Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
In accordance with societal norms and values, consumers readily indicate their positive attitudes toward sustainability. However, they hardly take sustainability into account when engaging in exchange relationships with companies. To shed light on this paradox, this paper investigates whether defense mechanisms and the more specific concept of neutralization techniques can explain the discrepancy between societal norms and actual behavior. A multi-method qualitative research design provides rich insights into consumers’ underlying cognitive processes and how they make sense of their attitude–behavior divergences. Drawing on the Ways Model of account-taking, which is advanced to a Cycle Model, the findings illustrate how neutralization strategies are used to legitimize inconsistencies between norm-conforming attitudes and actual behavior. Furthermore, the paper discusses how the repetitive reinforcement of neutralizing patterns and feedback loops between individuals and society are linked to the rise of anomic consumer behavior.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Akers, R. L., Krohn, M. D., Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Radosevich, M. (1979). Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of a general theory. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 636–655. CrossRef
Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 91(1), 3–26. CrossRef
Belk, R. W., Devinney, T., & Eckhardt, G. (2005). Consumer ethics across cultures. Consumption, Markets & Culture, 8(3), 275–289.
Boulstridge, E., & Carrigan, M. (2000). Do consumers really care about corporate responsibility? Highlighting the attitude-behaviour gap. Journal of Communication Management, 4(4), 355–368. CrossRef
Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011). An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 597–608. CrossRef
Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68–84. CrossRef
Carrigan, M., & Attalla, A. (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer-do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 560–577. CrossRef
Chabowski, B., Mena, J., & Gonzalez-Padron, T. (2011). The structure of sustainability research in marketing, 1958–2008: A basis for future research opportunities. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 55–70. CrossRef
Chan, R. Y. K. (2001). Determinants of Chinese consumers’ green purchase behavior. Psychology & Markting, 18(4), 389–413. CrossRef
Chatzidakis, A., Hibbert, S., & Smith, A. (2007). Why people don’t take their concerns about fair trade to the supermarket: The role of neutralisation. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(1), 89–100. CrossRef
Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce litterin in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026. CrossRef
Coleman, J. W. (2005). The criminal elite: Understanding white-collar crime. New York: Worth Publishers.
Collins, D. (1989). Organizational harm, legal condemnation and stakeholder retaliation: A typology, research agenda and application. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(1), 1–13. CrossRef
Cone. (2010). The 2010 cone cause evolution study. Boston: Cone.
Cone. (2011). Cone green gap trend tracker. Boston: Cone.
Cowe, R., & Williams, S. (2000). Who are the ethical consumers?. Manchester: The Co-operative Bank.
Cromwell, P. F., & Thurman, Q. C. (2003). The devil made me do it: Use of neutralizations by shoplifters. Deviant Behavior, 24(6), 535–550. CrossRef
De Bock, T., & Van Kenhove, P. (2011). Double standards: The role of techniques of neutralization. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(2), 283–296. CrossRef
De Pelsmacker, P., Driesen, L., & Rayp, G. (2005). Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair-trade coffee. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(2), 363–385. CrossRef
Devinney, T. M., Auger, P., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2010). The myth of the ethical consumer. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Devinney, T. M., Auger, P., Eckhardt, G. M., & Birtchnell, T. (2006). The other CSR: Consumer social responsibility. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 4, 30–37.
Dolan, P. (2002). The sustainability of sustainable consumption. Journal of Macromarketing, 22(2), 170–181.
Dunford, F. W., & Kunz, P. R. (1973). The neutralization of religious dissonance. Review of Religious Research, 15(1), 2–9. CrossRef
Ehrich, K. R., & Irwin, J. R. (2005). Willful ignorance in the request for product attribute information. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(3), 266–277. CrossRef
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
Elster, J. (1989). Social norms and economic theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(4), 99–117. CrossRef
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2004). Social norms and human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 185–190. CrossRef
Fenichel, O. (1945). The psychoanalytic theory of neurosis. New York: Norton.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: University Press.
Fisher, R. J. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2), 303–315. CrossRef
Folkes, V. S., & Kamins, M. A. (1999). Effects of information about firms’ ethical and unethical actions on consumers’ attitudes. Journal of Consumer Psychology (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 8(3), 243–259. CrossRef
Freestone, O., & McGoldrick, P. (2008). Motivations of the ethical consumer. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(4), 445–467. CrossRef
Freud, A. (1936). The ego and the mechanisms of defense. New York: Hogarth.
Fritsche, I. (2002). Account strategies for the violation of social norms: Integration and extension of sociological and social psychological typologies. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 32(4), 371–394. CrossRef
Fritsche, I. (2005). Predicting deviant behavior by neutralization: Myths and findings. Deviant Behavior, 26(5), 483–510. CrossRef
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford: University Press.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne: Aldine Publishing.
Harris, L. C., & Dumas, A. (2009). Online consumer misbehaviour: An application of neutralization theory. Marketing Theory, 9(4), 379–402. CrossRef
Hazani, M. (1991). The universal applicability of the theory of neutralization: German youth coming to terms with the holocaust. Crime Law and Social Change, 15(2), 135–149. CrossRef
Henry, S., & Eaton, R. (1999). Degrees of deviance: Student accounts of their deviant behavior. Salem: Sheffield Publishing.
Hildebrand, D., Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2011). Corporate social responsibility: A corporate marketing perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 45(9/10), 1353–1364. CrossRef
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Holloway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing qualitative research differently: Free association, narrative, and the interview method. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Jackson, T. (Ed.). (2006). The earthscan reader in sustainable consumption. London: Earthscan.
Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.
Kaiser, F. G., Byrka, K., & Hartig, T. (2010). Reviving Campbell’s paradigm for attitude research. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 14(4), 351–367. CrossRef
Kaiser, F. G., & Schultz, W. P. (2009). The attitude–behavior relationship: A test of three models of the moderating role of behavioral difficulty. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(1), 186–207. CrossRef
King, M. F., & Bruner, G. C. (2000). Social desirability bias: A neglected aspect of validity testing. Psychology & Marketing, 17(2), 79–103. CrossRef
Klockars, C. B. (1976). The professional fence. New York: Free Press.
Konty, M. (2005). Microanomie: The cognitive foundations of the relationship between anomie and deviance. Criminology, 43(1), 107–131. CrossRef
Kotler, P. (2011). Reinventing marketing to manage the environmental imperative. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 132–135. CrossRef
LaPiere, R. T. (1934). Attitudes vs. actions. Social Forces, 13(2), 230–237. CrossRef
Lennick, D., & Kiel, F. (2005). Moral intelligence: Enhancing business performance and leadership success. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Luchs, M. G., Naylor, R. W., Irwin, J. R., & Raghunathan, R. (2010). The sustainability liability: Potential negative effects of ethicality on product preference. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 18–31. CrossRef
Maignan, I. (2001). Consumers’ perceptions of corporate social responsibilities: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(1), 57–72. CrossRef
Maruna, S., & Copes, H. (2005). What have we learned from five decades of neutralization research? Crime and Justice, 32(221), 221–320.
McGregor, S. L. T. (2008). Conceptualizing immoral and unethical consumption using neutralization theory. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 36(3), 261–276. CrossRef
Minor, W. W. (1981). Techniques of neutralization: A reconceptualization and empirical examination. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 18(2), 295–318. CrossRef
Mohr, L. A., & Webb, D. J. (2005). The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(1), 121–147. CrossRef
Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45–72. CrossRef
Moisander, J. (2007). Motivational complexity of green consumerism. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(4), 404–409. CrossRef
Nicholls, A., & Lee, N. (2006). Purchase decision-making in fair trade and the ethical purchase gap: Is there a fair trade twix? Journal of Strategic Marketing, 14(4), 369–386. CrossRef
Öberseder, M., Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Gruber, V. (2011). Why don’t consumers care about CSR?: A qualitative study exploring the role of CSR in consumption decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(4), 449–460. CrossRef
Papaoikonomou, E., Ryan, G., & Ginieis, M. (2011). Towards a holistic approach of the attitude behaviour gap in ethical consumer behaviours: Empirical evidence from Spain. International Advances in Economic Research, 17(1), 77–88. CrossRef
Prothero, A., Dobscha, S., Freund, J., Kilbourne, W. E., Luchs, M. G., Ozanne, L. K., et al. (2011). Sustainable consumption: Opportunities for consumer research and public policy. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 30(1), 31–38. CrossRef
Reno, R. R., Cialdini, R. B., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). The transsituational influence of social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(1), 104–112. CrossRef
Rivis, A., & Sheeran, P. (2003). Descriptive norms as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. Current Psychology, 22(3), 218–233. CrossRef
Roberts, J. A. (1996). Will the real socially responsible consumer please step forward. Business Horizons, 39(1), 79–83. CrossRef
Rosenbaum, M. S., Kuntze, R., & Wooldridge, B. R. (2011). Understanding unethical retail disposition practice and restraint from the consumer perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 28(1), 29–52. CrossRef
Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225–243. CrossRef
Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology, 12(1), 1–36. CrossRef
Simon, F. L. (1995). Global corporate philanthropy: A strategic framework. International Marketing Review, 12(4), 20–37. CrossRef
Smith, J. R., & Louis, W. R. (2008). Do as we say and as we do: The interplay of descriptive and injunctive group norms in the attitude-behavior relationship. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 647–666. CrossRef
Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 491–503. CrossRef
Strutton, D., Pelton, L. E., & Ferrell, O. C. (1997). Ethical behavior in retail settings: Is there a generation gap? Journal of Business Ethics, 16(1), 87–105. CrossRef
Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670. CrossRef
Taneja, S., Taneja, P., & Gupta, R. (2011). Researches in corporate social responsibility: A review of shifting focus, paradigms, and methodologies. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(3), 343–364. CrossRef
Thogersen, J., Jorgensen, A. K., & Sandager, S. (2012). Consumer decision making regarding a green everyday product. Psychology & Marketing, 29(4), 187–197. CrossRef
Tice, D. M. (1992). Self-concept change and self-presentation: The looking glass self is also a magnifying glass. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 435–451. CrossRef
UNEP. (2003). Shopping for a better world. Paris: UNEP.
UNEP. (2005). Talk the walk? Advancing sustainable lifestyles through marketing and communications. Paris: UNEP/UN Global Compact.
Zaltman, G., LeMasters, K., & Heffring, M. (1982). Theory construction in marketing: Some thoughts on thinking. New York: John Wiley.
- How Techniques of Neutralization Legitimize Norm- and Attitude-Inconsistent Consumer Behavior
Bodo B. Schlegelmilch
- Springer Netherlands
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta