Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-018-9325-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
This article includes a Supplementary Appendix that is available for download from the Review of International Organizations’ website.
How, and under what conditions, can International Organizations (IOs) shape public opinion? The impact of IOs on public support for war has been studied closely by international relations scholars, yet their effects on environmental or human rights issues has not. This is surprising given the extent to which the success of these initiatives will depend upon cooperation through international institutions. This article examines how IOs can influence popular support for two policies aimed at solving global collective action problems: (1) the REDD+ deforestation initiative; and (2) efforts to resettle Syrian refugees. The results presented here use a pair of survey-based experiments to test whether public support for these policies can be affected by the recommendations made by various organizations and their member states. Somewhat surprisingly, the results suggest that endorsements by the United Nations have a greater effect on the US public than do endorsements by organizations known for their technical expertise, or by prominent international NGOs. These findings call into question some of the assumptions we commonly make about the perceived legitimacy of international organizations.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
(PDF 232 KB)11558_2018_9325_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Abbott, K.W., & Snidal, D. (1998). Why states act through formal international organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42(1), 3. CrossRef
Baldez, L. (2014). Defying convention: US resistance to the UN treaty on Women’s rights. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Berinsky, A.J., Huber, G.A., Lenz, G.S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon. com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368. CrossRef
Burley, A.M., & Mattli, W. (1993). Europe before the court: a political theory of legal integration. International Organization pp. 41–76.
Chapman, T.L. (2007). International security institutions, domestic politics, and institutional legitimacy. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(1), 134–166. CrossRef
Chapman, T.L. (2009). Audience beliefs and international organization legitimacy. International Organization, 63(4), 733–764. CrossRef
Chapman, T.L. (2012). Securing approval: domestic politics and multilateral authorization for war. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cichowski, R.A. (2004). Women’s rights, the European Court, and supranational constitutionalism. Law & Society Review, 38(3), 489–512. CrossRef
Garrett, G. (1995). The politics of legal integration in the European Union. International Organization, 49(1), 171–181. CrossRef
Gleditsch, K.S., & Ward, M.D. (2006). Diffusion and the international context of democratization. International Organization, 60(4), 911–933. CrossRef
Gourevitch, P. (1978). The second image reversed: the international sources of domestic politics. International Organization, 32(4), 881–912. CrossRef
Greenhill, B.D. (2015). Transmitting rights: international organizations and the diffusion of human rights practices. New York: Oxford University Press.
Grieco, J.M., Gelpi, C., Reifler, J., Feaver, P.D. (2011). Let’s get a second opinion: international institutions and American public support for war. International Studies Quarterly, 55(2), 563–583. CrossRef
Hafner-Burton, E.M., & Schneider, C.J. (2016). A dark side of cooperation: when international organizations spread political corruption. Laboratory on International Law and Regulation Working Paper 28.
Hawkins, D.G., Lake, D.A., Nielson, D.L., Tierney, M.J. (2006). Delegation and agency in international organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Huff, C., & Tingley, D. (2015). “Who are these people?” evaluating the demographic characteristics and political preferences of MTurk survey respondents. Research & Politics, 2(3), 1–12. CrossRef
Johnson, T. (2011). Guilt by association: the link between states’ influence and the legitimacy of intergovernmental organizations. Review of International Organizations, 6(1), 57–84. CrossRef
Maliniak, D., Parowski, B., Tierney, M.J. (2016). Changing Lessons from Survey Experiments on IO Approval and the Use of Force.” Working Paper.
McEntire, K.J., Leiby, M., Krain, M. (2015). Human rights organizations as agents of change: an experimental examination of framing and micromobilization. American Political Science Review, 109(3), 407–426. CrossRef
Mearsheimer, J.J. (1994). The false promise of international institutions. International Security, 19(3), 5–49. CrossRef
Nielson, D.L., & Tierney, M.J. (2003). Delegation to international organizations: Agency theory and World Bank environmental reform. International Organization, 57(2), 241–276. CrossRef
Nye, J.S. (2004). Soft power: the means to success in world politics. Public affairs.
Simmons, B.A., & Elkins, Z. (2004). The globalization of liberalization: policy diffusion in the international political economy. American Political Science Review, 98(1), 171–189. CrossRef
Thompson, A. (2006). Coercion through IOs: the security council and the logic of information transmission. International Organization, 60(1), 1–34. CrossRef
Wallace, G.P.R. (2017). Supplying protection: the United Nations and public support for humanitarian intervention. Conflict Management and Peace Science p. 0738894217697458.
- How can international organizations shape public opinion? analysis of a pair of survey-based experiments
- Springer US
- The Review of International Organizations
Print ISSN: 1559-7431
Elektronische ISSN: 1559-744X
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, Best Practices zu agiler Qualität