Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-018-0548-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Some electoral systems favor strong single-party majority governments, while others the formation of coalitions. Having one or the other is likely to affect economic outcomes in ways that are unintended when the electoral rules are approved. In this paper, we show that government fragmentation has large fiscal implications. We also provide results that have a causal interpretation. Using a panel of Spanish municipalities, along with a close-elections regression discontinuity design, we find that single-party majorities run budgets with a 1.5% point larger primary surplus than that of coalitions. In addition, we show that lower deficits are driven mainly by single-party majority governments’ capacity to raise more revenues. These findings are robust to several model specifications.
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 353 kb)11127_2018_548_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Alesina, A., & Drazen, A. (1989). Why are stabilizations delayed? No. w3053. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Alt, J. E., & Lowry, R. C. (1994). Divided government, fiscal institutions, and budget deficits: Evidence from the states. American Political Science Review, 88(04), 811–828. CrossRef
Artés, J., & Jurado, I. (2015). Fiscal deficits and the type of government: A study of Spanish local elections. In G. Caballero & N. Schofield (Eds.), The political economy of governance (pp. 363–376). Berlin: Springer. CrossRef
Ashworth, J., & Heyndels, B. (1999). Political budget cycles in tax structure: An empirical analysis for OECD countries. Moscow: International Institute of Public Finance.
Ashworth, J., & Heyndels, B. (2001). Political fragmentation and the evolution of national tax structures in the OECD. International Tax and Public Finance, 8(4), 377–393. CrossRef
Ashworth, J., & Heyndels, B. (2005). Government fragmentation and budgetary policy in “good” and “bad” times in Flemish municipalities. Economics and Politics, 17, 245–263. CrossRef
Balassone, F., & Giordano, R. (2001). Budget deficits and coalition governments. Public Choice, 106(3–4), 327–349. CrossRef
Baskaran, T. (2013). Coalition governments, cabinet size, and the common pool problem: Evidence from the German States. European Journal of Political Economy, 32, 356–376. CrossRef
Bawn, K., & Rosenbluth, F. (2006). Short versus long coalitions: Electoral accountability and the size of the public sector. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 251–265. CrossRef
Blais, A., Kim, J., & Foucault, M. (2010). Public spending, public deficits and government coalitions. Political Studies, 58(5), 829–846. CrossRef
Borge, L.-E. (2005). Strong politicians, small deficits: Evidence from Norwegian local governments. European Journal of Political Economy, 21, 325–344. CrossRef
Borrelli, S. A., & Royed, T. J. (1995). Government ‘strength’and budget deficits in advanced democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 28(2), 225–260. CrossRef
Bradbury, J. C., & Crain, M. (2001). Legislative organization and government spending: Cross-country evidence. Journal of Public Economics, 82(3), 309–325. CrossRef
Brollo, F., & Nannicini, T. (2012). Tying your enemy’s hands in close races: The politics of federal transfers in Brazil. American Political Science Review, 106, 742–761. CrossRef
Calonico, S., Cattaneo, M., & Titiunik, R. (2014). Robust nonparametric confidence intervals for regression-discontinuity designs. Econometrica, 82(6), 2295–2326. CrossRef
Calonico, S., Cattaneo, M. D., & Titiunik, R. (2015). rdrobust: An r package for robust nonparametric inference in regression-discontinuity designs. R Journal, 7(1), 38–51.
Casas-Arce, P., & Saiz, A. (2014). Women and power: Unpopular, unwilling, or held back? Journal of Political Economy, 123, 641–669. CrossRef
Caughey, D., & Sekhon, J. S. (2011). Elections and the regression discontinuity design: Lessons from close US house races, 1942–2008. Political Analysis, 19(4), 385–408. CrossRef
Curto-Grau, M., Solé-Ollé, A., & Sorribas-Navarro, P. (2012). Partisan targeting of inter- governmental, transfers and state interference in local elections: Evidence from Spain. IEB WP 2012/031.
de Haan, J., & Sturm, J.-E. (1994). Political and institutional determinants of fiscal policy in the European community. Public Choice, 80, 157–172. CrossRef
de Haan, J., & Sturm, J.-E. (1997). Political and economic determinants of OECD budget deficits and governments expenditures: A reinvestigation. European Journal of Political Economy, 13, 739–750. CrossRef
de Haan, J., Sturm, J.-E., & Beekhuis, G. (1999). The weak government thesis: Some new evidence. Public Choice, 101(3–4), 163–176. CrossRef
Edin, P.-A., & Ohlsson, H. (1991). Political determinants of budget deficits: Coalition effects vs. minority effects. European Economic Review, 35, 1597–1603. CrossRef
Falcó-Gimeno, A., & Jurado, I. (2011). Minority governments and budget deficits: The role of the opposition. European Journal of Political Economy, 27, 554–565. CrossRef
Ferreira, F., & Gyourko, J. (2007). Do political parties matter? Evidence from US cities. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124, 349–397.
Folke, O. (2014). Shades of brown and green: Party effects in proportional election systems. Journal of the European Economic Association, 12, 1361–1395. CrossRef
Franzese, R. J. (2000). Electoral and partisan manipulation of public debt in developed democracies, 1956–90. In R. A. Strauch & J. Von Hagen (Eds.), Institutions, politics and fiscal policy (pp. 61–83). US: Springer. CrossRef
Freier, R., & Odendahl, C. (2012). Do absolute majorities spend less? Evidence from Germany. Discussion Papers 1239, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
Gagliarducci, S., & Nannicini, T. (2013). Do better paid politicians perform better? Disentangling incentives from selection. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(2), 369–398. CrossRef
Gagliarducci, S., Nannicini, T., & Naticchioni, P. (2011). Electoral rules and politicians’ behavior: A micro test. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3(3), 144–174.
Gerber, A., Kessler, D., & Meredith, M. (2011). The persuasive effects of direct mail: A regression discontinuity based approach. The Journal of Politics, 73(1), 140–155. CrossRef
Goeminne, S., Geys, B., & Smolders, C. (2008). Political fragmentation and projected tax revenues: Evidence from Flemish municipalities. International Tax and Public Finance, 15(3), 297–315. CrossRef
Green, D. P., Terrence, Y., Leong, H. L., & Gerber, A. S. (2009). Testing the accuracy of regression discontinuity analysis using experimental benchmarks. Political Analysis, 17(4), 400–417. CrossRef
Hahn, J., Todd, P., & Van der Klaauw, W. (2001). Identification and estimation of treatment effects with a regression-discontinuity design. Econometrica, 69(1), 201–209. CrossRef
Hansen, S. W. (2014). Common pool size and project size: An empirical test on expenditures using Danish municipal mergers. Public Choice, 159(1–2), 3–21. CrossRef
Harrinvirta, M., & Mattila, M. (2001). The hard business of balancing budgets: A study of public finances in seventeen OECD countries. British Journal of Political Science, 31(03), 497–521. CrossRef
Hopkins, D. J., & McCabe, K. T. (2012). After it’s too late estimating the policy impacts of black mayoralties in US cities. American Politics Research, 40(4), 665–700. CrossRef
Imbens, G., & Kalyanaraman, K. (2012). Optimal bandwidth choice for the regression discontinuity estimator. Review of Economic Studies, 79(3), 933–959. CrossRef
Imbens, G., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615–635. CrossRef
Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2006). Electoral institutions and the politics of coalitions: Why some democracies redistribute more than others. American Political Science Review, 100(2), 165–181. CrossRef
Jacob, R. T., Zhu, P., Somers, M. A., & Bloom, H. S. (2012). A practical guide to regression discontinuity. New York, NY: MDRC.
Jochimsen, B., & Nuscheler, R. (2011). The political economy of the German Länder deficits: Weak governments meet strong finance ministers. Applied Economics, 43(19), 2399–2415. CrossRef
Jordahl, H., & Liang, C. Y. (2010). Merged municipalities, higher debt: On free-riding and the common pool problem in politics. Public Choice, 143(1–2), 157–172. CrossRef
Jurado, I., & Leon, S. (2017). Geography matters: The conditional effect of electoral systems on social spending. British Journal of Political Science, Firstview, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123416000338.
Kontopoulos, Y., & Perotti, R. (1999). Government fragmentation and fiscal policy outcomes: Evidence from OECD countries. In J. M. Poterba & J. von Hagen (Eds.), Fiscal institutions and fiscal performance (NBER conference report) (pp. 81–102). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Le Maux, B., Rocaboy, Y., & Goodspeed, T. (2011). Political fragmentation, party ideology and public expenditures. Public Choice, 147, 43–67. CrossRef
Lee, D. S. (2001). The electoral advantage to incumbency and voters’ valuation of politicians’ experience: A regression discontinuity analysis of elections to the US. (No. w8441). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Lee, D. S. (2008). Randomized experiments from non-random selection in U.S. House elections. Journal of Econometrics, 142, 675–697. CrossRef
Lee, D., & Card, D. (2008). Regression discontinuity inference with specification error. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 655–674. CrossRef
Lee, D. S., & Lemieux, T. (2010). Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2), 281–355. CrossRef
Leigh, A. (2008). Estimating the impact of gubernatorial partisanship on policy settings and economic outcomes. European Journal of Political Economy, 24(1), 256–268. CrossRef
McCrary, J. (2008). Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 698–714. CrossRef
Perotti, R., & Kontopoulos, Y. (2002). Fragmented fiscal policy. Journal of Public Economics, 86, 191–222. CrossRef
Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2004). Constitutions and economic policy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(1), 75–98. CrossRef
Pettersson-Lidbom, P. (2008). Do parties matter for political outcomes. A regression-discontinuity approach. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(5), 1037–1056. CrossRef
Pettersson-Lidbom, P. (2012). Does the size of the legislature affect the size of government? Evidence from two natural experiments. Journal of Public Economics, 96(3), 269–278. CrossRef
Plümper, T., & Troeger, V. E. (2007). Efficient estimation of time-invariant and rarely changing variables in finite sample panel analyses with unit fixed effects. Political Analysis, 15, 124–139. CrossRef
Rattsø, J., & Tovmo, P. (2002). Fiscal discipline and asymmetric adjustment of revenues and expenditures: Local government responses to shocks in Denmark. Public Finance Review, 30(3), 208–234. CrossRef
Ricciuti, R. (2004). Political fragmentation and fiscal outcomes. Public Choice, 118(3–4), 365–388. CrossRef
Rodden, J. (2002). The dilemma of fiscal federalism: Grants and fiscal performance around the world. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 670–687. CrossRef
Rodden, J. (2003). Reviving Leviathan: Fiscal federalism and the growth of government. International Organization, 57(04), 695–729. CrossRef
Roubini, N., & Sachs, J. (1989). Political and economic determinants of budget deficits in the industrial economies. European Economic Review, 33, 903–938. CrossRef
Sakamoto, T. (2001). Effects of government characteristics on fiscal deficits in 18 OECD countries, 1961–1994. Comparative Political Studies, 34(5), 527–554. CrossRef
Schaltegger, C., & Feld, L. P. (2009). Do large cabinets favor large governments? Evidence on the fiscal commons problem for Swiss Cantons. Journal of Public Economics, 93, 35–47. CrossRef
Shepsle, K. A., & Weingast, B. R. (1981). Structure-induced equilibrium and legislative choice. Public Choice, 37(3), 503–519. CrossRef
Snyder, J. M., Folke, O., & Hirano, S. (2012). Partisan imbalance in regression discontinuity studies based on electoral thresholds. Unpublished manuscript.
Solé-Ollé, A., & Viladecans-Marsal, E. (2013). Do political parties matter for local land use policies? Journal of Urban Economics, 78(C), 42–56. CrossRef
Tang, S. Y. (1991). Institutional arrangements and the management of common-pool resources. Public Administration Review, 51, 42–51. CrossRef
Velasco, A. (1999). A model of endogenous fiscal deficits and delayed fiscal reforms. In J. Poterba & J. von Hagen (Eds.), Fiscal institutions and fiscal performance (pp. 37–57). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Velasco, A. (2000). Debts and deficits with fragmented fiscal policymaking. Journal of Public Economics, 76, 105–125. CrossRef
Volkerink, B., & de Haan, J. (2001). Fragmented government effects on fiscal policy: New evidence. Public Choice, 109, 221–242. CrossRef
Weingast, B. R., Shepsle, K., & John, C. (1981). The political economy of benefits and costs: A neoclasical approach to distributive politics. Journal of Political Economy, 96, 132–163. CrossRef
Woo, J. (2003). Economic, political, and institutional determinants of public deficits. Journal of Public Economics, 87(3), 387–426. CrossRef
- Government fragmentation and fiscal deficits: a regression discontinuity approach
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, digitale Transformation/© Maksym Yemelyanov | Fotolia