757-0_10

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise