Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
FMWare: IoT-Based Fleet Management System Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

How Millennials Will Use Autonomous Vehicles: An Interview Study

verfasst von : Christina Pakusch, Gunnar Stevens, Dirk Schreiber

Erschienen in: Mobility Internet of Things 2018

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Hardly any other innovation has the potential to change our traffic systems as profoundly and dramatically as autonomous vehicles. In this context, the potentials of shared autonomous vehicles (SAV) are discussed controversially. In the age of cities struggling with growing emissions and congestion problems, some experts predict SAV to reduce private car use and to have an overall positive effect on transportation and traffic. Others fear an increase in vehicle miles traveled due to the high convenience SAV will offer. To address this concern more thoroughly we analyzed users’ perceptions and attitudes towards SAV by conducting 25 qualitative interviews focusing on the questions if and under what circumstances users would adopt SAV and how SAV would affect a user’s mobility behavior. Results show that participants especially tend to use SAV instead of traditional taxis and local public transport.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Cost Analysis of Telemedicine Implementation in the Lens of Healthcare Sustainability: A Review of the Literature
Nächstes Kapitel Smart Collaborative Learning Environment for Visually Impaired Children
Literatur
1.
Verband Deutscher Verkehrsunternehmen e. V. (VDV). (2015). Zukunftsszenarien autonomer Fahrzeuge—Chancen und Risiken für Verkehrsunternehmen.
2.
Fagnant, D. J., & Kockelman, K. M. (2014). The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 40, 1–13.CrossRef
3.
Fagnant, D. J., Kockelman, K. M., & Bansal, P. (2015). Operations of shared autonomous vehicle fleet for the Austin, Texas market. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2536, 98–106.
4.
Krueger, R., Rashidi, T. H., & Rose, J. M. (2016). Preferences for shared autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 69, 343–355.CrossRef
5.
6.
7.
8.
SAE International. (2016). Automated driving levels of driving automation are defined in New SAE International Standard J3016.
9.
Pakusch, C., Stevens, G., Boden, A., & Bossauer, P. (2018). Unintended effects of autonomous driving: A study on mobility preferences in the future. Sustainability, 10(7), 2404.CrossRef
10.
Payre, W., Cestac, J., & Delhomme, P. (2014). Intention to use a fully automated car: Attitudes and a priori acceptability. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 27, 252–263.CrossRef
11.
12.
13.
14.
Bischoff, J., & Maciejewski, M. (2016). Simulation of city-wide replacement of private cars with autonomous taxis in Berlin. Procedia computer science, 83, 237–244.CrossRef
15.
Bunghez, C. L. (2015). The future of transportation-autonomous vehicles. International Journal of Economic Practices and Theories, 5(5), 447–454.
16.
Fagnant, D. J., & Kockelman, K. (2015). Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77, 167–181.
17.
Burns, L. D. (2013). Sustainable mobility: a vision of our transport future. Nature, 497(7448), 181–182.CrossRef
18.
Burghout, W., Rigole, P. J., & Andreasson, I. (2015). Impacts of shared autonomous taxis in a metropolitan area. In Proceedings of the 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
19.
Spieser, K., Treleaven, K., Zhang, R., Frazzoli, E., Morton, D., & Pavone, M. (2014). Toward a systematic approach to the design and evaluation of automated mobility-on-demand systems: A case study in Singapore. In G. Meyer & S. Beiker (Eds.), Road Vehicle Automation (pp. 229–245). Cham: Springer.CrossRef
20.
Sina, N. N., de Winter, J. C. F., Payre, W., Van Arem, B., & Happee, R. (2017). What impressions do users have after a ride in an automated shuttle? An Interview Study | Request PDF.
21.
22.
Nordhoff, S., van Arem, B., Merat, N., Madigan, R., Ruhrort, L., Knie, A., & Happee, R. (2017). User acceptance of driverless shuttles running in an open and mixed traffic environment. In Proceedings of the 12th ITS European Congress.
23.
De Winter, J. C. F., Kyriakidis, M., Dodou, D., & Happee, R. (2015). Using CrowdFlower to study the relationship between self-reported violations and traffic accidents. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 2518–2525.CrossRef
24.
Kyriakidis, M., Happee, R., & de Winter, J. C. F. (2015). Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 32, 127–140.CrossRef
25.
Owczarzak, L., & Żak, J. (2015). Design of passenger public transportation solutions based on autonomous vehicles and their multiple criteria comparison with traditional forms of passenger transportation. Transportation Research Procedia, 10, 472–482.CrossRef
26.
Rödel, C., Stadler, S., Meschtscherjakov, A., & Tscheligi, M. (2014). Towards autonomous cars: the effect of autonomy levels on acceptance and user experience. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 1–8). http://​dl.​acm.​org/​citation.​cfm?​id=​2667330.
27.
Howard, D., & Dai, D. (2014). Public perceptions of self-driving cars: The case of Berkeley, California. In Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting.
28.
Moreno, A. T., Michalski, A., Llorca, C., & Moeckel, R. (2018). Shared autonomous vehicles effect on vehicle-km traveled and average trip duration. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2018, 8969353.CrossRef
29.
Witzel, A., & Reiter, H. (2012). The problem-centred interview. Sage.
30.
Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5–18.CrossRef
31.
Coyne, I. T. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26(3), 623–630.CrossRef
32.
Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10(2), 141–163.CrossRef
33.
Vavoula, G. N., & Sharples, M. (2007). Future technology workshop: A collaborative method for the design of new learning technologies and activities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(4), 393–419.CrossRef
34.
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968). The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. Nursing Research, 17(4), 364.CrossRef
35.
Pakusch, C., Stevens, G., Bossauer, P., & Weber, T. (2018). The users’ perspective on autonomous driving: A comparative analysis of Partworth utilities. In Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on e-Business and Telecommunications (ICETE 2018).
36.
Davidson, P., & Spinoulas, A. (2016). Driving alone versus riding together-How shared autonomous vehicles can change the way we drive. Road & Transport Research: A Journal of Australian and New Zealand Research and Practice, 25(3), 51.
37.
Collins, C. M., & Chambers, S. M. (2005). Psychological and situational influences on commuter-transport-mode choice. Environment and Behavior, 37(5), 640–661.CrossRef
38.
Franzen, A. (1997). Umweltbewusstsein und Verkehrsverhalten-Empirische Analysen zur Verkehrsmittelwahl und der Akzeptanz umweltpolitischer Massnahmen.
39.
Gardner, B., & Abraham, C. (2007). What drives car use? A grounded theory analysis of commuters’ reasons for driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 10(3), 187–200.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
How Millennials Will Use Autonomous Vehicles: An Interview Study
verfasst von
Christina Pakusch
Gunnar Stevens
Dirk Schreiber
Copyright-Jahr
2020
Buch
Mobility Internet of Things 2018

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30910-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-30911-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2020

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30911-4_33

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise