nach oben

Erschienen in:

2014 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Heterogeneity and the Structure of Export and FDI: A Cross-Industry Analysis of Japanese Manufacturing

verfasst von : Ayumu Tanaka

Erschienen in: Internationalization of Japanese Firms

Verlag: Springer Japan

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The fraction of exporters and multinational enterprises (MNEs) varies substantially across industries. We extend the firm heterogeneity model presented by Helpman et al. (Am Econ Rev 94(1):300–316, 2004) to derive testable predictions about the prevalence of these internationalized modes. The model indicates that intra-industry firm heterogeneity and R&D intensity play large roles in inter-industry variation of the fraction of internationalized firms. We investigate whether these factors affect the structure of export and foreign direct investment (FDI) using Japanese industry-level data. We obtain results that are consistent with the model. First, industries with larger productivity dispersion have a larger fraction of MNEs and a larger fraction of the sum of exporters and MNEs. Second, MNEs are heavily concentrated in R&D-intensive industries.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Features of Japanese Internationalized Firms: Findings Based on Firm-Level Data

Nächstes Kapitel The Role of Non-productivity Factors in the Internationalization of Firms

Our model and approach differ from those of Helpman et al. (2004) in several respects. We simplify the model, as Yeaple (2009) did. First, the model is not closed via a free-entry condition. Second, we do not solve for the full general equilibrium of the model. Rather, we present a partial-equilibrium analysis. We, therefore, take a reduced-form approach in our empirical analysis.

We omit to describe the mechanism how a firm chooses to enter an industry.

We assume that k is given and do not consider what determines k. Recent studies suggest that demand structure is one of determinants of k. Syverson (2004) reveals high-substitutability industries exhibit less productivity dispersion.

Our model is static and do not consider the dynamic decision of R&D investment, which Ederington and McCalman (2008), Aw et al. (2008), Lileeva and Trefler (2007), and Costantini and Melitz (2007) examine.

Taking derivative of δ ^X with respect to k, we obtain \(\frac{{\partial \delta }^{X}} {\partial k} = \frac{{\partial \delta }^{N}} {\partial k} -\frac{{\partial \delta }^{I}} {\partial k} = \left (\frac{{\varphi }^{D}} {{\varphi }^{X}}\right )^{k}\ln \left(\frac{{\varphi }^{D}} {{\varphi }^{X}}\right ) -\left(\frac{{\varphi }^{D}} {{\varphi }^{I}} \right )^{k}\ln \left(\frac{{\varphi }^{D}} {{\varphi }^{I}} \right )\), where both of the first and second terms are negative since \(0 <\left(\frac{{\varphi }^{D}} {{\varphi }^{I}} \right )^{k} < \left (\frac{{\varphi }^{D}} {{\varphi }^{X}}\right )^{k}\) and \(\ln \left(\frac{{\varphi }^{D}} {{\varphi }^{I}} \right ) <\ln \left(\frac{{\varphi }^{D}} {{\varphi }^{X}}\right ) < 0\). The sign of this derivative, therefore, is negative if a decrease in k raises the fraction of the sum of exporters and MNEs more than that of MNEs. In such a case, a decrease in k leads to an increase in the fraction of non-MNE exporters.

We do not have access to firm-level data for this study, although we have information about the number of foreign affiliates, dispersion of sales, and other industry-level variables. Appendix explains the data and variables we use in this chapter in more detail.

List of countries by regions are given in Table 5.

The Middle East, Central and South America, Africa, and Oceania are all classified as “the other regions” in our data.

While we have import tariff data, we do not have any data on variable trade costs of Japanese firms when they export their goods.

Antràs, P., & Helpman, E. (2004). Global sourcing. Journal of Political Economy, 112(3), 552–580.CrossRef

Antràs, P., & Helpman, E. (2008). Contractual frictions and global sourcing. In E. Helpman, D. Marin, & T. Verdier (Eds.), The organization of firms in a Global economy (pp. 9–54). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Aw, B. Y., Roberts, M. J., & Xu, D. Y. (2008). R&D investments, exporting, and the evolution of firm productivity. American Economic Review, 98(2), 451–456.CrossRef

Bernard, A. B., & Jensen, J. B. (1999). Exceptional exporter performance: cause, effect, or both? Journal of International Economics, 47(1), 1–25.CrossRef

Bernard, A. B., Jensen, J. B., Redding, S. J., & Schott, P. K. (2007). Firms in international trade. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(3), 105–130.CrossRef

Costantini, J. A., & Melitz, M. J. (2007). The dynamics of firm-Level adjustment to trade liberalization. In E. Helpman, D. Marin, & T. Verdier (Eds.), The organization of firms in a Global economy (pp. 107–141). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Ederington, J., & McCalman, P. (2008). Endogenous firm heterogeneity and the dynamics of trade liberalization. Journal of International Economics, 74(2), 422–440.CrossRef

Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J., & Yeaple, S. R. (2004). Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. American Economic Review, 94(1), 300–316.CrossRef

Lileeva, A., & Trefler, D. (2007). Improved access to foreign markets raises plant-Level productivity…for some plants. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 13297.

Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725.CrossRef

Syverson, C. (2004). Product substitutability and productivity dispersion. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(2), 534–550.CrossRef

Tomiura, E. (2007). Foreign outsourcing, exporting, and FDI: A productivity comparison at the firm level. Journal of International Economics, 72, 113–127.CrossRef

Wakasugi, R., Todo, Y., Sato, H., Nishioka, S., Matsuura, T., Ito, B., et al. (2008). Internationalization of Japanese firms: New findings based on firm-level data. RIETI Discussion Paper, 08-E-036.

Yeaple, S. R. (2006). Offshoring, foreign direct investment, and the structure of U.S. trade. Journal of the European Economic Association, 4(2-3), 602–611.

Yeaple, S. R. (2009). Firm heterogeneity and the structure of US multinational activity. Journal of International Economics, 78, 206–215.CrossRef

Titel: Heterogeneity and the Structure of Export and FDI: A Cross-Industry Analysis of Japanese Manufacturing
verfasst von: Ayumu Tanaka
Verlag: Springer Japan
Buch: Internationalization of Japanese Firms
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-54531-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-4-431-54532-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54532-3_3