Skip to main content

2018 | Buch

Hayek: A Collaborative Biography

Part XII: Liberalism in the Classical Tradition, Austrian versus British

insite
SUCHEN

Über dieses Buch

F.A. von Hayek (1899-1992) was a Nobel Prize winning economist, famous for promoting an Austrian version of classical liberalism. The multi-volume Hayek: A Collaborative Biography examines the evolution of his life and influence.

Two concepts of civilization revolve around power – should it be separated or concentrated? Liberalism in the non-Austrian classical tradition remains fearful of power concentrated in the hands of government, labour unions or corporations; Red Terrorists sought to monopolize power to liquidate enemies and competitors as a prelude to utopia (the ‘withering away of the State’); and behind the ‘slogan of liberty,’ White Terror promoters (Mises and Hayek) sought to concentrate power in the hands of a ‘dictatorial democracy’ where henchmen would liquidate enemies, and – ‘guided’ by ‘utopia’ (the ‘spontaneous’ order) – follow orders from their social superiors. This volume, Part XII, examines the ‘free’ market Use of Knowledge in Society; examines the foundations of ‘free’ market educational credentials; and asks whether those funded by the tobacco industry and the carbon lobby should be accorded ‘independent policy expert’ status.

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Frontmatter

Two Competing Neoclassical Traditions

Frontmatter
Chapter 1. ‘Austrian Thought and Fascism’: ‘The Victory of Fascism in a Number of Countries Is Only an Episode in the Long Series of Struggles Over the Problem of Property’
Abstract
Two concepts of civilisation revolve around the extent of power—should it be separated or concentrated? Liberalism in the non-Austrian classical tradition remains fearful of power concentrated in the hands of government, labour unions or corporations; Red Terrorists sought to monopolise power to liquidate enemies and competitors as a prelude to utopia (the ‘withering away of the State’); and behind the ‘slogan of liberty,’ White Terror promoters (Mises and Hayek) sought to concentrate power in the hands of a ‘dictatorial democracy’ where henchmen would liquidate enemies and—‘guided’ by ‘utopia’ (the ‘spontaneous’ order)—follow orders from their social superiors. In his mendacious Memoirs (which he denied having written), Mises—from the safety of neutral Manhattan—described the motto which had underpinned his life: ‘Do not give in to evil, but proceed ever more boldly against it.’ A few months before, he had abandoned Europe to the ‘Fascists’ (including ‘Hitler’) who he claimed had ‘saved European civilization. The merit that Fascism has thereby won for itself will live on eternally in history.’ Contrary to the Mont Pelerin Society ‘consistent doctrine,’ the evidence reveals that both ‘Fascism’ and anti-Semitism were endemic within the Austrian School of Economics—which continues to maintain a ‘united front’ with ‘Neo-Nazis.’ This chapter examines both the utopian personality characteristics of the ‘worst inferior mediocrities’ that Hayek recruited so as to provide the ‘effective framework for a functioning spontaneous order’; and also his support of the Operation Condor dictatorships that were, he asserted, reconstructing that ‘spontaneous’ order.
Robert Leeson
Chapter 2. ‘Persuade the Intellectuals in the Hopes that Ultimately They Could Be Converted and Transmit My Ideas to the Public at Large’
Abstract
Caldwell and Montes (2014a, 52; Review of Austrian Economics, 2014b; Review of Austrian Economics 28: 261–309, 2015a, 305) assert that they ‘have presented evidence [emphasis added] that Hayek’s ideas were little known in Chile in the 1970s. As such, it is very unlikely that they played a role in the creation of the 1980 Chilean Constitution. It also does not seem that those who invoked his name to defend their own positions correctly represented Hayek’s actual views.’ In the Chilean version of their paper, this was narrowed down to ‘Pedro Ibáñez and Carlos Cáceres, who knew Hayek, did not necessarily correctly interpret his ideas’ (2015b, 127).
Robert Leeson
Chapter 3. Hayek and Aristocratic Influence
Abstract
Hayek’s life was largely defined by his interactions with six exclusive clubs; he also legitimised three others. The first and last of the six were noble: the House of Habsburg intergeneration entitlement programme which—until April 1919—allowed him, legally, to attach the prefix ‘von’ to his name; plus the post-nominal Companion of Honour which the House of Windsor conferred on him almost two-thirds of a century later.
Robert Leeson
Chapter 4. Pigouvian Market Failure
Abstract
Nobel Prizes create a non-hereditary nobility—should the 1974 Nobel Prize for Economic Science have been awarded to a secular-religion-promoting fraud whose ‘children’s’ academic entitlements are assisting the process of re-feudalisation? Should the oil-, coal- and tobacco-funded Professors and think tank ‘Fellows’ who promote this religion be accorded policy ‘expert’ status? Should this religion be taught in economics departments? Markets—and the framework and full-cost pricing (Pigouvian externality taxes) within which they can provide the socially optimal result—require a more thorough and dispassionate examination than ‘free’ market advocates are either willing or able to provide.
Robert Leeson

Seeing the Utopian ‘Theory of the Order as a Whole’ to ‘Make Politically Possible What Today may be Politically Impossible’

Frontmatter
Chapter 5. Britain, White Supremacism and the ‘International Right’
Abstract
Having declared that ‘what we lack is a liberal Utopia,’ ‘von’ Hayek insisted that ‘It is not to be denied that to some extent the guiding model of the overall order will always be an utopia.’ Certain personality types have ‘instincts’ that make them vulnerable to bogus Bilgewater ‘Dukes,’ Romanov ‘Princesses’ and Habsburg ‘vons’ and ‘Counts’—an aristocratic placebo effect.
Robert Leeson
Chapter 6. The ‘Free’ Market ‘Emergency’ Demand for ‘Fascism’
Abstract
The political ‘Fascists’ that Mises believed had ‘saved European civilization’ included ‘Ludendorff and Hitler.’ Mises was a card-carrying Austro-Fascist and member of the official Fascist social club; Rothbard described the interwar emergency that Fascism had solved; and Hayek, his fellow fourth-generation Austrian School leader, saw similar merits in the Operation Condor dictatorships that targeted dissidents for liquidation.
Robert Leeson
Chapter 7. ‘[Italian] Fascism’
Abstract
‘Free’ market economists embrace the form or pose of scholarship, while also promoting crude caricatures and outright fraud: National Public Radio is run by ‘Nazis,’ and externalities were invented by an underground Communist. Some of this ‘knowledge’ appears to have been inspired by the satirical BBC television series Monty Python’s Flying Circus, and some has been derived from official government white supremacist propaganda (Rhodesia and Apartheid South Africa). ‘Free’ market funding is provided by the Gaddafi family, the Liechtenstein tax haven, the tobacco industry and the carbon lobby. And the best defence of ‘economic liberalism’ is, they believe, provided by political ‘Fascists’ and tax-evading billionaire populists. Mises’ promotion of the Warfare State has been rectified by deletion; and his promotion of all ‘Fascists,’ ‘German and Italian,’ including ‘Ludendorff and Hitler,’ has been rectified by insertion: ‘[Italian].’ This chapter examines these ‘free’ market rectifications.
Robert Leeson
Chapter 8. Austrian ‘Instincts,’ Serfdom, and Spanish and Portuguese ‘Fascism’
Abstract
In Europe, ‘Fascism,’ as defined and praised by Mises, overthrew democracy in Italy (1922), Spain (1923), Portugal (1926), Germany (1933), Austrian (1934), and Spain (1936–1939); and in Latin America, similar outcomes occurred in the Operation Condor countries: Paraguay (1954), Brazil (1964), Bolivia (1971), Uruguay (1973), Chile (1973) and Argentina (1976). In 1940, Mises had not wished to leave neutral Switzerland when escaping the ‘Fascists,’ who, he had asserted, had ‘saved European civilization’: he apparently preferred ‘Fascist’ Portugal to the USA.
Robert Leeson
Backmatter
Metadaten
Titel
Hayek: A Collaborative Biography
verfasst von
Dr. Robert Leeson
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Electronic ISBN
978-3-319-74509-1
Print ISBN
978-3-319-74508-4
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74509-1