Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
Over the last 30 years the number of methods for Eco-design increased dramatically. LCA in Eco-assessment has established itself as a reference methodology and with it some tools that reached an international resonance. On the contrary, in the Eco-improvement world, the growth of methods has not been accompanied by a method or a tool better than other ones. One of the main reasons is the different type of users; there are people skilled in problem solving and those who have no experience. In addition, in order to be universal, the methods based on guidelines often do not go into too much detail, thus limiting their effectiveness. The balance between completeness and simplicity is the key issue around which the authors have attempted in recent years.
In such a context, this paper aims at solving this contradiction and proposes an ontological framework to build guidelines for eco-improvements. Their content has been structured into five parts, according to well-known conceptual design frameworks, such as Function-Behaviour-Structure (FBS) methods and similar.
The result is a set of over than two hundreds suggestions that can be comfortably used through a web portal following a recommended step-by-step methodological path.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Altshuller, G.S.: Creativity as an exact science: The Theory of the Solution of Inventive Problems. Gordon & Breach Science Publishing, New York (1984)
Anderson, J.R.: Cognitive psychology and its implications. WH Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co, New York (1990)
Bovea, M., Pérez-Belis, V.: A taxonomy of ecodesign tools for integrating environmental requirements into the product design process. J. Cleaner Prod. 20(1), 61–71 (2012) CrossRef
Chechurin, L., Borgianni, Y.: Understanding TRIZ through the review of top cited publications. Comput. Ind. 82, 119–134 (2016) CrossRef
Jonassen, D.H.: Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 48(4), 63–85 (2000) CrossRef
Newell, A., Simon, H.A.: Human Problem Solving, vol. 104, No. 9. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1972)
Russo, D., Regazzoni, D., Montecchi, T.: Eco-design with TRIZ laws of evolution. Procedia Eng. 9, 311–322 (2011) CrossRef
Russo, D., Rizzi, C., Montelisciani, G.: Inventive guidelines for a TRIZ-based eco-design matrix. J. Cleaner Prod. 76, 95–105 (2014) CrossRef
Russo, D., Serafini, M., Rizzi, C.: Comparison and classification of eco improvement methods. In: DS 80-1 Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 2015) vol. 1: Design for Life, Milan, Italy, 27–30 July 2015 (2015)
Tyl, B., Legardeur, J., Millet, D., Vallet, F.: A comparative study of ideation mechanisms used in eco-innovation tools. J. Eng. Des. 25(10–12), 325–345 (2014) CrossRef
- How to Build Guidelines for Eco-Improvement
Neuer Inhalt/© ITandMEDIA, Best Practices für die Mitarbeiter-Partizipation in der Produktentwicklung/© astrosystem | stock.adobe.com