Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
“Historical pollution” in the United States may mean many things. For the purposes of the definition used in our project, the United States has a fairly evolved framework for addressing the phenomena. As a common law country, traditional and newly interpreted tort law may be applicable. So too, traditional criminal law can be and has been utilized. Before modern historical pollution legislation was enacted, legal means existed to punish historical pollution and to remediate and remove orphan dumps, related pollution and its effects—and to compensate victims. Most important now is federal (and some state) law passed specifically to address the massive historical pollution discovered several decades ago. Central is the Superfund law, which provides for rules of liability, punishment, removal, remediation, and compensation. It has had considerable success, after inefficient and expensive beginnings. Thus, U.S. laws of several kinds are relevant to the types of scenarios noted in this report. Complicating the analysis further is the need for several factual assumptions to make the scenarios realistic under U.S. law and the various interpretations of the arsenal of relevant law.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Abelkop, A. D. K. (2013). Tort law as an environmental policy instrument. Oregon Law Review,92, 381.
Beck, E. C. (1979). The love canal tragedy. EPA website. http://www2.epa.gov/aboutepa/love-canal-tragedy
Brickey, K. F. (2008). Conventional criminal statutes. Environmental Crime: Law, Policy, Prosecution.
Brook, D. (1994). Review of Andrew Szasz’s article EcoPoulism: Toxic waste and the movement for environmental justice. Journal of Political Ecology: Case Studies in History and Society, 1(1). http://jpe.library.arizona.edu/volume_1/brookvol1.htm
Broun, C. N. & O’Reilly, J. T. (n.d.). RCRA and superfund: A practice guide (2015 and October 2016 update).
Brown, M. H. (1979, December). Love Canal and the poisoning of America. Atlantic Magazine. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1979/12/love-canal-and-the-poisoning-of-america/376297/
Bukro, C. (1980, July 8). Valley of the Drums plays deadly chorus. Chicago Tribune.http://archives.chicagotribune.com/1980/07/08/page/1/article/valley-of-the-drums-plays-deadly-chorus#text
Carter, J. (1981). State of the union address. http://www.jimmycarterlibrary.gov/documents/speeches/su81jec.phtml
Craig, R. et al. (1979, 2010). Toxic and environmental torts: Cases and materials.
DeCarvalho, J. P. (2013). Love Canal disaster. Toxipedia. http://www.toxipedia.org/display/toxipedia/Love+Canal+Disaster
DiMento, J. F. (1986). Environmental law and American business: Dilemmas of compliance. New York: Plenum. CrossRef
Environmental Law Institute (2015). Law of environmental protection, Spring, Sect. 7.10.
EPA (1981, September 18). EPA schedules emergency cleanup at Valley of the Drums. https://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/epa-schedules-emergency-cleanup-valley-drums
Finding Dulcinea. (2011). On this day: President Carter approves emergency financial aid for love canal. http://www.findingdulcinea.com/news/on-this-day/July-August-08/On-This-Day–Love-Canal-Declared-Federal-Emergency.html
GAO, Funding and Reported Costs of Enforcement and Administration Activities. (2008). http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-841R
Hird, J. A. (1993). Environmental policy and equity: The case of Superfund. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 12, 324. http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3325238.pdf?acceptTC=true
Humphreys, S. L. (1990). An enemy of the people: Prosecuting The corporate polluter as a common law criminal. American University Law Review, 39, 311.
Kevles, A. (1983, September 28). Of mice and men in Love Canal. L.A. Times.
Logan, M. (2012). Dumped on: The messy truth about Love Canal; My America odyssey: Discovering one America at a time. http://myamericanodyssey.com/dumped-on-the-messy-truth-about-love-canal-ny/
O’Brien, R. M., et al. (1984). Open and closed systems of decision making: The case of toxic waste management. Public Administration Review,44, 334. CrossRef
O’Reilly, J. T. (2015). How is a cause of action established for toxic assault and battery? What common law causes of actions exist. Toxic Torts Practice Guide, 1, § 6.12.
Periconi, J. J. (2008). The state of environmental crimes prosecutions in New York. Natural Resources & Environment, 23. http://www.periconi.com/CM/Articles/Environmental_Crimes.pdf. Accessed July 2, 2015.
Plater, Z. et al. (2010). Environmental law and policy: Nature, law and society (4th ed., Vols. 680–681).
Stephenson, J. B. (2004). Superfund program: Updated appropriation and expenditure data. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d04475r.pdf
Tang, J. J. (2003). Public participation in brownfield development: A framework for community empowerment in zoning practices. Seattle Journal of Environmental Law,3, 241.
The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History (2014). Timeline: Love Canal hazardous waste disaster. https://www.gilderlehman.org/sites/default/files/inline-pdfs/LoveCanal_Timeline.pdf
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2016). Brownfields. EPA.GOV, http://www.epa.gov/brownfields/. Last updated March 29.
Usiak, R. (1982, June 13). Residents, buyers wait for Love Canal rebirth. L.A. Times.
Warren, E. (1980, June 20). Crusader for the Love Canal fights on. L.A. Times.
- Historical Pollution and Criminal Liability in the United States
Joseph F. C. DiMento
- Chapter 8
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, Neuer Inhalt/© julien tromeur | Fotolia