nach oben

Journal of Business Ethics

Erschienen in:

12.10.2015

Green Innovation and Performance: The View of Organizational Capability and Social Reciprocity

verfasst von: Jing-Wen Huang, Yong-Hui Li

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Synthesizing insights from a dynamic capability perspective and social network theory, this study identifies the factors influencing green innovation and examines the relationships between influencing factors, green innovation, and performance. This study uses structural equation modeling to test the research hypotheses. The results indicate that dynamic capability, coordination capability, and social reciprocity are significant drivers of green innovation, including green product innovation and green process innovation. Green product and process innovation have positive effects on environmental performance and organizational performance. These findings are relevant to firms in quest of green management and innovation.

Vorheriger Artikel The Power of One to Make a Difference: How Informal and Formal CEO Power Affect Environmental Sustainability

Nächster Artikel The Diffusion of Voluntary Environmental Programs: The Case of ISO 14001 in Korea, 1996–2011

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Adler, P., & Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.CrossRef

Banerjee, S. B. (2002). Corporate environmentalism: The construct and its measurement. Journal of Business Research, 55(3), 177–191.CrossRef

Barclay, D. W., Thompson, R., & Higgins, C. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use an illustration. Technology Studies, 2(2), 285–309.

Bocken, N. M. P., Farracho, M., Bosworth, R., & Kemp, R. (2014). The front-end of eco-innovation for eco-innovative small and medium sized companies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 31, 43–57.CrossRef

Cai, W., & Zhou, X. (2014). On the drivers of eco-innovation: Empirical evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 79(15), 239–248.CrossRef

Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20(4), 781–796.CrossRef

Chang, C. H. (2011). The influence of corporate environmental ethics on competitive advantage: The mediation role of green innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 361–370.CrossRef

Chen, Y. S. (2008). The driver of green innovation and green image—Green core competence. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 531–543.CrossRef

Chen, C. J., & Hung, S. W. (2010). To give or to receive? Factors influencing members’ knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual communities. Information & Management, 47(4), 226–236.CrossRef

Chen, Y. S., Lai, S. B., & Wen, C. T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331–339.CrossRef

Chiou, T. Y., Chan, H. K., Lettice, F., & Chung, S. H. (2011). The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part E, 47(6), 822–836.CrossRef

Dong, Y., Wang, X., Jin, J., Qiao, Y., & Shi, L. (2014). Effects of eco-innovation typology on its performance: Empirical evidence from Chinese enterprises. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 34, 78–98.CrossRef

Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11), 1105–1121.CrossRef

Ellonen, H. K., Wikström, P., & Jantunen, A. (2009). Linking dynamic-capability portfolios and innovation outcomes. Technovation, 29(11), 753–762.CrossRef

Gavronski, I., Klassen, R. D., Vachon, S., & Nascimento, L. F. M. (2011). A resource-based view of green supply management. Transportation Research Part E, 47(6), 872–885.CrossRef

Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178.CrossRef

Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.CrossRef

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Hillestad, T., Xie, C., & Haugland, S. A. (2010). Innovative corporate social responsibility: the founder’s role in creating a trustworthy corporate brand through “green innovation”. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 19(6), 440–451.CrossRef

Huang, Y. C., & Wu, Y. C. (2010). The effects of organizational factors on green new product success-evidence from high-tech industries in Taiwan. Management Decision, 48(10), 1539–1567.CrossRef

Hult, G. T. M., Hurley, R. F., Giunipero, L. C., & Nichols, E. L. (2000). Organizational learning in global purchasing: A model and test of internal users and corporate buyers. Decision Sciences, 31(2), 293–325.CrossRef

Janicke, M. (2008). Ecological modernization: New perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(5), 557–565.CrossRef

Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2005). Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 999–1015.CrossRef

Johansson, G. (2002). Success factors for integration of eco-design in product development: A review of state of the art. Environmental Management and Health, 13(1), 98–107.CrossRef

Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International Inc.

Li, D., & Liu, J. (2014). Dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and competitive advantage: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2793–2799.CrossRef

Lin, M. J., Hung, S. W., & Chen, C. J. (2009). Fostering the determinants of knowledge sharing in professional virtual communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 929–939.CrossRef

López-Gamero, M. D., E Claver-Cortés, E., & Molina-Azorín, J. F. (2008). Complementary resources and capabilities for an ethical and environmental management: A qual/quan study. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(3), 701–732.CrossRef

Mol, A. P. J., Sonnenfeld, D. A., & Spaargaren, G. (Eds.). (2009). The ecological modernization reader: Environmental reform in theory and practice. London: Routledge.

Noori, H., & Chen, C. (2003). Applying scenario-driven strategy to integrate environmental management and product design. Production and Operations Management, 12(3), 353–368.CrossRef

OECD. (2010). Eco-innovation in industry: Enabling green growth. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2012). The future of eco-innovation: The role of business models in green transformation. Copenhagen: OECD Background Paper.

Ogunbameru, O. A. (2004). Human-environment interactions: The sociological perspectives. Journal of Human Ecology, 16(1), 63–68.

Palmer, K., Oates, W. E., & Portney, P. R. (1995). Tightening environmental standards: The benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 119–132.CrossRef

Pane Haden, S. S., Oyler, J. D., & Humphreys, J. H. (2009). Historical, practical, and theoretical perspectives on green management: An exploratory analysis. Management Decision, 47(7), 1041–1055.CrossRef

Peng, Y. S., & Lin, S. S. (2008). Local responsiveness pressure, subsidiary resources, green management adoption and subsidiary’s performance: Evidence from Taiwanese manufactures. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(1), 199–212.CrossRef

Pervan, S. J., Bove, L., & Johnson, L. W. (2009). Reciprocity as a key stabilizing norm of interpersonal marketing relationships: Scale development and validation. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(1), 60–70.CrossRef

Phelps, C. C. (2010). A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 890–913.CrossRef

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Lee, J. Y. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.CrossRef

Przychodzen, J., & Przychodzen, W. (2015). Relationships between eco-innovation and financial performance—Evidence from publicly traded companies in Poland and Hungary. Journal of Cleaner Production, 90(1), 253–263.CrossRef

Pujari, D. (2006). Eco-innovation and new product development: Understanding the influences on market performance. Technovation, 26(1), 76–85.CrossRef

Ruef, M. (2002). Strong ties, weak ties and islands: structural and cultural predictors of organizational innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 427–449.CrossRef

Salman, N., & Saives, A. L. (2005). Indirect networks: An intangible resource for biotechnology innovation. R&D Management, 35(2), 203–215.CrossRef

Shi, Z., Rui, H., & Whinston, A. B. (2014). Content sharing in a social broadcasting environment: Evidence from twitter. MIS Quarterly, 38(1), 123–142.CrossRef

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.CrossRef

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.CrossRef

Tsai, W. (2002). Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intra-organizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13(2), 179–190.CrossRef

Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464–476.CrossRef

Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. D. (2008). Environmental management and manufacturing performance: The role of collaboration in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 299–315.CrossRef

Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35–57.

Weng, M. H., & Lin, C. Y. (2011). Determinants of green innovation adoption for small and medium-size enterprises (SMES). African Journal of Business Management, 5(22), 9154–9163.

Wincent, J., Anokhin, S., Örtqvist, D., & Autio, E. (2010). Quality meets structure: Generalized reciprocity and firm-level advantage in strategic networks. Journal of Management Studies, 47(4), 597–624.CrossRef

Wu, L. Y. (2010). Applicability of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views under environmental volatility. Journal of Business Research, 63(1), 27–31.CrossRef

Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2004). Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, 22(3), 265–289.CrossRef

Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., Cordeiro, J. J., & Lai, K. H. (2008). Firm-level correlates of emergent green supply chain management practices in the Chinese context. Omega, 36(4), 577–591.CrossRef

Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. H. (2012). Green supply chain management innovation diffusion and its relationship to organizational improvement: An ecological modernization perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29(1), 168–185.CrossRef

Titel: Green Innovation and Performance: The View of Organizational Capability and Social Reciprocity
verfasst von: Jing-Wen Huang
Yong-Hui Li
Publikationsdatum: 12.10.2015
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2903-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

Community Characteristics and Changes in Toxic Chemical Releases: Does Information Disclosure Affect Environmental Injustice?

When Does It Pay to be Good? Moderators and Mediators in the Corporate Sustainability–Corporate Financial Performance Relationship: A Critical Review

Beyond Environmental Regulations: Exploring the Potential of “Eco-Islam” in Boosting Environmental Ethics Within SMEs in Arab Markets

Does an Embedded Wind Turbine Reduce a Company’s Electricity Bill? Case Study of a 300 kW Wind Turbine in Ireland

Toward Moral Responsibility Theories of Corporate Sustainability and Sustainable Supply Chain

Motives and Performance Outcomes of Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices: A Multi-theoretical Perspective