Zum Inhalt

Open Access 2025 | Open Access | Buch

Global Partnerships and Neocolonialism

insite
SUCHEN

Über dieses Buch

Dieses Open-Access-Buch zeigt einige der problematischen Aspekte internationaler Partnerschaften auf, die weiterhin vom Kolonialismus geprägt sind. Eine "globale Partnerschaft für nachhaltige Entwicklung" ist das 17. der Ziele Nachhaltiger Entwicklung (ZNE). Die Forschung weist jedoch auf Mängel und problematische Aspekte internationaler Partnerschaften hin, die vom Kolonialismus geprägt sind und weiterhin ungleiche Machtverhältnisse zwischen dem globalen Norden und dem Süden widerspiegeln. In den Kapiteln dieses Bandes wird daher untersucht, wie in einem neokolonialen Umfeld globale Partnerschaften in den Bereichen Entwicklungszusammenarbeit, Weltwirtschaft und Wissensproduktion aufgebaut werden können. Die Beiträge wurden von Mitgliedern des Global Partnership Network (GPN) verfasst, eines vom Bundesministerium für Entwicklungszusammenarbeit geförderten Kompetenzzentrums für Austausch und Entwicklung, das sich in den letzten vier Jahren intensiv und kritisch mit dem Thema Partnerschaften und Nord-Süd-Beziehungen beschäftigt hat.

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Frontmatter

Open Access

Chapter 1. Introduction: Global Partnerships and Neocolonialism
Abstract
A “global partnership for sustainable development” is the 17th of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the Agenda 2030. This edited volume focuses on three specific areas of partnerships: Development cooperation, the global economy, as well as knowledge production and sharing. Despite the far-reaching commitments to create global partnerships in different areas, research still points to shortcomings and problematic aspects that have been shaped by colonialism and continue to reflect unequal power relations between the global North and South. This chapter outlines the state of research on partnerships within these three areas, highlighting how global power imbalances and structures rooted in colonialism continue to shape today’s global political economy and obstruct global partnership. This is followed by an introduction to the concept of neocolonialism as the book’s guiding theoretical framework and ends with an overview of the book’s chapters.
Jule Lümmen, Aram Ziai

Open Access

Chapter 2. Prospects of Solidarity in the Era of Neocolonialism
Abstract
This chapter provides an overview of the context and challenges in the postwar era with respect to the dynamics of domination and resistance between the North and the South. It provides a perspective rooted in Marxian political economy, on the changing economic-structural correlates, from the early postwar period to the onset of Neoliberalism in the early 1970s. It is argued that, especially in the latter period, it became increasingly evident that the prospects of charting out relatively autonomous economic development in the newly decolonized countries, or more generally in the South, confronted very powerful obstacles and challenges. The chapter provides a conceptual/empirical mapping of the South and the North at the current juncture, before turning to the prospects of solidarities and the underlying major challenges. It argues that solidarity requires that the end of imperialist wars and sanctions be given priority, and that the right to national self-determination and autonomous development be respected. These are the preconditions for charting a new course, with a view to reverse privatization and commodification of public goods and nature and to deliver essential goods and services for the social reproduction of the masses of working people perpetually trapped in multiple vulnerabilities. Humanity’s common issues can be basis for solidarity, as both the North and the South grapple with the consequences of a capitalist system that prioritizes profit over people.
Praveen Jha, Paris Yeros

Partnerships and Neocolonialism in Development Cooperation

Frontmatter

Open Access

Chapter 3. Partnership Instead of Colonialism? The Origins and Colonial Elements of Development Cooperation
Abstract
From its origins in biology, philosophy and evolutionary theory, the concept of ‘development’ became the dominant interpretative frame for the explanation of global inequality and social change in the second half of the twentieth century and the basis for development cooperation (Esteva, 1992; Ferguson, 1994). However, while this frame has been hegemonic for many decades (and still is, for the most part), it has been increasingly criticized as colonial (recently by Ndlovu-Gatsheni, 2020). This chapter seeks to investigate this claim. It starts with an exploration of the origins of development cooperation in US-President Truman’s, 1949 address in the historical context of the Cold War and decolonial ambitions (Sect. ‘The Origins of Development Cooperation’), before identifying not only the discontinuities, but also the colonial elements that could still be found in the theory and practice of post-war development cooperation despite the claim to establish a new program of North–South relations (Sect. ‘Colonial Elements of the Critique of Development Discourse’). Turning to the present day, we will then examine, to what extent the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), hailed as a new paradigm in international cooperation since 2015, offer new perspectives against the backdrop of these elements (Sect. ‘The Sustainable Development Goals: New Perspectives?’). We will conclude with reflections on how to overcome the colonial elements and decolonise development cooperation (Sect. ‘Decolonising Development Cooperation’).
Aram Ziai

Open Access

Chapter 4. International “Development” Cooperation and Social Change from Below. Challenges to the Viability of a Social and Solidarity Economy in Haiti 2010–2020
Abstract
Far from contributing to economic growth and an equitable distribution of resources, international ‘development’ cooperation has reinforced Haiti's spiral of debt and dependence. It has led to a reduction in public spending and the stripping of state assets. Social and popular movements are committed to building an alternative to this model of ‘development’: social change from below, through the Social and Solidarity Economy (SSE). Yet this alternative, which is grounded in the extension of peasant family farming and in opposition to large scale plantations intended primarily for export, is developing in a deleterious macroeconomic context largely shaped by ‘international development cooperation’. This chapter examines the challenges to the viability of SSE in such a context, with particular reference to the acceleration of humanitarian interference in the wake of the earthquake that devastated Haiti's capital on January 12, 2010.
Képler Aurélien, Marc-Arthur Fils-Aimé

Open Access

Chapter 5. Neocolonialism Facilitated by the World Bank? A Case Study of the World Bank’s Involvement in the Development of Guyana’s Oil and Gas Sector
Abstract
In 2015, the US oil company ExxonMobil discovered huge quantities of oil and gas off the coast of Guyana, a coastal country in the northern part of South America. Shortly after the oil discovery, the Guyanese government signed a contract with ExxonMobil and its coventurers, which granted the country only two percent of royalties and freed ExxonMobil from paying any taxes. Under these conditions, the World Bank provided two Technical Assistance loans of $55 million to Guyana between 2018 and 2019 aimed at developing new fiscal, regulatory, and legal frameworks for the oil and gas sector. While the World Bank claims its mission is to support the Guyanese government in managing its petroleum sector, experts say the World Bank facilitated a continuation of history in favour of the fossil industry. Not only did the World Bank hire ExxonMobil's go-to law firm to draft the country's petroleum regulations, but it also pursued the project with the support of a government that had been voted out of office by a vote of no confidence at the time. Drawing on Nkrumah’s theory of neocolonialism, this paper argues that the World Bank supported neocolonial structures in Guyana.
Jule Lümmen

Partnerships and Neocolonialism in the Global Economy

Frontmatter

Open Access

Chapter 6. Global Energy Partnerships: Green Colonialism and an Ecological New International Economic Order
Abstract
This chapter examines the contemporary relevance of the New International Economic Order (NIEO) and the Brandt Commission's suggestions in the climate and energy context, focusing on African nations. It analyzes recent global political and economic shifts, highlighting NIEO and Brandt Commission deficiencies in energy and climate policies. It explores persistent North–South dependency patterns, labelling them as energy imperialism and green colonialism with financial access as an example. Furthermore, the text considers the potential of a renewed ‘New International Economic Order’ (NIEO2) for promoting global partnerships for socio-ecological transformation. It draws on Global Ecological Political Economy, linking dependency, imperialism, and colonialism theories with ecological aspects.
Simone Claar

Open Access

Chapter 7. Transcending Imperialist/Sub-Imperialist Partnerships
Abstract
At a time of extreme political volatility, various multilateral sites of decision-making are no longer effective for solving world problems. Prior generations of global-scale deals had included a 1987 chlorofluorocarbon ban to halt ozone-hole deterioration, a 2002 medicines fund for AIDS, and—reflecting both financial power and vulnerability—the coordinated 2008–11 G20 financial bailouts. By the early 2020s, the Covid-19 pandemic showed that in spite of Quantitative Easing (printing money) and mild Keynesian income distribution by rich countries, there was no concept of global public goods. So ‘vaccine apartheid’ reflected the refusal of Britain and Germany to waive Intellectual Property on medicines. Even though there were two leaders of the Brazil-Russia-India-China-South Africa bloc (from Pretoria and New Delhi) fighting the West, the BRICS were in most instances assimilated into the existing multilateral institutions and global value chains. In 2014 they created a sole alternative institution, the New Development Bank, but it was a replica of a conservative Western financier, joining banking sanctions against 20% owner Russia due to the risk of a downgrade by New York credit ratings agencies. In crucial areas of finance, trade, investment and climate policy, imperial/sub-imperial partnerships were not ameliorations but instead amplifications of polycrisis.
Patrick Bond

Open Access

Chapter 8. Fairtrade Certification of Commercial Farms: The Case of South African Wine Farms
Abstract
The South African wine industry exists as one of the country's oldest sites of global partnerships in the country, beginning in the early years of South African colonialism in the seventeenth century through slave and slave-like labour. As an industry defined by racialised exploitation and dependency on farms, the wine industry has had to demonstrate changes from its history of exploitation to an industry that reflects the democratic values of a new South Africa. Partnerships formed through ethical certifications are considered one way through which the post-apartheid South African wine industry can demonstrate that it has moved away from its exploitative historical practices towards practices of decent work and social transformation. An important international certificatory partner that has allowed local wine producers entry into global wine production networks is Fairtrade International.
While Fairtrade certification is often reserved for small-scale producers, this certification has been extended to large-scale, commercial producers within the South African wine industry despite these producers historically being the beneficiaries of colonialism and Apartheid. This section explores the implications of this inclusion in terms of the global partnerships facilitated by this inclusion, and its implications for the social upgrading of farmworkers as a key dimension of decent work.
Joshua Bell, Sally Matthews

Open Access

Chapter 9. From Colonial Nursing to an Imperial Mode of Reproduction
Abstract
Inspired by the #Decolonise Global Health movement which scandalized the unequal distribution of Covid-19 vaccines, this paper embarks on a time- and space-diagnostic journey exploring nursing. In three steps the paper analyses care extractivism, starting with the history of nursing in former colonies, followed by the new international division of reproductive labour, and persisting patterns of (de)valuing and stereotyping of nurses in Global Care Chains. Finally, it delves paradigmatically into the recruitment and migration of nurses from Ghana and from India to the Global North. Throughout, professional nursing is considered a neuralgic axis of health care at the interface of the racial logic of (post)colonial power, and the capitalist logic of commodification and profit making. Establishing structures of an imperial mode of social reproduction, post-colonial and capitalist inequalities between the Global South and the Global North get deepened by Global Care Chains in terms of recruitment and import of nurses. While these are deemed to be the solution for the chronic shortage of nurses in the health care systems of OECD countries, they are once again shaped by the colonial and capitalist power matrix.
Christa Wichterich

Partnerships and Neocolonialism in Knowledge Production

Frontmatter

Open Access

Chapter 10. Knowledge Production for “Development”—Challenges and Pitfalls of Decolonization
Abstract
The impact of the era of Enlightenment and the violent expansion of central Europe to the rest of the world is not past. It exists in the present. Executed with brute force and immense human costs culminating in genocidal forms of elimination on the side of those forced under a regime of so-called development having its roots in the European (un)civilising mission. These were barbaric acts for the benefit of the perpetrators, with lasting consequences of destruction of indigenous forms of social reproduction. They left not only scars and festering wounds, but also a legacy. It is a challenge for solidarity as engagement advocating global emancipatory transformation on the way to decoloniality and justice. Such task must be an obligation to explore what “Development” should be about. Its dominant meaning since the mid-twentieth century has hardly been replaced by non-hegemonic counter narratives. Shared histories are rarely presented as such. Scholars fail to adequately counteract the inadequate and inaccurate omissions and silences. This chapter reflects on the linkage between knowledge production and development, with a cautious word on the pitfalls of a universalist reproduction of Eurocentric perspectives.
Henning Melber

Open Access

Chapter 11. Recognizing Complicity and our Unwillingness (and Inability) to do so
Abstract
This chapter is based on a research project aimed at giving a voice to “facilitating researchers” in the global South and outlining their crucial role in knowledge production. The author sheds light on the inequalities between Northern-based “contracting researchers” and Southern-based “facilitating researchers”, including poor remuneration, dangerous working conditions, and denied authorship. She then critically discusses in which ways and why even critical scholars in the Global North are complicit in reproducing these hierarchies and points toward possible pathways for change.
Maria Eriksson Baaz

Outlook

Frontmatter

Open Access

Chapter 12. In Search of a Democratic Eco-Socialist Politics
Abstract
As the science of climate change becomes irrefutable, alongside the increased recognition of a range of other environmental threats, the discourse around a ‘just transition’ to a post-carbon future has increased in intensity. The dominant discourse, however, has taken the form of a green capitalism that says little about the social dimensions of ‘fossil’ capitalism, including rising inequality (both between and within countries) and a deep appreciation of patriarchy. Thinking and practice around eco socialism and feminism has come from groups outside the dominant paradigms. They draw on growing struggles and bodies of thought throughout the world, that grapple with the ravages of ‘fossil’ capitalism, colonial dispossession and patriarchy.
New thinking has emerged around happiness and wellbeing, degrowth, a Green New Deal and ecosocialism, and how to pursue a counter-hegemonic politics within the context of the established nation-state. In recent years, a bold rupture with capitalist-patriarchy has occurred in northern Syria, where the Kurdish people of Rojava (alongside a diverse range of ethnic and religious groups) are leading a women’s revolution founded on the principles of social ecology and a new democratic civilisation. These radical alternatives pose a challenge to hegemonic thinking that permeates the SDGs, and places firmly on the agenda the possibilities of forging a counter-hegemonic ecosocialist politics.
Devan Pillay
Metadaten
Titel
Global Partnerships and Neocolonialism
herausgegeben von
Aram Ziai
Praveen Jha
Jule Lümmen
Copyright-Jahr
2025
Electronic ISBN
978-3-031-87005-7
Print ISBN
978-3-031-87004-0
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-87005-7