Sie können Operatoren mit Ihrer Suchanfrage kombinieren, um diese noch präziser einzugrenzen. Klicken Sie auf den Suchoperator, um eine Erklärung seiner Funktionsweise anzuzeigen.
Findet Dokumente, in denen beide Begriffe in beliebiger Reihenfolge innerhalb von maximal n Worten zueinander stehen. Empfehlung: Wählen Sie zwischen 15 und 30 als maximale Wortanzahl (z.B. NEAR(hybrid, antrieb, 20)).
Findet Dokumente, in denen der Begriff in Wortvarianten vorkommt, wobei diese VOR, HINTER oder VOR und HINTER dem Suchbegriff anschließen können (z.B., leichtbau*, *leichtbau, *leichtbau*).
Dieses Buch bietet Geisteswissenschaftlern eine Möglichkeit, sich kritisch mit generativer KI und den Auswirkungen des Technokaptialismus auf grundlegende und im Wesentlichen menschliche Fertigkeiten wie Lesen und Schreiben auseinanderzusetzen. Zur Zielgruppe gehören Pädagogen und Wissenschaftler aus dem Hochschulbereich und der K-12 sowie alle, die daran interessiert sind, wie kritisches Denken und Schreiben in Zukunft gelehrt wird. Für diejenigen, die nur den Begriff "ChatGPT" kennen, ist dieses Buch eine Ressource, um zu verstehen, wie allgegenwärtig und allgegenwärtig generative KI bereits in unserem Leben ist; für diejenigen, die mit OpenAI und anderen Entwicklern vertraut sind, bietet dieses Buch einen größeren Kontext für die Auswirkungen solcher Technologien auf unsere kreative Funktionalität.
Mit KI übersetzt
Über dieses Buch
This book offers scholars in the humanities a way to think critically about generative AI and the impact of technocaptialism on foundational, and essentially human, crafts such as reading and writing. The target audience includes educators and scholars in higher education and K-12, as well as anyone interested in how critical thinking and writing will be taught in the future. For those who only know the term "ChatGPT," this book is a resource for understanding how pervasive and ubiquitous generative AI already is in our lives; for those familiar with OpenAI and other developers, this book provides greater context for the effects of such technology on our creative functionality.
This chapter introduces the main argument of this book: namely, that while generative AI presents a unique threat to the acquisition and development of critical reading and writing skills, it also represents a general public malaise to those skills. The humanities as a professional institution have not been able to break through the public discourse noise to make a case for the necessity of those skills. This book aims to raise questions, offer suggestions, and ultimately argue for action rather than passivity.
Writing is such a funny, fickle activity, that often unites people in feelings of frustration and annoyance because it is a taxing endeavor if one takes writing seriously. This chapter focuses on novice (student and layperson) and professional (academic and public-facing) writing and calls for a reifying of the idea of public humanities, where we are addressing our communities-at-large as writers of all abilities and raising writing as a human right in a consistent, thoughtful, and compassionate manner.
Reading requires a level of trust that the author is acting in good faith, yet generative AI is untrustworthy. This chapter outlines how difficult, yet critical, it is for us to try to “read” generative AI so that we can more clearly interpret what affect is can and does have on the humanities and on our daily lives, including our ability to acquire and maintain literacy and deep reading skills.
Stepping away from the immediacy of the classroom, this chapter considers the humanities as a profession and the role educators play as laborers within the higher education industrial complex. This chapter interrogates the role time and speed play in our working conditions and the changes that are being proposed to those conditions. This chapter suggests that we think about the way “incapacitating technocapitalism” might be a framework that imperils our most essential work: teaching critical reading and writing skills.
This chapter is dedicated to teaching and will address pedagogy, but the primary focus when considering the impact of generative AI on the classroom is the discord sown between students and educators. Again, fractures in this critical relationship were visible long before fall of 2022, but the crisis of the COVID19 pandemic and the emergence of generative AI have turned a bad situation into a toxic one. We have an opportunity to course correct now in response to generative AI that could have long-lasting positive ramifications beyond the current AI discussion.
This final chapter argues that we should use our hard-won skills, developed through our humanistic work, to take the problem of incapacitating technocapitalism head on. Whether or not generative AI is a sustainable product from a sustainable industry, we have critical work to do to instigate a public reckoning around the value of critical reading and writing. We cannot continue to cede ground on this issue of what people need to survive and thrive, and we must endeavor to forge new alliances through deepening network ties with ostensible comrades in public-facing industries.
Die PDF-Dateien dieses Buches wurden gemäß dem PDF/UA-1-Standard erstellt, um die Barrierefreiheit zu verbessern. Dazu gehören Bildschirmlesegeräte, beschriebene nicht-textuelle Inhalte (Bilder, Grafiken), Lesezeichen für eine einfache Navigation, tastaturfreundliche Links und Formulare sowie durchsuchbarer und auswählbarer Text. Wir sind uns der Bedeutung von Barrierefreiheit bewusst und freuen uns über Anfragen zur Barrierefreiheit unserer Produkte. Bei Fragen oder Bedarf an Barrierefreiheit kontaktieren Sie uns bitte unter accessibilitysupport@springernature.com.