Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Soft Computing 18/2020

22.02.2020 | Methodologies and Application

Generalized hesitant fuzzy rough sets (GHFRS) and their application in risk analysis

verfasst von: Tanzeela Shaheen, Muhammad Irfan Ali, Muhammad Shabir

Erschienen in: Soft Computing | Ausgabe 18/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

As a generalization of fuzzy rough sets, the concept of generalized hesitant fuzzy rough sets (GHFRS) is presented in this paper. It is an endeavor to define rough approximations of a collection of hesitant fuzzy sets over a given universe. To this end, elements of the universe are initially clustered using a set-valued map, and then, hesitant fuzzy sets are aggregated by using lower and upper approximation operators. These operators produce hesitant fuzzy sets which aggregate hesitant fuzzy elements. Structural and topological properties associated with GHFRS have been examined. The model is further employed to design a three-way decision analysis technique which preserves many properties of classical techniques but needs less effort and computation. Unlike the existing approaches, the alternatives can be clustered and selected jointly by using a set-valued mapping. This feature makes its application area broader. Moreover, this method is applied to an example, where risk analysis issue is discussed for the selection of energy projects.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Alcantud JCR, de Andrés Calle R, Torrecillas MJM (2016) Hesitant fuzzy worth: an innovative ranking methodology for hesitant fuzzy subsets. Appl Soft Comput 38:232–243 Alcantud JCR, de Andrés Calle R, Torrecillas MJM (2016) Hesitant fuzzy worth: an innovative ranking methodology for hesitant fuzzy subsets. Appl Soft Comput 38:232–243
Zurück zum Zitat Ali MI, Shabir M, Tanvir S (2012) Roughness in hemirings. Neural Comput Appl 21(1):S171–S180 Ali MI, Shabir M, Tanvir S (2012) Roughness in hemirings. Neural Comput Appl 21(1):S171–S180
Zurück zum Zitat Ali MI, Davvaz B, Shabir M (2013) Some properties of generalized rough sets. Inf Sci 224:170–179MathSciNetMATH Ali MI, Davvaz B, Shabir M (2013) Some properties of generalized rough sets. Inf Sci 224:170–179MathSciNetMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Amiri MP (2010) Project selection for oil-fields development by using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst Appl 37:6218–6224 Amiri MP (2010) Project selection for oil-fields development by using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst Appl 37:6218–6224
Zurück zum Zitat Behzadian M, Otaghsara SK, Yazdani M, Ignatius J (2012) A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Syst Appl 39(17):13051–13069 Behzadian M, Otaghsara SK, Yazdani M, Ignatius J (2012) A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Syst Appl 39(17):13051–13069
Zurück zum Zitat Bonikowski Z, Bryniarski E, Wybraniec-Skardowska U (1998) Extensions and intentions in rough set theory. Inf Sci 107:149–167MathSciNetMATH Bonikowski Z, Bryniarski E, Wybraniec-Skardowska U (1998) Extensions and intentions in rough set theory. Inf Sci 107:149–167MathSciNetMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Davvaz B, Mahdavipour M (2008) Rough approximations in general approximation space and their fundamental properties. Int J Gen Syst 37(3):373–386MathSciNetMATH Davvaz B, Mahdavipour M (2008) Rough approximations in general approximation space and their fundamental properties. Int J Gen Syst 37(3):373–386MathSciNetMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Deng-Feng L, Shu-Ping W (2014b) A fuzzy inhomogenous multi-attribute group decision making approach to solve outsourcing provider selection problems. Knowl-Based Syst 67:71–89 Deng-Feng L, Shu-Ping W (2014b) A fuzzy inhomogenous multi-attribute group decision making approach to solve outsourcing provider selection problems. Knowl-Based Syst 67:71–89
Zurück zum Zitat Douglas M (1990) Risk as a forensic resource. Daedalus 1–16 Douglas M (1990) Risk as a forensic resource. Daedalus 1–16
Zurück zum Zitat Dubois D, Prade H (1990) Rough fuzzy sets and fuzzy rough sets. Int J Gen Syst 17:191–209MATH Dubois D, Prade H (1990) Rough fuzzy sets and fuzzy rough sets. Int J Gen Syst 17:191–209MATH
Zurück zum Zitat Ertuğrul İ, Karakaşoğlu N (2008) Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 39(7–8):783–795 Ertuğrul İ, Karakaşoğlu N (2008) Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 39(7–8):783–795
Zurück zum Zitat Farhadinia B (2013) A novel method of ranking hesitant fuzzy values for multiple attribute decision-making problems. Int J Intell Syst 28(8):752–767 Farhadinia B (2013) A novel method of ranking hesitant fuzzy values for multiple attribute decision-making problems. Int J Intell Syst 28(8):752–767
Zurück zum Zitat Feng F, Li C, Davvaz B, Ali MI (2010) Soft sets combined with fuzzy sets and rough sets: a tentative approach. Soft Comput 14:899–911MATH Feng F, Li C, Davvaz B, Ali MI (2010) Soft sets combined with fuzzy sets and rough sets: a tentative approach. Soft Comput 14:899–911MATH
Zurück zum Zitat Gang Q, Hai W, Xiangqian F (2013) Generalized hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in decision support system. Knowl-Based Syst 37:357–365 Gang Q, Hai W, Xiangqian F (2013) Generalized hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in decision support system. Knowl-Based Syst 37:357–365
Zurück zum Zitat Hu Q, Zhang L, An S, Zhang D, Yu D (2012) On robust fuzzy rough set models. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20(4):636–651 Hu Q, Zhang L, An S, Zhang D, Yu D (2012) On robust fuzzy rough set models. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20(4):636–651
Zurück zum Zitat Hutton B, Reilly I (1980) Separation axioms in fuzzy topological spaces. Fuzzy Sets Syst 3:93–104MathSciNetMATH Hutton B, Reilly I (1980) Separation axioms in fuzzy topological spaces. Fuzzy Sets Syst 3:93–104MathSciNetMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications. Springer, BerlinMATH Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications. Springer, BerlinMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Kahraman C, Cebeci U, Ulukan Z (2003) Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logist Inf Manag 16(6):382–394 Kahraman C, Cebeci U, Ulukan Z (2003) Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logist Inf Manag 16(6):382–394
Zurück zum Zitat Kaya T, Kahraman C (2011) Multi criteria decision making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology. Expert Syst Appl 38:6577–6585 Kaya T, Kahraman C (2011) Multi criteria decision making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology. Expert Syst Appl 38:6577–6585
Zurück zum Zitat Lee AHI, Chen WC, Chang CJ (2008) A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Expert Syst Appl 34(1):96–107 Lee AHI, Chen WC, Chang CJ (2008) A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Expert Syst Appl 34(1):96–107
Zurück zum Zitat Li Z, Cui R (2015) Similarity of fuzzy relations based on fuzzy topologies induced by fuzzy rough approximation operators. Inf Sci 305:219–233MathSciNetMATH Li Z, Cui R (2015) Similarity of fuzzy relations based on fuzzy topologies induced by fuzzy rough approximation operators. Inf Sci 305:219–233MathSciNetMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Li D-F, Wan S-P (2014a) Fuzzy heterogeneous multiattribute decision making method for outsourcing provider selection. Expert Syst Appl 41(6):3047–3059 Li D-F, Wan S-P (2014a) Fuzzy heterogeneous multiattribute decision making method for outsourcing provider selection. Expert Syst Appl 41(6):3047–3059
Zurück zum Zitat Li H, Zhou X (2011) Risk decision making based on decision-theoretic rough set: a three-way view decision model. Int J Comput Int Syst 4(1):1–11MathSciNet Li H, Zhou X (2011) Risk decision making based on decision-theoretic rough set: a three-way view decision model. Int J Comput Int Syst 4(1):1–11MathSciNet
Zurück zum Zitat Liang D, Liu D (2014) Systematic studies on three-way decisions with interval-valued decision-theoretic rough sets. Inf Sci 276:186–203 Liang D, Liu D (2014) Systematic studies on three-way decisions with interval-valued decision-theoretic rough sets. Inf Sci 276:186–203
Zurück zum Zitat Liang D, Liu D (2015a) A novel risk decision making based on decision-theoretic rough sets under hesitant fuzzy information. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23(2):237–247 Liang D, Liu D (2015a) A novel risk decision making based on decision-theoretic rough sets under hesitant fuzzy information. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23(2):237–247
Zurück zum Zitat Liang D, Liu D (2015b) Deriving three-way decisions from intuitionistic fuzzy decision-theoretic rough sets. Inf Sci 300:28–48MathSciNetMATH Liang D, Liu D (2015b) Deriving three-way decisions from intuitionistic fuzzy decision-theoretic rough sets. Inf Sci 300:28–48MathSciNetMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Liao HC, Xu ZS (2014) Subtraction and division operations over hesitant fuzzy sets. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 27:65–72MathSciNetMATH Liao HC, Xu ZS (2014) Subtraction and division operations over hesitant fuzzy sets. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 27:65–72MathSciNetMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Liao H, Xu Z, Zeng X (2014) Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making. Inf Sci 271:125–142MathSciNetMATH Liao H, Xu Z, Zeng X (2014) Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making. Inf Sci 271:125–142MathSciNetMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Liu H, Rodríguez RM (2014) A fuzzy envelope for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and its application to multicriteria decision making. Inf Sci 258:220–238MathSciNetMATH Liu H, Rodríguez RM (2014) A fuzzy envelope for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and its application to multicriteria decision making. Inf Sci 258:220–238MathSciNetMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Liu G, Zhu W (2008) The algebraic structures of generalized rough set theory. Inf Sci 178:4105–4113MathSciNetMATH Liu G, Zhu W (2008) The algebraic structures of generalized rough set theory. Inf Sci 178:4105–4113MathSciNetMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Liu X, Pedrycz W, Chai T, Song M (2009) The development of fuzzy rough sets with the use of structures and algebras of axiomatic fuzzy sets. IEEE Ttans Knowl Data Eng 21(3):1 Liu X, Pedrycz W, Chai T, Song M (2009) The development of fuzzy rough sets with the use of structures and algebras of axiomatic fuzzy sets. IEEE Ttans Knowl Data Eng 21(3):1
Zurück zum Zitat Meng F, Chen X, Zhang Q (2014) Multi-attribute decision analysis under a linguistic hesitant fuzzy environment. Inf Sci 267:287–305MathSciNetMATH Meng F, Chen X, Zhang Q (2014) Multi-attribute decision analysis under a linguistic hesitant fuzzy environment. Inf Sci 267:287–305MathSciNetMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Mieszkowicz- Rolka A, Rolka L (2008) Fuzzy rough approximations of process data. Int J Approx Reason 49:301–315MathSciNetMATH Mieszkowicz- Rolka A, Rolka L (2008) Fuzzy rough approximations of process data. Int J Approx Reason 49:301–315MathSciNetMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Parkinson D (1993) Risk: analysis, perception and management. Report of a Royal Society Study Group: Pp 201. The Royal Society. 1992. Paperback£ 15.50 ISBN 0 85403 467 6.” : 94–95 Parkinson D (1993) Risk: analysis, perception and management. Report of a Royal Society Study Group: Pp 201. The Royal Society. 1992. Paperback£ 15.50 ISBN 0 85403 467 6.” : 94–95
Zurück zum Zitat Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Comp Sci 11:341–356MATH Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Comp Sci 11:341–356MATH
Zurück zum Zitat Pawlak Z (1991) Rough sets theoretical aspects of reasoning about data. Kluwer Academic Publisher, BostonMATH Pawlak Z (1991) Rough sets theoretical aspects of reasoning about data. Kluwer Academic Publisher, BostonMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Pedrycz W (2013) Granular computing: analysis and design of intelligent systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton Pedrycz W (2013) Granular computing: analysis and design of intelligent systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Zurück zum Zitat Raftery J (2003) Risk analysis in project management. Routledge, Abingdon Raftery J (2003) Risk analysis in project management. Routledge, Abingdon
Zurück zum Zitat Royal Society (London) (1983) Risk Assessment: Report of a Royal Society Study Group. Royal Society Royal Society (London) (1983) Risk Assessment: Report of a Royal Society Study Group. Royal Society
Zurück zum Zitat Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New YorkMATH Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New YorkMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Shabir M, Ali MI, Shaheen T (2013) Another approach to soft rough sets. Knowl-Based Syst 40:72–80 Shabir M, Ali MI, Shaheen T (2013) Another approach to soft rough sets. Knowl-Based Syst 40:72–80
Zurück zum Zitat Torra V (2010) Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25:529–539MATH Torra V (2010) Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25:529–539MATH
Zurück zum Zitat Triantaphyllou E, Lin CT (1996) Development and evaluation of five fuzzy multiattribute decision-making methods. Int J Approx Reason 14:281–310MATH Triantaphyllou E, Lin CT (1996) Development and evaluation of five fuzzy multiattribute decision-making methods. Int J Approx Reason 14:281–310MATH
Zurück zum Zitat Tsang ECC, Wang C, Chen D, Wu C, Hu Q (2013) Communication between information systems using fuzzy rough sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 21(3):527–540 Tsang ECC, Wang C, Chen D, Wu C, Hu Q (2013) Communication between information systems using fuzzy rough sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 21(3):527–540
Zurück zum Zitat Van Laarhoven PJM, Pedrycz W (1983) A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 11(1):199–227MathSciNetMATH Van Laarhoven PJM, Pedrycz W (1983) A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 11(1):199–227MathSciNetMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Wei G (2012) Hesitant fuzzy prioritized operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 31:176–182 Wei G (2012) Hesitant fuzzy prioritized operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 31:176–182
Zurück zum Zitat White D, Fortune J (2002) Current practice in project management—an empirical study. Int J Proj Manag 20(1):1–11 White D, Fortune J (2002) Current practice in project management—an empirical study. Int J Proj Manag 20(1):1–11
Zurück zum Zitat Wu W, Xu Y, Shao M, Wang G (2016) Axiomatic characterizations of (S, T)-fuzzy rough approximation operators. Inf Sci 334:17–43MATH Wu W, Xu Y, Shao M, Wang G (2016) Axiomatic characterizations of (S, T)-fuzzy rough approximation operators. Inf Sci 334:17–43MATH
Zurück zum Zitat Xia MM, Xu ZS (2011) Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making. Int J Approx Reason 52(3):395–407MathSciNetMATH Xia MM, Xu ZS (2011) Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making. Int J Approx Reason 52(3):395–407MathSciNetMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Xu Z, Xia M (2011) Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 181:2128–2138MathSciNetMATH Xu Z, Xia M (2011) Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 181:2128–2138MathSciNetMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Xu Z, Zhang X (2013) Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information. Knowl-based Syst 52:53–64 Xu Z, Zhang X (2013) Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information. Knowl-based Syst 52:53–64
Zurück zum Zitat Yamak S, Kazanci O, Davaz B (2010) Generalized lower and upper approximations in a ring. Inf Sci 180:1759–1768MathSciNetMATH Yamak S, Kazanci O, Davaz B (2010) Generalized lower and upper approximations in a ring. Inf Sci 180:1759–1768MathSciNetMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Yang X, Song X, Qi Y, Yang J (2014) Constructive and axiomatic approaches to hesitant fuzzy rough set. Soft Comput 18:1067–1077MATH Yang X, Song X, Qi Y, Yang J (2014) Constructive and axiomatic approaches to hesitant fuzzy rough set. Soft Comput 18:1067–1077MATH
Zurück zum Zitat Yao YY (1998) Constructive and algebraic methods of the theory of rough sets. Inf Sci 109:21–47MathSciNetMATH Yao YY (1998) Constructive and algebraic methods of the theory of rough sets. Inf Sci 109:21–47MathSciNetMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Yao YY, Wong SKM, Lingras P (1990) A decision theoretic rough set model, methodologies for intelligent systems 5. North-Holland, New York, pp 17–24 Yao YY, Wong SKM, Lingras P (1990) A decision theoretic rough set model, methodologies for intelligent systems 5. North-Holland, New York, pp 17–24
Zurück zum Zitat Yeung DS, Chen D, Tsang ECC, Lee JWT, Xizhao W (2005) On the generalization of fuzzy rough sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 13(3):343–361 Yeung DS, Chen D, Tsang ECC, Lee JWT, Xizhao W (2005) On the generalization of fuzzy rough sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 13(3):343–361
Zurück zum Zitat Yu G, Li D-F, Fei W (2018a) A novel method for heterogeneous multi-attribute group decision making with preference deviation. Comput Ind Eng 124:58–64 Yu G, Li D-F, Fei W (2018a) A novel method for heterogeneous multi-attribute group decision making with preference deviation. Comput Ind Eng 124:58–64
Zurück zum Zitat Yu G-F, Fei W, Li D-F (2018b) A compromise-typed variable weight decision method for hybrid multi attribute decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27(5):861–872 Yu G-F, Fei W, Li D-F (2018b) A compromise-typed variable weight decision method for hybrid multi attribute decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27(5):861–872
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang H, Yang S (2015) Typical hesitant fuzzy rough sets. In: International conference on machine learning and cybernetics (ICMLC) (1) Zhang H, Yang S (2015) Typical hesitant fuzzy rough sets. In: International conference on machine learning and cybernetics (ICMLC) (1)
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu B, Xu Z (2014) Analytic hierarchy process-hesitant group decision making. Eur J Oper Res 239(3):794–801MathSciNetMATH Zhu B, Xu Z (2014) Analytic hierarchy process-hesitant group decision making. Eur J Oper Res 239(3):794–801MathSciNetMATH
Metadaten
Titel
Generalized hesitant fuzzy rough sets (GHFRS) and their application in risk analysis
verfasst von
Tanzeela Shaheen
Muhammad Irfan Ali
Muhammad Shabir
Publikationsdatum
22.02.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Soft Computing / Ausgabe 18/2020
Print ISSN: 1432-7643
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7479
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04776-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 18/2020

Soft Computing 18/2020 Zur Ausgabe