Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-018-0584-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Kelly Haws served as Area Editor for this article.
This article proposes two new donation strategies that focus on either the amount or the frequency of corporate donations, and verifies that consumers have very different perceptions of and behavioral responses to firms that adopt these different donation strategies. Through three lab experiments and two field studies with adult consumers, the authors show that an amount-focused donation strategy leads consumers to generate more resource- and capability-related associations about the firm’s endeavor in helping charities, whereas a frequency-focused donation strategy leads consumers to generate more commitment- and persistence-related associations about a firm’s endeavor in helping charities. Furthermore, consumers tend to perceive a donation as more instrumental in helping charities and are more likely to purchase from the donor firm, pay a higher price for the donor firm’s products, and make referrals when the firm adopts a frequency-focused (vs. amount-focused) donation strategy to support an approach-oriented (vs. avoidance-oriented) charitable goal. The findings hold important implications for corporate donation strategies regarding how firms should allocate their philanthropic budgets and strategically communicate their donation efforts.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
ESM 1 (DOCX 1925 kb)11747_2018_584_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Aaker, J., Vohs, K. D., & Mogilner, C. (2010). Nonprofits are seen as warm and for-profits as competent: Firm stereotypes matter. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 224–237. CrossRef
Alba, J. W., & Marmorstein, H. (1987). The effects of frequency knowledge on consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 14–25. CrossRef
Alba, J. W., Broniarczyk, S. M., Shimp, T. A., & Urbany, J. E. (1994). The influence of prior beliefs, frequency cues, and magnitude cues on consumers’ perceptions of comparative price data. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 219–235. CrossRef
Allen, F. (1984). Reputation and product quality. The Rand Journal of Economics, 15, 311–327. CrossRef
Ballings, M., McCullough, H., & Bharadwaj, N. (2018). Cause marketing and customer profitability. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(2), 234–251. CrossRef
Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 1–62. CrossRef
Burlingame, D. F., & Frishkoff, P. A (1996). How does firm size affect corporate philanthropy. in D.F. Burlingame and D.R. Young (Ed.), Corporate Philanthropy at the Crossroads (pp. 86–104). Bloomington, Indianna University Press.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1981). Effects of extent of thought on the pleasantness ratings of p-o-x triads: Evidence for three judgmental tendencies in evaluating social situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 1000–1009. CrossRef
Chin, M. K., Hambrick, D. C., & Treviño, L. K. (2013). Political ideologies of CEOs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58, 197–232. CrossRef
Wal-Mart China. (2015). Wal-Mart China’s corporate social responsibility 2015. Retrieved from http://wal-martchina.com/english/community/community.htm/
Creyer, E. H., & Ross Jr., W. T. (1996). The impact of corporate behavior on perceived product value. Marketing Letters, 7(2), 173–185. CrossRef
Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 117–132. CrossRef
Cui, Y., Trent, E. S., Sullivan, P. M., & Matiru, G. N. (2003). Cause-related marketing: How generation Y responds. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 31(6), 310–320. CrossRef
Dahl, D. W., & Lavack, A. M. (1995). Cause-related marketing: Impact of size of corporate donation and size of cause-related promotion on consumer perceptions and participation. In D. W. Stewart & N. J. Vilcassim (eds.), 1995 AMA winter educators’ conference: Marketing theory and applications, Vol. 6 (pp. 476–481). American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL.
Dean, D. H. (2003). Consumer perception of corporate donations: Effects of company reputation for social responsibility and type of donation. Journal of Advertising, 32, 91–102. CrossRef
Elliot, A. J., & Friedman, R. (2007). Approach-avoidance: A central characteristic of personal goals. In B. R. Little, S. D. Philips, & K. Salmela-Aro (Eds.), Personal project pursuit: Goals, action, and human flourishing (pp. 97–118). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Elliot, A. J., & Sheldon, K. M. (1997). Avoidance achievement motivation: A personal goals analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 171–185. CrossRef
Folse, J. G., Niedrich, R. W., & Grau, S. L. (2010). Cause-relating marketing: The effects of purchase quantity and firm donation amount on consumer inferences and participation intentions. Journal of Retailing, 86(4), 295–309. CrossRef
Fry, L. W., Keim, G. D., & Meiners, R. E. (1982). Corporate contributions: Altruistic or for-profit? The Academy of Management Journal, 25(1), 94–106. CrossRef
Gautier, A., & Pache, A. (2015). Research on corporate philanthropy: A review and assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(3), 343–369. CrossRef
Giving USA Foundation. (2017). Annual report on philanthropy 2017. Retrieved from https://givingusa.org/giving-usa-2017-total-charitable-donations-rise-to-new-high-of-390-05-billion/
Gneezy, A., Gneezy, U., Nelson, L. D., & Brown, A. (2010). Shared social responsibility: A field experiment in pay-what-you-want pricing and charitable giving. Science, 329, 325–327. CrossRef
Groza, M. D., Pronschinske, M. R., & Walker, M. (2011). Perceived organizational motives and consumer responses to proactive and reactive CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(4), 639–652. CrossRef
Gupta, S., & Pirsch, J. (2006). The company-cause-customer fit decision in cause-related marketing. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(6), 314–326.
Hall, M. R. (2006). Corporate philanthropy and corporate community relations: Measuring relationship-building results. Journal of Public Relations Research, 18(1), 1–21. CrossRef
Hamilton, R., & Chernev, A. (2013). Low prices are just the beginning: Price image in retail management. Journal of Marketing, 77, 1–20. CrossRef
Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340. CrossRef
Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1–46. CrossRef
Higgins, E. T. (2002). How self-regulation creates distinct values: The case of promotion and prevention decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(3), 177–191. CrossRef
Higgins, E. T., Roney, C. J., Crowe, E., & Hymes, C. (1994). Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance: Distinct self-regulatory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 276–286. CrossRef
Higgins, E. T., Shah, J., & Friedman, R. (1997). Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 515–525. CrossRef
Jin, L., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Motivational intensity and persistence, working paper. Shanghai: Fudan University.
Kardes, F. R., & Cronley, M. L. (2000). The role of approach/avoidance asymmetries in motivated belief formation and change. In S. Ratneshwar, D. G. Mick, & C. Huffman (Eds.), The why of consumption: Contemporary perspectives on consumer motives, goals, and desires (pp. 81–97). New York, NY: Routledge.
Kim, J. Y., Natter, M., & Spann, M. (2009). Pay what you want: A new participative pricing mechanism. Journal of Marketing, 73, 44–58. CrossRef
Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate social responsibility doing the most good for your company and your cause. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Lee, A. Y., & Higgins, E. T. (2009). The persuasive power of regulatory fit. In M. Wänke (Ed.), Social psychology of consumer behavior (pp. 319–333). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Lee, N. R., & Kotler, P. (2013). Social marketing: Changing behaviors for good. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Lenz, I., Wetzel, H. A., & Hammerschmidt, M. (2017). Can doing good lead to doing poorly? Firm value implications of CSR in the face of CSI. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(5), 677–697. CrossRef
Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P., & Erez, M. (1988). The determinants of goal commitment. Academy of Management Review, 13, 23–39. CrossRef
Luo, X. (2005). A contingent perspective on the advantages of stores’ strategic philanthropy for influencing consumer behaviour. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(5), 390–401. CrossRef
Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70, 1–18. CrossRef
Madrigal, R., & Boush, D. M. (2008). Social responsibility as a unique dimension of brand personality and consumers’ willingness to reward. Psychology & Marketing, 25(6), 538–564. CrossRef
McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 854–872.
Mishra, S., & Modi, S. B. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder wealth: The role of marketing capability. Journal of Marketing, 80(1), 26–46. CrossRef
Mowrer, O. H. (1960). Learning theory and behavior. New York, NY: John Wiley. CrossRef
Müller, S., Fries, A. J., & Gedenk, K. (2014). How much to give?- the effect of donation size on tactical and strategic success in cause-related marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 31(2), 178–191. CrossRef
Naylor, J. C., & Ilgen, D. R. (1984). Goal setting: A theoretical analysis of a motivational technology. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 95–140.
Neal, D. T., Wood, W., & Quinn, J. M. (2006). Habits—A repeat performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 198–202. CrossRef
Paharia, N., Keinan, A., Avery, J., & Schor, J. B. (2011). The underdog effect: The marketing of disadvantage and determination through brand biography. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 775–790. CrossRef
Patten, D. M. (2008). Does the market value corporate philanthropy? Evidence from the response to the 2004 tsunami relief effort. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 599–607. CrossRef
Peloza, J., & Shang, J. (2011). How can corporate social responsibility activities create value for stakeholders? A systematic review. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39, 117–135. CrossRef
Pham, M. T., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). Promotion and prevention in consumer decision making: State of the art and theoretical propositions. In S. Ratneshwar & D. G. Mick (Eds.), Inside consumption: Consumer motives, goals, and desires (pp. 8–43). Hoboken, NJ: Psychology Press.
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227. CrossRef
Rahman, F., & Norman, R. T. (2016). The effect of firm scale and CSR geographical scope of impact on consumers’ response. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 28, 189–198. CrossRef
Ricks Jr., J. M. (2005). An assessment of strategic corporate philanthropy on perceptions of brand equality variables. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22(3), 121–134. CrossRef
Rob, R., & Fishman, A. (2005). Is bigger better? Customer base expansion through word-of-mouth reputation. Journal of Political Economy, 113, 1146–1162. CrossRef
Robinson, S. R., Irmak, C. & Jayachandran, S. (2012). Choice of cause in cause-related marketing. Journal of Marketing 76(4), 126–139.
Russell, D. W., & Russell, C. A. (2010). Here or there? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility initiatives: Egocentric tendencies and their moderators. Marketing Letters, 21, 65–81. CrossRef
Safer, D. (1998). Preferences for luxurious or reliable products: Promotion and prevention focus as moderators, Doctoral dissertation. Columbia, NY: Columbia University.
Schlosser, A. E. (2003). Experiencing products in the virtual world: The role of goal and imagery in influencing attitudes versus purchase intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 184–198. CrossRef
Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 158–166. CrossRef
Shah, J., Higgins, E. T., & Friedman, R. S. (1998). Performance incentives and means: How regulatory focus influences goal attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 285–293. CrossRef
Simons, J., Dewitte, S., & Lens, W. (2000). Wanting to have vs. wanting to be: The effect of perceived instrumentality on goal orientation. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 335–351. CrossRef
Szőcs, I., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Rusch, T., & Shamma, H. M. (2016). Linking cause assessment, corporate philanthropy, and corporate reputation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(3), 376–396. CrossRef
Vandello, J. A., Goldschmied, N. P., & Richards, D. A. (2007). The appeal of the underdog. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1603–1616. CrossRef
Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303–319. CrossRef
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573. CrossRef
Zhang, Y., Fishbach, A., & Dhar, R. (2007). When thinking beats doing: The role of optimistic expectations in goal-based choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 567–578. CrossRef
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197–120. CrossRef
- How the frequency and amount of corporate donations affect consumer perception and behavioral responses
- Springer US
- Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
Official Publication of the Academy of Marketing Science
Print ISSN: 0092-0703
Elektronische ISSN: 1552-7824
Best Practices für Web-Exzellenz im Online-Handel/© venimo | Fotolia