Anzeige
Erschienen in:
14.07.2020
Growth of rod structure with static electrical field in the Al–Ni eutectic system
Erschienen in: Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics | Ausgabe 17/2020
EinloggenAktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.
Wählen Sie Textabschnitte aus um mit Künstlicher Intelligenz passenden Patente zu finden. powered by
Markieren Sie Textabschnitte, um KI-gestützt weitere passende Inhalte zu finden. powered by
Abstract
The influence of the positive and negative static electrical fields (E+ and E−, respectively) on eutectic rod spacing (λ), eutectic grain size (EGS), hardness (HB) and ultimate tensile strength for Al–6.4 wt % Ni eutectic alloy directionally solidified from bottom to upward were investigate. The applied electric field constitutes an electrical force on liquid ions and the electrical field force leads an increment and decrement in the atomic mass flux at the solid–liquid interface when its direction is the parallel or antiparallel with solid liquid interface growth direction, respectively. Dependence of the λ, EGS, HB and σUTS values on E+ and E− values were obtained to be \(\lambda_{{}}^{ + } = 2.57 \times E_{ + }^{2.87}\), \(\lambda_{{}}^{ - } = 0.73 \times E_{ - }^{ - 1.41}\), \({\text{EGS}}_{{}}^{ + } = 362242.99 \times E_{ + }^{7.75}\), \({\text{EGS}}_{{}}^{ - } = 12189.89 \times E_{ - }^{ - 4.89}\), \({\text{HB}}_{{}}^{ + } = 2102.03 \times E_{ + }^{ - 0.61}\), \({\text{HB}}_{{}}^{ - } = 0.602 \times E_{ - }^{0.63}\), \(\sigma_{\text{UTS}}^{ + } = 111.99 \times E_{ + }^{ - 1.31}\) and \(\sigma_{\text{UTS}}^{ - } = 256.79 \times E_{ - }^{1.12}\), respectively by linear regression analysis. The exponent values of E+ and E− for EGS are higher than the exponent values of E+ and E− for λ, ΗΒ and σUTS.