Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Business & Information Systems Engineering 4/2022

06.01.2022 | Research Paper

Identifying Digital Transformation Paradoxes

A Design Perspective

verfasst von: Lieselot Danneels, Stijn Viaene

Erschienen in: Business & Information Systems Engineering | Ausgabe 4/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In turbulent contexts, organizations face contradictory challenges which give rise to management tensions and paradoxes. Digital transformation is one such context where the disruptive potential of digital technologies demands radical responses from existing organizations. While prior research has recognized the importance of coping with organizational paradoxes, little is known about how to identify them. Although it may be apparent in some settings which paradoxes are at play, other more ambivalent contexts require explicit identification. This study takes a design perspective to identify the relevant paradoxes in a digital transformation context. It presents the results of a 2-year action design research study in collaboration with an organization that chose to explicitly focus on paradoxical tensions for managing its digital transformation. The study’s main contribution is twofold: (1) it presents design knowledge to identify organizational paradoxes; (2) it provides a better understanding of the organizational paradoxes involved in digital transformation. The design knowledge will help others to identify paradoxes when working with an organization and highlights dynamic and collaborative aspects of the identification process. The study also enhances the descriptive understanding of digital transformation paradoxes by showing the importance of learning and belonging tensions and by expressing a different view on what knowledge about paradoxes is, and how it is created and used.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
See https://​arcadis.​com/​en for more information.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Adler PS, Goldoftas B, Levine DI (1999) Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organ Sci 10(1):43–68CrossRef Adler PS, Goldoftas B, Levine DI (1999) Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organ Sci 10(1):43–68CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Andriopoulos C, Lewis MW (2009) Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: managing paradoxes of innovation. Organ Sci 20(4):696–717CrossRef Andriopoulos C, Lewis MW (2009) Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: managing paradoxes of innovation. Organ Sci 20(4):696–717CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Benitez J, Llorens J, Braojos J (2018) How information technology influences opportunity exploration and exploitation firm’s capabilities. Inf Manag 55(4):508–523CrossRef Benitez J, Llorens J, Braojos J (2018) How information technology influences opportunity exploration and exploitation firm’s capabilities. Inf Manag 55(4):508–523CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bharadwaj A, El Sawy OA, Pavlou PA, Venkatraman N (2013) Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights. MIS Q 37(2):471–482CrossRef Bharadwaj A, El Sawy OA, Pavlou PA, Venkatraman N (2013) Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights. MIS Q 37(2):471–482CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carlo JL, Lyytinen K, Boland RJ Jr (2012) Dialectics of collective minding: contradictory appropriations of information technology in a high-risk project. MIS Q 36(4):1081–1108CrossRef Carlo JL, Lyytinen K, Boland RJ Jr (2012) Dialectics of collective minding: contradictory appropriations of information technology in a high-risk project. MIS Q 36(4):1081–1108CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Danneels L, Viaene S (2015) Simple rules strategy to transform government: an ADR approach. Gov Inf Q 32(4):516–525CrossRef Danneels L, Viaene S (2015) Simple rules strategy to transform government: an ADR approach. Gov Inf Q 32(4):516–525CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Danneels L, Viaene S (2021) Cultivating digital transformation at Arcadis: a global expedition into the digital universe. In: Urbach N et al (eds) Digitalization cases vol. 2: mastering digital transformation for global business. Springer, Berlin, pp 363–379CrossRef Danneels L, Viaene S (2021) Cultivating digital transformation at Arcadis: a global expedition into the digital universe. In: Urbach N et al (eds) Digitalization cases vol. 2: mastering digital transformation for global business. Springer, Berlin, pp 363–379CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Donaldson T, Preston LE (1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad Manag Rev 20(1):65–91CrossRef Donaldson T, Preston LE (1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad Manag Rev 20(1):65–91CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Farjoun M (2010) Beyond dualism: stability and change as a duality. Acad Manag Rev 35(2):202–225 Farjoun M (2010) Beyond dualism: stability and change as a duality. Acad Manag Rev 35(2):202–225
Zurück zum Zitat Gittell JH (2000) Paradox of coordination and control. Calif Manag Rev 42(3):101–117CrossRef Gittell JH (2000) Paradox of coordination and control. Calif Manag Rev 42(3):101–117CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Goldkuhl G (2012) Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research. Eur J Inf Syst 21(2):135–146CrossRef Goldkuhl G (2012) Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research. Eur J Inf Syst 21(2):135–146CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Goldkuhl G (2004) Meanings of pragmatism: ways to conduct information systems research. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on action in language, organisations and information systems. Linköping Goldkuhl G (2004) Meanings of pragmatism: ways to conduct information systems research. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on action in language, organisations and information systems. Linköping
Zurück zum Zitat Gregor S, Hevner AR (2013) Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Q 37(2):337–355CrossRef Gregor S, Hevner AR (2013) Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Q 37(2):337–355CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gregor S, Kruse LC, Seidel S (2020) The anatomy of a design principle. J Asssoc Inf Syst 21(6):1622–1652 Gregor S, Kruse LC, Seidel S (2020) The anatomy of a design principle. J Asssoc Inf Syst 21(6):1622–1652
Zurück zum Zitat Gregory RW, Keil M, Muntermann J, Mähring M (2015) Paradoxes and the nature of ambidexterity in IT transformation programs. Inf Syst Res 26(1):57–80CrossRef Gregory RW, Keil M, Muntermann J, Mähring M (2015) Paradoxes and the nature of ambidexterity in IT transformation programs. Inf Syst Res 26(1):57–80CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Haffke I, Kalgovas B, Benlian A (2017) Options for transforming the IT function using bimodal IT. MIS Q Exec 16(2):101–120 Haffke I, Kalgovas B, Benlian A (2017) Options for transforming the IT function using bimodal IT. MIS Q Exec 16(2):101–120
Zurück zum Zitat Hevner A, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science research in information systems. MIS Q 28(1):75–105CrossRef Hevner A, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science research in information systems. MIS Q 28(1):75–105CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Huy QN (2002) Emotional balancing of organizational continuity and radical change: the contribution of middle managers. Admin Sci Q 47(1):31–69CrossRef Huy QN (2002) Emotional balancing of organizational continuity and radical change: the contribution of middle managers. Admin Sci Q 47(1):31–69CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Iivari J (2015) Distinguishing and contrasting two strategies for design science research. Eur J Inf Syst 24(1):107–115CrossRef Iivari J (2015) Distinguishing and contrasting two strategies for design science research. Eur J Inf Syst 24(1):107–115CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jarzabkowski P, Lê JK, Van de Ven AH (2013) Responding to competing strategic demands: how organizing, belonging, and performing paradoxes coevolve. Strateg Organ 11(3):245–280CrossRef Jarzabkowski P, Lê JK, Van de Ven AH (2013) Responding to competing strategic demands: how organizing, belonging, and performing paradoxes coevolve. Strateg Organ 11(3):245–280CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Klein HK, Myers MD (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Q 23(1):67–94CrossRef Klein HK, Myers MD (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Q 23(1):67–94CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kreiner GE, Hollensbe EC, Sheep ML (2006) Where is the “me” among the “we”? Identity work and the search for optimal balance. Acad Manag J 49(5):1031–1057CrossRef Kreiner GE, Hollensbe EC, Sheep ML (2006) Where is the “me” among the “we”? Identity work and the search for optimal balance. Acad Manag J 49(5):1031–1057CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis MW (2000) Exploring paradox: toward a more comprehensive guide. Acad Manag Rev 25(4):760–776CrossRef Lewis MW (2000) Exploring paradox: toward a more comprehensive guide. Acad Manag Rev 25(4):760–776CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lüscher LS, Lewis MW (2008) Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: working through paradox. Acad Manag J 51(2):221–240CrossRef Lüscher LS, Lewis MW (2008) Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: working through paradox. Acad Manag J 51(2):221–240CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Marshall P, Kelder J-A, Perry A (2005) Social constructionism with a twist of pragmatism: a suitable cocktail for information systems research. In: 16th Australasian conference on information systems, Sydney Marshall P, Kelder J-A, Perry A (2005) Social constructionism with a twist of pragmatism: a suitable cocktail for information systems research. In: 16th Australasian conference on information systems, Sydney
Zurück zum Zitat Matt C, Hess T, Benlian A (2015) Digital transformation strategies. Bus Inf Syst Eng 57(5):339–343CrossRef Matt C, Hess T, Benlian A (2015) Digital transformation strategies. Bus Inf Syst Eng 57(5):339–343CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mullarkey MT, Hevner AR (2019) An elaborated action design research process model. Eur J Inf Syst 28(1):6–20CrossRef Mullarkey MT, Hevner AR (2019) An elaborated action design research process model. Eur J Inf Syst 28(1):6–20CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat O’Reilly CA, Tushman ML (2008) Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Res Organ Behav 28:185–206 O’Reilly CA, Tushman ML (2008) Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Res Organ Behav 28:185–206
Zurück zum Zitat Peffers K, Tuunanen T, Niehaves B (2018) Design science research genres: introduction to the special issue on exemplars and criteria for applicable design science research. Taylor & Francis, Abingdon Peffers K, Tuunanen T, Niehaves B (2018) Design science research genres: introduction to the special issue on exemplars and criteria for applicable design science research. Taylor & Francis, Abingdon
Zurück zum Zitat Poole MS, Van de Ven AH (1989) Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):562–578CrossRef Poole MS, Van de Ven AH (1989) Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):562–578CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Quinn RE, Cameron KS (1988) Paradox and transformation: toward a theory of change in organization and management. Ballinger, Cambridge Quinn RE, Cameron KS (1988) Paradox and transformation: toward a theory of change in organization and management. Ballinger, Cambridge
Zurück zum Zitat Schad J, Lewis MW, Raisch S, Smith WK (2016) Paradox research in management science: looking back to move forward. Acad Manag Ann 10(1):5–64CrossRef Schad J, Lewis MW, Raisch S, Smith WK (2016) Paradox research in management science: looking back to move forward. Acad Manag Ann 10(1):5–64CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sein MK, Henfridsson O, Purao S, Rossi M, Lindgren R (2011) Action design research. MIS Q 35(1):37–56CrossRef Sein MK, Henfridsson O, Purao S, Rossi M, Lindgren R (2011) Action design research. MIS Q 35(1):37–56CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Selander L, Jarvenpaa SL (2016) Digital action repertoires and transforming a social movement organization. MIS Q 40(2):331–352CrossRef Selander L, Jarvenpaa SL (2016) Digital action repertoires and transforming a social movement organization. MIS Q 40(2):331–352CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Smith WK (2014) Dynamic decision making: a model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Acad Manag J 57(6):1592–1623CrossRef Smith WK (2014) Dynamic decision making: a model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Acad Manag J 57(6):1592–1623CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Smith WK, Lewis MW (2011) Toward a theory of paradox: a dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Acad Manag Rev 36(2):381–403 Smith WK, Lewis MW (2011) Toward a theory of paradox: a dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Acad Manag Rev 36(2):381–403
Zurück zum Zitat Smith WK, Lewis MW, Tushman ML (2016) Both/and” leadership. Harv Bus Rev 94(5):62–70 Smith WK, Lewis MW, Tushman ML (2016) Both/and” leadership. Harv Bus Rev 94(5):62–70
Zurück zum Zitat Soh C, Yeow A, Goh Q, Hansen R (2019) Digital transformation: of paradoxical tensions and managerial responses. In: 14th international conference on information systems, Munich Soh C, Yeow A, Goh Q, Hansen R (2019) Digital transformation: of paradoxical tensions and managerial responses. In: 14th international conference on information systems, Munich
Zurück zum Zitat Svahn F, Mathiassen L, Lindgren R (2017) Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: how Volvo Cars managed competing concerns. MIS Q 41(1):239–253CrossRef Svahn F, Mathiassen L, Lindgren R (2017) Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: how Volvo Cars managed competing concerns. MIS Q 41(1):239–253CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tumbas S, Berente N, Brocke JV (2018) Digital innovation and institutional entrepreneurship: Chief Digital Officer perspectives of their emerging role. J Inf Technol 33(3):188–202CrossRef Tumbas S, Berente N, Brocke JV (2018) Digital innovation and institutional entrepreneurship: Chief Digital Officer perspectives of their emerging role. J Inf Technol 33(3):188–202CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Viaene S (2020) Digital transformation know how: connecting digital transformation, agility and leadership. Acco, Leuven Viaene S (2020) Digital transformation know how: connecting digital transformation, agility and leadership. Acco, Leuven
Zurück zum Zitat Viaene S, Danneels L (2015) Driving digital: Welcome to the ExConomy. J Financ Perspect 3(3):2–10 Viaene S, Danneels L (2015) Driving digital: Welcome to the ExConomy. J Financ Perspect 3(3):2–10
Zurück zum Zitat Vial G (2019) Understanding digital transformation: a review and a research agenda. J Strateg Inf Syst 28:118–144CrossRef Vial G (2019) Understanding digital transformation: a review and a research agenda. J Strateg Inf Syst 28:118–144CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vom Brocke J, Winter R, Hevner A, Maedche A (2020) Special issue editorial – accumulation and evolution of design knowledge in design science research: a journey through time and space. J Asssoc Inf Syst 21(3):9 Vom Brocke J, Winter R, Hevner A, Maedche A (2020) Special issue editorial – accumulation and evolution of design knowledge in design science research: a journey through time and space. J Asssoc Inf Syst 21(3):9
Zurück zum Zitat Walsham G (1995) Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. Eur J Inf Syst 4(2):74–81CrossRef Walsham G (1995) Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. Eur J Inf Syst 4(2):74–81CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Walsham G (2006) Doing interpretive research. Eur J Inf Syst 15(3):320–330CrossRef Walsham G (2006) Doing interpretive research. Eur J Inf Syst 15(3):320–330CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wareham J, Fox PB, Cano Giner JL (2014) Technology ecosystem governance. Organ Sci 25(4):1195–1215CrossRef Wareham J, Fox PB, Cano Giner JL (2014) Technology ecosystem governance. Organ Sci 25(4):1195–1215CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wimelius H, Mathiassen L, Holmström J, Keil M (2021) A paradoxical perspective on technology renewal in digital transformation. Inf Syst J 31(1):198–225CrossRef Wimelius H, Mathiassen L, Holmström J, Keil M (2021) A paradoxical perspective on technology renewal in digital transformation. Inf Syst J 31(1):198–225CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Identifying Digital Transformation Paradoxes
A Design Perspective
verfasst von
Lieselot Danneels
Stijn Viaene
Publikationsdatum
06.01.2022
Verlag
Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
Erschienen in
Business & Information Systems Engineering / Ausgabe 4/2022
Print ISSN: 2363-7005
Elektronische ISSN: 1867-0202
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-021-00735-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2022

Business & Information Systems Engineering 4/2022 Zur Ausgabe