nach oben

Erschienen in:

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Ideal Types in Public Administration

verfasst von : Lhawang Ugyel

Erschienen in: Paradigms and Public Sector Reform

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This chapter builds on the two important characteristics of paradigms—that is, ‘exemplars’ and ‘world views’, to develop a typology of ideal types in the field of public administration. The two main paradigms in public administration, traditional public administration (TPA) and new public management (NPM), and characteristics of some of the key post-NPM models form the ideal type typology. In addition, the characteristics of the patronage system are also included into the typology. This chapter also argues that, in reality, public administrative systems do not always fit into one particular paradigm. Public administration systems exist as hybrid systems that are layered with characteristics of the various paradigms overlapping one another. The identification and descriptions of the ideal types help to describe the nature of Bhutan’s public administration.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Paradigms of Public Administration

Nächstes Kapitel Bhutan’s Approach to Public Administration from Modernisation to the New Millennium

Aberbach, Joel D., and Tom Christensen. 2005. Citizens and Consumers. Public Management Review 7(2): 225–246.CrossRef

Alford, John, and Owen Hughes. 2008. Public Value Pragmatism as the Next Phase of Public Management. The American Review of Public Administration 38(2): 130–148.CrossRef

Andrews, Christina W. 2008. Legitimacy and Context: Implications for Public Sector Reform in Developing Countries. Public Administration and Development 28: 171–180.CrossRef

Baker, Bruce. 2004. Uneasy Partners: Democratisation and New Public Management in Developing Countries. In Contesting Public Sector Reforms, eds. Pauline Dibber, Geoffrey Wood, and Ian Roper. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Barzelay, Michael, and with the collaboration of Babak J. Armajani. 1992. Breaking through Bureaucracy. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Bearfield, Domonic A. 2009. What Is Patronage? A Critical Reexamination. Public Administration Review 69(1): 64–76.CrossRef

Bourgon, Jocelyne. 2009. New Governance and Public Administration: Towards a Dynamic Synthesis. Public lecture hosted by the Australian Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Canberra, Australia, February 24.

Box, Richard C. 1999. Running Government Like a Business: Implications for Public Administration Theory and Practice. The American Review of Public Administration 29(1): 19–43.CrossRef

Brinkerhoff, Derick W., and Jennifer M. Brinkerhoff. 2002. Governance Reforms and Failed States: Challenges and Implications. International Review of Administrative Sciences 68(4): 511–531.CrossRef

Capano, Giliberto. 2003. Administrative Traditions and Policy Change: When Policy Paradigms Matter. The Case of Italian Administrative Reform During the 1990s. Public Administration 81(4): 781–801.CrossRef

Cheung, Anthony B.L., and Ian Scott. 2003. Governance and Public Sector Reforms in Asia: Paradigms, Paradoxes and Dilemmas. In Governance and Public Sector Reforms in Asia: Paradigm Shifts or Business as Usual, eds. Anthony B.L. Cheung, and Ian Scott. New York: Routledge Curzon.CrossRef

Christensen, Tom. 2003. Organization Theory and Public Administration: Introduction. In Handbook of Public Administration, eds. B. Guy Peters, and Jon Pierre. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Christensen, Tom, and Per Laegreid. 2007. The Whole-of-Government Approach to Public Sector Reform. Public Administration Review 67(6): 1059–1066.CrossRef

Common, Richard. 2001. Public Management and Policy Transfer in Southeast Asia. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Company.

Dawson, Sandra, and Charlotte Dargie. 2002. New Public Management: A Discussion with Special Reference to UK Health. In New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects, eds. Kate McLaughlin, Stephen P. Osborne, and Ewan Ferlie. London: Routledge.

Denhardt, Robert B., and Janet Vinzant Denhardt. 2000. The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering. Public Administration Review 60(6): 549–559.CrossRef

Drechsler, Wolfgang. 2013. Three Paradigms of Governance and Administration: Chinese, Western and Islamic. Society and Economy 35(3): 319–342.

Dunleavy, Patrick, Helen Margetts, Simon Bastow, and Jane Tinkler. 2006. New Public Management Is Dead – Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(3): 467–494.CrossRef

Foster, C.D. 2001. The Civil Service under Stress: The Fall in Civil Service Power and Authority. Public Administration 79(3): 725–749.CrossRef

Frederickson, H. George. 1996. Comparing the Reinventing Government Movement with the New Public Administration. Public Administration Review 56(3): 263–270.CrossRef

Gardner, Roy. 1987. A Theory of Spoils System. Public Choice 54(2): 171–185.CrossRef

Gladden, E.N. 1972. A History of Public Administration, vol 1. London: Frank Cass and Company Limited.

Gray, Andrew, and Bill Jenkins. 1995. From Public Administration to Public Management: Reassessing a Revolution. Public Administration 73(1): 75–99.CrossRef

Halligan, John. 2001. Comparing Public Sector Reform in the OECD. In Public Sector Reform: An International Perspective, ed. Brendan C. Nolan. New York: Palgrave.

James, Oliver. 2001. Business Models and the Transfer of Businesslike Central Government Agencies. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 14(2): 233–252.CrossRef

Kaufman, Herbert. 1956. Emerging Conflicts in the Doctrines of Public Administration. The American Political Science Review 50(4): 1057–1073.CrossRef

Kelly, Gavin, Geoff Mulgan, and Stephen Muers. 2002. Creating Public Value: An Analytical Framework for Public Service Reform. United Kingdom: Discussion paper prepared by the Cabinet Office Strategy Unit.

Kelly, Janet M. 2005. The Dilemma of the Unsatisfied Customer in a Market Model of Public Administration. Public Administration Review 65(1): 76–84.CrossRef

Klijn, Erik-Hans. 2008. Complexity Theory and Public Administration: What’s New? Public Management Review 10(3): 299–317.CrossRef

Klijn, Erik-Hans, and Joop Koppenjan. 2012. Governance Network Theory: Past, Present and Future. Policy and Politics 40(4): 587–606.CrossRef

Klitgaard, Robert. 1997. Cleaning Up and Invigorating the Civil Service. Public Administration and Development 17: 487–509.CrossRef

Kuhn, Thomas. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, vol 2. Chicago: The University of Chicago.

Lane, Jan-Erik. 2000. New Public Management. London: Routledge.

———. 2005. Public Administration and Public Management: The Principal-Agent Perspective. Abingdon: Routledge.

Light, Paul C. 2006. The Tides of Reform Revisited: Patterns in Making Government Work, 1945–2002. Public Administration Review 66(1): 6–19.CrossRef

Llorens, Jared J., and R. Paul Battaglio Jr. 2010. Human Resources Management in a Changing World: Reassessing Public Human Resources Management Education. Review of Public Personnel Administration 30(1): 112–132.CrossRef

Luton, Larry S. 2003. Administrative State and Society: A Case Study of the United States of America. In Handbook of Public Administration, eds. B. Guy Peters, and Jon Pierre. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Lynn, Laurence E. 1998. The New Public Management: How to Transform a Theme into a Legacy. Public Administration Review 58(3): 231–237.CrossRef

Lynn, Laurence E. 2006. Public Management: Old and New. New York: Routledge.

Machiavelli, Niccolo. 1913. The Prince. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

McCourt, Willy. 2002. New Public Management in Developing Countries. In New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects, eds. Kate McLaughlin, Stephen P. Osborne, and Ewan Ferlie. London: Routledge.

Meier, Kenneth J. 1997. Bureaucracy and Democracy: The Case for More Bureaucracy and Less Democracy. Public Administration Review 57(3): 193–199.CrossRef

Newman, Janet. 2002. The New Public Management, Modernization and Institutional Change. In New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects, eds. Kate McLaughlin, Stephen P. Osborne, and Ewan Ferlie. London: Routledge.

O’Flynn, Janine. 2007. From New Public Management to Public Value: Paradigmatic Change and Managerial Implications. The Australian Journal of Public Administration 66(3): 353–366.CrossRef

Olsen, Johan P. 2005. Maybe It Is Time to Rediscover Bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(1): 1–24.CrossRef

Osborne, David, and Ted Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, PA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Osborne, Stephen P. 2006. The New Public Governance? Public Management Review 8(3): 377–387.CrossRef

Peters, B. Guy, and Donald J. Savoie. 1994. Civil Service Reform: Misdiagnosing the Patient. Public Administration Review 54(5): 418–425.CrossRef

Pierre, Jon. 2009. Reinventing Governance, Reinventing Democracy? Policy and Politics 37(4): 591–609.CrossRef

Pollitt, Christopher. 2003. Joined-up Government: A Survey. Political Studies Review 1(1): 34–49.CrossRef

Pollitt, Christopher, and Geert Bouckaert. 2004. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rhodes, R.A.W., John Wanna, and Patrick Weller. 2008. Reinventing Westminster: How Public Executives Reframe Their World. Policy and Politics 36(4): 461–479.CrossRef

Rogers, Rolf E. 1969. Max Weber’s Ideal Type Theory. New York: Philosophical Library.

Romzek, Barbara S., and Melvin J. Dubnick. 1987. Accountability in the Public Sector: Lessons from the Challenger Tragedy. Public Administration Review 47(3): 227–238.CrossRef

Sorauf, Frank J. 1959. Patronage and Party. Midwest Journal of Political Science 3(2): 115–126.CrossRef

Stoker, Gerry. 2006. Public Value Management: A New Narrative for Networked Governance? The American Review of Public Administration 36(41): 41–57.CrossRef

Stout, Margaret. 2010. Revisiting the (Lost) Art of Ideal-Typing in Public Administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis 32(4): 491–519.CrossRef

———. 2012. Competing Ontologies: A Primer for Public Administration. Public Administration Review 72(3): 388–398.CrossRef

Talbot, Colin. 2008. Performance Regimes – The Institutional Context of Performance Policies. International Journal of Public Administration 31(14): 1569–1591.CrossRef

Terry, Larry D. 2005. The Thinning of Administrative Institutions in the Hollow State. Administration and Society 37(4): 426–444.CrossRef

Turner, Mark, and David Hulme. 1997. Governance Administration and Development. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.CrossRef

UN. 2005. Unlocking the Human Potential for Public Sector Performance. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

Vigoda, Eran. 2002. From Responsiveness to Collaboration: Governance, Citizens, and the Next Generation of Public Administration. Public Administration Review 62(5): 527–540.CrossRef

Vigoda-Gadot, Eran, and Sagie Meiri. 2007. New Public Management Values and Person-Organization Fit: A Socio-Psychological Approach and Empirical Examination among Public Sector Personnel. Public Administration 86(1): 111–131.CrossRef

Waldo, Dwight. 1955. The Study of Public Administration. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology, vol 1. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Welch, Eric, and Wilson Wong. 1998. Public Administration in a Global Context: Bridging the Gaps of Theory and Practice between Western and Non-Western Nations. Public Administration Review 58(1): 40–49.CrossRef

Titel: Ideal Types in Public Administration
verfasst von: Lhawang Ugyel
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Paradigms and Public Sector Reform
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40279-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-40280-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40280-2_3