Skip to main content

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Governance Failure in Light of Government 3.0: Foundations for Building Next Generation eGovernment Maturity Models

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Demographic, economic and other challenges is putting the public sector and service deliver under increasing pressure. ICT as an enabler of increased efficiency, effectiveness and transformation has long been recognized as part of the solution. National experiences show that the potential of ICT has not been fully realized, especially not in relation to Government 3.0 (Gov3.0). Existing public administration, information systems management and eGovernment literature and individual studies all point to the role of governance and cross-organisational cooperation in successfully introducing eServices and citizens actual use of them.
With a specific focus on eGovernment and eGovernance maturity and stage models, the literature attempt to unearth the underlying reasons why countries with similar infrastructures and eService availability experience very different levels of online interaction with the public sector, and in particular whether existing stage models address governance and cooperation.
Unfortunately, the review highlight a number of gaps including: Focus on outcomes and actual use is missing; most lack a real understanding of core government service concepts; decision-making should not be considered an eGovernment maturity level; front-office service provision and back-office integration is mixed-up; none addresses governance directly; most models are merely restructure or adjust existing ones, and none address Gov3.0 as such.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Alhomod SM, Shafi MM (2012) Best practices in e-government: a review of some innovative models proposed in different countries. Int J Electri Comput Sci 12(2):1–6 Alhomod SM, Shafi MM (2012) Best practices in e-government: a review of some innovative models proposed in different countries. Int J Electri Comput Sci 12(2):1–6
Zurück zum Zitat Almazan RS, Gil-Garcia JR (2008) e-Government portals in Mexico. Electron Gov Concepts Methodol Tools Appl 6:1726–1736CrossRef Almazan RS, Gil-Garcia JR (2008) e-Government portals in Mexico. Electron Gov Concepts Methodol Tools Appl 6:1726–1736CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ANAO (1999) Electronic service delivery, including internet use by Commonwealth government agencies. ANAO, Australian National Auditing Office, Canberra, p 87 ANAO (1999) Electronic service delivery, including internet use by Commonwealth government agencies. ANAO, Australian National Auditing Office, Canberra, p 87
Zurück zum Zitat Andersen KV, Henriksen HZ (2006) E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model. Gov Inf Q 23(2):236–248CrossRef Andersen KV, Henriksen HZ (2006) E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model. Gov Inf Q 23(2):236–248CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bannister F (2001) Dismantling the silos: extracting new value from IT investments in public administration. Inf Syst J 11(1):65–84CrossRef Bannister F (2001) Dismantling the silos: extracting new value from IT investments in public administration. Inf Syst J 11(1):65–84CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bannister F (2007) The curse of the benchmark: an assessment of the validity and value of e-government comparisons. Int Rev Adm Sci 73(2):171–188CrossRef Bannister F (2007) The curse of the benchmark: an assessment of the validity and value of e-government comparisons. Int Rev Adm Sci 73(2):171–188CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bannister F, Connolly R (2011) Transformation and public sector values, in tGov 11. Brunel University, London Bannister F, Connolly R (2011) Transformation and public sector values, in tGov 11. Brunel University, London
Zurück zum Zitat Bates MJ (1989) The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Review 13(5):407–424CrossRef Bates MJ (1989) The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Review 13(5):407–424CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baum C, Di Maio A. (2000) Gartner’s four phases of e-government model. In: Gartner Group Baum C, Di Maio A. (2000) Gartner’s four phases of e-government model. In: Gartner Group
Zurück zum Zitat Brown AE, Grant GG (2005) Framing the frameworks: a review of IT governance research. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 15(1):38 Brown AE, Grant GG (2005) Framing the frameworks: a review of IT governance research. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 15(1):38
Zurück zum Zitat Brown CV, Magill SL (1994) Alignment of the IS functions with the enterprise: toward a model of antecedents. MIS Q:371–403 Brown CV, Magill SL (1994) Alignment of the IS functions with the enterprise: toward a model of antecedents. MIS Q:371–403
Zurück zum Zitat Chan CM, Lau YM, Pan SL (2008) E-government implementation: a macro analysis of Singapore's e-government initiatives. Gov Inf Q 25(2):239–255CrossRef Chan CM, Lau YM, Pan SL (2008) E-government implementation: a macro analysis of Singapore's e-government initiatives. Gov Inf Q 25(2):239–255CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chandler S, Emanuels S (2002) Transformation not automation. In: Proceedings of 2nd European conference on E-government. Management Center Europe, Brusseles Chandler S, Emanuels S (2002) Transformation not automation. In: Proceedings of 2nd European conference on E-government. Management Center Europe, Brusseles
Zurück zum Zitat Charalabidis Y (2015) What is government 3.0? In: Charalabidis Y (ed) Governance and transformation. Yannis Charalabidis, Athens Charalabidis Y (2015) What is government 3.0? In: Charalabidis Y (ed) Governance and transformation. Yannis Charalabidis, Athens
Zurück zum Zitat Chen JYY, Mingins C (2011) A three-dimensional model for e-government development with cases in China’s regional e-government practice and experience. In: ICMeCG, 2011 fifth international conference on management of e-commerce and e-government. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Wuhan Chen JYY, Mingins C (2011) A three-dimensional model for e-government development with cases in China’s regional e-government practice and experience. In: ICMeCG, 2011 fifth international conference on management of e-commerce and e-government. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Wuhan
Zurück zum Zitat Christensen T, Lægreid P (2007) The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Adm Rev 67(6):1059–1066CrossRef Christensen T, Lægreid P (2007) The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Adm Rev 67(6):1059–1066CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Christine Leitner, J.-M.E., François Heinderyckx, Klaus Lenk, Morten Meyerhoff Nielsen, Roland Traunmüller (2003) eGovernment in Europe: the state of affairs. p 66 Christine Leitner, J.-M.E., François Heinderyckx, Klaus Lenk, Morten Meyerhoff Nielsen, Roland Traunmüller (2003) eGovernment in Europe: the state of affairs. p 66
Zurück zum Zitat Cisco IBSG (2007) e-Government Best Practices learning from success, avoiding the pitfalls. Cisco IBSG Cisco IBSG (2007) e-Government Best Practices learning from success, avoiding the pitfalls. Cisco IBSG
Zurück zum Zitat Cordella A (2007) E-government: towards the e-bureaucratic form? J Inf Technol 22(3):265–274CrossRef Cordella A (2007) E-government: towards the e-bureaucratic form? J Inf Technol 22(3):265–274CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cordella A, Bonina CM (2012) A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: a theoretical reflection. Gov Inf Q 29(4):512–520CrossRef Cordella A, Bonina CM (2012) A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: a theoretical reflection. Gov Inf Q 29(4):512–520CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Davison RM, Wagner C, Ma LC (2005) From government to e-government: a transition model. Inf Technol People 18(3):280–299CrossRef Davison RM, Wagner C, Ma LC (2005) From government to e-government: a transition model. Inf Technol People 18(3):280–299CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat de Bri F, Bannister F (2010) Whole-of-government: the continuing problem of eliminating silos. Proceedings of the 10th European conference on eGovernment. National Centre for Taxation Studies and University of Limerick, Ireland, pp 122–133 de Bri F, Bannister F (2010) Whole-of-government: the continuing problem of eliminating silos. Proceedings of the 10th European conference on eGovernment. National Centre for Taxation Studies and University of Limerick, Ireland, pp 122–133
Zurück zum Zitat Deloitte and Touche (2001) The citizen as customer. In: CMS management. Deloitte and Touche, p 58 Deloitte and Touche (2001) The citizen as customer. In: CMS management. Deloitte and Touche, p 58
Zurück zum Zitat Demmke C (2006) Governmental, organisational and individual performance. Performance myths, performance “hype” and real performance. EIPAScope 2006(1):4–11 Demmke C (2006) Governmental, organisational and individual performance. Performance myths, performance “hype” and real performance. EIPAScope 2006(1):411
Zurück zum Zitat Dias GP, Gomes H (2014) Evolution of local e-government maturity in Portugal. In: Information systems and technologies (CISTI), 2014 9th Iberian conference on. 2014. IEEE Dias GP, Gomes H (2014) Evolution of local e-government maturity in Portugal. In: Information systems and technologies (CISTI), 2014 9th Iberian conference on. 2014. IEEE
Zurück zum Zitat EC (2012) E.C., Public services online ‘Digital by default or by De-tour?’ Assessing user centric eGovernment performance in Euorpe – eGovernment Benchmark 2012. European Commission, Brussels EC (2012) E.C., Public services online ‘Digital by default or by De-tour?’ Assessing user centric eGovernment performance in Euorpe – eGovernment Benchmark 2012. European Commission, Brussels
Zurück zum Zitat EC (2014) E.C., Delivering the European advantage? ‘How European governments can and should benefit from innovative public services’. European Commission DG Communications Networks, Content & Technology, Brussels EC (2014) E.C., Delivering the European advantage? ‘How European governments can and should benefit from innovative public services’. European Commission DG Communications Networks, Content & Technology, Brussels
Zurück zum Zitat Edelmann N, Krimmer R, Parycek P (2008) Engaging youth through deliberative e-participation: a case study. Int J Electron Gov 1(4):385–399CrossRef Edelmann N, Krimmer R, Parycek P (2008) Engaging youth through deliberative e-participation: a case study. Int J Electron Gov 1(4):385–399CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat European Commission, D.R.a.I (2013) Powering European public sector innovation: towards a new architecture. D.R.a. Innovation, Editor. European Commission, DG Research and Innovation, Brussels, pp 1–64 European Commission, D.R.a.I (2013) Powering European public sector innovation: towards a new architecture. D.R.a. Innovation, Editor. European Commission, DG Research and Innovation, Brussels, pp 1–64
Zurück zum Zitat Fath-Allah A et al (2014) eGovernment maturity models: a comparative study. Int J Software Eng Appl 5(3):72–91 Fath-Allah A et al (2014) eGovernment maturity models: a comparative study. Int J Software Eng Appl 5(3):72–91
Zurück zum Zitat Frissen V et al (2007) The future of eGovernment: an exploration of ICT-driven models of eGovernment for the EU in 2020. D. Osimo, D. Zinnbauer and A. Bianchi, Joint Research Centre Frissen V et al (2007) The future of eGovernment: an exploration of ICT-driven models of eGovernment for the EU in 2020. D. Osimo, D. Zinnbauer and A. Bianchi, Joint Research Centre
Zurück zum Zitat Gammon H (1954) The automatic handling of office paper work. Public Adm Rev 14(1):63–73CrossRef Gammon H (1954) The automatic handling of office paper work. Public Adm Rev 14(1):63–73CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Heeks R (2005) Implementing and managing eGovernment: an international text. Sage, Los Angeles Heeks R (2005) Implementing and managing eGovernment: an international text. Sage, Los Angeles
Zurück zum Zitat Heeks R (2006) Understanding and measuring eGovernment: international benchmarking studies. UNDESA workshop “E-participation and e-government: understanding the present and creating the future”. Budapest, Hungary, pp 27–28 Heeks R (2006) Understanding and measuring eGovernment: international benchmarking studies. UNDESA workshop “E-participation and e-government: understanding the present and creating the future”. Budapest, Hungary, pp 27–28
Zurück zum Zitat Heeks R (2015) A better eGovernment maturity model. In: iGovernment Briefing. Manchester, University of Manchester Heeks R (2015) A better eGovernment maturity model. In: iGovernment Briefing. Manchester, University of Manchester
Zurück zum Zitat Heeks R, Bailur S (2007) Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Gov Inf Q 24(2):243–265CrossRef Heeks R, Bailur S (2007) Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Gov Inf Q 24(2):243–265CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hiller JS, Belanger F (2001) Privacy strategies for electronic government. E-government 200:162–198 Hiller JS, Belanger F (2001) Privacy strategies for electronic government. E-government 200:162–198
Zurück zum Zitat Hodgkinson S (2002) Managing an e-government transformation program. Working Towards Whole-of-Government Online Conference, Canberra Hodgkinson S (2002) Managing an e-government transformation program. Working Towards Whole-of-Government Online Conference, Canberra
Zurück zum Zitat Howard M (2001) E-government across the globe: how will “e” change government? Gov Finan Rev 17(4):6–9 Howard M (2001) E-government across the globe: how will “e” change government? Gov Finan Rev 17(4):6–9
Zurück zum Zitat Huijboom N, van der Broek T, Frissen V, Kool L, Kotterink B, Meyerhoff Nielsen M, Millard J (2009a) Public services 2.0: key areas in the public sector impact of social computing. p 134 Huijboom N, van der Broek T, Frissen V, Kool L, Kotterink B, Meyerhoff Nielsen M, Millard J (2009a) Public services 2.0: key areas in the public sector impact of social computing. p 134
Zurück zum Zitat Huijboom N et al (2009b) Public Services 2.0: the impact of social computing on public services, in Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre, European Commission. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg Huijboom N et al (2009b) Public Services 2.0: the impact of social computing on public services, in Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre, European Commission. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
Zurück zum Zitat Igari N (2014) How to successfully promote ICT usage: a comparative analysis of Denmark and Japan. Telematics Inform 31(1):115–125CrossRef Igari N (2014) How to successfully promote ICT usage: a comparative analysis of Denmark and Japan. Telematics Inform 31(1):115–125CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat InfoDev, C.f.D.a.T (2002) The e-government handbook for developing countries. World Bank, Washington, DC, pp 1–41 InfoDev, C.f.D.a.T (2002) The e-government handbook for developing countries. World Bank, Washington, DC, pp 1–41
Zurück zum Zitat Iribarren M et al (2008) Capability maturity framework for eGovernment: a multi-dimensional model and assessing tool. In: Electronic government. Springer, pp 136–147 Iribarren M et al (2008) Capability maturity framework for eGovernment: a multi-dimensional model and assessing tool. In: Electronic government. Springer, pp 136–147
Zurück zum Zitat Janowski T (2015) Digital government evolution: from transformation to contextualization. Gov Inf Q 32(3):221–236CrossRef Janowski T (2015) Digital government evolution: from transformation to contextualization. Gov Inf Q 32(3):221–236CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Janssen M, Chun SA, Gil-Garcia JR (2009) Building the next generation of digital government infrastructures. Gov Inf Q 26(2):233–237CrossRef Janssen M, Chun SA, Gil-Garcia JR (2009) Building the next generation of digital government infrastructures. Gov Inf Q 26(2):233–237CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Janssen M, Charalabidis Y, Zuiderwijk A (2012) Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Inf Syst Manag 29(4):258–268CrossRef Janssen M, Charalabidis Y, Zuiderwijk A (2012) Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Inf Syst Manag 29(4):258–268CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jukić TT, Ljupčo N, Nameslaki A (2015) Investigation of e-government research field: what has been done and how to proceed? NISPAcee J Public Admin Policy 23 Jukić TT, Ljupčo N, Nameslaki A (2015) Investigation of e-government research field: what has been done and how to proceed? NISPAcee J Public Admin Policy 23
Zurück zum Zitat Kalampokis E, Tambouris E, Tarabanis K (2011) Open government data: a stage model. In: Electronic government. Springer, pp 235–246 Kalampokis E, Tambouris E, Tarabanis K (2011) Open government data: a stage model. In: Electronic government. Springer, pp 235–246
Zurück zum Zitat Kim D-Y, Grant G (2010) E-government maturity model using the capability maturity model integration. J Syst Inf Technol 12(3):230–244CrossRef Kim D-Y, Grant G (2010) E-government maturity model using the capability maturity model integration. J Syst Inf Technol 12(3):230–244CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Klievink B, Janssen M (2009) Realizing joined-up government—dynamic capabilities and stage models for transformation. Gov Inf Q 26(2):275–284CrossRef Klievink B, Janssen M (2009) Realizing joined-up government—dynamic capabilities and stage models for transformation. Gov Inf Q 26(2):275–284CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Klischewski R, Scholl HJ (2008) Information quality as capstone in negotiating e-government integration, interoperation and information sharing. Electron Gov Int J 5(2):203–225 Klischewski R, Scholl HJ (2008) Information quality as capstone in negotiating e-government integration, interoperation and information sharing. Electron Gov Int J 5(2):203–225
Zurück zum Zitat Koh CE, Prybutok VR (2003) The three ring model development of an instrument for measuring dimensions of E-government functions. J Comput Inf Syst 43(3):34 Koh CE, Prybutok VR (2003) The three ring model development of an instrument for measuring dimensions of E-government functions. J Comput Inf Syst 43(3):34
Zurück zum Zitat Layne K, Lee J (2001) Developing fully functional E-government: a four stage model. Gov Inf Q 18(2):122–136CrossRef Layne K, Lee J (2001) Developing fully functional E-government: a four stage model. Gov Inf Q 18(2):122–136CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lee J (2010) 10 year retrospect on stage models of e-Government: a qualitative meta-synthesis. Gov Inf Q 27(3):220–230CrossRef Lee J (2010) 10 year retrospect on stage models of e-Government: a qualitative meta-synthesis. Gov Inf Q 27(3):220–230CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lee G, Kwak YH (2012) An open government maturity model for social media-based public engagement. Gov Inf Q 29(4):492–503CrossRef Lee G, Kwak YH (2012) An open government maturity model for social media-based public engagement. Gov Inf Q 29(4):492–503CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lips M (2012) E-government is dead: long live public administration 2.0. Inf Polity 17(3):239–250 Lips M (2012) E-government is dead: long live public administration 2.0. Inf Polity 17(3):239–250
Zurück zum Zitat Luna DE et al (2013) Improving the performance assessment of government web portals: a proposal using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Inf Polity 18(2):169–187 Luna DE et al (2013) Improving the performance assessment of government web portals: a proposal using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Inf Polity 18(2):169–187
Zurück zum Zitat Meyerhoff M, Kelly A (2011) Scandinavia 2.0: efficiency, cooperation and innovations to alleviate the economic crisis. Eur J ePract 11:19–38 Meyerhoff M, Kelly A (2011) Scandinavia 2.0: efficiency, cooperation and innovations to alleviate the economic crisis. Eur J ePract 11:19–38
Zurück zum Zitat Meyerhoff Nielsen M (2014) Identifying eGovernment success factors: an analysis of selected national governance models and their experiences in digitising service delivery. Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: challenges in Eurasia, 2014, pp 19–25 Meyerhoff Nielsen M (2014) Identifying eGovernment success factors: an analysis of selected national governance models and their experiences in digitising service delivery. Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: challenges in Eurasia, 2014, pp 19–25
Zurück zum Zitat Meyerhoff Nielsen M (2015) Supply and use of citizen eServices: an analysis of selected national experiences in relation to existing governance and cooperation models. NISPAcee J Public Admin Policy 23 Meyerhoff Nielsen M (2015) Supply and use of citizen eServices: an analysis of selected national experiences in relation to existing governance and cooperation models. NISPAcee J Public Admin Policy 23
Zurück zum Zitat Meyerhoff Nielsen M (2016a) The role of governance, cooperation, and eService use in current eGovernment stage models. Hawaii Meyerhoff Nielsen M (2016a) The role of governance, cooperation, and eService use in current eGovernment stage models. Hawaii
Zurück zum Zitat Meyerhoff Nielsen M (2016b) eGovernance and stage models: Analysis of identified models and selected Eurasian experiences in digitizing citizen service delivery. Int J Electron Gov Res x(x):2016 Meyerhoff Nielsen M (2016b) eGovernance and stage models: Analysis of identified models and selected Eurasian experiences in digitizing citizen service delivery. Int J Electron Gov Res x(x):2016
Zurück zum Zitat Meyerhoff Nielsen M, Igari N (2012) Speaking Danish in Japan. CeDEM 12 conference for E-Democracy and Open Government 3–4 May 2012 Danube-University Krems, 2012, p 137 Meyerhoff Nielsen M, Igari N (2012) Speaking Danish in Japan. CeDEM 12 conference for E-Democracy and Open Government 3–4 May 2012 Danube-University Krems, 2012, p 137
Zurück zum Zitat Meyerhoff Nielsen M, Mika Y (2014) An analysis of the Danish approach to eGovernment benefit realisation. Internet Technologies and Society 2014 conference proceedings, 2014, pp 47–58 Meyerhoff Nielsen M, Mika Y (2014) An analysis of the Danish approach to eGovernment benefit realisation. Internet Technologies and Society 2014 conference proceedings, 2014, pp 47–58
Zurück zum Zitat Meyerhoff Nielsen M, Robert K (2015) Reuse of data for personal and proactive service: an opportunity not yet utilised. In: CeDEM 15 conference for e-democracy and open government 20–22 May 2015, Danube-University Krems, Austria. Krems an der Donau: Donau-Universität Krems; eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government Meyerhoff Nielsen M, Robert K (2015) Reuse of data for personal and proactive service: an opportunity not yet utilised. In: CeDEM 15 conference for e-democracy and open government 20–22 May 2015, Danube-University Krems, Austria. Krems an der Donau: Donau-Universität Krems; eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government
Zurück zum Zitat Millard J (2010) Government 1.5 – is the bottle half full or half empty? Eur J ePract (9):35–48 Millard J (2010) Government 1.5 – is the bottle half full or half empty? Eur J ePract (9):35–48
Zurück zum Zitat Millard J (2013) ICT-enabled public sector innovation: trends and prospects. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance. ACM Millard J (2013) ICT-enabled public sector innovation: trends and prospects. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance. ACM
Zurück zum Zitat Millard J, Luca C, Galasso G, Riedl R, Neuroni AC, Walser K, Sami Hamida A, Huijboom N, Meyerhoff Nielsen M, Leitner C, Fehlmann RS (2007) European eGovernment 2005–2007: Taking stock of good practice and progress towards implementation of the i2010 eGovernment Action Plan. p 80 Millard J, Luca C, Galasso G, Riedl R, Neuroni AC, Walser K, Sami Hamida A, Huijboom N, Meyerhoff Nielsen M, Leitner C, Fehlmann RS (2007) European eGovernment 2005–2007: Taking stock of good practice and progress towards implementation of the i2010 eGovernment Action Plan. p 80
Zurück zum Zitat Millard J et al (2008) Social computing: trends in public services and policies. JRC-IPTS Millard J et al (2008) Social computing: trends in public services and policies. JRC-IPTS
Zurück zum Zitat Ministry of Interior Korea (2016) Government 3.0. Ministry of Interior Korea, Seoul Ministry of Interior Korea (2016) Government 3.0. Ministry of Interior Korea, Seoul
Zurück zum Zitat Moon MJ (2002) The evolution of e-government among municipalities: rhetoric or reality? Public Adm Rev 62(4):424–433CrossRef Moon MJ (2002) The evolution of e-government among municipalities: rhetoric or reality? Public Adm Rev 62(4):424–433CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat NAO (2002) N.A.O., Government on the Web II. UK National Audit Office, London NAO (2002) N.A.O., Government on the Web II. UK National Audit Office, London
Zurück zum Zitat NASCIO, N.A.o.S.C.I.O. (2006) Enterprise Architecture Maturity Model (EAMM), version 3.1. National Association of State Chief Information Officers, Lexington NASCIO, N.A.o.S.C.I.O. (2006) Enterprise Architecture Maturity Model (EAMM), version 3.1. National Association of State Chief Information Officers, Lexington
Zurück zum Zitat Netchaeva I (2002) e-government and e-democracy a comparison of opportunities in the North and South. Int Commun Gaz 64(5):467–477CrossRef Netchaeva I (2002) e-government and e-democracy a comparison of opportunities in the North and South. Int Commun Gaz 64(5):467–477CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat O’Leary R, Gerard C, Bingham LB (2006) Introduction to the symposium on collaborative public management. Public Adm Rev 66(s1):6–9CrossRef O’Leary R, Gerard C, Bingham LB (2006) Introduction to the symposium on collaborative public management. Public Adm Rev 66(s1):6–9CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Obi T (2012) WASEDA – IAC Internationl e-Government Index. Waseda University and IAC International Agency of CIO, Tokyo Obi T (2012) WASEDA – IAC Internationl e-Government Index. Waseda University and IAC International Agency of CIO, Tokyo
Zurück zum Zitat Obi T (2014) WASEDA – IAC internationl e-government index. Waseda University and IAC International Agency of CIO, Tokyo Obi T (2014) WASEDA – IAC internationl e-government index. Waseda University and IAC International Agency of CIO, Tokyo
Zurück zum Zitat Obi T (2015) WASEDA – IAC Internationl e-Government Index. Waseda University and IAC International Agency of CIO, Tokyo Obi T (2015) WASEDA – IAC Internationl e-Government Index. Waseda University and IAC International Agency of CIO, Tokyo
Zurück zum Zitat OECD (2014) Recommendation of the Council on Digital Government Strategies 15 July 2014 – C(2014)88. OECD, Paris OECD (2014) Recommendation of the Council on Digital Government Strategies 15 July 2014 – C(2014)88. OECD, Paris
Zurück zum Zitat Persson A, Goldkuhl, G (2005) Stage-models for public e-services-investigating conceptual foundations. 2nd Scandinavian Workshop on e-Government, Copenhagen Persson A, Goldkuhl, G (2005) Stage-models for public e-services-investigating conceptual foundations. 2nd Scandinavian Workshop on e-Government, Copenhagen
Zurück zum Zitat Peters BG, Pierre J (1998) Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. J Public Adm Res Theory 8(2):223–243CrossRef Peters BG, Pierre J (1998) Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. J Public Adm Res Theory 8(2):223–243CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Poeppelbuss J et al (2011) Maturity models in information systems research: literature search and analysis. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 29(27):505–532 Poeppelbuss J et al (2011) Maturity models in information systems research: literature search and analysis. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 29(27):505–532
Zurück zum Zitat Pollitt C (2014) Future trends in European public administration and management: an outside-in perspective. COCOPS Coordination for Cohesion in the Public Sector of the Future Pollitt C (2014) Future trends in European public administration and management: an outside-in perspective. COCOPS Coordination for Cohesion in the Public Sector of the Future
Zurück zum Zitat Pollitt C, Bouckaert G (2011) Public management reform: a comparative analysis-new public management, governance, and the Neo-Weberian state. Oxford University Press, Oxford Pollitt C, Bouckaert G (2011) Public management reform: a comparative analysis-new public management, governance, and the Neo-Weberian state. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Zurück zum Zitat Pöppelbuß J, Röglinger M (2011) What makes a useful maturity model? A framework of general design principles for maturity models and its demonstration in business process management. ECIS Pöppelbuß J, Röglinger M (2011) What makes a useful maturity model? A framework of general design principles for maturity models and its demonstration in business process management. ECIS
Zurück zum Zitat Reddick CG (2004) A two-stage model of e-government growth: theories and empirical evidence for US cities. Gov Inf Q 21(1):51–64CrossRef Reddick CG (2004) A two-stage model of e-government growth: theories and empirical evidence for US cities. Gov Inf Q 21(1):51–64CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts SE (1977) Theories and Models in Information Retrieval. J Doc 33(2):126–148CrossRef Roberts SE (1977) Theories and Models in Information Retrieval. J Doc 33(2):126–148CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Röglinger M, Pöppelbuß J, Becker J (2012) Maturity models in business process management. Bus Process Manag J 18(2):328–346CrossRef Röglinger M, Pöppelbuß J, Becker J (2012) Maturity models in business process management. Bus Process Manag J 18(2):328–346CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rohleder SJ, Jupp V (2003) e-Government leadership: engaging the customer. Accenture, Arlington, pp 1–94 Rohleder SJ, Jupp V (2003) e-Government leadership: engaging the customer. Accenture, Arlington, pp 1–94
Zurück zum Zitat Ronaghan SA (2002) Benchmarking e-government: a global perspective: assessing the progress of the UN member states United Nations Division for Public Economics and Public Administration Ronaghan SA (2002) Benchmarking e-government: a global perspective: assessing the progress of the UN member states United Nations Division for Public Economics and Public Administration
Zurück zum Zitat Rorissa A, Demissie D, Pardo T (2011) Benchmarking e-Government: a comparison of frameworks for computing e-Government index and ranking. Gov Inf Q 28(3):354–362CrossRef Rorissa A, Demissie D, Pardo T (2011) Benchmarking e-Government: a comparison of frameworks for computing e-Government index and ranking. Gov Inf Q 28(3):354–362CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ross JW, Weill P, Robertson D (2006) Enterprise architecture as strategy: creating a foundation for business execution. Harvard Business Press, Boston Ross JW, Weill P, Robertson D (2006) Enterprise architecture as strategy: creating a foundation for business execution. Harvard Business Press, Boston
Zurück zum Zitat Scholl HJJ (2009) Profiling the EG research community and its core. In: Electronic government. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 1–12 Scholl HJJ (2009) Profiling the EG research community and its core. In: Electronic government. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 1–12
Zurück zum Zitat Self P (2000) Rolling back the state. Economic dogma & political choice. St Martin’s Press, New York Self P (2000) Rolling back the state. Economic dogma & political choice. St Martin’s Press, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Shahkooh KA, Saghafi F, Abdollahi A (2008) A proposed model for e-Government maturity. In: Information and communication technologies: from theory to applications, 2008. ICTTA 2008. 3rd international conference on. 2008. IEEE Shahkooh KA, Saghafi F, Abdollahi A (2008) A proposed model for e-Government maturity. In: Information and communication technologies: from theory to applications, 2008. ICTTA 2008. 3rd international conference on. 2008. IEEE
Zurück zum Zitat Shareef MA et al (2011) e-Government Adoption Model (GAM): differing service maturity levels. Gov Inf Q 28(1):17–35CrossRef Shareef MA et al (2011) e-Government Adoption Model (GAM): differing service maturity levels. Gov Inf Q 28(1):17–35CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Siau K, Long Y (2005) Synthesizing e-government stage models-a meta-synthesis based on meta-ethnography approach. Ind Manag Data Syst 105(4):443–458CrossRef Siau K, Long Y (2005) Synthesizing e-government stage models-a meta-synthesis based on meta-ethnography approach. Ind Manag Data Syst 105(4):443–458CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Statskontoret (2000) 24-timmmarsmyndighet: Förslag til kriterier för statlige elektronisk förvaltning i medborgarnas tjänst. Statskontoret, Stockholm, pp 1–80 Statskontoret (2000) 24-timmmarsmyndighet: Förslag til kriterier för statlige elektronisk förvaltning i medborgarnas tjänst. Statskontoret, Stockholm, pp 1–80
Zurück zum Zitat Toasaki Y (2003) e-Government from a user’s perspective. World Bank, Taipei Toasaki Y (2003) e-Government from a user’s perspective. World Bank, Taipei
Zurück zum Zitat Traunmüller R, Wimmer MA (2003) E-government at a decisive moment: sketching a roadmap to excellence. In: Electronic government. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 1–14CrossRef Traunmüller R, Wimmer MA (2003) E-government at a decisive moment: sketching a roadmap to excellence. In: Electronic government. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 1–14CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat UNDESA (2008) E-Government Survey 2008: From e-government to connected government. United Nations, New York UNDESA (2008) E-Government Survey 2008: From e-government to connected government. United Nations, New York
Zurück zum Zitat UNDESA (2010) E-Government Survey 2010: Leveraging e-government at a time of financial and economic crisis. United Nations, New York UNDESA (2010) E-Government Survey 2010: Leveraging e-government at a time of financial and economic crisis. United Nations, New York
Zurück zum Zitat UNDESA (2012) E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the people. New York UNDESA (2012) E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the people. New York
Zurück zum Zitat UNDESA (2014) E-Government Survey 2014: E-Government for the future we want. United Nations, New York UNDESA (2014) E-Government Survey 2014: E-Government for the future we want. United Nations, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Walsh D, Downe S (2005) Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. J Adv Nurs 50(2):204–211CrossRef Walsh D, Downe S (2005) Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. J Adv Nurs 50(2):204–211CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weill P (2004) Don’t just lead, govern: how top-performing firms govern IT. MIS Q Exec 3(1):1–17 Weill P (2004) Don’t just lead, govern: how top-performing firms govern IT. MIS Q Exec 3(1):1–17
Zurück zum Zitat Wescott CG (2001) E-Government in the Asia-pacific region. Asian J Political Sci 9(2):1–24CrossRef Wescott CG (2001) E-Government in the Asia-pacific region. Asian J Political Sci 9(2):1–24CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat West DM (2004) E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Adm Rev 64(1):15–27CrossRef West DM (2004) E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Adm Rev 64(1):15–27CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yildiz M (2007) E-government research: reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Gov Inf Q 24(3):646–665CrossRef Yildiz M (2007) E-government research: reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Gov Inf Q 24(3):646–665CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Governance Failure in Light of Government 3.0: Foundations for Building Next Generation eGovernment Maturity Models
verfasst von
Morten Meyerhoff Nielsen
Copyright-Jahr
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63743-3_4