Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
This chapter analyses the relationship between historical pollution and human rights violations in the light of the case law developed by international and regional human rights courts and other bodies. According to this case law, States are required to adopt preventive measures intended to handle certain cases of pollution that pose significant risks for human rights. Some regional courts oblige national authorities to protect the right to life in the context of dangerous activities through effective criminal investigations aimed at punishing—in the victims’ interests—the individuals or corporations responsible for deaths or physical illnesses resulting from technological and environmental disasters. In this framework, two situations need to be distinguished. As far as “historical pollution” is concerned, criminal proceedings for deaths and injuries caused by past activities are often considered inadequate to meet the real needs of the victims and to respect the fundamental rights in criminal matters. Conversely, when human rights have been violated as an effect of “ongoing pollution” caused by industrial activities in the absence of appropriate public measures, criminal law is often required. Further developments in the case law of the human rights courts and bodies are expected: they will tell us whether, and if so to what extent, criminal law may play a role in strengthening human rights and environmental protection with reference to different cases of historical pollution.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Akandji-Kombe, J. F. (2007). Positive obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights. A guide to the implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights. Human rights handbook, No. 7. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Anicama, C. (2008). State responsibilities to regulate and adjudicate corporate activities under the Inter-American human rights system. Report on the American convention on human rights. Available at http://www.reports-and-materials.org/sites/default/files/reports-and-materials/State-Responsibilities-under-Inter-American-System-Apr-2008.pdf
Anton, D. K., & Shelton, D. L. (2011). Environmental protection and human rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Arato, J. (2012). Constitutional transformation in the ECtHR: Strasbourg’s expansive recourse to external rules of international law. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 37(2), 349–387.
Basch, F. F. (2007). The doctrine of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights regarding states’ duty to punish human rights violations and its dangers. American University International Law Review, 23(1), 195–229.
Bernardi, A. (2001). Nessuna pena senza legge (art. 7). In S. Bartole, B. Conforti, & G. Raimondi (Eds.), Commentario alla Convenzione europea per la tutela dei diritti dell’uomo e delle libertà fondamentali (pp. 249–306). Padova: Cedam.
Boer, B. (2015). Environmental law dimensions of human rights (Vol. 21). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Bosselmann, K. (2001). Human rights and the environment: Redefining fundamental principles? In B. Gleeson & N. Low (Eds.), Governance for the environment: Global problems, ethics and democracy (pp. 118–134). London: Palgrave.
Boyle, A. (2007). Human rights or environmental rights: A reassessment. Fordham Envtl. L. Rev., 18, 471–511.
Boyle, A. (2012). Human rights and the environment: Where next? European Journal of International Law, 23(3), 613–642. CrossRef
Boyle, A. E., & Anderson, M. R. (1996). Human rights approaches to environmental protection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Brandon, E. (2013). Global approaches to site contamination law. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media. CrossRef
Chevalier-Watts, J. (2010). Effective investigations under Article 2 of the European Convention On Human Rights: Securing the right to life or an onerous burden on a state? European Journal of International Law, 21(3), 701–721. CrossRef
Chopra, S. K. (1994). Multinational corporations in the aftermath of Bhopal: The need for a new comprehensive global regime for transnational corporate activity. Valparaiso University Law Review, 29(1), 235–284.
Coomans, F. (2003). The Ogoni case before the African Commission on human and peoples’ rights. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 52(03), 749–760. CrossRef
Council of Europe. (2012). Manual on human rights and the environment: Principles emerging from the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Cuneo, I. M. (2005). The rights of indigenous peoples and the Inter-American Human Rights System. Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, 22, 53–63.
De Vero, G. (2007). La giurisprudenza della Corte di Strasburgo. In G. De Vero & G. Panebianco (Eds.), Delitti e pene nella giurisprudenza delle Corti europee (pp. 11–58). Torino: Giappichelli.
Delmas-Marty, M. (Dir.) (1987). La “matière pénale” au sens de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme, flou du droit pénal. Revue de science criminelle et de droit pénal comparé, 819–862.
DeMerieux, M. (2001). Deriving environmental rights from the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Oxford Journal of legal studies, 21(3), 521–561. CrossRef
Desgagné, R. (1995). Integrating environmental values into the European Convention on Human Rights. American Journal of International Law, 89, 263–294. CrossRef
Eaton, J. P. (1997). The Nigerian tragedy, environmental regulation of transnational corporations, and the human right to a healthy environment. Boston University International Law Journal, 15, 261–297.
Esposito, A. (2008). Il diritto penale “flessibile”. Giappichelli: Quando i diritti umani incontrano i sistemi penali. Torino.
Eweje, G. (2006). Environmental costs and responsibilities resulting from oil exploitation in developing countries: The case of the Niger Delta of Nigeria. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(1), 27–56. CrossRef
Fitzmaurice, M. (2011). The European court of human rights, environmental damage and the applicability of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Environmental Law Review, 13(2), 107–114. CrossRef
Fitzmaurice, M., & Marshall, J. (2007). The Human Right to a Clean Environment-Phantom or reality? The European Court of Human Rights and English courts perspective on balancing rights in environmental cases. Nordic Journal of International Law, 76(2), 103–151. CrossRef
Francioni, F. (2010). International human rights in an environmental horizon. European Journal of International Law, 21(1), 41–55. CrossRef
Giudicelli-Delage, G., Manacorda, S., & Tricot, J. (2013). “Devoir de punir?” Le système pénal et la protection internationale du droit à la vie. Paris: Société de législation comparée.
Green, A. (2013). Rights, risk and the value of life: A critical analysis of the right to life under the European Convention on Human Rights. Journal of Law and Medicine, 20, 877–887.
Hessbruegge, J. (2005). Human rights violations arising from conduct of non-state actors. Buffalo Human Rights Law Review, 11, 21–88.
Hillemanns, C. F. (2003). UN norms on the responsibilities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises with regard to human rights. German Law Journal, 4(10), 1065–1080.
Hilson, C. (2009). Risk and the European Convention on Human Rights: Towards a new approach. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 11(1), 353–398. CrossRef
Jagers, N. (2011). UN Guiding Principles on business and human rights: Making headway towards real corporate accountability. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 29(2), 159–163. CrossRef
Jarvis, F., & Sherlock, A. (1999). The European Convention on Human Rights and the environment. European Law Review, 24, HR-15, 15–29.
Kravchenko, S., & Bonine, J. E. (2012). Interpretation of human rights for the protection of the environment in the European Court of Human Rights. Pacific McGeorge Global Business & Development Law Journal, 25, 245–287.
Krstic, I., & Cuckovic, B. (2015). Procedural aspects of Article 8 of the ECHR in environmental cases-The greening of human rights law. Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade, 170–189.
Lacroix, C. (2011). L’influence de la jurisprudence de la Cour européenne des droits de l’Homme. Le droit au procès pénal en cas de catastrophes. RISEO, 3, 173–186.
Loucaides, L. (2004). Environmental protection through the jurisprudence of the European convention on human rights. The British Year Book of International Law, 75(1), 249–267. CrossRef
Manacorda, S. (2012). “Dovere di punire”? Gli obblighi di tutela penale nell’era della internazionalizzazione del diritto. Rivista italiana di diritto e procedura penale, 55(4), 1364–1401.
Manes, V. (2012). Art. 7 §§ I–XV. In S. Bartole, P. De Sena, & V. Zagrebelsky (Eds.), Commentario breve alla Convenzione europea per la salvaguardia dei diritti dell’uomo e delle libertà fondamentali (pp. 258–288). Padova: Cedam.
Mazzacuva, F. (2013). La materia penale e il “doppio binario” della Corte europea: le garanzie al di là delle apparenze. Rivista italiana di diritto e procedura penale, 1899–1940.
Morgera, E. (2006). The UN and corporate environmental responsibility: Between international regulation and partnerships. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 15(1), 93–109. CrossRef
Mowbray, A. (2002). Duties of investigation under the European Convention on Human Rights. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 51(02), 437–448. CrossRef
Nicosia, E. (2006). Convenzione europea dei diritti dell’uomo e diritto penale. Torino: Giappichelli.
Nwobike, J. C. (2005). The African commission on human and peoples’ rights and the demystification of second and third generation rights under the African Charter: Social and Economic Rights Action Center (SERAC) and the Center for Economic and Social Rights (CESR) v Nigeria. African Journal of Legal Studies, 1(2), 129–146. CrossRef
Panebianco, G. (2014). The Nulla Poena Sine Culpa Principle in European Courts Case Law. The perspective of the Italian criminal law. In S. Ruggeri (Ed.), Human Rights in European Criminal Law (pp. 47–78). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Patel, S. (2012). Delayed justice: A case study of Texaco and the Republic of Ecuador’s operations, harms, and possible redress in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Tulane Environmental Law Journal, 26, 71.
Pedersen, O. W. (2008). European environmental human rights and environmental rights: A long time coming? Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 21(1), 73–111.
Pedersen, O. W. (2010). The ties that bind: The environment, the European convention on human rights and the rule of law. European Public Law, 16(4), 571–595.
Pulitanò, D. (2013). Diritti umani e diritto penale. Rivista italiana di diritto e procedura penale, 1613–1636.
Roos, S. R. (2013). UN guiding principles on business and human rights. In S.O. Idowu, N. Capaldi, L. Zu, & A. Das Gupta (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 2592–2601). Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
San José, D. I. G. (2005). Environmental protection and the European convention on human rights (Vol. 88). Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Satzger, H. (2012). International and European criminal law. München: Beck. CrossRef
Scalia, V. (2015). The European Court of Human Rights and environmental crime. Catania: Study in the framework of the EFFACE research project, University of Catania.
Schmidt, T. M. (2005). Transnational corporate responsibility for international environmental and human rights violations: Will the United Nations’ norms provided the required means? California Western International Law Journal, 36, 217–247.
Scott, I. K. (2000). The Inter-American System of human rights: An effective means of environmental protection. Virginia Environmental Law Journal, 19, 197.
Shelton, D. (1991). Human rights, environmental rights, and the right to environment. Stanford Journal of International Law, 28(1), 103–138.
Shelton, D. (2002a). Decision regarding communication 155/96 (Social and Economic Rights Action Center/Center for Economic and Social Rights v. Nigeria). Case No. ACHPR/COMM/A044/1. American Journal of International Law, 96(4), 937–942. CrossRef
Shelton, D. (2002b). Human rights and the environment: Jurisprudence of human rights bodies. Environmental Policy and Law, 32(3–4), 158–162.
Shelton, D. (2006). Human rights and the environment: What specific environmental rights have been recognized? Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, 35(1), 129–171.
Shelton, D. (2007). Human rights, health and environmental protection: Linkages in law and practice. Human Rights and International Legal Discourse, 1, 9–59.
Shelton, D. (2008). Human rights and the environment: Problems and possibilities. Environmental Policy and Law, 38(1–2), 41.
Shelton, D. (2015). Legitimate and necessary: Adjudicating human rights violations related to activities causing environmental harm or risk. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 6(2), 139–155. CrossRef
Shinsato, A. L. (2005). Increasing the accountability of transnational corporations for environmental harms: The petroleum industry in Nigeria. Northwestern Journal of Human Rights, 4(1), 186–209.
Skogly, S. I. (1997). Complexities in human rights protection: Actors and rights involved in the Ogoni conflict in Nigeria. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 15(1), 47–60.
Spieler, P. (2010). The La Oroya case: The relationship between environmental degradation and human rights violations. Human Rights Brief, 18, 19–79.
Sudre, F. (1995). Les obligations positives dans la jurisprudence européenne des droits de l’homme. Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’homme, 23, 363–384.
Tulkens, F. (2011). The paradoxical relationship between criminal law and human rights. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 9(3), 577–595. CrossRef
Tulkens, F., & van de Kerchove, M. (2014). Criminal law and human rights. In S. Body-Gendrot, M. Hough, K. Kerezsi, R. Lévy, & S. Snacken (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of European criminology (pp. 91–106). New York: Routledge.
UNEP Compendium on Human Rights and the Environment. Selected international legal materials and cases (UNEP/CIEL). (2014). Nairobi: UNON Publishing Services Section.
Valentini, V. (2012). Diritto penale intertemporale. Logiche continentali ed ermeneutica europea. Milano: Giuffré.
Van der Linde, M., & Louw, L. (2003). Considering the Interpretation and Implementation of Article 24 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights in Light of the SERAC Communication. African Human Rights Law Journal, 3, 167–171.
Viganò, F. (2011). Obblighi convenzionali di tutela penale. In V. Manes–G. Zagrebelsky (Eds.) , La Convenzione europea dei diritti dell’uomo nell’ordinamento penale italiano (pp. 243–298). Milano: Giuffré Editore.
Wheeler, D., Fabig, H., & Boele, R. (2002). Paradoxes and dilemmas for stakeholder responsive firms in the extractive sector: Lessons from the case of Shell and the Ogoni. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(3), 297–318. CrossRef
Xenos, D. (2007). Asserting the right to life (Article 2, ECHR) in the context of industry. German Law Journal, 8(3), 231–254.
Zarsky, L. (2012). Human rights and the environment: Conflicts and norms in a globalizing world. London: Earthscan.
Zengerling, C. (2013). Greening international jurisprudence: Environmental NGOs before international courts, tribunals, and compliance committees. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. CrossRef
ACommHR, Communication 155/96, The Social and Economic Rights Action Center and the Center for Economic, and Social Rights/Nigeria. Case No. ACHPR/COMM/A044/1 (ACommHR 27 May 2002).
ECtHR, Brincat and others v. Malta, Appl. Nos. 60908/11, 62110/11, 62129/11, 62312/11 and 62338/11, 24 July 2014.
ECtHR, Bullerwell v. United Kingdom, Appl. No. 48013/99, 12 December 2002.
ECtHR, Cordella and Others v. Italy, Appl. Nos. 54414/13 and 54264/15, Communicated Case, 27 April 2016.
ECtHR, Dubetska and others v. Ukraine, Appl. No. 30499/03, 10 February 2011.
ECtHR, Fadeyeva v. Russia, Appl. No. 55723/00, 9 June 2005, 30 November 2005.
ECtHR, Giacomelli v. Italy, Appl. No. 59909/00, 2 November 2006.
ECtHR, Guerra and others v. Italy, Appl. no. 116/1996/735/932, 19 February 1998.
ECtHR, Howald Moor and Others v. Switzerland, Appl. No. 52067/10 and 41072/11, 11 March 2014.
ECtHR, Janssen v. Germany, Appl. no. 23959/94, 20 December 2001.
ECtHR, Klasen v. Germany, Appl. No. 75204/01, 5 October 2006.
ECtHR, LCB v. United Kingdom, Appl. No. 14/1997/798/1001, 9 June 1988.
ECtHR, Ledyaeva and Others v. Russia, Appl. Nos. 53157/99, 53247/99, 53695/00, 56850/00, 26 October 2006.
ECtHR, Locascia and others v. Italy, Appl. No. 35648/10, Communicated case, 5 March 2013.
ECtHR, Öneryıldız v. Turkey [GC], Appl. No. 48939/99, 30 November 2004.
ECtHR, Smaltini v. Italy, Appl. No. 43961/09, 24 March 2015.
ECtHR, Taşkın and others v. Turkey, Appl. No. 46117/99, 10 November 2004.
IACommHR, Community of La Oroya v. Peru, Admissibility Report (Report No. 76/09—Petition 1473-06), 5 August 2009.
IACommHR, Community San Mateo de Huanchor and its members v. Peru Report, Admissibility Report (Report No. 69/04, Petition 504/03, 15 October 2004).
IACommHR, Report on the Situation of Human Rights in Ecuador, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.96, doc. 10 rev. 1 (1997).
- Historical Pollution and Human Rights Violations: Is There a Role for Criminal Law?
- Chapter 13
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, So bewältigen Sie Stress im Fernstudium/© granata68 | stock.adobe.com | AdobeStock