nach oben

Education and Information Technologies

Erschienen in:

13.07.2020

Identification of operational risks impeding the implementation of eLearning in higher education system

verfasst von: Ali Murad Syed, Shabir Ahmad, Adel Alaraifi, Waleed Rafi

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Higher education institutions are in a consistent pursuit of technological adoption through digital transformation techniques since the beginning of the technology revolution. The transformation from traditional to eLearning education system faces the challenges of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) and operational risks. The operational risks in ICT mainly prevent the efficient utilization of eLearning systems. In the higher education system, faculty experience in eLearning, resistance to change, and quality of the Learning Management System (LMS) are the core sources of operational risks. This study endeavors to measure the impact of operational risks in eLearning implementation in higher education institutions. We employed a quantitative research design through a self-administered survey questionnaire and used the Partial Least Square approach of Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to analyze the data. The findings indicated that eLearning implementation is positively influenced by faculty experience in eLearning and LMS quality. However, faculty resistance is not only negatively related to eLearning implementation, but it inversely influences the LMS quality as well. The study has important practical and theoretical implications discussed in the end.

Vorheriger Artikel A case study on learning basic logical competencies when utilising technologies and real-world objects

Nächster Artikel Contemplative insight as an opinion conflict and a search for meaning in the context of innovative elements of the revolution industry 4.0

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Abouammoh, A. M. (2018). The regeneration aspects for higher education research in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. In Researching higher education in Asia (pp. 327-352): Springer.

Ahmad, S., Omar, R., & Quoquab, F. (2020). Family firms’ sustainable longevity: The role of family involvement in business and innovation capability. Journal of Family Business Management.

Al-Asmari, A. M., & Rabb Khan, M. S. (2014). E-learning in Saudi Arabia: Past, present and future. Near and Middle Eastern Journal of Research in Education, 2.

Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alias, N., Othman, M. S., Marin, V. I., & Tur, G. (2018). A model of factors affecting learning performance through the use of social media in Malaysian higher education. Computers & Education, 121, 59–72.CrossRef

Alexander, S., & McKenzie, J. (1998). An evaluation of information technology projects in university learning, Department of Employment. Education and Training and Youth Affairs, Australian Government Publishing Services, Canberra.

Almodaires, A. A., Alayyar, G. M., Almsaud, T. O., & Almutairi, F. M. (2019). The effectiveness of flipped learning: A quasi-experimental study of the perceptions of Kuwaiti pre-service teachers. International Education Studies, 12(1), 10–23.CrossRef

Alwi, N. H. M., & Fan, I.-S. (2010). E-learning and information security management. International Journal of Digital Society (IJDS), 1(2), 148–156.CrossRef

Asoodar, M., Vaezi, S., & Izanloo, B. (2016). Framework to improve e-learner satisfaction and further strengthen e-learning implementation. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 704–716.CrossRef

Bandara, I., Ioras, F., & Maher, K. (2014). Cyber security concerns in e-learning education.

Blackmon, B. (2013). Social work and online education with all deliberate speed. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 10(5), 509–521.CrossRef

Bousbahi, F., & Alrazgan, M. S. (2015). Investigating IT faculty resistance to learning management system adoption using latent variables in an acceptance technology model. The Scientific World Journal, 2015, 1–11.CrossRef

Brown, S. A. (2012). Seeing web 2.0 in context: A study of academic perceptions. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 50–57.CrossRef

Bryce, C., Webb, R., & Adams, J. (2011). Internal loss data collection implementation: Evidence from a large UK financial institution. Journal of Risk Research, 14(10), 1161–1176.CrossRef

Cidral, W. A., Oliveira, T., Di Felice, M., & Aparicio, M. (2018). E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study. Computers & Education, 122, 273–290.CrossRef

Chin, W. W., (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2),295–336.

Coates, H., James, R., & Baldwin, G. (2005). A critical examination of the effects of learning management systems on university teaching and learning. Tertiary Education and Management, 11, 19–36.CrossRef

Dai, N. H. P., András, K., & Zoltán, R. (2016). E-learning security risks and counter measures. Engineering research and solutions in ICT, 1, 17–25.

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.CrossRef

Farmer, E. A. (2004). Faculty development for problem-based learning. European Journal of Dental Education, 8(2), 59–66.CrossRef

Fishbein, M., Jaccard, J., Davidson, A. R., Ajzen, I., & Loken, B. (1980). Predicting and understanding family planning behaviors. In Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior: Prentice Hall.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.CrossRef

Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice: Routledge.

Gaytan, J. (2015). Comparing faculty and student perceptions regarding factors that affect student retention in online education. American Journal of Distance Education, 29(1), 56–66.CrossRef

Golden, S., McCrone, T., Walker, M., & Rudd, P. (2006). Impact of e-learning in further education: Survey of scale and breadth. National Foundation for Educational Research: Research Report, 745, 1–91.

Guri-Rosenblit, S. (2005). ‘Distance education’and ‘e-learning’: Not the same thing. Higher Education, 49(4), 467–493.CrossRef

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). London: Sage.MATH

Hamilton, M. (2013). Autonomy and foreign language learning in a virtual learning environment: A&C black.

Hara, K. J. E. (1995). Quantitative and qualitative research approaches in education. 115(3), 351-356.

Hassan, M., Gumaei, A., Huda, S., & Almogren, A. (2020). Increasing the trustworthiness in the industrial IoT networks through a reliable cyber-attack detection model. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

Hayashi, A., Chen, C., Ryan, T., & Wu, J. (2020). The role of social presence and moderating role of computer self efficacy in predicting the continuance usage of e-learning systems. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(2), 5.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing (Vol. 20, pp. 277-319): Emerald Group publishing limited.

Hino, M., Field, C. B., & Mach, K. J. (2017). Managed retreat as a response to natural hazard risk. Nature Climate Change, 7(5), 364–370.CrossRef

Humbert, M. (2007). Adoption of blended learning by faculty. In The challenges of educating people to lead in a challenging world (pp. 423-436): Springer.

Jorion, P. (2005). Bank trading risk and systemic risk. National Bureau of Economic Research.

Kallenberg, K. (2007). The role of risk in corporate value: A case study of the ABB asbestos litigation. Journal of Risk Research, 10(8), 1007–1025.CrossRef

Khajeh-Hosseini, A., Greenwood, D., Smith, J. W., & Sommerville, I. (2012). The cloud adoption toolkit: Supporting cloud adoption decisions in the enterprise. Software: Practice and Experience, 42(4), 447–465.

King, E., & Boyatt, R. (2015). Exploring factors that influence adoption of e-learning within higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1272–1280.CrossRef

Kolekar, S. V., Pai, R. M., & MM, M. P. (2019). Rule based adaptive user interface for adaptive E-learning system. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 613–641.

Koohang, A., & Harman, K. (2005). Open source: A metaphor for e-learning. Informing Science, 8.

Li, M. (2014). Using the websites in interactive-based english language learning. Academic Research International, 29(1), 24–43.

Maina, E. M., Oboko, R. O., & Waiganjo, P. W. (2017). Using machine learning techniques to support group formation in an online collaborative learning environment. International Journal of Intelligent Systems & Applications, 9(3), 26–33.CrossRef

Martin, E., & Webb, D. (2001). Is e-learning good learning. The ethics and equity of e-learning in higher education, Melbourne: Victoria University, 4960.

Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning: ERIC.

Momani, A. M., & Jamous, M. (2017). The evolution of technology acceptance theories.

Muijs, D. (2010). Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS: Sage.

Noesgaard, S. S., & Ørngreen, R. (2015). The effectiveness of E-learning: An explorative and integrative review of the definitions, methodologies and factors that promote e-learning effectiveness. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 13(4), 278–290.

O’neill, K., Singh, G., & O’donoghue, J. (2004). Implementing eLearning programmes for higher education: A review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 3(1), 313–323.CrossRef

Patomviriyavong, S., Samphanwattanachai, B., & Suwannoi, T. (2006). eLearning operational risk Assesment and management: A case study of the M. Sc in management program. International Journal of Computers, the Internet and Management, 14, 44.41–44.45.

Pollex, H., Johnson, C., & Wood, A. (2007). Why eLearning. Can J Nurs Inform, 2(3), 9–13.

Rjaibi, N., Rabai, L. B. A., Aissa, A. B., & Louadi, M. (2012). Cyber security measurement in depth for e-learning systems. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering (IJARCSSE), 2(11), 107–120.

Rodrigues, M. W., Isotani, S., & Zárate, L. E. (2018). Educational data mining: A review of evaluation process in the e-learning. Telematics and Informatics, 35(6), 1701–1717.CrossRef

Roumell, E. A., & Salajan, F. D. (2016). The evolution of US e-learning policy: A content analysis of the National Education Technology Plans. Educational Policy, 30(2), 365–397.CrossRef

Salloum, S. A., Al-Emran, M., Shaalan, K., & Tarhini, A. (2019). Factors affecting the E-learning acceptance: A case study from UAE. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 509–530.CrossRef

Smedley, J. (2010). Modelling the impact of knowledge management using technology. OR insight, 23(4), 233–250.CrossRef

Son, B., & Simonian, M. Using mobile learning to enhance integrated multimedia learning at DeVry online. In EdMedia+ Innovate Learning, 2014 (pp. 546–552): Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Stenholm, D., Catic, A., & Bergsjö, D. (2019). Knowledge reuse in industrial practice: Evaluation from implementing engineering checksheets in industry. Design Science, 5.

Suo, Y., Miyata, N., Morikawa, H., Ishida, T., & Shi, Y. (2008). Open smart classroom: Extensible and scalable learning system in smart space using web service technology. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 21(6), 814–828.CrossRef

Titel: Identification of operational risks impeding the implementation of eLearning in higher education system
verfasst von: Ali Murad Syed
Shabir Ahmad
Adel Alaraifi
Waleed Rafi
Publikationsdatum: 13.07.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10281-6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Retraction Note: Impact of the learning set’s size

No more excuses, learn English for free: Factors affecting L2 learners intention to use online technology for informal English learning

Does behavior simulation based on augmented reality improve moral imagination?

eLearning technology and the advancement of practical constructivist pedagogies: Illustrations from classroom observations

A software architecture perspective about Moodle flexibility for supporting empirical research of teaching theories

Social media usage by higher education academics: A scoping review of the literature