Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2013 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Hierarchical Model in Decision Making

verfasst von : Hing Kai Chan, Xiaojun Wang

Erschienen in: Fuzzy Hierarchical Model for Risk Assessment

Verlag: Springer London

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Decision-making problems normally involve multiple criteria. This is already not an easy problem to address.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Risk Assessment
Nächstes Kapitel An Integrated Fuzzy Approach for Aggregative Supplier Risk Assessment
Literatur
Abdi, M. R. (2009). Fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for evaluating reconfigurable machines. International Journal of Production Economics, 117(1), 1–15.MathSciNetCrossRef
Arshinder, K. A., & Deshmukh, S. G. (2007). Coordination in supply chains: An evaluation using fuzzy logic. Production Planning and Control, 18(5), 420–435.CrossRef
Bao, Q., Ruan, D., Shen, Y., Hermans, E., & Janssens, D. (2012). Improved hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS for road safety performance evaluation. Knowledge-Based Systems, 32, 84–98.CrossRef
Bayazit, O., & Karpak, B. (2007). An analytical network process-based framework for successful total quality management (TQM): An assessment of Turkish manufacturing industry readiness. International Journal of Production Economics, 105, 79–96.CrossRef
Bhander, G. S., Hauschild, M., & McAloone, T. (2003). Implementing life cycle assessment in product development. Environmental Progress, 22(4), 255–267.CrossRef
Boran, F. E., Genc, S., Kurt, M., & Akay, D. (2009). A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for selection of supplier with TOPSIS method. Expert System with Applications, 36(8), 11363–11368.CrossRef
Bottani, E., & Rizzi, A. (2006). A fuzzy TOPSIS methodology to support outsourcing of logistics services. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(4), 294–308.CrossRef
Büyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2012a). A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 3000–3011.CrossRef
Büyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2012b). Evaluation of the green supply chain management practices: A fuzzy ANP approach. Production Planning and Control, 23(6), 405–418.CrossRef
Büyüközkan, G., Feyzioğlu, O., & Nebol, E. (2008). Selection of the strategic alliance partner in logistics value chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 113(1), 148–158.CrossRef
Chamodrakas, I., Alexopoulou, N., & Martakos, D. (2009). Customer evaluation for order acceptance using a novel class of fuzzy methods based on TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 7409–7415.CrossRef
Chan, F. T. S., & Chan, H. K. (2010). An AHP model for selection of suppliers in the fast changing fashion market. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 51(9–12), 1195–1207.CrossRef
Chan, F. T. S., & Kumar, N. (2007). Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Omega, 35(4), 417–431.CrossRef
Chan, F. T. S., Chan, H. K., Lau, H. C. W., & Ip, R. W. L. (2006). Benchmarking logistics performance of the postal industry: A double AHP approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 13(6), 636–661.
Chan, H. K., Wang, X., White, G., & Nick, Y. (2012). An extended fuzzy AHP approach for the evaluation of green product designs. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, (99), 1–13.
Chang, D. Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95, 649–655.MATHCrossRef
Chang, H.-T., & Chen, J. L. (2004). The conflict-problem-solving CAD software integrating TRIZ into eco-innovation. Advances in Engineering Software, 35(8–9), 553–566.CrossRef
Chen, Y. M., & Huang, P.-N. (2007). Bi-negotiation integrated AHP in suppliers selection. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 27(11), 1254–1274.CrossRef
Chen, C. T., Lin, C. T., & Huang, S. F. (2005). A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 102(2), 289–301.CrossRef
Chiang, S.-Y., Wei, C.-C., Chiang, T.-H., & Chen, W.-L. (2011). How can electronics industries become green manufacturers in Taiwan and Japan. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 13(1), 37–47.CrossRef
Choice, Expert. (1995). Decision Support Software. PA: Pittsburgh.
Chung, S. H., Lee, A. H. I., & Pearn, W. L. (2005). Analytic network process (ANP) approach for product mix planning in semiconductor fabricator. International Journal of Production Economics, 96, 15–36.CrossRef
Council, European. (2005). Directive 2005/32/EC of the European Parliament of the council of 6 July 2005 establishing a framework for the settings of ecodesign requirements for energy-using products and amending Council Directive 92/42/EEC and Directive 96/57/EC and 2000/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Union, L191(48), 29058.
Dağdeviren, M., & Yüksel, İ. (2010). A fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) model for measurement of the sectoral competition level. Expert System with Application, 37, 1005–1014.CrossRef
Ertuğrul, İ., & Karakaşoğlu, N. (2008). Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 39(7–8), 783–795.CrossRef
Faez, F., Ghodsypour, S. H., & O’Brien, C. (2009). Vendor selection and order allocation using an integrated fuzzy case-based reasoning and mathematical programming model. International Journal of Production Economics, 121(2), 395–408.CrossRef
Finnveden, G., Hauschild, M. Z., Ekvall, T., Guinee, J., Heijungs, R., Hellweg, S., et al. (2009). Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(1), 1–21.CrossRef
Gao, Y., Liu, Z., Hu, D., Zhang, L., & Gu, G. (2010). Selection of green product design scheme based on multi-attribute decision-making method. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 3(4), 277–291.CrossRef
Gumus, A. T. (2009). Evaluation of hazardous waste transportation firms by using a two step fuzzy-AHP and TOPSIS methodology. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 4067–4074.MathSciNetCrossRef
Güngör, Z., Serhadlıoğlu, G., & Kesen, E. (2009). A fuzzy AHP approach to personnel selection problem. Applied Soft Computing, 9(2), 641–646.CrossRef
Huang, C., Chu, P., & Chiang, Y. (2008). A fuzzy AHP application in government-sponsored R&D project selection. Omega, 36, 1038–1052.CrossRef
Huntzinger, D. N., & Eatmon, T. D. (2009). A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: Comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(7), 668–675.CrossRef
Hur, T., Lee, J., Ryu, J., & Kwon, E. (2005). Simplified LCA and matrix methods in indentifying the environmental aspects of a product system. Journal of Environmental Management, 75(3), 229–237.CrossRef
Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., & Ulukan, Z. (2003). Multi criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics Information Management, 16(6), 382–394.CrossRef
Kahraman, C., Büyüközkan, G., & Ateş, N. Y. (2007). A two phase multi-attribute decision-making approach for new product introduction. Information Sciences, 177, 1567–1582.CrossRef
Kahraman, C., Engin, O., Kabak, Ö., & Kaya, I. (2009). Information systems outsourcing decisions using a group decision-making approach. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 22(6), 832–841.
Kang, Y., & Li, J. (2010). Green rationality evaluation of degradable packaging based on LCA and fuzzy AHP: Proceedings of the IEEE 17th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IE&EM), 329–332.
Karpak, B., & Topcu, I. (2010). Small medium manufacturing enterprises in Turkey: An analytic network process framework for prioritizing factors affecting success. International Journal of Production Economics, 125, 60–70.CrossRef
Kelemenis, A., & Askounis, D. (2010). A new TOPSIS-based multi-criteria approach to personnel selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(7), 4999–5008.CrossRef
Kelemenis, A., Eragzakis, A., & Askounis, D. (2011). Support managers’ selection using an extension of fuzzy TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 2774–2782.CrossRef
Krohling, R. A., & Campanharo, V. C. (2011). Fuzzy TOPSIS for group decision making: A case study for accidents with oil spill in the sea. Expert System with Applications, 38(4), 4190–4197.
Lee, A. H. I., Kang, H. Y., Hsu, C. F., & Hung, H. C. (2009). A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 7917–7927.CrossRef
Li, T. (2010). Applying TRIZ and AHP to develop innovative design for automated assembly systems. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 46, 301–313.CrossRef
Lin, S.-S., Juang, Y.-S., Chen, M.-Y., & Yu, C.-J. (2009). Analysis of green design criteria and alternative evaluation processes for 3C products. Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering & Management Systems Conference (APIEMS), Dec 14–16, (pp. 2675–2685), Japan: Kitakyushu.
Liu, K. F. R., & Lai, J. H. (2009). Decision-support for environmental impact assessment: A hybrid approach using fuzzy logic and fuzzy analytic network process. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 5119–5136.CrossRef
Liu, H. T., & Wang, C. H. (2010). An advanced quality function deployment model using fuzzy analytic network process. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34(11), 3333–3351.MATHCrossRef
Lu, L. Y. Y., Wu, C. H., & Kuo, T.-C. (2007). Environmental principles applicable to green supplier evaluation by using multi-objective decision analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18–19), 4317–4331.MATHCrossRef
Luo, Z. M., Zhou, J. Z., Zheng, L. P., Mo, L., & He, Y. Y. (2010). A TFN–ANP based approach to evaluate Virtual Research Center comprehensive performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), 8379–8386.CrossRef
Mahmoodzadeh, S., Shahrabi, J., Pariazar, M., & Zaeri, M. S. (2007). Project selection by using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS technique. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences, 2(7), 397–402.
Mikhailov, L., & Madan, G. (2003). Fuzzy analytic network process and its application to the development of decision support system. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part C: Application and Reviews, 33(1), 33–41.CrossRef
Mohanty, R. P., Agarwal, R., Choudhury, A. K., & Tiwari, M. K. (2005). A fuzzy ANP based approach to R&D project selection: A case study. International Journal of Production Research, 43, 5199–5216.MATHCrossRef
Ng, C. Y., & Chuah, K. B. (2010). Evaluation of eco design alternatives using fuzzy AHP methodology. Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal, 4(1), 1–14.
Roghanian, E., Rahimi, J., & Ansari, A. (2010). Comparison of first aggregation and last aggregation in fuzzy group TOPSIS. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34(12), 3754–3766.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Saaty, (1978). Modeling unstructured decision problems: The theory of analytical hierarchies. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 20(3), 147–158.MATHCrossRef
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.MATH
Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchical process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9–26.MATHCrossRef
Saaty, T. L., & Peniwati, K. (2008). Group decision making: Drawing out and reconciling differences. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
Sarkis, J. (2002). Quantitative models for performance measurement systems-alternate considerations. International Journal of Production Economics, 86, 81–90.CrossRef
Sarkis, J. (2003). A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(4), 397–409.MathSciNetCrossRef
Sarminento, R., & Thomas, A. (2010). Identifying improvement areas when implementing green initiatives using a multitier AHP approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 17(3), 452–463.
Seçme, N. Y., Bayrakdaroğlu, A., & Kahraman, C. (2009). Fuzzy performance evaluation in Turkish Banking Sector using Analytic Hierarchy Process and TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9), 11699–11709.CrossRef
Sobotka, A., & Rolak, Z. (2009). Multi-attribute analysis for the eco-energetic assessment of the building life cycle. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 15(4), 593–611.CrossRef
Tan, R. R. (2005). Application of symmetric fuzzy linear programming in life cycle assessment. Environmental Modelling and Software, 20, 1343–1346.CrossRef
Tuzkaya, U. R., & Onut, S. (2008). A fuzzy analytic network process based approach to transportation-mode selection between Turkey and Germany: A case study. Information Sciences, 178, 3133–3146.MathSciNetCrossRef
Tuzkaya, G., Ozgen, A., Ozgen, D., & Tuzkaya, U. R. (2009). Environmental performance evaluation of suppliers: A hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 6, 477–490.
Vahidnia, M. H., Alesheikh, A. A., & Alimohammadi, A. (2009). Hospital site selection using fuzzy AHP and its derivatives. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(10), 3048–3056.CrossRef
Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11, 229–241.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Vinodh, S., Ramiya, R. A., & Gautham, S. G. (2011). Application of fuzzy analytic network process for supplier selection in a manufacturing organisation. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(1), 272–280.CrossRef
Wang, X., & Chan, H. K. (2011). Fuzzy-AHP approach for evaluation of green product design. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference of Production Research, 31 July–4 Aug, Germany: Stuttgart.
Wang, Y. M., & Elhag, T. M. S. (2006). Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 31(2), 309–319.CrossRef
Wang, Y., Luo, M. Y., & Hua, Z. (2008). On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(2), 735–747.MATHCrossRef
Wang, J.-W., Cheng, C.-H., & Huang, K.-C. (2009). Fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS for supplier selection. Applied Soft Computing, 9, 377–386.CrossRef
Wang, X., Chan, H. K., Yee, W. Y., & Diaz-Rainey, I. (2012a). A two-stage Fuzzy-AHP model for risk assessment of implementing green initiatives in the fashion supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 595–606.CrossRef
Wang, X., Li, D., & Shi, X. (2012b). A fuzzy enabled model for aggregative food safety risk assessment in food supply chains. Production Planning and Control, 23(5), 377–395.CrossRef
Weck, M., Klocke, F., Schell, H., & Ruenauver, E. (1997). Evaluating alternative production cycles using the extended fuzzy AHP method. European Journal of Operational Research, 100(2), 351–366.MATHCrossRef
Wu, C., Barnes, D., Rosenberg, D., & Luo, X. (2009). An analytic network process-mixed integer multi-objective programming model for partner selection in agile supply chains. Production Planning and Control, 20(3), 254–275.CrossRef
Wu, W., Kou, G., Peng, Y., & Ergu, D. (2012). Improved AHP-group decision making for investment strategy selection. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 18(2), 299–316.CrossRef
Yan, W., Chen, C.-H., Huang, Y., & Mi, W. (2008). An integration of bidding-oriented product conceptualization and supply chain formation. Computers in Industry, 59(2–3), 128–144.CrossRef
Yang, C., Liu, T., Kao, C., & Wang, H. (2010). Integrating AHP and DELPHI methods to construct a green product assessment hierarchy for early stage of product design and development. International Journal of Operations Research, 7(3), 35–43.
Yong, D. (2006). Plant location selection based on fuzzy TOPSIS. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 28, 839–844.CrossRef
Yung, K. C., Chan, H. K., So, H. T., Wong, W. C., Choi, C. K., & Yue, T. M. (2011). A life-cycle assessment for eco-redesign of a consumer electronic product. Journal of Engineering Design, 22(2), 69–85.CrossRef
Yung, W. K. C., Chan, H. K., So, J. H. T., Wong, D. C. W., Choi, A. C. K., & Yue, T. M. (2012). Environmental impact of two electrical products with reference to the energy-using products directive. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 5(2), 86–90.CrossRef
Yurdakul, M. (2003). Measuring long-term performance of a manufacturing firm using the analytic network process (ANP) approach. International Journal of Production Research, 41(11), 2501–2529.CrossRef
Zeydan, M., Çolpan, C., & Çobanoğlu, C. (2011). A combined methodology for supplier selection and performance evaluation. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 2741–2751.CrossRef
Zheng, G., Jing, Y., Huang, H., & Gao, Y. (2011). Applying LCA and fuzzy AHP to evaluate building energy conservation. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 28(2), 123–141.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Hierarchical Model in Decision Making
verfasst von
Hing Kai Chan
Xiaojun Wang
Copyright-Jahr
2013
Verlag
Springer London
Buch
Fuzzy Hierarchical Model for Risk Assessment

Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5042-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-4471-5043-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2013

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5043-5_3

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise