nach oben

Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft

Erschienen in:

15.01.2021

Getting Prices for Prosumers Right? Incentivizing Investment and Operation of Small-scale PV-Battery Storage Systems Through Prices, Charges and Levies

verfasst von: Jessica Thomsen, Christoph Weber

Erschienen in: Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

We assess how the design of retail prices, grid fees and levies for household prosumers affects the attractiveness and resulting operation of small-scale photovoltaic battery storage systems (PVBSS), using a detailed modeling approach applied to a case study of six households in Germany. The selected pricing schemes and reform proposals are evaluated regarding the investment attractiveness for the prosumer and the impact on system-oriented operation, considering both market and grid integration. We show that the current business models for PV and PVBSS are only exist because they are based on avoiding the need to purchase electricity from the grid and thus avoiding paying taxes and levies on consumed electricity. Introducing time-variable pricing schemes or price components increase the value of PVBSS for the customer and the market, but lead to a less grid-friendly operation. It is shown that the term “system-oriented operation” should be defined carefully, since under the analyzed incentives, the two objectives included in system-oriented operation (market and grid integration) do not necessarily go hand in hand, sometimes even contradicting one another. Both the tariff design and the design of single tariff components have a considerable impact on the attractiveness and the resulting system integration of PVBSS and should be evaluated thoroughly to avoid unintended outcomes.

Vorheriger Artikel Einfluss der CO2-Bepreisung nach BEHG auf die Kosten von Wärmeversorgung und Nutzung von Abwärme in deutschen Industriebetrieben

Nächster Artikel Blockchain or Aggregator? An Assessment of Service Provision Approaches for Prosumer Engagement in Grid Congestion Management

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft

Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft (ZfE) ist eine unabhängige Fachzeitschrift mit aktuellen Themen zu Energiewirtschaft, Energiepolitik und Energierecht. JETZT BESTELLEN

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Obviously, one may also question whether some objectives are well-posed and appropriate. Notably in line with mainstream environmental economics, incentives for renewable investments should not be an objective on its own. It is rather the decrease in greenhouse gas emissions that should be retained as primary objective. Yet this debate is beyond the scope of this paper (cf. e.g. Frondel et al. (2014), van der Ploeg and Withagen (2014) for contributions to that debate). We rather take the formulated objectives as given and are interested in the question to what extent price structure reforms can contribute to attain them.

In view of actual policy making, this is not a realistic scenario. Yet it reflects the assumptions underlying most so-called energy system models (e.g. Saad Hussein 2017; Eggers and Stryi-Hipp 2013; Palzer and Henning 2014; Simoes et al. 2013, 2015; Sgobbi et al. 2016; Di Leo et al. 2015) which are frequently used to advise policy makers on optimal long-term system development. Since such a pricing scheme also is the first-best choice in view of a system-oriented operation in the absence of local congestions, it is retained here as a kind of benchmark scenario.

Or put differently: Investments in pure PV plants are profitable in all scenarios whereas the addition of a battery leads to a loss in profitability. Yet households frequently will rather consider the packaged bundles (such as the PVBSS) than making individual profitability calculations per portfolio element.

Capacity charges can either be imposed on rated capacity or annual peak load. Both has its merits, however, as essentially the installation of the network infrastructure is the cost driver of grid costs, the present case study uses grid costs on contracted capacity. However, capacity charges on peak load can be used to incentivize a certain customer behavior, cf. e.g. Rodríguez Ortega et al. (2008); Hinz et al. (2018); Pérez-Arriaga und Bharatkumar (2014); Brown et al. (2015) for contributions to the discussion.

Abdelmotteleb I, Gómez T, Reneses J (2017) Evaluation methodology for tariff design under escalating penetrations of distributed energy resources. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10060778CrossRef

Abolhosseini S, Heshmati A (2014) The main support mechanisms to finance renewable energy development. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 40:876–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.013CrossRef

Agricola A‑C, Höflich B, Richard P, Völker J, Rehtanz C, Greve M, Gwisdorf B, Kays J, Noll T, Schwippe J, Seack A, Teuwsen J, Brunekreeft G, Meyer R, Liebert V (2012) dena-Verteilnetzstudie.; Ausbau- und Innovationsbedarf der Stromverteilnetze in Deutschland bis 2030

Allcott H (2011) Rethinking real-time electricity pricing. Resour Energy Econ 33:820–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.06.003CrossRef

Andersen FM, Larsen HV, Kitzing L, Morthorst PE (2014) Who gains from hourly time-of-use retail prices on electricity? An analysis of consumption profiles for categories of Danish electricity customers. WIREs Energy Environ 3:582–593. https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.120CrossRef

BDEW (2017) BDEW-Strompreisanalyse Mai 2017; Haushalte und Industrie. https://www.bdew.de/internet.nsf/res/ACB6766AE4CA66E0C1258132004BC873/$file/170531_BDEW_Strompreisanalyse_Mai2017.pdf. Accessed 4 Aug 2017

Borenstein S (2005) The long-run efficiency of real-time electricity pricing. Energy J 26:93–116CrossRef

Bourgault C, Bons M, Breitschopf B, Buzharovski S, Csanak G, Friedrichsen N, Grave K, Ivan V, Janeiro L, Karas J, Nierop S, Novák J, Ordonez J, Pace L, Petrikova K, Robić S, Rošā M, Artürs B, Ščasný M, Schult H, Śmietanka A, Uiga J, Vakarinaite M, van den Brink L, Wong L (2016) Prices and costs of EU energy; Annex 1: country descriptions

Brown T, Faruqui A, Grausz L (2015) Efficient tariff structures for distribution network services. Econ Anal Policy 48:139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2015.11.010 CrossRef

Brunekreeft G, Brandstätt C, Friedrichsen N (2011) Locational distribution network pricing in Germany locational distribution network pricing in Germany. 24–29 July 2011 IEEE, Detroit, Piscataway

Couture T, Gagnon Y (2010) An analysis of feed-in tariff remuneration models; Implications for renewable energy investment. Energy Policy 38:955–965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.047CrossRef

Denholm P, Hand M (2011) Grid flexibility and storage required to achieve very high penetration of variable renewable electricity. Energy Policy 39:1817–1830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.019CrossRef

Dietrich A, Weber C (2018) What drives profitability of grid-connected residential PV storage systems?; A closer look with focus on Germany. Energy Econ 74:399–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.06.014CrossRef

Eggers J‑B, Stryi-Hipp G (2013) Kommod as a tool to support municipalities on their way to becoming smart energy cities. In: Passer A, Höfler K, Maydl P (eds) Proceedings of the sustainable buildings, construction products & technologies conference 2013 Graz University of Technology, 25–28 September 2013 Verlag der Technischen Universität, Graz, pp 580–591

eurelectric (2013) Network tariff structure for a smart energy system; A EURELECTRIC paper. http://www.eurelectric.org/media/80239/20130409_network-tariffs-paper_final_to_publish-2013-030-0409-01-e.pdf. Accessed 4 Feb 2018

eurelectric (2016) Network tariffs; a EURELECTRIC position paper

Figgener J, Haberschusz D, Kairies K‑P, Wessels O, Tepe B, Sauer DU (2018) Wissenschaftliches Mess- und Evaluierungsprogramm Solarstromspeicher 2.0; Jahresbericht 2018

Fischer D, Härtl A, Wille-Haussmann B (2015) Model for electric load profiles with high time resolution for German households. Energy Build 92:170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.01.058CrossRef

Frondel M, Schmidt CM, Vance C (2014) Revisiting Germany’s solar cell promotion; an unfolding disaster. Econ Anal Policy 44:3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2014.02.001CrossRef

Frontier Economics Ltd., BET (2016) Kosten und Nutzen einer Dynamisierung von Strompreiskomponenten als Mittel zur Flexibilisierung der Nachfrage; Bericht für das Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie (BMWi). https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/DE/Publikationen/Studien/kosten-nutzen-dynamisierung-strompreiskomponenten.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v = 4. Accessed 27 July 2017

Haas R, Panzer C, Resch G, Ragwitz M, Reece G, Held A (2011a) A historical review of promotion strategies for electricity from renewable energy sources in EU countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:1003–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.015CrossRef

Haas R, Resch G, Panzer C, Busch S, Ragwitz M, Held A (2011b) Efficiency and effectiveness of promotion systems for electricity generation from renewable energy sources—lessons from EU countries. Energy 36:2186–2193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.06.028CrossRef

Härtl A, Fischer D, Müller S, Wille-Haussmann B, Wittwer C (2014) Berechnung hochaufgelöster, elektrischer Lastprofile für den Haushaltssektor. 29. Symposium Photovoltaische Solarenergie, Bad Staffelstein

Hinz F, Schmidt M, Möst D (2018) Regional distribution effects of different electricity network tariff designs with a distributed generation structure; The case of Germany. Clean Cook Fuels Technol Dev Econ 113:97–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.055CrossRef

Jahn A, Graichen P (2018) Netzentgelte 2018: Problematische Umverteilung zulasten von Geringverbrauchern; Kurzanalyse

Jenner S, Groba F, Indvik J (2013) Assessing the strength and effectiveness of renewable electricity feed-in tariffs in European Union countries. Clean Cook Fuels Technol Dev Econ 52:385–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.046CrossRef

Kaschub T, Jochem P, Fichtner W (2016) Solar energy storage in German households; profitability, load changes and flexibility. Clean Cook Fuels Technol Dev Econ 98:520–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.017CrossRef

Khalilpour R, Vassallo A (2015) Leaving the grid: an ambition or a real choice? Energy Policy 82:207–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.03.005CrossRef

Khalilpour R, Vassallo A (2016) Planning and operation scheduling of PV-battery systems: a novel methodology. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 53:194–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.015CrossRef

Kost C, Mayer JN, Thomsen J, Hartmann N, Senkpiel C, Philipps S, Nold S, Lude S, Schlegl T (2013) Stromgestehungskosten Erneuerbare Energien. Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE, Freiburg

Di Leo S, Pietrapertosa F, Loperte S, Salvia M, Cosmi C (2015) Energy systems modelling to support key strategic decisions in energy and climate change at regional scale. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 42:394–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.031CrossRef

Linssen J, Stenzel P, Fleer J (2017) Techno-economic analysis of photovoltaic battery systems and the influence of different consumer load profiles. Appl Energy 185:2019–2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.11.088CrossRef

Meibom P, Barth R, Hasche B, Brand H, Weber C, O’Malley M (2011) Stochastic optimization model to study the operational impacts of high wind penetrations in Ireland. IEEE T Power Syst 26:1367–1379. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2070848CrossRef

Merei G, Moshövel J, Magnor D, Sauer DU (2016) Optimization of self-consumption and techno-economic analysis of PV-battery systems in commercial applications. Appl Energy 168:171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.083CrossRef

Moshövel J, Magnor D, Sauer DU, Gährs S, Bost M, Hirschl B, Cramer M, Özalay B, Matrose C, Müller C, Schnettler A (2015) Analyse des wirtschaftlichen, technischen und ökologischen Nutzens von PV-Speichern (Gemeinsamer Ergebnisbericht für das Projekt PV-Nutzen, FKZ 0325534A/B.)

Nabe C, Bons M (2014) Der Spotmarktpreis als Index für eine dynamische EEG-Umlage; Vorschlag für eine verbesserte Integration Erneuerbarer Energien durch Flexibilisierung der Nachfrage. Agora Energiewende, Berlin

Netze B (2017) Preise für die Nutzung des Stromverteilnetzes der Netze BW GmbH. https://assets.contentful.com/xytfb1vrn7of/3UkcBW3Hd6W8gKIo0QkGM8/bbf236ce696a3daabbb7417dacca5112/preise-gueltig-ab-01.01.2017.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2018

Palzer A, Henning H‑M (2014) A comprehensive model for the German electricity and heat sector in a future energy system with a dominant contribution from renewable energy technologies—Part II: Results. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 30:1019–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.032CrossRef

Parra D, Patel MK (2016) Effect of tariffs on the performance and economic benefits of PV-coupled battery systems. Appl Energy 164:175–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.11.037CrossRef

Pérez-Arriaga I, Knittel C, Miller R, Tabors R, Bharatkumar A, Birk M, Burger S, Chaves JP, Duenas-Martinez P, Herrero I, Huntington S, Jenkins J, Luke M, Rodilla P, Tapia-Ahumada K, Vergara C, Xu N (2016) Utility of the Future; An MIT Energy Initiative response to an industry in transition

Pérez-Arriaga I, Bharatkumar A (2014) A framework for redesigning distribution network use of system charges under high penetration of distributed energy resources: new principles for new problems. https://www.iit.comillas.edu/docs/IIT-14-161A.pdf. Accessed 9 Jan 2018

van der Ploeg F, Withagen C (2014) Growth, renewable and the optimal carbon tax. Int Econ Rev 55:283–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12049MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

Rodríguez Ortega MP, Pérez-Arriaga JI, Abbad JR, González JP (2008) Distribution network tariffs; a closed question? Clean Cook Fuels Technol Dev Econ 36:1712–1725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.01.025CrossRef

del Río P, Mir-Artigues P (2014) Combinations of support instruments for renewable electricity in Europe; a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 40:287–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.039CrossRef

Saad Hussein N (2017) A method for evaluating building retrofit effects on a decentral energy system by a sector coupling operation and expansion model. Energy Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-017-0257-5CrossRef

Sani Hassan A, Cipcigan L, Jenkins N (2017) Optimal battery storage operation for PV systems with tariff incentives. Appl Energy 203:422–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.043CrossRef

Sgobbi A, Simões SG, Magagna D, Nijs W (2016) Assessing the impacts of technology improvements on the deployment of marine energy in Europe with an energy system perspective. Renew Energy 89:515–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.11.076CrossRef

Simoes S, Fortes P, Seixas J, Huppes G (2015) Assessing effects of exogenous assumptions in GHG emissions forecasts—a 2020 scenario study for Portugal using the Times energy technology model. Technol Forecast Soc Change 94:221–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.09.016CrossRef

Simoes S, Nijs W, Ruiz P, Sgobbi A, Radu D, Bolat P, Thiel C, Peteves S (2013) The JRC-EU-TIMES model; Assessing the long-term role of the SET plan energy technologies

Stelmach G, Zanocco C, Flora J, Rajagopal R, Boudet HS (2020) Exploring household energy rules and activities during peak demand to better determine potential responsiveness to time-of-use pricing. Energy Policy 144:111608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111608CrossRef

Thomsen J (2017) Enhancing operation of decentralized energy systems by a regional economic optimization model DISTRICT. Energy Syst 8:828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-017-0261-9CrossRef

Tinbergen J (1963) On the theory of economic policy. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam

Wood L, Hemphill R, Howat J, Cavanagh R, Borenstein S, Deason J, Schwartz LC (2016) Recovery of Utility Fixed Costs; Utility, Consumer. Environmental and Economist Perspectives FEUR Report No. 5CrossRef

Titel: Getting Prices for Prosumers Right? Incentivizing Investment and Operation of Small-scale PV-Battery Storage Systems Through Prices, Charges and Levies
verfasst von: Jessica Thomsen
Christoph Weber
Publikationsdatum: 15.01.2021
Verlag: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
Erschienen in: Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0343-5377
Elektronische ISSN: 1866-2765
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12398-020-00295-5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Veranstaltungskalender

Regionalität aus Sicht von Energieversorgungsunternehmen – Eine qualitative Inhaltsanalyse zu Regionalstrom in Deutschland

Measuring the Impact of Renewable Energy Sources on Power Sector Carbon Emissions in Germany—a Methodological Inquiry

Einfluss der CO2-Bepreisung nach BEHG auf die Kosten von Wärmeversorgung und Nutzung von Abwärme in deutschen Industriebetrieben

Blockchain or Aggregator? An Assessment of Service Provision Approaches for Prosumer Engagement in Grid Congestion Management