nach oben

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change

Erschienen in:

05.08.2020 | Original article

Heterogeneity in the relationship between carbon emission performance and urbanization: evidence from China

verfasst von: Zhibo Zhao, Tian Yuan, Xunpeng Shi, Lingdi Zhao

Erschienen in: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change | Ausgabe 7/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Global change caused by carbon emissions alone has become a common challenge for all countries. However, current debates about urbanization and carbon emissions generally do not take into account the heterogeneities in urbanization and economic development levels. The goal of this study is to revisit the urbanization–emissions nexus by considering such heterogeneities in the Chinese context. The results reveal that there is significant heterogeneity in the total factor carbon emission performance index across provinces. Specifically, the relationship between carbon emission performance and urbanization reflects a U-shaped curve. Urbanization is found to have a stronger inhibiting effect on carbon emission performance when economic development levels improve. The results suggest that tailoring policies to each region’s conditions, promoting investments in energy-saving and emissions-reducing technologies, and improving the use of public transportation could be mitigation strategies for global change that lead to low-carbon urbanization.

Vorheriger Artikel Economic structural change, renewable energy development, and carbon dioxide emissions in China

Nächster Artikel Indicator system to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of China clean power systems

If we exclude the four municipalities, we lose the highest threshold, but the results for the low thresholds remain unchanged.

Alcott B (2010) Impact caps: why population, affluence and technology strategies should be abandoned. J Clean Prod 18:552–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.08.001CrossRef

Cai B, Guo H, Cao L, Guan D, Bai H (2018) Local strategies for China’s carbon mitigation: an investigation of Chinese city-level CO2 emissions. J Clean Prod 178:890–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.054CrossRef

Cao J, Karplus VJ (2014) Firm-level determinants of energy and carbon intensity in China. Energy Policy 75:167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.012CrossRef

Chang TP, Hu JL (2010) Total-factor energy productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change: an empirical study of China. Appl Energy 87:3262–3270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.04.026CrossRef

Cheng Z, Li L, Liu J (2018) Industrial structure, technical progress and carbon intensity in China’s provinces. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81:2935–2946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.103CrossRef

Chung YH, Färe R, Grosskopf S (1997) Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. J Environ Manag 51:229–240. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1997.0146CrossRef

Dietz T, Rosa EA (1994) Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and Technolog. Hum Ecol Rev 1:277–300

Dietz T, Rosa EA (1997) Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 94:175–179. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.1.175CrossRef

Ding Y, Li F (2017) Examining the effects of urbanization and industrialisation on carbon dioxide emission: evidence from China’s provincial regions. Energy 125:533–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.156CrossRef

Duan HB, Zhang GP, Wang SY, Fan Y (2019) Integrated benefit-cost analysis of China's optimal adaptation and targeted mitigation. Ecol Econ 160:76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.02.008CrossRef

Ehrhardt-Martinez K, Crenshaw EM, Jenkins JC (2002) Deforestation and the environmental Kuznets curve: a cross-national investigation of intervening mechanisms. Soc Sci Q 83:226–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.00080CrossRef

Ehrlich PR, Holdren JP (1971) Impact of population growth. Science 171:1212–1217. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3977.1212CrossRef

Fan Y, Liu LC, Wu G, Wei YM (2006) Analyzing impact factors of CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model. Environ Impact Assess Rev 26:377–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2005.11.007CrossRef

Fan JL, Zhang YJ, Wang B (2017) The impact of urbanization on residential energy consumption in China: an aggregated and disaggregated analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 75:220–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.066CrossRef

Fang G, Tian L, Fu M, Sun M, He Y, Lu L (2018) How to promote the development of energy-saving and emission-reduction with changing economic growth rate—a case study of China. Energy 143:732–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.008CrossRef

Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK, Pasurka C (1989) Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: a nonparametric approach. Rev Econ Stat 71:90–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/1928055CrossRef

Färe R, Grosskopf S, Pasurka CA (2007) Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions. Energy 32:1055–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.09.005CrossRef

Fukuyama H, Weber WL (2009) A directional slacks-based measure of technical inefficiency. Socio Econ Plan Sci 43:274–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2008.12.001CrossRef

Gao Y (2016) China’s response to climate change issues after Paris climate change conference. Adv Clim Chang Res 7:235–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2016.10.001CrossRef

Hansen BE (1999) Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: estimation, testing, and inference. J Econ 93:345–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(99)00025-1CrossRef

He JK (2015) China’s INDC and non-fossil energy development. Adv Clim Chang Res 6:210–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2015.11.007CrossRef

Holtedahl P, Joutz FL (2004) Residential electricity demand in Taiwan. Energy Econ 26:201–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2003.11.001CrossRef

Huang Z, Zhang H, Duan H (2019) Nonlinear globalization threshold effect of energy intensity convergence in belt and road countries. J Clean Prod 237:117750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117750CrossRef

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2006) IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Hayama, Japan: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES)

Jarnicka J, Żebrowski P (2019) Learning in greenhouse gas emission inventories in terms of uncertainty improvement over time. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 24:1143–1168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09866-5CrossRef

Ji X, Chen B (2017) Assessing the energy-saving effect of urbanization in China based on stochastic impacts by regression on population, affluence and technology (STIRPAT) model. J Clean Prod 163:S306–S314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.002CrossRef

Kais S, Sami H (2016) An econometric study of the impact of economic growth and energy use on carbon emissions: panel data evidence from fifty -eight countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 59:1101–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.054CrossRef

Korsbakken JI, Peters GP, Andrew RM (2016) Uncertainties around reductions in China’s coal use and CO2 emissions. Nat Clim Chang 6:687–690. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2963CrossRef

Li K, Lin B (2015) Impacts of urbanization and industrialization on energy consumption/CO2 emissions: does the level of development matter? Renew Sust Energ Rev 52:1107–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.185CrossRef

Liao X, Shi X(R) (2018) Public appeal, environmental regulation and green investment: evidence from China. Energy Policy 119:554–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.020CrossRef

Liddle B (2013) Population, affluence, and environmental impact across development: evidence from panel cointegration modeling. Environ Model Softw 40:255–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.10.002CrossRef

Liddle B, Lung S (2010) Age-structure, urbanization, and climate change in developed countries: revisiting STIRPAT for disaggregated population and consumption-related environmental impacts. Popul Environ 31:317–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-010-0101-5CrossRef

Liu Z, Guan D, Wei W, Davis SJ, Ciais P, Bai J, Peng S, Zhang Q, Hubacek K, Marland G, Andres RJ, Crawford-Brown D, Lin J, Zhao H, Hong C, Boden TA, Feng K, Peters GP, Xi F, Liu J, Li Y, Zhao Y, Zeng N, He K (2015) Reduced carbon emission estimates from fossil fuel combustion and cement production in China. Nature 524:335–338. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14677CrossRef

Martínez-Zarzoso I, Maruotti A (2011) The impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions: evidence from developing countries. Ecol Econ 70:1344–1353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.02.009CrossRef

Mi Z, Zhang Y, Guan D, Shan Y, Liu Z, Cong R, Yuan XC, Wei YM (2016) Consumption-based emission accounting for Chinese cities. Appl Energy 184:1073–1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.094CrossRef

National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC) (2000) China population and employment statistics yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing

Northam RM (1979) Urban geography. John Wiley & Sons, New York

Oda T, Bun R, Kinakh V, Topylko P, Halushchak M, Marland G, Lauvaux T, Jonas M, Maksyutov S, Nahorski Z, Lesiv M, Danylo O, Horabik-Pyzel J (2019) Errors and uncertainties in a gridded carbon dioxide emissions inventory. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 24:1007–1050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09877-2CrossRef

Ouyang X, Lin B (2017) Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions during urbanization: a comparative study between China and Japan. J Clean Prod 143:356–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.102CrossRef

Parikh J, Shukla V (1995) Urbanization, energy use and greenhouse effects in economic development. Glob Environ Chang 5:87–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-3780(95)00015-gCrossRef

Poumanyvong P, Kaneko S (2010) Does urbanization lead to less energy use and lower CO2 emissions? A cross-country analysis. Ecol Econ 70:434–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.029CrossRef

Rafiq S, Salim R, Nielsen I (2016) Urbanization, openness, emissions, and energy intensity: a study of increasingly urbanised emerging economies. Energy Econ 56:20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.02.007CrossRef

Sadorsky P (2014) The effect of urbanization on CO2 emissions in emerging economies. Energy Econ 41:147–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.11.007CrossRef

Salim RA, Shafiei S (2014) Urbanization and renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in OECD countries: an empirical analysis. Econ Model 38:581–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.02.008CrossRef

Shan Y, Liu J, Liu Z, Xu X, Shao S, Wang P, Guan D (2016) New provincial CO2 emission inventories in China based on apparent energy consumption data and updated emission factors. Appl Energy 184:742–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.073CrossRef

Shan Y, Guan D, Zheng H, Ou J, Li Y, Meng J, Mi Z, Liu Z, Zhang Q (2018) China CO₂ emission accounts 1997-2015. Sci Data 5:170201. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.201CrossRef

Shephard RW (1970) Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton University Press, Princeton

Shi A (2003) The impact of population pressure on global carbon dioxide emissions, 1975-1996: evidence from pooled cross-country data. Ecol Econ 44:29–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00223-9CrossRef

Song X, Lu Y, Shen L, Shi X (2018) Will China’s building sector participate in emission trading system? Insights from modelling an owner’s optimal carbon reduction strategies. Energy Policy 118:232–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.075CrossRef

UNFCCC (1998) Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. https://unfccc.int/process/the-kyoto-protocol/history-of-the-kyoto-protocol/text-of-the-kyoto-protocol

UNFCCC (2015) 21st conference of the parties. France, Paris https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement

Wang X (2011) On China’s energy intensity statistics: toward a comprehensive and transparent indicator. Energy Policy 39:7284–7289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.050CrossRef

Wang Y, Zhao T (2018) Impacts of urbanization-related factors on CO 2 emissions: evidence from China’s three regions with varied urbanization levels. Atmos Pollut Res 9:15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2017.06.002CrossRef

Wang C, Wang F, Zhang X, Yang Y, Su Y, Ye Y, Zhang H (2017) Examining the driving factors of energy related carbon emissions using the extended STIRPAT model based on IPAT identity in Xinjiang. Renew Sust Energ Rev 67:51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.006CrossRef

Wang K, Wu M, Sun Y, Shi X, Sun A, Zhang P (2019) Resource abundance, industrial structure, and regional carbon emissions efficiency in China. Res Policy 60:203–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.01.001CrossRef

Watanabe M, Tanaka K (2007) Efficiency analysis of Chinese industry: a directional distance function approach. Energy Policy 35:6323–6331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.07.013CrossRef

Wright L, Fulton L (2005) Climate change mitigation and transport in developing nations. Transp Rev 25:691–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640500360951CrossRef

Wu Y, Shen J, Zhang X, Skitmore M, Lu W (2017) Reprint of: the impact of urbanization on carbon emissions in developing countries: a Chinese study based on the U-Kaya method. J Clean Prod 163:S284–S298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.144CrossRef

Yang M, Yu X (2017) Energy efficiency to mitigate carbon emissions: strategies of China and the USA. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 22(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9657-9CrossRef

Yeh JC, Liao CH (2017) Impact of population and economic growth on carbon emissions in Taiwan using an analytic tool STIRPAT. Sustain Environ Res 27:41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serj.2016.10.001CrossRef

York R, Rosa EA, Dietz T (2003) STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecol Econ 46:351–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00188-5CrossRef

Zhang XP, Cheng XM (2009) Energy consumption, carbon emissions, and economic growth in China. Ecol Econ 68:2706–2712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.011CrossRef

Zhang W, Xu H (2017) Effects of land urbanization and land finance on carbon emissions: a panel data analysis for Chinese provinces. Land Use Policy 63:493–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.006CrossRef

Zhang J, Wu GY, Zhang JP (2004) The estimation of China's provincial capital stock: 1952-2000. Econ Res J 10:35–44

Zhang N, Yu K, Chen Z (2017) How does urbanization affect carbon dioxide emissions? A cross-country panel data analysis. Energy Policy 107:678–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.072CrossRef

Zhao Z, Zhang F, Xu M, Huang K, Zhong W, Cai W, Yin Z, Huang S, Deng Z, Wei M, Xiong J, Hawkey PM (2003) Description and clinical treatment of an early outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Guangzhou, PR China. J Med Microbiol 52:715–720. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.05320-0CrossRef

Zheng H, Shan Y, Mi Z, Meng J, Ou J, Schroeder H, Guan D (2018) How modifications of China’s energy data affect carbon mitigation targets. Energy Policy 116:337–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.031CrossRef

Zhou P, Ang BW (2008) Linear programming models for measuring economy-wide energy efficiency performance. Energy Policy 36:2911–2916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.03.041CrossRef

Zhou P, Poh KL, Ang BW (2007) A non-radial DEA approach to measuring environmental performance. Eur J Oper Res 178:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.04.038CrossRef

Zhou P, Ang BW, Wang H (2012) Energy and CO2 emission performance in electricity generation: a non-radial directional distance function approach. Eur J Oper Res 221:625–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.04.022CrossRef

Zhu Z, Liu Y, Tian X, Wang Y, Zhang Y (2017) CO2 emissions from the industrialization and urbanization processes in the manufacturing center Tianjin in China. J Clean Prod 168:867–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.245CrossRef

Titel: Heterogeneity in the relationship between carbon emission performance and urbanization: evidence from China
verfasst von: Zhibo Zhao
Tian Yuan
Xunpeng Shi
Lingdi Zhao
Publikationsdatum: 05.08.2020
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change / Ausgabe 7/2020
Print ISSN: 1381-2386
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1596
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-020-09924-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2020

Technology-side carbon abatement cost curves for China’s power generation sector

Indicator system to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of China clean power systems

Economic structural change, renewable energy development, and carbon dioxide emissions in China

Combining STRIPAT model and gated recurrent unit for forecasting nature gas consumption of China

Evaluation of cooperative mitigation: captured carbon dioxide for enhanced oil recovery

Can a low-carbon development path achieve win-win development: evidence from China’s low-carbon pilot policy