nach oben

Erschienen in:

24.01.2020 | Original Research

Hydrophobic modification of bacterial cellulose using oxygen plasma treatment and chemical vapor deposition

verfasst von: Salomé Leal, Cecília Cristelo, Sara Silvestre, Elvira Fortunato, Aureliana Sousa, Anabela Alves, D. M. Correia, S. Lanceros-Mendez, Miguel Gama

Erschienen in: Cellulose | Ausgabe 18/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

A new strategy for the surface modification of bacterial cellulose (BC) through the combination of oxygen plasma deposition and silanization with trichloromethyl silane (TCMS) is described. The combined use of the two techniques modifies both the surface roughness and energy and therefore maximizes the obtained hydrophobic effect. These modified membranes were characterized by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), water contact angle measurements, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR-ATR) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and its cytotoxic potential was investigated using both indirect and direct contact in vitro studies. The obtained results suggest an effective conjugation of TCMS to the surface of BC, leading to a highly hydrophobic surface, with a water contact angle of approximately 130º. It is also demonstrated that this is a stable and durable surface modification strategy, since BC remained hydrophobic even after 6 months, in dry conditions or after being submerged in distilled water for about a month. Importantly, this surface modification revealed no short-term cytotoxic effects on L929 and hDNFs cells. Altogether, these data indicate the successful development of a surface modification method that can be applied to BC, enabling the production of a biodegradable and hydrophobic platform that can be applied to different areas of research and industry.

Graphic abstract

Vorheriger Artikel Phosphorylated cellulose nanofibers exhibit exceptional capacity for uranium capture

Nächster Artikel Influence of bacterial nanocellulose surface modification on calcium phosphates precipitation for bone tissue engineering

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Bhushan B, Jung YC (2011) Effects of surface structure on wetting of patterned superhydrophobic surfaces. In: Drummond CH& III (Eds.), 68th Conference on glass problems, vol. 29. Wiley

Bhushan B, Nosonovsky M (2010) The rose petal effect and the modes of superhydrophobicity. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 368(1929):4713–4728. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0203CrossRefPubMed

Cacicedo ML, Castro MC, Servetas I, Bosnea L, Boura K, Tsafrakidou P, Castro GR et al (2016) Progress in bacterial cellulose matrices for biotechnological applications. Bioresour Technol 213:172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.071CrossRefPubMed

Calvimontes A, Mauersberger P, Nitschke M, Dutschk V, Simon F (2011) Effects of oxygen plasma on cellulose surface. Cellulose 18(3):802–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-011-9511-5CrossRef

Cassie ABD, Baxter S (1944) Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans Faraday Soc 40:546–551. https://doi.org/10.1039/TF9444000546CrossRef

Costa MN, Veigas B, Jacob JM, Santos DS, Gomes J, Baptista PV, Fortunato E et al (2014) A low cost, safe, disposable, rapid and self-sustainable paper-based platform for diagnostic testing: lab-on-paper. Nanotechnology 25(9):094006. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/25/9/094006CrossRefPubMed

Costa AFS, Almeida FCG, Vinhas GM, Sarubbo LA (2017) Production of bacterial cellulose by gluconacetobacter hansenii using corn steep liquor as nutrient sources. Front Microbiol 8:2027. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02027CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Creighton JR, Ho P (2010) Introduction to Chemical Vapour Deposition| SpringerLink. In: Xu Y, Yan X-T (eds) engineeing materials and processes. Springer, London, pp 1–28

Fadeev AY, McCarthy TJ (2000) Self-Assembly Is Not the Only Reaction Possible between Alkyltrichlorosilanes and Surfaces: monomolecular and Oligomeric Covalently Attached Layers of Dichloro—and Trichloroalkylsilanes on Silicon. Langmuir 16(18):7268–7274. https://doi.org/10.1021/la000471zCrossRef

Faria G, Cardoso CR, Larson RE, Silva JS, Rossi MA (2009) Chlorhexidine-induced apoptosis or necrosis in L929 fibroblasts: a role for endoplasmic reticulum stress. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 234(2):256–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2008.10.012CrossRefPubMed

Fink H, Faxalv L, Molnar GF, Drotz K, Risberg B, Lindahl TL, Sellborn A (2010) Real-time measurements of coagulation on bacterial cellulose and conventional vascular graft materials. Acta Biomater 6(3):1125–1130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.09.019CrossRefPubMed

Glavan AC, Martinez RV, Subramaniam AB, Yoon HJ, Nunes RMD, Lange H, Whitesides GM et al (2013) Omniphobic “RF Paper” Produced by Silanization of Paper with Fluoroalkyltrichlorosilanes. Adv Func Mater 24:60–70CrossRef

Helenius G, Backdahl H, Bodin A, Nannmark U, Gatenholm P, Risberg B (2006) In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. J Biomed Mater Res A 76(2):431–438. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30570CrossRefPubMed

Hong X, Gao X, Jiang L (2007) Application of Superhydrophobic Surface with High Adhesive Force in No Lost Transport of Superparamagnetic Microdroplet. J Am Chem Soc 129(6):1478–1479. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja065537cCrossRefPubMed

Huang Y, Zhu C, Yang J, Nie Y, Chen C, Sun D (2014) Recent advances in bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 21(1):1–30CrossRef

ISO 10993-5. (2009). Biological evaluation of medical devices. In: Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity, 3rd ed. pp 34)

Jedrzejczak-Krzepkowska M, Kubiak K, Ludwicka K, Bielecki S (2016) Chapter 2—bacterial nanocellulose synthesis, recent findings. In: Gama M, Dourado F, Bielecki S (eds) Bacterial nanocel-lulose: from biotechnology to bio-economy. Elsevier, New York, pp 19–46CrossRef

Katara G, Hemvani N, Chitnis S, Chitnis V, Chitnis DS (2008) Surface disinfection by exposure to germicidal UV light. Indian J Med Microbiol 26(3):241–242CrossRef

Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink HP, Bohn A (2005) Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 44(22):3358–3393. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200460587CrossRefPubMed

Kumar A, Negi YS, Choudhary V, Bhardwaj NK (2014) Characterization of cellulose nanocrystals produced by acid-hydrolysis from sugarcane bagasse as agro-waste. J Mater Phys Chem 2(1):1–8

Leitao AF, Faria MA, Faustino AM, Moreira R, Mela P, Loureiro L, Gama M et al (2016) A novel small-caliber bacterial cellulose vascular prosthesis: production, characterization, and preliminary in vivo testing. Macromol Biosci 16(1):139–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201500251CrossRefPubMed

Mohd NH, Ismail NFH, Zahari JI, Wan Fathilah WFb, Kargarzadeh H, Ramli S, Othaman R et al (2016) Effect of aminosilane modification on nanocrystalline cellulose properties. J Nanomater 2016 2016:8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4804271CrossRef

Mosmann T (1983) Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 65(1–2):55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4CrossRefPubMed

North EJ, Halden RU (2013) Plastics and environmental health: the road ahead. Rev Environ Health 28(1):1–8CrossRef

Pan C, Kumar C, Bohl S, Klingmueller U, Mann M (2009) Comparative proteomic phenotyping of cell lines and primary cells to assess preservation of cell type-specific functions. Mol Cell Proteomics 8(3):443–450. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M800258-MCP200CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Petersen N, Gatenholm P (2011) Bacterial cellulose-based materials and medical devices: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 91(5):1277–1286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3432-yCrossRefPubMed

Picheth GF, Pirich CL, Sierakowski MR, Woehl MA, Sakakibara CN, de Souza CF, de Freitas RA et al (2017) Bacterial cellulose in biomedical applications: a review. Int J Biol Macromol 104:97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.171CrossRefPubMed

Rachini A, Le Troedec M, Peyratout C, Smith A (2012) Chemical modification of hemp fibers by silane coupling agents. J Appl Polym Sci 123(1):601–610. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.34530CrossRef

Riss TL, Moravec RA, Niles AL, Duellman S, Benink HA, Worzella TJ, Minor L (2016) Cell viability assays. In: Assay guidance manual: Eli Lilly & Company and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

Seo K, Kim M, Kim DH (2015) Re-derivation of Young’s equation, Wenzel equation, and Cassie-Baxter equation based on energy minimization. In: Aliofkhazraei M (ed) Surface energy. IntechOpen, London

Shao W, Wu J, Liu H, Ye S, Jiang L, Liu X (2017) Novel bioactive surface functionalization of bacterial cellulose membrane. Carbohyd Polym 178:270–276CrossRef

Silva MA, Leite YKC, de Carvalho CES, Feitosa MLT, Alves MMM, Carvalho FAA, de Carvalho MAM et al (2018) Behavior and biocompatibility of rabbit bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells with bacterial cellulose membrane. PeerJ 6:e4656. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4656CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Song J, Rojas OJ (2013) Approaching super-hydrophobicity from cellulosic materials: a review. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 28(2):216–238CrossRef

Svensson A, Nicklasson E, Harrah T, Panilaitis B, Kaplan DL, Brittberg M, Gatenholm P (2005) Bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for tissue engineering of cartilage. Biomaterials 26(4):419–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.049CrossRefPubMed

Thuo MM, Martinez RV, Lan W-J, Liu X, Barber J, Atkinson MBJ, Whitesides GM et al (2014) Fabrication of low-cost paper-based microfluidic devices by embossing or cut-and-stack methods. Chem Mater 26(14):4230–4237CrossRef

Wang Y-W, Wu Q, Chen G-Q (2003) Reduced mouse fibroblast cell growth by increased hydrophilicity of microbial polyhydroxyalkanoates via hyaluronan coating. Biomaterials 24(25):4621–4629. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00356-9CrossRefPubMed

Wenzel RN (1936) Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind Eng Chem 28(8):988–994. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50320a024CrossRef

Zhang H, Li Y, Xu Y, Lu Z, Chen L, Huang L, Fan M (2016) Versatile fabrication of a superhydrophobic and ultralight cellulose-based aerogel for oil spillage clean-up. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18(40):28297–28306. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CP04932JCrossRefPubMed

Zimmermann KA, LeBlanc JM, Sheets KT, Fox RW, Gatenholm P (2011) Biomimetic design of a bacterial cellulose/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite for bone healing applications. Mater Sci Eng C 31(1):43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2009.10.007CrossRef

Titel: Hydrophobic modification of bacterial cellulose using oxygen plasma treatment and chemical vapor deposition
verfasst von: Salomé Leal
Cecília Cristelo
Sara Silvestre
Elvira Fortunato
Aureliana Sousa
Anabela Alves
D. M. Correia
S. Lanceros-Mendez
Miguel Gama
Publikationsdatum: 24.01.2020
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Cellulose / Ausgabe 18/2020
Print ISSN: 0969-0239
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-882X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03005-z

Springer Professional

Abstract

Graphic abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 18/2020

Lignocellulosic nanofibers for the reinforcement of brown line paper in industrial water systems

Drying and redispersion of plant cellulose nanofibers for industrial applications: a review

The current status of the enzyme-mediated isolation and functionalization of nanocelluloses: production, properties, techno-economics, and opportunities

Understanding important aspects of spray drying microfibrillated cellulose through statistical analysis

Different degree of fibrillation: strategy to reduce permeability in nanocellulose-starch films

Oxidative treatments for cellulose nanofibers production: a comparative study between TEMPO-mediated and ammonium persulfate oxidation